M. Ribecai
To Win
M. B. Sobhy
To Win
Lorenzo Sciahbasi vs Michael Bassem Sobhy Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W W L W W L L W W L
Form
L L L L W L W L W LHead-to-head: Sciahbasi 0 - 1 Sobhy
They have played 2 sets in total, with Sciahbasi winning 0 and Sobhy winning 2. The last match between Sciahbasi and Sobhy was at the M15 Sharm ElSheikh, 19-02-2025, First, Hard with Michael Bassem Sobhy getting the victory 7-5 6-2.
M15 Sharm ElSheikh(19-02-2025)
Upcoming Match
- / First
ODDS
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Arnaldi VS Wu PREDICTION Hard
Miami Open - Miami atp
19 Mar 2025 / First
ODDS
PREDICTION
EDGE
Cirstea VS Cocciaretto PREDICTION Hard
Miami Open - Miami wta
18 Mar 2025 / First
ODDS
PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7-5 6-2 |
Stats 
Michael Bassem Sobhy
Player
Lorenzo Sciahbasi
62%
(
37 of
60)
1st Serve %
58%
(
29 of
50)
4
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
1
84%
(
31 of
37)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
15 of
29)
43%
(
10 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
67%
(
14 of
21)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
32%
(
19 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
21 of
50)
62
Total Points Won
48
|
||||
Stats
0
H2H Matches
1
0
Sets Won
2
7
Games Won
13
4
Aces (Total)
4
1
Total Double Faults
0
1:19:30
Average Match Time
1:19:30
58% (29/50)
1st Serve %
62% (37/60)
52% (15/29)
1st Serve Win %
84% (31/37)
67% (14/21)
2nd Serve Win %
43% (10/23)
50% (1/2)
Break Points Won % (Total)
100% (4/4)
32% (19/60)
Return Points Win %
42% (21/50)
0% (0/1)
Best of 3 Sets Win %
100% (1/1)
0% (0/0)
Best of 5 Sets Win %
0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)
Tiebreaks Win % (Total)
0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)
Deciding Set Win %
0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)
1st Set Won, Won Match
100% (1/1)
0% (0/0)
1st Set Won, Lost Match
0% (1/0)
0% (1/0)
1st Set Lost, Won Match
0% (0/0)
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Lorenzo Sciahbasi vs Michael Bassem Sobhy Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Lorenzo Sciahbasi 0 - 1 Michael Bassem Sobhy
Predictions Analysis for Upcoming Tennis Match
Recent statistics reveal valuable insights regarding the forthcoming tennis match. In the past six months, Sciahbasi has exhibited a second serve performance with a point's success rate of 45.97%, whereas Sobhy has triumphed in 51.19% of second serve points. This statistic is highly correlated with the accuracy of match predictions, providing a hint towards the expected outcome.
Considering return game statistics, Sciahbasi has demonstrated an impressive performance in recent form by winning 49.56% of their opponent's second serve points. Sobhy, on the other hand, has showcased their prowess with 49.58% success rate in this regard. The figures for first serve returns are slightly lower, with Sciahbasi achieving a 35.54% rate, while Sobhy acquiring a 33.47% rate. These statistics hold a substantial correlation in determining the player with the advantage in their head-to-head matchup.
Under pressure analysis forms an essential aspect of in-game betting predictions. Sciahbasi has successfully saved 49% of breakpoints in recent form, yet Sobhy has proven their mettle by saving an impressive 63.28%. Such statistics become instrumental in predicting the outcome of intense moments within the match.
Examining the performance overview of the past year, Sciahbasi has recorded a win percentage of 43.24% (16 out of 37 matches), while Sobhy has fared slightly better with a win percentage of 47.83% (22 out of 46 matches). These figures provide us with a comprehensive overview of expectations for their head-to-head encounter.
Considering the best surface for each player, Sciahbasi has displayed their prowess on Hard surfaces, triumphing in 58% of matches (14 out of 24), whereas their performance on I.hard surfaces has been weaker, with a win percentage of 38% (3 out of 8). Sobhy, in comparison, excels on Hard surfaces, winning 45% of matches (48 out of 106), while their performance on I.hard surfaces remains unimpressive, with a win percentage of 0% (0 out of 1).
Assessing player level, Sciahbasi has predominantly played in the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K category, winning 44.44% of matches (16 out of 36). Conversely, Sobhy has competed in a similar category, winning 47.83% of matches (22 out of 46). The event level at which players partake must be taken into account while comparing their statistics to predict the favorite.
