Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Prediction of Lisa Zaar vs Camilla Gennaro Head-to-Head, Best Odds & Picks At Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Zaar vs Gennaro analysis and find out who is favored!
Lisa Zaar vs Camilla Gennaro Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Zaar 1 - 0 Gennaro
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Zaar has won 44.54% of points on their second serve, while Gennaro has won 43.02%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Zaar, in recent form, has won 61.53% of their opponent's second serve points, while Gennaro has won 55.92%. The same stats for first serve returns are 48.56% and 43.43% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Zaar has saved 48.78% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Gennaro has saved 51.86% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Zaar has won 65.96% of matches played (W/L 31/ 16), with Gennaro winning 54.72% (W/L 29/ 24) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Zaar has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 60% (W/L 27/ 18), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 55% (W/L 6/ 5). Gennaro has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 56% (W/L 57/ 44), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 43% (W/L 3/ 4).
- Player level: In the last year, Zaar has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 70.97% of matches (W/L 22/ 9), where as Gennaro has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 53.13% of matches (W/L 17/ 15). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Zaar winning 1 times and Gennaro being victorious 0 times. They have played 3 sets in total, with Zaar winning 2 and Gennaro winning 1. The last match between Zaar and Gennaro was at the W35 Santa Margherita di Pula, 20-09-2024, Quarterfinals, Clay with Lisa Zaar getting the victory 6-2 3-6 6-3.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 3:10:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Zaar and Gennaro have played a deciding set 1 times, with Zaar winning 1 times and Gennaro 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Zaar winning 0, and Gennaro 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Zaar has played against opponents with an average rank of 350.79 while Gennaro has played against players with an average rank of 437.09.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Zaar has won 47% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Gennaro has won 67% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Zaar has converted 53.39% of breakpoint opportunities, and Gennaro has converted 48.91% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
647
Rank
498
High
24
Age
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
1
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
707
Rank
707
High
21
Age
Plays
W
W
W
L
W
L
W
W
W
L
Form
W
W
L
W
W
L
W
W
W
L
58% (71-52)
Career Total W/L
54% (71-61)
64% (23-13)
YTD W/L
58% (28-20)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
The Best Odds For Lisa Zaar vs Camilla Gennaro For Any Market:
We highly recommend you open accounts with at least 3 Bookmakers as depending on the match, odds can vary a lot between them, and always getting the best odds available will improve your profitability a lot in the long run. We recommend these Sportsbooks for you so sign up now! Check the current best odds by clicking the Sportsbook links below:
Sportsbooks & Bookies Promo Codes For Zaar VS Gennaro
| stats | Lisa Zaar | Camilla Gennaro |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 1 |
| Games Won | 15 | 11 |
| Aces (Total) | 0 | 0 |
| DFs Total | 4 | 6 |
| Avg Match Time | 3:10:0 | 3:10:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 76% (71/93) | 58% (49/85) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 46% (33/71) | 47% (23/49) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 59% (13/22) | 36% (13/36) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 53% (9/17) | 54% (7/13) |
| Return Points W% | 58% (49/85) | 51% (47/93) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-2 3-6 6-3 |
Stats 
Lisa Zaar
Player
Camilla Gennaro
76%
(
71 of
93)
1st Serve %
58%
(
49 of
85)
-
Aces
-
4
Double Faults
6
46%
(
33 of
71)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
23 of
49)
59%
(
13 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
13 of
36)
53%
(
9 of
17)
Break Points Won
54%
(
7 of
13)
51%
(
47 of
93)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
49 of
85)
95
Total Points Won
83
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Lisa Zaar | Camilla Gennaro |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 64% (23/13) | 58% (28/20) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 64% (54/31) | 54% (59/51) |
| Games Win/Loss | 57% (445/336) | 53% (511/454) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 63% (5/3) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 64% (18/10) | 60% (28/19) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/1) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.01 | 0.04 |
