C. Vlasselaer
To Win
R. A. Stoiber
To Win
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
L W W L W L L W W LForm
L L L L W L W L W WThey have played 3 sets in total, with Zaar winning 2 and Vlasselaer winning 1. The last match between Zaar and Vlasselaer was at the W50 Nantes, 31-03-2025, Round: Q3, Surface: I.hard, with Lisa Zaar getting the victory 6-3 5-7 6-1.
Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
---|---|
Lisa Zaar | 1 |
Clara Vlasselaer | 0 |
LAST H2H MATCH: W50 Nantes(31-03-2025)
Zaar | Stats | Vlasselaer |
---|---|---|
53% (16-14) | YTD Win/Loss | 50% (10-10) |
1 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
470 | Ranking | 474 |
470 | Highest Rank | 398 |
25 | Age | 24 |
- | Plays | - |
2 | Titles | 0 |
58% (96-70) | Career Total W/L | 51% (167-159) |
$0 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
1 | Indoor H2H | 0 |
23 May 2025 / Quarterfinals
French Open - Paris wta
25 May 2025 / First
French Open - Paris atp
25 May 2025 / First
Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
6-3 5-7 6-1 |
![]() ![]()
Lisa Zaar
Player
Clara Vlasselaer
63%
(
57 of
91)
1st Serve %
63%
(
65 of
104)
0
Aces
0
6
Double Faults
2
65%
(
37 of
57)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
37 of
65)
50%
(
17 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
14 of
39)
37%
(
7 of
19)
Break Points Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
41%
(
37 of
91)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
53 of
104)
107
Total Points Won
88
|
Stats | ||
---|---|---|
1 | H2H Matches | 0 |
2 | Sets Won | 1 |
17 | Games Won | 11 |
6 | Total Double Faults | 2 |
2:41:10 | Average Match Time | 2:41:10 |
63% (57/91) | 1st Serve % | 63% (65/104) |
65% (37/57) | 1st Serve Win % | 57% (37/65) |
50% (17/34) | 2nd Serve Win % | 36% (14/39) |
37% (7/19) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 36% (4/11) |
51% (53/104) | Return Points Win % | 41% (37/91) |
100% (1/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
100% (1/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/1) |
100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
When evaluating the second serve statistics from the past six months, Zaar stands slightly ahead by winning 39.93% of points, compared to Vlasselaer's 37.52%. This is an important indicator when predicting the match outcome. Similarly, their return game performance in recent form shows Zaar winning 55.93% of second serve points and 39.16% of first serve return points, whereas Vlasselaer has secured 54.49% and 29.5% respectively. Notably, such figures are crucial for identifying the favorite in direct matchups.
An analysis of their performance under pressure reveals Vlasselaer has a higher breakpoint save percentage, standing at 51.74% compared to Zaar's 43.53%. This stat is especially valuable for in-game betting predictions. In terms of overall performance over the past year, Vlasselaer's match win rate sits at 45%, with a win-loss record of 27-33. Zaar, on the other hand, has been more successful, winning 66.13% of matches and achieving a 41-21 record. This offers a broader perspective on their head-to-head prediction.
Examining their preferred surfaces, both players favor indoor hard courts. Vlasselaer has achieved a 54% win percentage on this surface, while Zaar's win percentage is higher at 67%. Conversely, their least successful surface is clay, with Vlasselaer holding a 42% win rate and Zaar at 57%. These figures are informative but should be weighed alongside the level of events they've participated in.
The competition level in the past year indicates that Vlasselaer has been active mostly at Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, securing 45% of their matches. Zaar shows a stronger record in the same tier, winning 59.46% of their matches. Quality of opponents also plays a role; Vlasselaer has faced competitors with an average ranking of 490.07 compared to Zaar's 426.27, highlighting a potentially tougher competition landscape for Zaar.
In scenarios where matches extend to a deciding set, Vlasselaer has demonstrated a strong performance with a 64% win rate, slightly higher than Zaar's 59%. When considering breakpoint conversion rates, Zaar edges ahead slightly with a conversion rate of 43.06% over Vlasselaer's 41.88%, indicating a slight advantage when opportunities arise to break serve.
