Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Lola Marandel vs Amelie Van Impe Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Marandel vs Impe analysis and find out who is favored!
Lola Marandel vs Amelie Van Impe Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Marandel has won 42.65% of points on his second serve, while Impe has won 44.35%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Marandel, in recent form, has won 56.58% of his opponent's second serve points, while Impe has won 57.36%. The same stats for first serve returns are 40% and 35.87% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Marandel has saved 34.88% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Impe has saved 54.01% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Marandel has won 38.71% of matches played (W/L 12/ 19), with Impe winning 62.71% (W/L 37/ 22) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Marandel has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 40% (W/L 2/ 3), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 34% (W/L 17/ 33). Impe has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 67% (W/L 6/ 3), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 59% (W/L 23/ 16).
- Player level: In the last year, Marandel has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 38.46% of matches (W/L 10/ 16), where as Impe has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 52.94% of matches (W/L 18/ 16). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Marandel winning 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Marandel winning 0 and Impe winning 2. The last match between Marandel and Impe was at the W15 Antalya, 18-04-2021, Q1 round, Clay with Amelie Van Impe getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:0:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Marandel and Impe have played a deciding set 0 times, with Marandel winning 0 times and Impe 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Marandel winning 0, and Impe 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Marandel has played against opponents with an average rank of 159.32 while Impe has played against players with an average rank of 172.47.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Marandel has won 50% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Impe has won 44% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Marandel has converted 38.98% of breakpoint opportunities, and Impe has converted 48.74% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Marandel 0 - 1 Impe
N/A
Rank
High
21
Age
Plays
0
Total1
0
Hard0
0
Clay1
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
495
Rank
456
High
19
Age
Plays
L
W
L
L
W
L
L
W
W
L
Form
L
L
W
L
L
W
L
W
L
L
35% (42-77)
Career Total W/L
64% (73-41)
50% (3-3)
YTD W/L
33% (2-4)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Lola Marandel | Amelie Van Impe |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 0 | 1 |
| Sets Won | 0 | 2 |
| Games Won | 3 | 12 |
| Aces (Total) | 0 | 0 |
| DFs (Total) | 0 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 0:0:0 | 0:0:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Points W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/1) | 100% (1/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-2 6-1 | |||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Lola Marandel | Amelie Van Impe |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 50% (3/3) | 33% (2/4) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 50% (6/6) | 38% (6/10) |
| Games Win/Loss | 51% (49/48) | 45% (70/86) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 50% (3/3) | 25% (1/3) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 50% (1/1) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0 | 0.03 |
| Aces Total | 0 | 2 |
| DFs per game | 0.06 | 0.12 |
| DFs Total | 3 | 9 |
| Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1:52:40 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 109.67 | 315.83 |
| 1st Serve % | 65% (91/140) | 75% (329/441) |
| 1st Serve W% | 54% (49/91) | 60% (197/329) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 43% (21/49) | 40% (45/112) |
| BPs Won% Total | 67% (10/15) | 49% (21/43) |
| Return Pts W% | 48% (70/147) | 42% (174/417) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 33% (2/4) |
| Futures W/L | 50% (3/3) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 50% (3/6) | 33% (2/6) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 67% (2/3) |
| Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 50% (2/4) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (3/3) | 0% (1/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (3/0) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (3/0) | 40% (5/2) |
Lola Marandel Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats 
Luisa Meyer Auf Der Heide
Player
Lola Marandel
86%
(
43 of
50)
1st Serve %
73%
(
35 of
48)
-
Aces
-
-
Double Faults
-
65%
(
28 of
43)
1st Serve Won
37%
(
13 of
35)
43%
(
3 of
7)
2nd Serve Won
62%
(
8 of
13)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
38%
(
19 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
27 of
48)
58
Total Points Won
40
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Lola Marandel
Player
Warda Ait El Bachir
67%
(
29 of
43)
1st Serve %
55%
(
18 of
33)
-
Aces
-
1
Double Faults
3
69%
(
20 of
29)
1st Serve Won
22%
(
4 of
18)
57%
(
8 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
5 of
15)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
35%
(
15 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
73%
(
24 of
33)
52
Total Points Won
24
|
6-1 6-0 | H2H | ||
| Q2 | 6-2 6-0 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Anastasia Safta
Player
Lola Marandel
78%
(
50 of
64)
1st Serve %
55%
(
27 of
49)
-
Aces
-
0
Double Faults
2
58%
(
29 of
50)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
16 of
27)
57%
(
8 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
23%
(
5 of
22)
86%
(
6 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
42%
(
27 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
28 of
49)
65
Total Points Won
48
|
7-5 6-0 | H2H | ||
| Q2 | 6-1 6-2 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-4 6-4 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Ruth Roura Llaverias
Player
Lola Marandel
48%
(
27 of
56)
1st Serve %
59%
(
26 of
44)
1
Aces
0
6
Double Faults
0
78%
(
21 of
