Loic Namigandet Tenguere vs Dane Sweeny Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
L W L W L L L L W L
Form
W L W L L L L W L WHead-To-Head: Tenguere 1 - 0 Sweeny
They have played 2 sets in total, with Tenguere winning 2 and Sweeny winning 0. The last match between Tenguere and Sweeny was at the M25 Nottingham, 30-04-2025, Round: First, Surface: Hard, with Loic Namigandet Tenguere getting the victory 6-4 7-6(4).
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Loic Namigandet Tenguere | 1 |
| Dane Sweeny | 0 |
LAST H2H MATCH: M25 Nottingham(30-04-2025)
Loic Namigandet Tenguere
Dane Sweeny
6
4
7
6
| Tenguere | Stats | Sweeny |
|---|---|---|
| 46% (12-14) | YTD Win/Loss | 50% (17-17) |
| 1 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
| N/A | Ranking | 573 |
| Highest Rank | 194 | |
| 26 | Age | 24 |
| - | Plays | R |
| 0 | Titles | 7 |
| 52% (54-50) | Career Total W/L | 54% (182-152) |
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $346,065 |
| 1 | Hard H2H | 0 |
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Masarova VS Stojanovic PREDICTION Grass
Wimbledon - London wta
25 Jun 2025 / Q2 round
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Jones VS Radivojevic PREDICTION Grass
Wimbledon - London wta
25 Jun 2025 / Q2 round
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-4 7-6(4) |
Stats 
Loic Namigandet Tenguere
Player
Dane Sweeny
55%
(
41 of
75)
1st Serve %
65%
(
44 of
68)
8
Aces
0
12
Double Faults
4
80%
(
33 of
41)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
27 of
44)
38%
(
13 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
13 of
24)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
39%
(
29 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
28 of
68)
74
Total Points Won
69
|
||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 13 | Games Won | 10 |
| 8 | Aces (Total) | 0 |
| 12 | Total Double Faults | 4 |
| 1:44:18 | Average Match Time | 1:44:18 |
| 55% (41/75) | 1st Serve % | 65% (44/68) |
| 80% (33/41) | 1st Serve Win % | 61% (27/44) |
| 38% (13/34) | 2nd Serve Win % | 54% (13/24) |
| 40% (4/10) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 33% (3/9) |
| 41% (28/68) | Return Points Win % | 39% (29/75) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Tenguere vs Sweeny Match Preview :
Analyzing second serve performance over the past six months reveals that Sweeny has won 44.53% of points on their second serve, slightly outpacing Tenguere, who has secured 43.13%. This metric is closely associated with predicting match outcomes. Moreover, Sweeny's ability to win 46.3% of second serve return points compared to Tenguere's 45.09% enhances Sweeny's advantage. For first serve returns, Sweeny leads with 28.16% as opposed to Tenguere's 24.15%, providing a clear indicator of who is favored in their head-to-head encounters.
Examining their competencies under pressure, Sweeny has managed to save 56.54% of breakpoints during recent matches, while Tenguere has saved 54.41%. These figures are critical for in-game betting forecasts. Over the past year, Sweeny's win-loss record stands at 41.46%, with Tenguere displaying a stronger performance at 53.19%, contributing to an overall predictive outlook of their encounters. Notably, Sweeny's most successful surface is Hard, with a win percentage of 59%, whereas Tenguere's best on Hard records at 57%.
Reflecting on the level of player participation, Sweeny has predominantly competed in Challengers and ITF tournaments, recording a modest win rate of 23.81%. In contrast, Tenguere's consistent participation in Futures tournaments has resulted in a 54.35% success rate, indicating a disparity in levels of competition. A closer look at the quality of their opponents shows that Sweeny's average opponent rank was 364.78, compared to Tenguere's 301.6 over the past year.
If the match extends to a deciding set, Sweeny is statistically more likely to prevail, with a 50% success rate in such scenarios over the last 12 months, contrasting with Tenguere's 35%. Additionally, Sweeny's breakpoint conversion rate of 34.65% surpasses Tenguere's 28.57%, serving as a crucial metric for live betting during matches. While past performance offers a substantial foundation for predictions, assessing current event stats can be equally important for identifying in-form players.
