Lisa-Marie Rioux vs Chihiro Muramatsu Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W L W L L W L W W L
Form
W W W L W W W L L WH2H: Rioux 1 - 0 Muramatsu
They have played 2 sets in total, with Rioux winning 2 and Muramatsu winning 0. The last match between Rioux and Muramatsu was at the W15 Kashiwa, 02-04-2025, Round: First, Surface: Hard, with Lisa-Marie Rioux getting the victory 6-3 6-4.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Lisa-Marie Rioux | 1 |
| Chihiro Muramatsu | 0 |
LAST H2H MATCH: W15 Kashiwa(02-04-2025)
Lisa-Marie Rioux
Chihiro Muramatsu
6
3
6
4
| Rioux | Stats | Muramatsu |
|---|---|---|
| 50% (8-8) | YTD Win/Loss | 69% (24-11) |
| 1 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
| 798 | Ranking | 491 |
| 561 | Highest Rank | 205 |
| 28 | Age | 27 |
| - | Plays | - |
| 0 | Titles | 1 |
| 55% (121-100) | Career Total W/L | 56% (281-219) |
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $95,167 |
| 1 | Hard H2H | 0 |
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Basilashvili VS Vacherot PREDICTION Clay
French Open - Paris atp
21 May 2025 / Q2 round
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Khachanov VS Ofner PREDICTION Clay
Gonet Geneva Open - Geneva atp
22 May 2025 / Quarterfinals
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-3 6-4 |
Stats 
Lisa-Marie Rioux
Player
Chihiro Muramatsu
69%
(
53 of
77)
1st Serve %
76%
(
51 of
67)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
0
66%
(
35 of
53)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
26 of
51)
46%
(
11 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
9 of
16)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
15%
(
2 of
13)
40%
(
31 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
32 of
67)
78
Total Points Won
66
|
||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 12 | Games Won | 7 |
| 1 | Aces (Total) | 0 |
| 2 | Total Double Faults | 0 |
| 2:27:53 | Average Match Time | 2:27:53 |
| 69% (53/77) | 1st Serve % | 76% (51/67) |
| 66% (35/53) | 1st Serve Win % | 51% (26/51) |
| 46% (11/24) | 2nd Serve Win % | 56% (9/16) |
| 50% (4/8) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 15% (2/13) |
| 48% (32/67) | Return Points Win % | 40% (31/77) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Rioux vs Muramatsu Match Preview :
Analyzing the competitive strengths of these two tennis players sheds light on their potential performances in the upcoming match. In the domain of second serve performance over the last six months, Muramatsu edges ahead with a win rate of 38.64% compared to Rioux's 35.88%. This metric, with its strong predictive value, is a critical component in forecasting the match outcome.
Evaluating return game stats within the same recent period, Muramatsu has gained 51.89% of points off opponents’ second serves, while Rioux shows a superior 59.26% in this category. On first serve returns, Muramatsu leads with a return success rate of 37.89%, whereas Rioux trails at 33.03%. These figures play a significant role in determining the likelihood of victory in head-to-head confrontations.
Under pressure, specifically in saving breakpoints, Muramatsu again demonstrates an advantage with a 48.89% success rate, compared to Rioux's 45.31%. This stat provides insights into their ability to withstand crucial moments in matches and strategically impacts in-game betting predictions.
Considering their performance on different surfaces, Muramatsu boasts a 58% career win rate on Hard courts, their best surface, while Rioux excels on Grass with a 57% success rate. By contrast, their weakest surfaces are I.hard at 38% for Muramatsu and Clay at 48% for Rioux. This surface specialization can be pivotal depending on the playing conditions of their forthcoming match.
Examining the level of competition, Muramatsu has often faced stronger opponents, with an average ranking of 335.12 compared to Rioux’s 454.46. Such differences in opponent quality can influence overall match preparedness and resilience. Performance in deciding sets also favors Muramatsu, who has clinched 65% of such sets over the past year, whereas Rioux has only achieved a 33% success rate.
