search

Liudmila Samsonova vs Celine Naef Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com

By Wojtek Kolan

At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Samsonova vs Naef analysis and find out who is favored!

Our tennis head to head predictions work!
Sign up now!

Up to 78% win accuracy on past h2h matches

Want To Bet On This Match?

After checking out our Predictions and stats analysis, we recommend opening accounts at several Sportsbooks so you can get the best possible odds for the outcome. We recommend:

* To claim FREE Matchstat for 3 months – Click Here

If you’re not ready for real bets and want to practice, sign up for FREE at www.meerkatbet.com  Enjoy simulated betting with our virtual currency, learn about value bets, and compete for monthly prizes in a risk-free environment.

Liudmila Samsonova vs Celine Naef Important H2H Prediction Stats:

Head-to-head: Samsonova 1 - 0 Naef

  • Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Samsonova has won 47.25% of points on their second serve, while Naef has won 47.97%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
  • Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Samsonova, in recent form, has won 56.7% of their opponent's second serve points, while Naef has won 54.83%. The same stats for first serve returns are 36.8% and 36.36% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
  • Under pressure analysis: Samsonova has saved 57.83% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Naef has saved 56.36% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
  • Performance overview: Over the last year Samsonova has won 60% of matches played (W/L 36/ 24), with Naef winning 48.15% (W/L 26/ 28) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
  • Best surface: Samsonova has their best career surface win % on Grass, winning 67% (W/L 28/ 14), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 59% (W/L 123/ 87). Naef has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 72% (W/L 43/ 17), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 50% (W/L 6/ 6).
  • Player level: In the last year, Samsonova has played most of their matches on the Main tour, winning 62.96% of matches (W/L 17/ 10), where as Naef has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 58.97% of matches (W/L 23/ 16). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
  • Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Samsonova winning 1 times and Naef being victorious 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Samsonova winning 2 and Naef winning 0. The last match between Samsonova and Naef was at the Libema Open - 's-Hertogenbosch, 13-06-2024, Second, Grass with Liudmila Samsonova getting the victory 7-5 6-2.
  • Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:31:10.
  • Deciding set H2H prediction: Samsonova and Naef have played a deciding set 0 times, with Samsonova winning 0 times and Naef 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
  • Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Samsonova winning 0, and Naef 0.
  • Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Samsonova has played against opponents with an average rank of 85.4 while Naef has played against players with an average rank of 197.37.
  • Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Samsonova has won 52% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Naef has won 36% in all matches played on tour.
  • Break point conversion: In recent form, Samsonova has converted 48.02% of breakpoint opportunities, and Naef has converted 45.38% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
  • If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
bet365
Liudmila Samsonova

9

Total

0

Mast

2

Chall

0

Slam

5

Main

2

Minor

13

Rank

12

High

25

Age

R

Plays

1

Total

0

0

Hard

0

0

Clay

0

0

Indoor

0

1

Grass

0

185

Rank

121

High

19

Age

Plays

Celine Naef

6

Total

0

Mast

4

Chall

0

Slam

0

Main

2

Minor

1

Total

0

0

Hard

0

0

Clay

0

0

Indoor

0

1

Grass

0

W W W W L W L W W L

Form

W L L L L L W L L L

62% (303-189)

Career Total W/L

65% (88-47)

53% (18-16)

YTD W/L

50% (18-18)

$4,073,528

Career Prize Money

$173,282

1

YTD Titles

0

Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.

banner

The Best Odds For Liudmila Samsonova vs Celine Naef For Any Market:

We highly recommend you open accounts with at least 3 Bookmakers as depending on the match, odds can vary a lot between them, and always getting the best odds available will improve your profitability a lot in the long run. We recommend these Sportsbooks for you so sign up now! Check the current best odds by clicking the Sportsbook links below:

Sportsbooks & Bookies Promo Codes For Samsonova VS Naef

Get up to $1500 in bonuses if you don’t win!

Regional Signup Bonuses
With competitive adds and live betting

Samsonova VS Naef H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions

stats Liudmila Samsonova Celine Naef
All H2H Matches 1 0
Sets Won 2 0
Games Won 13 7
Aces (Total) 6 4
DFs Total 5 4
Avg Match Time 1:31:10 1:31:10
1st Serve % 60% (34/57) 59% (41/69)
1st Serve Win% 85% (29/34) 63% (26/41)
2nd Serve Win% 52% (12/23) 39% (11/28)
BPs Won% (Total) 44% (4/9) 14% (1/7)
Return Points W% 46% (32/69) 28% (16/57)
Best of 3 Sets W% 100% (1/1) 0% (0/1)
Best of 5 Sets W% 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
TBs Win% (Total) 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
Deciding Set Win% 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
1st set W, W 100% (1/1) 0% (0/0)
1st set W, L 0% (1/0) 0% (0/0)
1st set L, W 0% (0/0) 0% (1/0)