| Aces Total | 5 | 20 |
| DFs per game | 0.33 | 0.28 |
| DFs Total | 124 | 132 |
| Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1:32:10 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 355.69 | 428.81 |
| 1st Serve % | 73% (1666/2270) | 55% (1397/2531) |
| 1st Serve W% | 55% (924/1666) | 59% (827/1397) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 45% (269/604) | 44% (503/1134) |
| BPs Won% Total | 53% (197/369) | 49% (185/374) |
| Return Pts W% | 53% (1248/2357) | 48% (1299/2704) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 56% (9/7) | 55% (16/13) |
| Futures W/L | 70% (14/6) | 63% (12/7) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 66% (23/35) | 57% (26/46) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 100% (1/1) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 25% (2/8) | 63% (5/8) |
| Deciding Set W% | 50% (7/14) | 71% (10/14) |
| 1st set W, W | 81% (26/21) | 91% (23/21) |
| 1st set W, L | 19% (26/5) | 9% (23/2) |
| 1st set L, W | 30% (10/3) | 28% (25/7) |
Lisa Zaar Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Tereza Valentova
Player
Lisa Zaar
58%
(
28 of
48)
1st Serve %
75%
(
27 of
36)
2
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
1
71%
(
20 of
28)
1st Serve Won
37%
(
10 of
27)
60%
(
12 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
33%
(
16 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
22 of
36)
54
Total Points Won
30
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Lisa Zaar
Player
Michaela Laki
77%
(
48 of
62)
1st Serve %
50%
(
33 of
66)
1
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
4
63%
(
30 of
48)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
18 of
33)
36%
(
5 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
13 of
33)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
44%
(
27 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
35 of
66)
70
Total Points Won
58
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Lisa Zaar
Player
Yasmine Kabbaj
82%
(
47 of
57)
1st Serve %
78%
(
49 of
63)
-
Aces
-
1
Double Faults
5
60%
(
28 of
47)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
24 of
49)
20%
(
2 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
4 of
14)
100%
(
5 of
5)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
47%
(
27 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
35 of
63)
65
Total Points Won
55
|
6-0 3-6 10-8 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-0 6-2 | H2H | |||
| QF |
Stats
Iva Ivanova
Player
Lisa Zaar
66%
(
19 of
29)
1st Serve %
63%
(
20 of
32)
-
Aces
-
3
Double Faults
1
42%
(
8 of
19)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
10 of
20)
40%
(
4 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
7 of
12)
33%
(
1 of
3)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
59%
(
17 of
29)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
15 of
32)
27
Total Points Won
34
|
2-5 ret. | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-4 6-4 | H2H | |||
| SF |
Stats
Nuria Brancaccio
Player
Lisa Zaar
71%
(
37 of
52)
1st Serve %
80%
(
33 of
41)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
3
59%
(
22 of
37)
1st Serve Won
30%
(
10 of
33)
47%
(
7 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
78%
(
7 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
44%
(
23 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
71%
(
29 of
41)
58
Total Points Won
35
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Lisa Zaar
Player
Camilla Gennaro
76%
(
71 of
93)
1st Serve %
58%
(
49 of
85)
-
Aces
-
4
Double Faults
6
46%
(
33 of
71)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
23 of
49)
59%
(
13 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
13 of
36)
53%
(
9 of
17)
Break Points Won
54%
(
7 of
13)
51%
(
47 of
93)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
49 of
85)
95
Total Points Won
83
|
6-2 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Lisa Zaar
Player
Katharina Hobgarski
70%
(
57 of
81)
1st Serve %
70%
(
69 of
99)
-
Aces
-
7
Double Faults
4
51%
(
29 of
57)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
33 of
69)
58%
(
14 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
10 of
30)
60%
(
9 of
15)
Break Points Won
43%
(
6 of
14)
47%
(
38 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
56 of
99)
99
Total Points Won
81
|
4-6 6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Lisa Zaar
Player
Pia Lovric
72%
(
80 of
111)
1st Serve %
73%
(
61 of
83)
1
Aces
2
10
Double Faults
2
56%
(
45 of
80)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
32 of
61)
32%
(
10 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
6 of
22)
50%
(
7 of
14)
Break Points Won
50%
(
7 of
14)
50%
(
56 of
111)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
45 of
83)
100
Total Points Won
94
|
6-1 1-6 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