In summary, based on the comprehensive stats presented, Zaar appears to have a slight edge in the upcoming match due to a consistent performance in second serve points, return stats, overall match wins, and breakpoint conversion. These factors collectively suggest Zaar has a higher probability of emerging victorious in this encounter.
Zaar vs Vlasselaer Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88
OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Lina Gjorcheska
Player
Lisa Zaar
71%
(
39 of
55)
1st Serve %
83%
(
48 of
58)
2
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
4
64%
(
25 of
39)
1st Serve Won
38%
(
18 of
48)
44%
(
7 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
54%
(
7 of
13)
Break Points Won
20%
(
2 of
10)
42%
(
23 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
36 of
58)
68
Total Points Won
45
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
QF |
![]() ![]()
Lisa Zaar
Player
Freya Christie
78%
(
35 of
45)
1st Serve %
53%
(
23 of
43)
0
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
4
69%
(
24 of
35)
1st Serve Won
35%
(
8 of
23)
50%
(
5 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
7 of
20)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
36%
(
16 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
65%
(
28 of
43)
57
Total Points Won
31
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
![]() ![]()
Lisa Zaar
Player
Federica Sacco
78%
(
58 of
74)
1st Serve %
61%
(
45 of
74)
0
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
2
60%
(
35 of
58)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
20 of
45)
31%
(
5 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
15 of
29)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
38%
(
5 of
13)
46%
(
34 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
39 of
74)
79
Total Points Won
69
|
6-3 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Irene Burillo Escorihuela
Player
Lisa Zaar
68%
(
54 of
80)
1st Serve %
75%
(
55 of
73)
0
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
4
59%
(
32 of
54)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
33 of
55)
46%
(
12 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
6 of
18)
86%
(
6 of
7)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
45%
(
36 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
34 of
73)
78
Total Points Won
75
|
4-6 6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
R2 |
![]() ![]()
Ekaterine Gorgodze
Player
Lisa Zaar
94%
(
51 of
54)
1st Serve %
71%
(
37 of
52)
0
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
5
59%
(
30 of
51)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
16 of
37)
33%
(
1 of
3)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
4 of
15)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
43%
(
23 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
32 of
52)
63
Total Points Won
43
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Lisa Zaar
Player
Ekaterina Kldiashvili
80%
(
33 of
41)
1st Serve %
57%
(
31 of
54)
0
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
4
64%
(
21 of
33)
1st Serve Won
39%
(
12 of
31)
63%
(
5 of
8)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
9 of
23)
43%
(
6 of
14)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
37%
(
15 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
33 of
54)
59
Total Points Won
36
|
6-0 6-4 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Martyna Kubka
Player
Lisa Zaar
55%
(
56 of
102)
1st Serve %
60%
(
69 of
115)
5
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
4
55%
(
31 of
56)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
38 of
69)
46%
(
21 of
46)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
21 of
46)
33%
(
7 of
21)
Break Points Won
50%
(
6 of
12)
49%
(
50 of
102)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
56 of
115)
108
Total Points Won
109
|
7-6(4) 3-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
QF |
![]() ![]()
Lisa Zaar
Player
Daria Khomutsianskaya
76%
(
63 of
83)
1st Serve %
59%
(
55 of
93)
0
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
8
57%
(
36 of
63)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
28 of
55)
45%
(
9 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
12 of
38)
50%
(
8 of
16)
Break Points Won
80%
(
4 of
5)
46%
(
38 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
53 of
93)
98
Total Points Won
78
|
6-1 6-7(4) 6-1 | H2H |
view more
OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R2 |
![]() ![]()
Clara Vlasselaer
Player
Esther Adeshina
64%
(
27 of
42)
1st Serve %
46%
(
27 of
59)
3
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
9
78%
(
21 of
27)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
14 of
27)
53%
(
8 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
10 of
32)
35%
(
6 of
17)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
31%
(
13 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
35 of
59)
64
Total Points Won
37
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Clara Vlasselaer