Samsonova VS Naef H2h Matches played

Winning Player Losing Player Score
7-5 6-2
cross
Liudmila Samsonova
Player
Celine Naef
60% ( 34 of 57)
1st Serve %
59% ( 41 of 69)
6
Aces
4
5
Double Faults
4
85% ( 29 of 34)
1st Serve Won
63% ( 26 of 41)
52% ( 12 of 23)
2nd Serve Won
39% ( 11 of 28)
44% ( 4 of 9)
Break Points Won
14% ( 1 of 7)
28% ( 16 of 57)
Rtn Points Won
46% ( 32 of 69)
73
Total Points Won
53

Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents

stats Liudmila Samsonova Celine Naef
YTD W/L 53% (18/16) 50% (18/18)
Sets Win/Loss 53% (42/38) 52% (43/39)
Games Win/Loss 52% (385/359) 52% (393/358)
Hard Win/Loss 33% (4/8) 60% (3/2)
Clay Win/Loss 55% (6/5) 43% (3/4)
Indoor Hard W/L 0% (0/0) 58% (11/8)
Grass Win/Loss 73% (8/3) 20% (1/4)
Aces pg 0.46 0.29
Aces Total 168 107
DFs per game 0.48 0.2
DFs Total 173 75
Avg Match Time 1:46:53 1:35:31
Avg Opp Rank 85.62 185.72
1st Serve % 51% (1217/2383) 60% (1470/2437)
1st Serve W% 71% (860/1217) 66% (963/1470)
2nd Serve W% 47% (544/1166) 47% (452/967)
BPs Won% Total 47% (128/273) 44% (133/300)
Return Pts W% 44% (1050/2411) 44% (1080/2458)
Slam W/L 57% (4/3) 25% (1/3)
Masters W/L 25% (2/6) 0% (0/0)
Cups W/L 0% (0/0) 0% (0/2)
Main Tour W/L 63% (12/7) 50% (1/1)
Tour Finals W/L 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
Challenger W/L 0% (0/0) 57% (16/12)
Futures W/L 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
Best of 3 Sets W% 53% (18/34) 50% (18/36)
Best of 5 Sets W% 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
TBs Win% (Total) 38% (3/8) 67% (6/9)
Deciding Set W% 50% (6/12) 30% (3/10)
1st set W, W 89% (18/16) 89% (19/17)
1st set W, L 11% (18/2) 11% (19/2)
1st set L, W 13% (16/2) 6% (17/1)