Through a comprehensive analysis of these statistics, Sweeny emerges as the player with a slight edge, leveraging their strengths in key performance areas, which is likely to secure their victory in the upcoming match.
Tenguere vs Sweeny Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88
Loic Namigandet Tenguere Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Roger Pascual Ferra
Player
Loic Namigandet Tenguere
69%
(
36 of
52)
1st Serve %
65%
(
44 of
68)
0
Aces
9
1
Double Faults
4
78%
(
28 of
36)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
31 of
44)
75%
(
12 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
10 of
24)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
23%
(
12 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
27 of
68)
67
Total Points Won
53
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Loic Namigandet Tenguere
Player
Mikael Arseneault
61%
(
63 of
103)
1st Serve %
62%
(
57 of
92)
7
Aces
2
8
Double Faults
5
73%
(
46 of
63)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
39 of
57)
40%
(
16 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
12 of
35)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
40%
(
41 of
103)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
41 of
92)
103
Total Points Won
92
|
6-7(6) 6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Peter Bertran
Player
Loic Namigandet Tenguere
67%
(
60 of
90)
1st Serve %
66%
(
54 of
82)
1
Aces
8
5
Double Faults
5
68%
(
41 of
60)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
38 of
54)
60%
(
18 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
14 of
28)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
34%
(
31 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
30 of
82)
89
Total Points Won
83
|
6-4 2-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Mikael Arseneault
Player
Loic Namigandet Tenguere
71%
(
73 of
103)
1st Serve %
71%
(
57 of
80)
1
Aces
5
8
Double Faults
4
59%
(
43 of
73)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
32 of
57)
53%
(
16 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
12 of
23)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
43%
(
44 of
103)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
36 of
80)
95
Total Points Won
88
|
4-6 7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Conor Brady
Player
Loic Namigandet Tenguere
76%
(
53 of
70)
1st Serve %
59%
(
34 of
58)
0
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
3
62%
(
33 of
53)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
22 of
34)
53%
(
9 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
9 of
24)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
40%
(
28 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
27 of
58)
69
Total Points Won
59
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Alastair Gray
Player
Loic Namigandet Tenguere
60%
(
29 of
48)
1st Serve %
38%
(
18 of
48)
4
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
4
69%
(
20 of
29)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
11 of
18)
53%
(
10 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
9 of
30)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
38%
(
18 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
28 of
48)
58
Total Points Won
38
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Loic Namigandet Tenguere
Player
Dane Sweeny
55%
(
41 of
75)
1st Serve %
65%
(
44 of
68)
8
Aces
0
12
Double Faults
4
80%
(
33 of
41)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
27 of
44)
38%
(
13 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
13 of
24)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
39%
(
29 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
28 of
68)
74
Total Points Won
69
|
6-4 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Shinji Hazawa
Player
Loic Namigandet Tenguere
67%
(
56 of
83)
1st Serve %
53%
(
40 of
76)
2
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
1
73%
(
41 of
56)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
27 of
40)
41%
(
11 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
16 of
36)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
37%
(
31 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
33 of
76)
85
Total Points Won
74
|
7-6(5) 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Dane Sweeny Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Dane Sweeny
Player
Max Fardanesh
64%
(
29 of
45)
1st Serve %
50%
(
24 of
48)
1
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
5
76%
(
22 of
29)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
16 of
24)
44%
(
7 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
8 of
24)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
36%
(
16 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
24 of
48)
53
Total Points Won
40
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Noah Zamora
Player
Dane Sweeny
59%
(
38 of
64)
1st Serve %
57%
(
35 of
61)
3
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
4
63%
(
24 of
