Lois Boisson vs Carson Branstine Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W W W W W W L L W L
Form
L L W W W L W W W LHead-To-Head: Boisson 0 - 1 Branstine
They have played 3 sets in total, with Boisson winning 1 and Branstine winning 2. The last match between Boisson and Branstine was at the Wimbledon - London, 24-06-2025, Round: Q1 round, Surface: Grass, with Carson Branstine getting the victory 6-2 6-7(1) 6-4.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Lois Boisson | 0 |
| Carson Branstine | 1 |
LAST H2H MATCH: Wimbledon - London(24-06-2025)
Carson Branstine
Lois Boisson
6
2
6
7
6
4
| Boisson | Stats | Branstine |
|---|---|---|
| 69% (22-10) | YTD Win/Loss | 64% (27-15) |
| 0 | Head-to-Head | 1 |
| 66 | Ranking | 194 |
| 65 | Highest Rank | 190 |
| 22 | Age | 24 |
| - | Plays | R |
| 7 | Titles | 7 |
| 63% (138-82) | Career Total W/L | 65% (139-74) |
| $719,224 | Career Prize Money | $112,624 |
| 1 | YTD Titles | 1 |
| 0 | Grass H2H | 1 |
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Fritz VS Alcaraz PREDICTION Grass
Wimbledon - London atp
11 Jul 2025 / Semifinals
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Sinner VS Djokovic PREDICTION Grass
Wimbledon - London atp
11 Jul 2025 / Semifinals
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-2 6-7(1) 6-4 |
Stats 
Carson Branstine
Player
Lois Boisson
52%
(
42 of
81)
1st Serve %
67%
(
62 of
93)
6
Aces
7
4
Double Faults
1
81%
(
34 of
42)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
45 of
62)
56%
(
22 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
13 of
31)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
31%
(
25 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
35 of
93)
91
Total Points Won
83
|
||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 0 | H2H Matches | 1 |
| 1 | Sets Won | 2 |
| 13 | Games Won | 18 |
| 7 | Aces (Total) | 6 |
| 1 | Total Double Faults | 4 |
| 1:53:0 | Average Match Time | 1:53:0 |
| 67% (62/93) | 1st Serve % | 52% (42/81) |
| 73% (45/62) | 1st Serve Win % | 81% (34/42) |
| 42% (13/31) | 2nd Serve Win % | 56% (22/39) |
| 100% (2/2) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 63% (5/8) |
| 31% (25/81) | Return Points Win % | 38% (35/93) |
| 0% (0/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 100% (1/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 100% (1/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 100% (1/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (1/0) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Boisson vs Branstine Match Preview :
- How does Boisson perform on their second serve compared to Branstine? Boisson slightly edges out Branstine, winning 40.61% of second serve points, while Branstine wins 40.22%.
- In returning second serves, Boisson also has a better record, winning 52.08% of opponents' second serve points, compared to Branstine’s 48.63%.
- When it comes to returning first serves, Branstine excels, capturing 34.89% of these points, as opposed to Boisson's 29.34%.
- Under pressure, Boisson saves more breakpoints, with a rate of 55.97%, while Branstine saves 49.86%.
- In terms of match wins over the past year, Boisson holds a higher percentage, winning 72.41% of their matches, compared to Branstine’s 59.32%.
- Boisson’s favored surface is Clay, winning 71% of these matches, while Branstine thrives on Hard courts, achieving a 70% win rate.
- Boisson generally competes against higher-ranked players with an average rank of 232.38, compared to Branstine's opponents, who average a rank of 316.69.
- In deciding sets, Boisson has an impressive win rate of 69%, significantly higher than Branstine's 41%.
- Branstine leads in breakpoint conversion, successfully converting 45.41% of opportunities, while Boisson converts at 35.9%.
Editorial Prediction (June 23, 2025, UTC):
Considering the recent performance patterns, Boisson demonstrates slightly better efficiency on second serve points. This edge, combined with their higher breakpoint saving percentage, positions them favorably in high-pressure scenarios.
