Logan Smith vs Michael Shabaz Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Smith vs Shabaz analysis and find out who is favored!
Logan Smith vs Michael Shabaz Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Smith has won 0% of points on his second serve, while Shabaz has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Smith, in recent form, has won 0% of his opponent's second serve points, while Shabaz has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Smith has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Shabaz has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Smith has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/ 0), with Shabaz winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Smith has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 59% (W/L 69/ 47), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 56% (W/L 5/ 4). Shabaz has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 53% (W/L 115/ 101), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 33% (W/L 1/ 2).
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Smith has played against opponents with an average rank of while Shabaz has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Smith has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Shabaz has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Smith has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Shabaz has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Smith 0 - 0 Shabaz
0
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
0
Minor
N/A
Rank
High
27
Age
R
Plays
0
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
N/A
Rank
High
36
Age
R
Plays
4
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
0
Minor
Form
0% (0-0)
Career Total W/L
0% (0-0)
0% (0-0)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
No H2H Matches Available
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
stats | Logan Smith | Michael Shabaz |
---|---|---|
YTD W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Aces pg | 0 | 0 |
Aces Total | 0 | 0 |
DFs per game | 0 | 0 |
DFs Total | 0 | 0 |
Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1st Match |
Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 0 |
1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Logan Smith Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Q1 | 6-4 6-2 | H2H | |||
QF |
Maik Steiner
Player
Logan Smith
67%
(
37 of
55)
1st Serve %
75%
(
58 of
77)
4
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
3
73%
(
27 of
37)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
33 of
58)
50%
(
9 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
5 of
19)
36%
(
5 of
14)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
35%
(
19 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
39 of
77)
75
Total Points Won
57
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
Q2 | 4-6 6-3 10-0 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-4 6-1 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-4 6-2 | H2H | |||
QF | 6-2 6-2 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-2 6-2 | H2H | |||
QF |
Lucas Gomez
Player
Logan Smith
65%
(
37 of
57)
1st Serve %
66%
(
40 of
61)
3
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
2
76%
(
28 of
37)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
27 of
40)
60%
(
12 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
8 of
21)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
30%
(
17 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
26 of
61)
66
Total Points Won
52
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
Q1 | 6-4 6-2 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-3 6-0 | H2H |
view more
Michael Shabaz Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
QF | 6-2 6-3 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-3 4-6 10-3 | H2H | |||
R1 |
Ryan Dickerson
Player
Michael Shabaz
73%
(
46 of
63)
1st Serve %
62%
(
31 of
50)
0
Aces
5
7
Double Faults
2
67%
(
31 of
46)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
21 of
31)
47%
(
8 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
21%
(
4 of
19)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
38%
(
24 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
25 of
50)
64
Total Points Won
49
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
QF | 4-6 6-4 10-7 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-3 6-4 | H2H | |||
QF | 6-4 6-3 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-1 6-1 | H2H | |||
R1 |
Hudson Rivera
Player
Michael Shabaz
64%
(
46 of
72)
1st Serve %
61%
(
40 of
66)
5
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
72%
(
33 of
46)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
24 of
40)
42%
(
11 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
12 of
26)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
39%
(
28 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
30 of
66)
74
Total Points Won
64
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Gage Brymer
Player
Michael Shabaz
69%
(
78 of
113)
1st Serve %
66%
(
82 of
125)
2
Aces
4
4
Double Faults
6
63%
(
49 of
78)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
52 of
82)
66%
(
23 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
19 of
43)
25%
(
4 of
16)
Break Points Won
21%
(
3 of
14)
36%
(
41 of
113)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
54 of
125)
126
Total Points Won
112
|
6-2 5-7 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
QF | 6-2 7-6(0) | H2H |
view more