view more
Camilla Gennaro Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Matilde Paoletti
Player
Camilla Gennaro
67%
(
47 of
70)
1st Serve %
56%
(
36 of
64)
1
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
4
62%
(
29 of
47)
1st Serve Won
42%
(
15 of
36)
48%
(
11 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
11 of
28)
54%
(
7 of
13)
Break Points Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
43%
(
30 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
38 of
64)
78
Total Points Won
56
|
6-0 2-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Camilla Gennaro
Player
Fiona Ganz
57%
(
46 of
81)
1st Serve %
72%
(
52 of
72)
1
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
4
52%
(
24 of
46)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
24 of
52)
51%
(
18 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
6 of
20)
54%
(
7 of
13)
Break Points Won
33%
(
5 of
15)
48%
(
39 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
42 of
72)
84
Total Points Won
69
|
6-2 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Camilla Gennaro
Player
Marcella Dessolis
52%
(
16 of
31)
1st Serve %
80%
(
28 of
35)
0
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
2
100%
(
16 of
16)
1st Serve Won
21%
(
6 of
28)
53%
(
8 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
86%
(
6 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
23%
(
7 of
31)
Rtn Points Won
74%
(
26 of
35)
50
Total Points Won
16
|
6-0 6-0 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-0 6-0 | H2H | |||
| QF |
Stats
Silvia Ambrosio
Player
Camilla Gennaro
78%
(
38 of
49)
1st Serve %
52%
(
22 of
42)
2
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
4
58%
(
22 of
38)
1st Serve Won
36%
(
8 of
22)
82%
(
9 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
5 of
20)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
37%
(
18 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
69%
(
29 of
42)
60
Total Points Won
31
|
6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Camilla Gennaro
Player
Katharina Hobgarski
65%
(
64 of
99)
1st Serve %
69%
(
85 of
123)
0
Aces
3
6
Double Faults
5
55%
(
35 of
64)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
43 of
85)
43%
(
15 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
17 of
38)
33%
(
9 of
27)
Break Points Won
39%
(
7 of
18)
49%
(
49 of
99)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
63 of
123)
113
Total Points Won
109
|
4-6 7-6(5) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Camilla Gennaro
Player
Dia Evtimova
59%
(
52 of
88)
1st Serve %
56%
(
42 of
75)
-
Aces
-
7
Double Faults
5
69%
(
36 of
52)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
21 of
42)
39%
(
14 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
13 of
33)
64%
(
7 of
11)
Break Points Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
43%
(
38 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
41 of
75)
91
Total Points Won
72
|
3-6 6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Lisa Zaar
Player
Camilla Gennaro
76%
(
71 of
93)
1st Serve %
58%
(
49 of
85)
-
Aces
-
4
Double Faults
6
46%
(
33 of
71)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
23 of
49)
59%
(
13 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
13 of
36)
53%
(
9 of
17)
Break Points Won
54%
(
7 of
13)
51%
(
47 of
93)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
49 of
85)
95
Total Points Won
83
|
6-2 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Camilla Gennaro
Player
Nastasja Mariana Schunk
59%
(
46 of
78)
1st Serve %
65%
(
60 of
92)
0
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
3
65%
(
30 of
46)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
38 of
60)
56%
(
18 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
11 of
32)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
20%
(
2 of
10)
38%
(
30 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
43 of
92)
91
Total Points Won
79
|
3-6 6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Camilla Gennaro
Player
Gabriela Ce
55%
(
51 of
93)
1st Serve %
55%
(
48 of
88)
2
Aces
2
6
Double Faults
8
65%
(
33 of
51)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
28 of
48)
38%
(
16 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
19 of
40)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
31%
(
5 of
16)
47%
(
44 of
93)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
41 of
88)
90
Total Points Won
91
|
1-6 6-2 7-5 | H2H | ||
view more
Free Tennis Predictions For Today's Matches
A few tennis predictions for upcoming lower level events head to head tennis matches are below. If you want to get access to the best matches that will win you the most, subscribe to our tennis predictions plan for a low monthly fee and get full access to all our expert picks with full odds analysis and value bets.
Zaar Vs Gennaro Prediction H2H Images To Share
More tennis photos of Zaar are available here and Gennaro photos here.
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
