C. Paquet
To Win
L. Boisson
To Win
Lois Boisson vs Mirra Andreeva Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W W W W W W W W L L
Form
W W L L W L W W W WHead-2-Head: Boisson 1 - 0 Andreeva
They have played 2 sets in total, with Boisson winning 2 and Andreeva winning 0. The last match between Boisson and Andreeva was at the French Open - Paris, 04-06-2025, Round: Quarterfinals, Surface: Clay, with Lois Boisson getting the victory 7-6(6) 6-3.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Lois Boisson | 1 |
| Mirra Andreeva | 0 |
LAST H2H MATCH: French Open - Paris(04-06-2025)
Lois Boisson
Mirra Andreeva
7
6
6
3
| Boisson | Stats | Andreeva |
|---|---|---|
| 70% (21-9) | YTD Win/Loss | 77% (36-11) |
| 1 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
| 66 | Ranking | 7 |
| 65 | Highest Rank | 6 |
| 22 | Age | 18 |
| - | Plays | - |
| 7 | Titles | 9 |
| 63% (137-81) | Career Total W/L | 76% (145-45) |
| $719,224 | Career Prize Money | $5,587,024 |
| 1 | YTD Titles | 2 |
| 1 | Clay H2H | 0 |
Upcoming Match
08 Jul 2025 / First
ODDS
Upcoming Match
09 Jul 2025 / Quarterfinals
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Fritz VS Khachanov PREDICTION Grass
Wimbledon - London atp
08 Jul 2025 / Quarterfinals
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Anisimova VS Pavlyuchenkova PREDICTION Grass
Wimbledon - London wta
08 Jul 2025 / Quarterfinals
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7-6(6) 6-3 |
Stats 
Lois Boisson
Player
Mirra Andreeva
68%
(
58 of
85)
1st Serve %
61%
(
57 of
94)
3
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
9
62%
(
36 of
58)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
34 of
57)
48%
(
13 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
12 of
37)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
42%
(
36 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
48 of
94)
97
Total Points Won
82
|
||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 13 | Games Won | 9 |
| 3 | Aces (Total) | 1 |
| 3 | Total Double Faults | 9 |
| 2:8:0 | Average Match Time | 2:8:0 |
| 68% (58/85) | 1st Serve % | 61% (57/94) |
| 62% (36/58) | 1st Serve Win % | 60% (34/57) |
| 48% (13/27) | 2nd Serve Win % | 32% (12/37) |
| 45% (5/11) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 33% (3/9) |
| 51% (48/94) | Return Points Win % | 42% (36/85) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Boisson vs Andreeva Match Preview :
- Second serve effectiveness favors Andreeva slightly with 41.84% of points won compared to Boisson's 41.11%.
- Who returns better on the second serve? Boisson has the edge, winning 52.85% of points, compared to Andreeva's 48.2%.
- First serve returns show Andreeva with a slight advantage, achieving 30.46% to Boisson's 28.61%.
- Under pressure, Boisson is stronger, saving 57.33% of breakpoints versus Andreeva's 46.77%.
- Performance overview: Both players have nearly identical match win rates over the past year, Andreeva at 74.24% and Boisson at 74.07%.
- On clay, both players excel, but Andreeva has a slightly higher win percentage (80%) than Boisson (72%).
- Analyzing player levels, Andreeva competes mostly in Masters events, winning 79.41%, while Boisson predominates in Challengers, winning 71.43%.
- Who faces tougher opponents? Andreeva confronts higher-ranked opponents, averaging a rank of 126.56, compared to Boisson's 248.48.
- If the match goes to a deciding set, Boisson has been more successful, winning 69% compared to Andreeva's 63%.
- Both players show similar breakpoint conversion rates recently, with Boisson slightly ahead at 36.62% over Andreeva's 35.5%.
Editorial Prediction (June 4, 2025, UTC):
The upcoming match promises to be highly competitive, as both Andreeva and Boisson have demonstrated commendable form over the past year. Andreeva showcases a slight edge in second serve points won, although Boisson excels in returning those serves.