Liudmila Samsonova Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT RESULT Score H2H
R3
cross
Anna Kalinskaya
Player
Liudmila Samsonova
71% ( 42 of 59)
1st Serve %
36% ( 24 of 67)
0
Aces
8
1
Double Faults
4
76% ( 32 of 42)
1st Serve Won
92% ( 22 of 24)
65% ( 11 of 17)
2nd Serve Won
40% ( 17 of 43)
38% ( 3 of 8)
Break Points Won
50% ( 1 of 2)
27% ( 16 of 59)
Rtn Points Won
42% ( 28 of 67)
71
Total Points Won
55
L
7-6(4) 6-2 H2H
R2
cross
Liudmila Samsonova
Player
Elina Avanesyan
50% ( 28 of 56)
1st Serve %
67% ( 36 of 54)
6
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
5
75% ( 21 of 28)
1st Serve Won
53% ( 19 of 36)
46% ( 13 of 28)
2nd Serve Won
39% ( 7 of 18)
63% ( 5 of 8)
Break Points Won
22% ( 2 of 9)
39% ( 22 of 56)
Rtn Points Won
52% ( 28 of 54)
62
Total Points Won
48
W
6-3 6-3 H2H
R1
cross
Liudmila Samsonova
Player
Rebeka Masarova
61% ( 50 of 82)
1st Serve %
59% ( 54 of 92)
3
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
4
72% ( 36 of 50)
1st Serve Won
67% ( 36 of 54)
69% ( 22 of 32)
2nd Serve Won
39% ( 15 of 38)
50% ( 4 of 8)
Break Points Won
20% ( 1 of 5)
29% ( 24 of 82)
Rtn Points Won
45% ( 41 of 92)
99
Total Points Won
75
W
6-3 4-6 6-2 H2H
R2
cross
Katerina Siniakova
Player
Liudmila Samsonova
69% ( 79 of 115)
1st Serve %
51% ( 49 of 96)
2
Aces
6
4
Double Faults
4
62% ( 49 of 79)
1st Serve Won
73% ( 36 of 49)
56% ( 20 of 36)
2nd Serve Won
40% ( 19 of 47)
63% ( 5 of 8)
Break Points Won
33% ( 3 of 9)
40% ( 46 of 115)
Rtn Points Won
43% ( 41 of 96)
110
Total Points Won
101
L
6-3 6-7(3) 6-3 H2H
R1
cross
Liudmila Samsonova
Player
Sara Sorribes Tormo
46% ( 21 of 46)
1st Serve %
74% ( 46 of 62)
7
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
1
81% ( 17 of 21)
1st Serve Won
52% ( 24 of 46)
60% ( 15 of 25)
2nd Serve Won
19% ( 3 of 16)
45% ( 5 of 11)
Break Points Won
25% ( 1 of 4)
30% ( 14 of 46)
Rtn Points Won
56% ( 35 of 62)
67
Total Points Won
41
W
6-3 6-1 H2H
R1
cross
Veronika Kudermetova
Player
Liudmila Samsonova
61% ( 53 of 87)
1st Serve %
67% ( 63 of 94)
6
Aces
11
2
Double Faults
10
68% ( 36 of 53)
1st Serve Won
63% ( 40 of 63)
35% ( 12 of 34)
2nd Serve Won
32% ( 10 of 31)
70% ( 7 of 10)
Break Points Won
43% ( 6 of 14)
45% ( 39 of 87)
Rtn Points Won
47% ( 44 of 94)
92
Total Points Won
89
L
3-6 6-4 6-4 H2H
F
cross
Liudmila Samsonova
Player
Bianca Vanessa Andreescu
55% ( 56 of 102)
1st Serve %
67% ( 65 of 97)
2
Aces
4
5
Double Faults
4
66% ( 37 of 56)
1st Serve Won
66% ( 43 of 65)
57% ( 26 of 46)
2nd Serve Won
38% ( 12 of 32)
50% ( 5 of 10)
Break Points Won
67% ( 4 of 6)
38% ( 39 of 102)
Rtn Points Won
43% ( 42 of 97)
105
Total Points Won
94
W
4-6 6-3 7-5 H2H
SF
cross
Liudmila Samsonova
Player
Ekaterina Alexandrova
51% ( 53 of 103)
1st Serve %
70% ( 67 of 96)
10
Aces
4
11
Double Faults
6
64% ( 34 of 53)
1st Serve Won
57% ( 38 of 67)
48% ( 24 of 50)
2nd Serve Won
28% ( 8 of 29)
44% ( 8 of 18)
Break Points Won
38% ( 5 of 13)
44% ( 45 of 103)
Rtn Points Won
52% ( 50 of 96)
108
Total Points Won
91
W
6-3 6-7(1) 6-1 H2H
QF
cross
Liudmila Samsonova
Player
Greetje Minnen
55% ( 42 of 76)
1st Serve %
73% ( 48 of 66)
3
Aces
6
6
Double Faults
3
74% ( 31 of 42)
1st Serve Won
65% ( 31 of 48)
50% ( 17 of 34)
2nd Serve Won
50% ( 9 of 18)
80% ( 4 of 5)
Break Points Won
40% ( 2 of 5)
37% ( 28 of 76)
Rtn Points Won
39% ( 26 of 66)
74
Total Points Won
68
W
6-4 7-5 H2H
R2
cross
Liudmila Samsonova
Player
Celine Naef
60% ( 34 of 57)
1st Serve %
59% ( 41 of 69)
6
Aces
4
5
Double Faults
4
85% ( 29 of 34)
1st Serve Won
63% ( 26 of 41)
52% ( 12 of 23)
2nd Serve Won
39% ( 11 of 28)
44% ( 4 of 9)
Break Points Won
14% ( 1 of 7)
28% ( 16 of 57)
Rtn Points Won
46% ( 32 of 69)
73
Total Points Won
53
W
7-5 6-2 H2H