38)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
20 of
35)
50%
(
13 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
13 of
26)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
80%
(
4 of
5)
42%
(
27 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
28 of
61)
65
Total Points Won
60
|
7-6(4) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Dane Sweeny
Player
Evan Burnett
44%
(
25 of
57)
1st Serve %
61%
(
64 of
105)
4
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
5
80%
(
20 of
25)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
37 of
64)
56%
(
18 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
19 of
41)
29%
(
4 of
14)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
33%
(
19 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
49 of
105)
87
Total Points Won
75
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Hyeon Chung
Player
Dane Sweeny
65%
(
37 of
57)
1st Serve %
60%
(
47 of
78)
2
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
7
68%
(
25 of
37)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
27 of
47)
45%
(
9 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
10 of
31)
33%
(
5 of
15)
Break Points Won
20%
(
2 of
10)
40%
(
23 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
41 of
78)
75
Total Points Won
60
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Patrick Kypson
Player
Dane Sweeny
61%
(
40 of
66)
1st Serve %
66%
(
38 of
58)
5
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
2
83%
(
33 of
40)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
26 of
38)
54%
(
14 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
10 of
20)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
29%
(
19 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
22 of
58)
69
Total Points Won
55
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Fabrizio Andaloro
Player
Dane Sweeny
63%
(
45 of
72)
1st Serve %
62%
(
53 of
85)
4
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
4
76%
(
34 of
45)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
32 of
53)
44%
(
12 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
66%
(
21 of
32)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
36%
(
26 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
32 of
85)
78
Total Points Won
79
|
7-6(5) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Kaichi Uchida
Player
Dane Sweeny
48%
(
55 of
115)
1st Serve %
67%
(
62 of
92)
9
Aces
6
7
Double Faults
5
69%
(
38 of
55)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
47 of
62)
52%
(
31 of
60)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
11 of
30)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
40%
(
46 of
115)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
34 of
92)
103
Total Points Won
104
|
6-3 4-6 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Dane Sweeny
Player
Masamichi Imamura
68%
(
65 of
95)
1st Serve %
65%
(
62 of
95)
2
Aces
5
3
Double Faults
3
60%
(
39 of
65)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
32 of
62)
50%
(
15 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
18 of
33)
50%
(
7 of
14)
Break Points Won
100%
(
5 of
5)
43%
(
41 of
95)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
45 of
95)
99
Total Points Won
91
|
4-6 6-2 7-5 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 52% (54/50) | Win/Loss | 54% (182/152) |
| 54% (133/114) | Sets Win/Loss | 52% (407/376) |
| 51% (1353/1282) | Games Win/Loss | 51% (3781/3616) |
| 53% (28/25) | Hard Win/Loss | 58% (149/110) |
| 0% (0/0) | Clay Win/Loss | 44% (17/22) |
| 51% (26/25) | Indoor Hard W/L | 37% (7/12) |
| 0% (0/0) | Grass Win/Loss | 53% (9/8) |
| 0.46 | Aces Per Game | 0.2 |
| 595 | Aces Total | 727 |
| 0.27 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.29 |
| 353 | Total Double Faults | 1054 |
| 1:27:26 | Average Match Time | 1:38:58 |
| 52.13 | Average Opponent Rank | 282.25 |
| 59% (3529/5942) | 1st Serve % | 63% (13769/21954) |
| 75% (2661/3529) | 1st Serve Win % | 65% (9009/13769) |
| 50% (1205/2413) | 2nd Serve Win % | 51% (4137/8185) |
| 40% (200/506) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 43% (961/2236) |
| 37% (2251/6083) | Return Points Win % | 41% (8759/21612) |
| 0% (0/0) | Slam W/L | 47% (7/8) |
| 0% (0/0) | Masters W/L | 60% (3/2) |
| 0% (0/0) | Main Tour W/L | 43% (3/4) |
| 0% (0/1) | Challenger W/L | 41% (49/71) |
| 52% (54/49) | Futures W/L | 64% (120/67) |
| 52% (54/103) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 54% (179/330) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 67% (2/3) |
| 41% (16/39) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 47% (41/88) |
| 39% (16/41) | Deciding Set Win % | 62% (69/112) |
| 87% (53/46) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 88% (158/139) |
| 13% (53/7) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 12% (158/19) |
| 16% (50/8) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 24% (176/43) |
Tenguere vs. Sweeny Prediction Form Trend:
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