Boisson's commendable ability to save breakpoints and her proficiency in deciding sets highlight her resilience under pressure, a crucial factor in tight matches. In contrast, Andreeva's experience against higher-ranked opponents could provide her with a strategic advantage.
Overall, the prediction leans slightly in favor of Boisson due to her superior pressure performance and adaptability in deciding sets. However, it will be a closely contested match, potentially reliant on key moments during gameplay.
Based on the data, Boisson is the more likely winner in this matchup.
Boisson vs Andreeva Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88
Lois Boisson Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Carson Branstine
Player
Lois Boisson
52%
(
42 of
81)
1st Serve %
67%
(
62 of
93)
6
Aces
7
4
Double Faults
1
81%
(
34 of
42)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
45 of
62)
56%
(
22 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
13 of
31)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
31%
(
25 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
35 of
93)
91
Total Points Won
83
|
6-2 6-7(1) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Cori Gauff
Player
Lois Boisson
57%
(
26 of
46)
1st Serve %
59%
(
26 of
44)
0
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
1
62%
(
16 of
26)
1st Serve Won
38%
(
10 of
26)
70%
(
14 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
7 of
18)
86%
(
6 of
7)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
35%
(
16 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
27 of
44)
57
Total Points Won
33
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Lois Boisson
Player
Mirra Andreeva
68%
(
58 of
85)
1st Serve %
61%
(
57 of
94)
3
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
9
62%
(
36 of
58)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
34 of
57)
48%
(
13 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
12 of
37)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
42%
(
36 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
48 of
94)
97
Total Points Won
82
|
7-6(6) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R4 |
Stats
Lois Boisson
Player
Jessica Pegula
62%
(
63 of
102)
1st Serve %
58%
(
63 of
108)
3
Aces
0
7
Double Faults
1
65%
(
41 of
63)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
36 of
63)
38%
(
15 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
25 of
45)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
42%
(
5 of
12)
45%
(
46 of
102)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
47 of
108)
103
Total Points Won
107
|
3-6 6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R3 |
Stats
Lois Boisson
Player
Elsa Jacquemot
64%
(
50 of
78)
1st Serve %
64%
(
61 of
96)
1
Aces
5
6
Double Faults
3
66%
(
33 of
50)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
38 of
61)
43%
(
12 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
16 of
35)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
83%
(
5 of
6)
42%
(
33 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
42 of
96)
87
Total Points Won
87
|
6-3 0-6 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Lois Boisson
Player
Anhelina Kalinina
78%
(
32 of
41)
1st Serve %
70%
(
33 of
47)
4
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
1
81%
(
26 of
32)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
18 of
33)
67%
(
6 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
21%
(
3 of
14)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
22%
(
9 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
26 of
47)
58
Total Points Won
30
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Lois Boisson
Player
Elise Mertens
54%
(
47 of
87)
1st Serve %
45%
(
36 of
80)
3
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
6
83%
(
39 of
47)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
27 of
36)
48%
(
19 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
24 of
44)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
33%
(
29 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
29 of
80)
87
Total Points Won
80
|
6-4 4-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Lois Boisson
Player
Tatiana Prozorova
56%
(
45 of
81)
1st Serve %
53%
(
41 of
78)
4
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
3
76%
(
34 of
45)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
26 of
41)
44%
(
16 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
15 of
37)
25%
(
4 of
16)
Break Points Won
10%
(
1 of
10)
38%
(
31 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
37 of
78)
87
Total Points Won
72
|
7-6(4) 6-0 | H2H | ||
view more
Mirra Andreeva Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R4 |
Stats
Mirra Andreeva
Player
Emma Navarro
59%
(
32 of
54)
1st Serve %
61%
(
33 of
54)
2
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
3
72%
(
23 of
32)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
17 of
33)
41%
(
9 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
6 of
21)
86%
(
6 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
41%
(
22 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
31 of
54)
63
Total Points Won
45
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R3 |
Stats
Mirra Andreeva