Celine Naef Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT RESULT Score H2H
Q1
cross
Katarina Zavatska
Player
Celine Naef
81% ( 42 of 52)
1st Serve %
47% ( 24 of 51)
0
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
3
67% ( 28 of 42)
1st Serve Won
58% ( 14 of 24)
90% ( 9 of 10)
2nd Serve Won
44% ( 12 of 27)
67% ( 4 of 6)
Break Points Won
50% ( 1 of 2)
29% ( 15 of 52)
Rtn Points Won
49% ( 25 of 51)
62
Total Points Won
41
L
6-2 6-4 H2H
R1
cross
Alison Van Uytvanck
Player
Celine Naef
66% ( 45 of 68)
1st Serve %
59% ( 41 of 70)
2
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
3
76% ( 34 of 45)
1st Serve Won
63% ( 26 of 41)
39% ( 9 of 23)
2nd Serve Won
28% ( 8 of 29)
56% ( 5 of 9)
Break Points Won
20% ( 1 of 5)
37% ( 25 of 68)
Rtn Points Won
51% ( 36 of 70)
79
Total Points Won
59
L
7-5 6-1 H2H
R2
cross
Liudmila Samsonova
Player
Celine Naef
60% ( 34 of 57)
1st Serve %
59% ( 41 of 69)
6
Aces
4
5
Double Faults
4
85% ( 29 of 34)
1st Serve Won
63% ( 26 of 41)
52% ( 12 of 23)
2nd Serve Won
39% ( 11 of 28)
44% ( 4 of 9)
Break Points Won
14% ( 1 of 7)
28% ( 16 of 57)
Rtn Points Won
46% ( 32 of 69)
73
Total Points Won
53
L
7-5 6-2 H2H
R1
cross
Celine Naef
Player
Elizabeth Mandlik
62% ( 69 of 111)
1st Serve %
58% ( 60 of 104)
6
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
5
67% ( 46 of 69)
1st Serve Won
67% ( 40 of 60)
45% ( 19 of 42)
2nd Serve Won
55% ( 24 of 44)
43% ( 3 of 7)
Break Points Won
24% ( 4 of 17)
41% ( 46 of 111)
Rtn Points Won
38% ( 40 of 104)
105
Total Points Won
110
W
7-6(4) 1-6 6-4 H2H
R1
cross
Jule Niemeier
Player
Celine Naef
48% ( 22 of 46)
1st Serve %
57% ( 28 of 49)
5
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
3
82% ( 18 of 22)
1st Serve Won
39% ( 11 of 28)
46% ( 11 of 24)
2nd Serve Won
38% ( 8 of 21)
67% ( 6 of 9)
Break Points Won
40% ( 2 of 5)
37% ( 17 of 46)
Rtn Points Won
61% ( 30 of 49)
59
Total Points Won
36
L
6-3 6-1 H2H
Q1
cross
Darja Semenistaja
Player
Celine Naef
51% ( 27 of 53)
1st Serve %
63% ( 39 of 62)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
1
59% ( 16 of 27)
1st Serve Won
46% ( 18 of 39)
58% ( 15 of 26)
2nd Serve Won
43% ( 10 of 23)
86% ( 6 of 7)
Break Points Won
75% ( 3 of 4)
42% ( 22 of 53)
Rtn Points Won
55% ( 34 of 62)
65
Total Points Won
50
L
6-2 7-5 H2H
R1
cross
Antonia Ruzic
Player
Celine Naef
63% ( 66 of 104)
1st Serve %
60% ( 58 of 96)
1
Aces
3
9
Double Faults
1
70% ( 46 of 66)
1st Serve Won
50% ( 29 of 58)
29% ( 11 of 38)
2nd Serve Won
47% ( 18 of 38)
62% ( 8 of 13)
Break Points Won
54% ( 7 of 13)
45% ( 47 of 104)
Rtn Points Won
51% ( 49 of 96)
106
Total Points Won
94
L
6-4 4-6 7-5 H2H
R1
cross
Jenny Lim
Player
Celine Naef
65% ( 37 of 57)
1st Serve %
59% ( 24 of 41)
-
Aces
-
3
Double Faults
2
68% ( 25 of 37)
1st Serve Won
50% ( 12 of 24)
45% ( 9 of 20)
2nd Serve Won
41% ( 7 of 17)
83% ( 5 of 6)
Break Points Won
50% ( 2 of 4)
40% ( 23 of 57)
Rtn Points Won
54% ( 22 of 41)
56
Total Points Won
42
L
6-3 6-3 H2H
SF
cross
Chloe Paquet
Player
Celine Naef
54% ( 31 of 57)
1st Serve %
71% ( 48 of 68)
1
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
2
71% ( 22 of 31)
1st Serve Won
54% ( 26 of 48)
42% ( 11 of 26)
2nd Serve Won
35% ( 7 of 20)
50% ( 6 of 12)
Break Points Won
60% ( 3 of 5)
42% ( 24 of 57)
Rtn Points Won
51% ( 35 of 68)
68
Total Points Won
57
L
6-3 6-4 H2H
QF
cross
Celine Naef
Player
Clara Burel
64% ( 36 of 56)
1st Serve %
53% ( 33 of 62)
1
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
6
64% ( 23 of 36)
1st Serve Won
76% ( 25 of 33)
80% ( 16 of 20)
2nd Serve Won
38% ( 11 of 29)
43% ( 3 of 7)
Break Points Won
0% ( 0 of 1)
30% ( 17 of 56)
Rtn Points Won
42% ( 26 of 62)
65
Total Points Won
53
W
6-3 6-3 H2H

Samsonova Vs Naef Prediction H2H Images To Share

More tennis photos of Samsonova are available here and Naef photos here.


Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions

Unlock All Predictions