Additionally, Boisson's overall match win percentage over the past year surpasses Branstine's, suggesting more consistent form. Moreover, Boisson's ability to perform well against higher-ranked opponents adds to their competitive edge.
While Branstine’s strength lies in converting breakpoints and first serve returns, the deciding set performance heavily favors Boisson, indicating resilience when matches are tightly contested.
Taking all these factors into account, Boisson is the more likely winner of this upcoming tennis match.
Boisson vs Branstine Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88
Lois Boisson Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Darja Semenistaja
Player
Lois Boisson
74%
(
45 of
61)
1st Serve %
49%
(
36 of
74)
5
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
8
69%
(
31 of
45)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
24 of
36)
56%
(
9 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
17 of
38)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
34%
(
21 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
33 of
74)
73
Total Points Won
62
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Lois Boisson
Player
Chloe Paquet
61%
(
34 of
56)
1st Serve %
62%
(
26 of
42)
6
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
3
82%
(
28 of
34)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
17 of
26)
36%
(
8 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
5 of
16)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
36%
(
20 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
20 of
42)
56
Total Points Won
42
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Carson Branstine
Player
Lois Boisson
52%
(
42 of
81)
1st Serve %
67%
(
62 of
93)
6
Aces
7
4
Double Faults
1
81%
(
34 of
42)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
45 of
62)
56%
(
22 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
13 of
31)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
31%
(
25 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
35 of
93)
91
Total Points Won
83
|
6-2 6-7(1) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Cori Gauff
Player
Lois Boisson
57%
(
26 of
46)
1st Serve %
59%
(
26 of
44)
0
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
1
62%
(
16 of
26)
1st Serve Won
38%
(
10 of
26)
70%
(
14 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
7 of
18)
86%
(
6 of
7)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
35%
(
16 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
27 of
44)
57
Total Points Won
33
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Lois Boisson
Player
Mirra Andreeva
68%
(
58 of
85)
1st Serve %
61%
(
57 of
94)
3
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
9
62%
(
36 of
58)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
34 of
57)
48%
(
13 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
12 of
37)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
42%
(
36 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
48 of
94)
97
Total Points Won
82
|
7-6(6) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R4 |
Stats
Lois Boisson
Player
Jessica Pegula
62%
(
63 of
102)
1st Serve %
58%
(
63 of
108)
3
Aces
0
7
Double Faults
1
65%
(
41 of
63)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
36 of
63)
38%
(
15 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
25 of
45)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
42%
(
5 of
12)
45%
(
46 of
102)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
47 of
108)
103
Total Points Won
107
|
3-6 6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R3 |
Stats
Lois Boisson
Player
Elsa Jacquemot
64%
(
50 of
78)
1st Serve %
64%
(
61 of
96)
1
Aces
5
6
Double Faults
3
66%
(
33 of
50)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
38 of
61)
43%
(
12 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
16 of
35)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
83%
(
5 of
6)
42%
(
33 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
42 of
96)
87
Total Points Won
87
|
6-3 0-6 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Lois Boisson
Player
Anhelina Kalinina
78%
(
32 of
41)
1st Serve %
70%
(
33 of
47)
4
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
1
81%
(
26 of
32)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
18 of
33)
67%
(
6 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
21%
(
3 of
14)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
22%
(
9 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
26 of
47)
58
Total Points Won
30
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Carson Branstine Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Aryna Sabalenka
Player
Carson Branstine
61%
(
36 of
59)
1st Serve %
56%
(
30 of
54)
3
Aces
7
3
Double Faults
4
78%
(
28 of
36)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
20 of
30)
70%
(
16 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
11 of
24)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
25%
(
15 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
23 of
54)
67
Total Points Won
46
|
6-1 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Carson Branstine
Player