Player
Hailey Baptiste
63%
(
43 of
68)
1st Serve %
50%
(
24 of
48)
3
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
3
65%
(
28 of
43)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
12 of
24)
56%
(
14 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
8 of
24)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
11%
(
1 of
9)
38%
(
26 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
28 of
48)
70
Total Points Won
46
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Mirra Andreeva
Player
Lucia Bronzetti
63%
(
39 of
62)
1st Serve %
54%
(
35 of
65)
4
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
6
77%
(
30 of
39)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
23 of
35)
57%
(
13 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
11 of
30)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
31%
(
19 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
31 of
65)
74
Total Points Won
53
|
6-1 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Mirra Andreeva
Player
Mayar Sherif
60%
(
30 of
50)
1st Serve %
75%
(
50 of
67)
0
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
1
73%
(
22 of
30)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
27 of
50)
55%
(
11 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
6 of
17)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
34%
(
17 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
34 of
67)
67
Total Points Won
50
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Linda Noskova
Player
Mirra Andreeva
55%
(
30 of
55)
1st Serve %
53%
(
32 of
60)
2
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
6
83%
(
25 of
30)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
24 of
32)
60%
(
15 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
8 of
28)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
27%
(
15 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
28 of
60)
68
Total Points Won
47
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Mirra Andreeva
Player
Clara Tauson
71%
(
48 of
68)
1st Serve %
70%
(
59 of
84)
4
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
2
73%
(
35 of
48)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
39 of
59)
65%
(
13 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
10 of
25)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
29%
(
20 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
35 of
84)
83
Total Points Won
69
|
3-6 6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Magdalena Frech
Player
Mirra Andreeva
56%
(
49 of
87)
1st Serve %
60%
(
59 of
99)
1
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
8
67%
(
33 of
49)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
37 of
59)
42%
(
16 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
12 of
40)
37%
(
7 of
19)
Break Points Won
33%
(
5 of
15)
44%
(
38 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
50 of
99)
99
Total Points Won
87
|
2-6 7-5 6-0 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Lois Boisson
Player
Mirra Andreeva
68%
(
58 of
85)
1st Serve %
61%
(
57 of
94)
3
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
9
62%
(
36 of
58)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
34 of
57)
48%
(
13 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
12 of
37)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
42%
(
36 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
48 of
94)
97
Total Points Won
82
|
7-6(6) 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 63% (137/81) | Win/Loss | 76% (145/45) |
| 58% (297/213) | Sets Win/Loss | 72% (311/122) |
| 54% (2520/2132) | Games Win/Loss | 59% (2260/1574) |
| 52% (11/10) | Hard Win/Loss | 75% (66/22) |
| 71% (104/42) | Clay Win/Loss | 79% (68/18) |
| 44% (22/28) | Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/1) | Grass Win/Loss | 69% (11/5) |
| 0.27 | Aces Per Game | 0.2 |
| 604 | Aces Total | 369 |
| 0.38 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.25 |
| 864 | Total Double Faults | 466 |
| 1:31:38 | Average Match Time | 1:35:7 |
| 371.36 | Average Opponent Rank | 205.79 |
| 61% (8422/13699) | 1st Serve % | 64% (7909/12316) |
| 66% (5539/8422) | 1st Serve Win % | 65% (5140/7909) |
| 45% (2385/5278) | 2nd Serve Win % | 50% (2189/4407) |
| 50% (812/1640) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 53% (886/1664) |
| 46% (6093/13285) | Return Points Win % | 48% (5991/12373) |
| 55% (6/5) | Slam W/L | 78% (32/9) |
| 0% (0/0) | Masters W/L | 75% (38/13) |
| 25% (1/3) | Main Tour W/L | 61% (22/14) |
| 64% (104/59) | Challenger W/L | 88% (36/5) |
| 65% (26/14) | Futures W/L | 81% (17/4) |
| 63% (134/214) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 77% (144/188) |
| 50% (1/2) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 100% (1/1) |
| 47% (18/38) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 73% (24/33) |
| 68% (51/75) | Deciding Set Win % | 63% (33/52) |
| 90% (127/114) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 91% (138/125) |
| 9% (127/12) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 9% (138/13) |
| 25% (91/23) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 40% (52/21) |
Boisson vs. Andreeva Prediction Form Trend:
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