27)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
14 of
26)
52%
(
15 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
22%
(
4 of
18)
100%
(
5 of
5)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
36%
(
20 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
26 of
44)
62
Total Points Won
38
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q2 | w/o | H2H | |||
| R2 |
Stats
Jenny Duerst
Player
Lola Marandel
66%
(
29 of
44)
1st Serve %
68%
(
34 of
50)
-
Aces
-
3
Double Faults
1
79%
(
23 of
29)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
16 of
34)
53%
(
8 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
6 of
16)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
30%
(
13 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
28 of
50)
59
Total Points Won
35
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Lola Marandel
Player
Arina Solomatina
67%
(
26 of
39)
1st Serve %
71%
(
34 of
48)
-
Aces
-
1
Double Faults
2
77%
(
20 of
26)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
17 of
34)
69%
(
9 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
21%
(
3 of
14)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
26%
(
10 of
39)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
28 of
48)
57
Total Points Won
30
|
6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
view more
Amelie Van Impe Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Laura Pigossi
Player
Amelie Van Impe
67%
(
4 of
6)
1st Serve %
80%
(
12 of
15)
-
Aces
-
0
Double Faults
1
75%
(
3 of
4)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
8 of
12)
100%
(
2 of
2)
2nd Serve Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
0%
(
0 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
17%
(
1 of
6)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
5 of
15)
10
Total Points Won
11
|
4-6 6-0 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Emily Appleton
Player
Amelie Van Impe
65%
(
36 of
55)
1st Serve %
61%
(
35 of
57)
14
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
2
83%
(
30 of
36)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
22 of
35)
37%
(
7 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
7 of
22)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
33%
(
18 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
28 of
57)
65
Total Points Won
47
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Amelie Van Impe
Player
Sina Herrmann
68%
(
73 of
108)
1st Serve %
55%
(
47 of
86)
0
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
8
64%
(
47 of
73)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
31 of
47)
46%
(
16 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
17 of
39)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
29%
(
5 of
17)
42%
(
45 of
108)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
38 of
86)
101
Total Points Won
93
|
4-6 7-6(1) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Guiomar Zuleta De Reales
Player
Amelie Van Impe
69%
(
51 of
74)
1st Serve %
80%
(
66 of
83)
3
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
2
65%
(
33 of
51)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
37 of
66)
52%
(
12 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
8 of
17)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
39%
(
29 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
38 of
83)
83
Total Points Won
74
|
6-3 2-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Amelie Van Impe
Player
Laura Hietaranta
79%
(
81 of
102)
1st Serve %
56%
(
62 of
111)
-
Aces
-
1
Double Faults
9
62%
(
50 of
81)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
34 of
62)
43%
(
9 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
24 of
49)
37%
(
7 of
19)
Break Points Won
78%
(
7 of
9)
42%
(
43 of
102)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
53 of
111)
112
Total Points Won
101
|
5-7 7-6(3) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Lucija Ciric Bagaric
Player
Amelie Van Impe
68%
(
58 of
85)
1st Serve %
82%
(
62 of
76)
1
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
2
64%
(
37 of
58)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
33 of
62)
48%
(
13 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
21%
(
3 of
14)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
41%
(
35 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
40 of
76)
90
Total Points Won
71
|
7-5 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Magali Kempen
Player
Amelie Van Impe
75%
(
36 of
48)
1st Serve %
77%
(
60 of
78)
1
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
4
69%
(
25 of
36)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
30 of
60)
58%
(
7 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
8 of
18)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
33%
(
16 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
40 of
78)
72
Total Points Won
54
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Amelie Van Impe
Player
Daria Khomutsianskaya
82%
(
42 of
51)
1st Serve %
74%
(
31 of
42)
0
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
3
69%
(
29 of
42)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
17 of
31)
67%
(
6 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
9%
(
1 of
11)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
31%
(
16 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
24 of
42)
59
Total Points Won
34
|
6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Cagla Buyukakcay
Player
Amelie Van Impe
78%
(
47 of
60)
1st Serve %
70%
(
40 of
57)
1
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
2
60%
(
28 of
47)
1st Serve Won
40%
(
16 of
40)
38%
(
5 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
6 of
17)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
45%
(
27 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
35 of
57)
68
Total Points Won
49
|
7-6(3) 6-0 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Anna-Lena Friedsam
Player
Amelie Van Impe
59%
(
40 of
68)
1st Serve %
54%
(
37 of
69)
7
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
7
70%
(
28 of
40)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
20 of
37)
36%
(
10 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
10 of
32)
40%
(
6 of
15)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
44%
(
30 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
39 of
69)
77
Total Points Won
60
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Marandel Vs Impe Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