Player
Eliz Maloney
56%
(
31 of
55)
1st Serve %
71%
(
29 of
41)
1
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
1
77%
(
24 of
31)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
19 of
29)
58%
(
14 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
7 of
12)
100%
(
2 of
2)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
31%
(
17 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
15 of
41)
53
Total Points Won
43
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Alba Rey Garcia
Player
Clara Vlasselaer
76%
(
38 of
50)
1st Serve %
55%
(
28 of
51)
1
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
66%
(
25 of
38)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
16 of
28)
75%
(
9 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
10 of
23)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
32%
(
16 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
25 of
51)
59
Total Points Won
42
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
QF |
![]() ![]()
Clara Vlasselaer
Player
Kateryna Lazarenko
61%
(
35 of
57)
1st Serve %
67%
(
32 of
48)
3
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
4
74%
(
26 of
35)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
14 of
32)
50%
(
11 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
8 of
16)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
35%
(
20 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
26 of
48)
63
Total Points Won
42
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
R2 |
![]() ![]()
Josy Daems
Player
Clara Vlasselaer
68%
(
42 of
62)
1st Serve %
49%
(
31 of
63)
2
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
4
60%
(
25 of
42)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
19 of
31)
70%
(
14 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
16 of
32)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
37%
(
23 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
28 of
63)
67
Total Points Won
58
|
6-2 7-5 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Clara Vlasselaer
Player
Lina Soussi
55%
(
37 of
67)
1st Serve %
60%
(
44 of
73)
3
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
7
73%
(
27 of
37)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
24 of
44)
33%
(
10 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
8 of
29)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
45%
(
30 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
41 of
73)
78
Total Points Won
62
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
QF |
![]() ![]()
Lisa Zaar
Player
Clara Vlasselaer
63%
(
57 of
91)
1st Serve %
63%
(
65 of
104)
0
Aces
0
6
Double Faults
2
65%
(
37 of
57)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
37 of
65)
50%
(
17 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
14 of
39)
37%
(
7 of
19)
Break Points Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
41%
(
37 of
91)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
53 of
104)
107
Total Points Won
88
|
6-3 5-7 6-1 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Daria Frayman
Player
Clara Vlasselaer
65%
(
34 of
52)
1st Serve %
64%
(
29 of
45)
3
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
2
79%
(
27 of
34)
1st Serve Won
38%
(
11 of
29)
44%
(
8 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
7 of
16)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
33%
(
17 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
27 of
45)
62
Total Points Won
35
|
6-0 6-4 | H2H |
view more
Stats | ||
---|---|---|
58% (96/70) | Win/Loss | 51% (167/159) |
56% (217/168) | Sets Win/Loss | 52% (385/356) |
53% (1875/1667) | Games Win/Loss | 51% (3509/3354) |
59% (33/23) | Hard Win/Loss | 53% (113/100) |
57% (46/35) | Clay Win/Loss | 42% (23/32) |
59% (17/12) | Indoor Hard W/L | 53% (31/27) |
0.02 | Aces Per Game | 0.23 |
28 | Aces Total | 782 |
0.37 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.42 |
644 | Total Double Faults | 1409 |
1:40:54 | Average Match Time | 1:30:33 |
418.87 | Average Opponent Rank | 455.24 |
72% (6972/9726) | 1st Serve % | 55% (9970/18071) |
57% (3942/6972) | 1st Serve Win % | 66% (6540/9970) |
41% (1142/2754) | 2nd Serve Win % | 43% (3483/8102) |
51% (714/1392) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 47% (980/2104) |
50% (4871/9684) | Return Points Win % | 44% (7839/17637) |
0% (0/3) | Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) |
54% (54/46) | Challenger W/L | 47% (76/85) |
67% (42/21) | Futures W/L | 55% (91/74) |
59% (96/164) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 51% (165/321) |
0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/2) |
53% (21/40) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 55% (36/66) |
56% (31/55) | Deciding Set Win % | 45% (41/91) |
88% (96/84) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 82% (181/149) |
13% (96/12) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 17% (181/31) |
19% (70/13) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 12% (145/18) |