Over the previous year, Muramatsu boasts a match win rate of 60% (39 wins and 26 losses), giving them an upper hand over Rioux’s 54.05% win rate (20 wins and 17 losses). This comprehensive performance analysis indicates Muramatsu's slightly higher consistency in results.
Analyzing the efficiency of break point conversion during recent performance, Muramatsu has a higher success rate at 41.28% compared to Rioux at 36.59%. These percentages are instrumental for live betting forecasts, especially when identifying who might capitalize on breakpoint opportunities.
In summation, evaluating these detailed metrics, Muramatsu seems to possess a slight edge over Rioux in the upcoming match, given their superior statistics in several key areas. These insights suggest a higher likelihood for Muramatsu to emerge victorious in their encounter. While historical data provides a strong indication, the dynamics of the match will ultimately depend on current conditions and performance under pressure.
Rioux vs Muramatsu Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88
Lisa-Marie Rioux Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Zarina Diyas
Player
Lisa-Marie Rioux
71%
(
39 of
55)
1st Serve %
61%
(
30 of
49)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
4
64%
(
25 of
39)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
14 of
30)
69%
(
11 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
8 of
19)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
35%
(
19 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
27 of
49)
63
Total Points Won
41
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Lisa-Marie Rioux
Player
Natsumi Kawaguchi
73%
(
74 of
101)
1st Serve %
59%
(
63 of
106)
1
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
6
62%
(
46 of
74)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
38 of
63)
52%
(
14 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
18 of
43)
35%
(
6 of
17)
Break Points Won
71%
(
5 of
7)
41%
(
41 of
101)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
50 of
106)
110
Total Points Won
97
|
4-6 7-6(2) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Lisa-Marie Rioux
Player
Minori Natsuka
70%
(
26 of
37)
1st Serve %
51%
(
24 of
47)
1
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
1
77%
(
20 of
26)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
13 of
24)
73%
(
8 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
7 of
23)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
24%
(
9 of
37)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
27 of
47)
55
Total Points Won
29
|
6-0 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Himeno Sakatsume
Player
Lisa-Marie Rioux
67%
(
28 of
42)
1st Serve %
61%
(
30 of
49)
0
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
4
46%
(
13 of
28)
1st Serve Won
40%
(
12 of
30)
79%
(
11 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
5 of
19)
70%
(
7 of
10)
Break Points Won
100%
(
3 of
3)
43%
(
18 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
65%
(
32 of
49)
56
Total Points Won
35
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Lisa-Marie Rioux
Player
Nana Kawagishi
74%
(
55 of
74)
1st Serve %
64%
(
27 of
42)
1
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
5
71%
(
39 of
55)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
16 of
27)
37%
(
7 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
5 of
15)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
11%
(
1 of
9)
38%
(
28 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
21 of
42)
67
Total Points Won
49
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-4 3-6 10-6 | H2H | |||
| R2 |
Stats
Natsumi Kawaguchi
Player
Lisa-Marie Rioux
78%
(
38 of
49)
1st Serve %
73%
(
48 of
66)
2
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
6
74%
(
28 of
38)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
29 of
48)
64%
(
7 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
5 of
18)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
29%
(
14 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
32 of
66)
67
Total Points Won
48
|
6-0 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Lisa-Marie Rioux
Player
Chihiro Muramatsu
69%
(
53 of
77)
1st Serve %
76%
(
51 of
67)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
0
66%
(
35 of
53)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
26 of
51)
46%
(
11 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
9 of
16)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
15%
(
2 of
13)
40%
(
31 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
32 of
67)
78
Total Points Won
66
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Chihiro Muramatsu Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q2 | 6-0 6-2 | H2H | |||
| QF |
Stats
Anastasia Zolotareva
Player