Significant opponent quality statistics are also noteworthy. Over the past twelve months, Sciahbasi has faced opponents with an average rank of 351.14, while Sobhy has confronted adversaries with an average rank of 435.7. The level of competition faced by each player contributes to the overall analysis of their performances.
In matches that reach a deciding set, Sciahbasi has been triumphant in 43% of such instances in the last twelve months, while Sobhy has achieved a winning rate of 33% in all matches played on the tour. These statistics present vital information for live predictions and betting during a match's decisive moments.
While past player performance serves as a valuable indicator in predicting tennis matches, current event statistics should not be disregarded once an event is underway. The section below offers insights into players' performances within the ongoing event. Additionally, players' tendencies to excel in certain events must be considered while making outcome predictions.
Break point conversion serves as an essential factor in in-game live betting. Sciahbasi has successfully converted 38.53% of breakpoint opportunities, while Sobhy has attained a conversion rate of 40.13% when presented with a chance to break their opponent's serve. These statistics provide valuable guidance for making real-time betting decisions when a breakpoint opportunity arises.
For those interested in advanced models that predict tennis matches, this informative article offers a commendable starting point. It delves into the synergy between data analysis and expert judgments, tailored for the discerning statistics enthusiasts.
Lorenzo Sciahbasi Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q2 | 6-2 1-6 10-2 | H2H | |||
| QF |
Stats
Pietro Marino
Player
Lorenzo Sciahbasi
69%
(
27 of
39)
1st Serve %
61%
(
30 of
49)
2
Aces
5
0
Double Faults
3
63%
(
17 of
27)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
19 of
30)
75%
(
9 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
9 of
19)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
33%
(
13 of
39)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
21 of
49)
47
Total Points Won
41
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-0 6-1 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Michael Bassem Sobhy
Player
Lorenzo Sciahbasi
62%
(
37 of
60)
1st Serve %
58%
(
29 of
50)
4
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
1
84%
(
31 of
37)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
15 of
29)
43%
(
10 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
67%
(
14 of
21)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
32%
(
19 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
21 of
50)
62
Total Points Won
48
|
7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Illya Beloborodko
Player
Lorenzo Sciahbasi
56%
(
30 of
54)
1st Serve %
59%
(
23 of
39)
4
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
1
70%
(
21 of
30)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
14 of
23)
63%
(
15 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
5 of
16)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
33%
(
18 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
20 of
39)
56
Total Points Won
37
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q2 | 6-1 6-4 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-3 6-0 | H2H | |||
| QF |
Stats
Martyn Pawelski
Player
Lorenzo Sciahbasi
79%
(
96 of
122)
1st Serve %
57%
(
65 of
114)
12
Aces
10
2
Double Faults
7
67%
(
64 of
96)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
48 of
65)
62%
(
16 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
24 of
49)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
34%
(
42 of
122)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
42 of
114)
122
Total Points Won
114
|
6-7(3) 7-6(7) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Lorenzo Sciahbasi
Player
Alexandr Binda
47%
(
29 of
62)
1st Serve %
62%
(
43 of
69)
1
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
6
72%
(
21 of
29)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
26 of
43)
55%
(
18 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
10 of
26)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
37%
(
23 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
33 of
69)
72
Total Points Won
59
|
6-1 1-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Lorenzo Sciahbasi
Player
Aleksander Chayka
76%
(
19 of
25)
1st Serve %
72%
(
23 of
32)
2
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
2
89%
(
17 of
19)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
10 of
23)
50%
(
3 of
6)
2nd Serve Won
11%
(
1 of
9)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
20%
(
5 of
25)
Rtn Points Won
66%
(
21 of
32)
41
Total Points Won
16
|
6-0 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
Michael Bassem Sobhy Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Oskari Paldanius
Player
Michael Bassem Sobhy
67%
(
48 of
72)
1st Serve %
63%
(
35 of
56)
4
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
0
60%
(
29 of
48)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
21 of
35)
50%
(
12 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
7 of
21)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
25%
(
3 of
12)
43%
(
31 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
28 of
56)
69
Total Points Won
59
|
6-1 0-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Michael Bassem Sobhy
Player
Faris Zakaryia
64%
(
7 of
11)
1st Serve %
60%
(
6 of
10)
2
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
1
71%
(
5 of
7)
1st Serve Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
25%
(
1 of