Raluca Georgiana Serban
73%
(
81 of
111)
1st Serve %
68%
(
88 of
130)
3
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
10
68%
(
55 of
81)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
50 of
88)
50%
(
15 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
19 of
42)
25%
(
5 of
20)
Break Points Won
25%
(
4 of
16)
37%
(
41 of
111)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
61 of
130)
131
Total Points Won
110
|
4-6 7-6(6) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Carson Branstine
Player
Bianca Vanessa Andreescu
70%
(
62 of
89)
1st Serve %
66%
(
65 of
99)
6
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
3
71%
(
44 of
62)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
37 of
65)
52%
(
14 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
20 of
34)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
35%
(
31 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
42 of
99)
100
Total Points Won
88
|
7-6(3) 4-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Carson Branstine
Player
Lois Boisson
52%
(
42 of
81)
1st Serve %
67%
(
62 of
93)
6
Aces
7
4
Double Faults
1
81%
(
34 of
42)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
45 of
62)
56%
(
22 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
13 of
31)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
31%
(
25 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
35 of
93)
91
Total Points Won
83
|
6-2 6-7(1) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Elena Gabriela Ruse
Player
Carson Branstine
70%
(
37 of
53)
1st Serve %
49%
(
35 of
72)
1
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
2
57%
(
21 of
37)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
17 of
35)
31%
(
5 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
11 of
37)
53%
(
8 of
15)
Break Points Won
56%
(
5 of
9)
51%
(
27 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
44 of
72)
70
Total Points Won
55
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Carson Branstine
Player
Liudmila Samsonova
58%
(
56 of
96)
1st Serve %
61%
(
56 of
92)
6
Aces
5
5
Double Faults
3
71%
(
40 of
56)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
31 of
56)
45%
(
18 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
19 of
36)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
40%
(
38 of
96)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
42 of
92)
100
Total Points Won
88
|
6-4 5-7 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Carson Branstine
Player
Yue Yuan
64%
(
37 of
58)
1st Serve %
70%
(
45 of
64)
8
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
2
73%
(
27 of
37)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
27 of
45)
52%
(
11 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
6 of
19)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
34%
(
20 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
31 of
64)
69
Total Points Won
53
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Carson Branstine
Player
Jule Niemeier
56%
(
38 of
68)
1st Serve %
44%
(
29 of
66)
5
Aces
4
5
Double Faults
13
58%
(
22 of
38)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
19 of
29)
67%
(
20 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
16 of
37)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
38%
(
26 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
31 of
66)
73
Total Points Won
61
|
6-3 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 63% (138/82) | Win/Loss | 65% (139/74) |
| 58% (299/215) | Sets Win/Loss | 62% (304/184) |
| 54% (2539/2151) | Games Win/Loss | 55% (2425/1990) |
| 52% (11/10) | Hard Win/Loss | 70% (87/37) |
| 71% (105/43) | Clay Win/Loss | 63% (40/24) |
| 44% (22/28) | Indoor Hard W/L | 38% (6/10) |
| 0% (0/1) | Grass Win/Loss | 67% (6/3) |
| 0.27 | Aces Per Game | 0.22 |
| 612 | Aces Total | 464 |
| 0.38 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.33 |
| 876 | Total Double Faults | 715 |
| 1:31:32 | Average Match Time | 1:28:47 |
| 369.25 | Average Opponent Rank | 448.79 |
| 61% (8492/13829) | 1st Serve % | 61% (7840/12916) |
| 66% (5591/8492) | 1st Serve Win % | 64% (5053/7840) |
| 45% (2410/5338) | 2nd Serve Win % | 46% (2313/5076) |
| 50% (817/1650) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 50% (808/1623) |
| 46% (6134/13388) | Return Points Win % | 47% (5907/12674) |
| 55% (6/5) | Slam W/L | 67% (4/2) |
| 0% (0/0) | Masters W/L | 0% (0/5) |
| 25% (1/3) | Main Tour W/L | 50% (3/3) |
| 64% (105/60) | Challenger W/L | 65% (92/50) |
| 65% (26/14) | Futures W/L | 74% (40/14) |
| 63% (135/216) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 65% (138/211) |
| 50% (1/2) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 100% (1/1) |
| 47% (18/38) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 53% (27/51) |
| 68% (51/75) | Deciding Set Win % | 58% (36/62) |
| 90% (128/115) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 90% (136/123) |
| 9% (128/12) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 10% (136/13) |
| 25% (92/23) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 21% (77/16) |
Boisson vs. Branstine Prediction Form Trend:
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