Chihiro Muramatsu
74%
(
54 of
73)
1st Serve %
71%
(
53 of
75)
0
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
2
72%
(
39 of
54)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
31 of
53)
37%
(
7 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
11 of
22)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
37%
(
27 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
33 of
75)
79
Total Points Won
69
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Hong Yi Cody Wong
Player
Chihiro Muramatsu
69%
(
52 of
75)
1st Serve %
75%
(
62 of
83)
1
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
2
62%
(
32 of
52)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
36 of
62)
65%
(
15 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
9 of
21)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
37%
(
28 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
38 of
83)
85
Total Points Won
73
|
3-6 6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Chihiro Muramatsu
Player
Sohyun Park
70%
(
66 of
94)
1st Serve %
49%
(
40 of
82)
0
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
4
56%
(
37 of
66)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
22 of
40)
57%
(
16 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
18 of
42)
53%
(
8 of
15)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
44%
(
41 of
94)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
42 of
82)
95
Total Points Won
81
|
6-7(3) 6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Chihiro Muramatsu
Player
Eunji Lee
77%
(
36 of
47)
1st Serve %
73%
(
22 of
30)
0
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
1
67%
(
24 of
36)
1st Serve Won
36%
(
8 of
22)
27%
(
3 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
13%
(
1 of
8)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
43%
(
20 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
70%
(
21 of
30)
48
Total Points Won
29
|
6-1 3-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| Q2 | 6-1 6-1 | H2H | |||
| R2 |
Stats
Dayeon Back
Player
Chihiro Muramatsu
62%
(
54 of
87)
1st Serve %
74%
(
67 of
91)
0
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
4
70%
(
38 of
54)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
39 of
67)
52%
(
17 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
13 of
24)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
37%
(
32 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
39 of
91)
94
Total Points Won
84
|
6-3 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Chihiro Muramatsu
Player
Ekaterina Reyngold
74%
(
63 of
85)
1st Serve %
58%
(
38 of
65)
0
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
3
62%
(
39 of
63)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
24 of
38)
36%
(
8 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
9 of
27)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
45%
(
38 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
32 of
65)
79
Total Points Won
71
|
7-6(4) 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 55% (121/100) | Win/Loss | 56% (281/219) |
| 56% (273/217) | Sets Win/Loss | 55% (627/508) |
| 53% (2363/2085) | Games Win/Loss | 52% (5326/4869) |
| 57% (83/63) | Hard Win/Loss | 59% (211/148) |
| 48% (14/15) | Clay Win/Loss | 47% (42/48) |
| 50% (16/16) | Indoor Hard W/L | 55% (21/17) |
| 57% (8/6) | Grass Win/Loss | 54% (7/6) |
| 0.03 | Aces Per Game | 0.03 |
| 68 | Aces Total | 128 |
| 0.17 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.16 |
| 376 | Total Double Faults | 790 |
| 1:12:9 | Average Match Time | 1:37:47 |
| 521 | Average Opponent Rank | 501.9 |
| 69% (6371/9267) | 1st Serve % | 72% (20265/28070) |
| 57% (3606/6371) | 1st Serve Win % | 56% (11446/20265) |
| 45% (1301/2896) | 2nd Serve Win % | 46% (3577/7804) |
| 48% (617/1286) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 48% (1824/3819) |
| 48% (4441/9218) | Return Points Win % | 47% (13439/28655) |
| 0% (0/0) | Slam W/L | 33% (2/4) |
| 0% (0/0) | Cups W/L | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | Main Tour W/L | 38% (6/10) |
| 55% (71/57) | Challenger W/L | 56% (235/184) |
| 54% (50/43) | Futures W/L | 66% (38/20) |
| 53% (115/215) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 56% (275/494) |
| 100% (3/3) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 100% (3/3) |
| 59% (20/34) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 53% (44/83) |
| 29% (14/49) | Deciding Set Win % | 50% (67/135) |
| 85% (129/110) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 88% (272/238) |
| 15% (129/19) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 13% (272/34) |
| 11% (91/10) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 19% (228/43) |
Rioux vs. Muramatsu Prediction Form Trend:
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