4)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
100%
(
1 of
1)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Rtn Points Won
70%
(
7 of
10)
13
Total Points Won
8
|
2-1 ret. | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Faris Zakaryia
Player
Michael Bassem Sobhy
53%
(
24 of
45)
1st Serve %
62%
(
23 of
37)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
1
83%
(
20 of
24)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
12 of
23)
29%
(
6 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
4 of
14)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
42%
(
19 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
21 of
37)
47
Total Points Won
35
|
6-4 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Michael Bassem Sobhy
Player
Lorenzo Sciahbasi
62%
(
37 of
60)
1st Serve %
58%
(
29 of
50)
4
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
1
84%
(
31 of
37)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
15 of
29)
43%
(
10 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
67%
(
14 of
21)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
32%
(
19 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
21 of
50)
62
Total Points Won
48
|
7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Gianluca Cadenasso
Player
Michael Bassem Sobhy
52%
(
61 of
117)
1st Serve %
51%
(
49 of
97)
7
Aces
7
1
Double Faults
4
72%
(
44 of
61)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
36 of
49)
52%
(
29 of
56)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
27 of
48)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
15%
(
2 of
13)
38%
(
44 of
117)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
34 of
97)
107
Total Points Won
107
|
7-6(2) 4-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Michael Bassem Sobhy
Player
Luka Plosnic
58%
(
26 of
45)
1st Serve %
63%
(
31 of
49)
4
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
3
85%
(
22 of
26)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
19 of
31)
58%
(
11 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
5 of
18)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
27%
(
12 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
25 of
49)
58
Total Points Won
36
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Nicholas David Ionel
Player
Michael Bassem Sobhy
71%
(
37 of
52)
1st Serve %
54%
(
31 of
57)
1
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
1
59%
(
22 of
37)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
20 of
31)
53%
(
8 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
8 of
26)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
42%
(
22 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
29 of
57)
59
Total Points Won
50
|
6-1 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Vadym Ursu
Player
Michael Bassem Sobhy
69%
(
52 of
75)
1st Serve %
63%
(
43 of
68)
2
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
2
71%
(
37 of
52)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
27 of
43)
57%
(
13 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
13 of
25)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
33%
(
25 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
28 of
68)
78
Total Points Won
65
|
2-6 6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Faris Zakaryia
Player
Michael Bassem Sobhy
58%
(
38 of
65)
1st Serve %
59%
(
42 of
71)
7
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
1
68%
(
26 of
38)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
24 of
42)
56%
(
15 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
13 of
29)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
37%
(
24 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
34 of
71)
75
Total Points Won
61
|
6-1 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Nikola Milojevic
Player
Michael Bassem Sobhy
63%
(
57 of
90)
1st Serve %
70%
(
74 of
105)
6
Aces
5
7
Double Faults
0
74%
(
42 of
57)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
46 of
74)
48%
(
16 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
61%
(
19 of
31)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
20%
(
2 of
10)
36%
(
32 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
40 of
105)
98
Total Points Won
97
|
6-4 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
Stats
51% (35/34)
Win/Loss
42% (72/98)
49% (76/78)
Sets Win/Loss
45% (171/210)
52% (721/678)
Games Win/Loss
49% (1708/1792)
57% (16/12)
Hard Win/Loss
45% (50/60)
48% (16/17)
Clay Win/Loss
37% (22/37)
38% (3/5)
Indoor Hard W/L
0% (0/1)
0% (0/0)
Grass Win/Loss
0% (0/0)
0.24
Aces Per Game
0.15
163
Aces Total
251
0.23
Double Faults Per Game
0.14
154
Total Double Faults
244
1:9:43
Average Match Time
1st Match
362.88
Average Opponent Rank
334.88
60% (1990/3311)
1st Serve %
56% (3718/6633)
64% (1283/1990)
1st Serve Win %
64% (2393/3718)
45% (593/1321)
2nd Serve Win %
48% (1390/2918)
47% (154/331)
Break Points Won % (Total)
44% (286/651)
42% (1402/3348)
Return Points Win %
40% (2604/6521)
0% (0/0)
Slam W/L
0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)
Masters W/L
0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)
Cups W/L
0% (0/2)
0% (0/0)
Main Tour W/L
0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)
Tour Finals W/L
0% (0/0)
0% (0/2)
Challenger W/L
0% (0/0)
52% (35/32)
Futures W/L
43% (72/96)
50% (34/68)
Best of 3 Sets Win %
42% (69/164)
0% (0/0)
Best of 5 Sets Win %
0% (0/0)
31% (4/13)
Tiebreaks Win % (Total)
56% (15/27)
59% (10/17)
Deciding Set Win %
36% (17/47)
83% (36/30)
1st Set Won, Won Match
82% (76/62)
17% (36/6)
1st Set Won, Lost Match
18% (76/14)
12% (33/4)
1st Set Lost, Won Match
11% (94/10)
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
