Lisa Zaar vs Anet Angelika Koskel Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Zaar vs Koskel analysis and find out who is favored!
Lisa Zaar vs Anet Angelika Koskel Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Zaar has won 42.02% of points on his second serve, while Koskel has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Zaar, in recent form, has won 56.3% of his opponent's second serve points, while Koskel has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 52.5% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Zaar has saved 52.48% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Koskel has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Zaar has won 50% of matches played (W/L 13/ 13), with Koskel winning 36.36% (W/L 4/ 7) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Zaar has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 58% (W/L 22/ 16), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 51% (W/L 20/ 19). Koskel has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 49% (W/L 25/ 26), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 29% (W/L 2/ 5).
- Player level: In the last year, Zaar has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 33.33% of matches (W/L 5/ 10), where as Koskel has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 42.86% of matches (W/L 3/ 4). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Zaar winning 1 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Zaar winning 2 and Koskel winning 0. The last match between Zaar and Koskel was at the W15 Savitaipale, 27-07-2021, Q3, Clay with Lisa Zaar getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:0:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Zaar and Koskel have played a deciding set 0 times, with Zaar winning 0 times and Koskel 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Zaar winning 0, and Koskel 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Zaar has played against opponents with an average rank of 207.5 while Koskel has played against players with an average rank of 262.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Zaar has won 44% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Koskel has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Zaar has converted 58.82% of breakpoint opportunities, and Koskel has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Zaar 1 - 0 Koskel
1
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
1
Minor
777
Rank
498
High
23
Age
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
1
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
N/A
Rank
High
20
Age
Plays
0
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
0
Minor
Form
55% (48-40)
Career Total W/L
45% (30-37)
0% (0-1)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
stats | Lisa Zaar | Anet Angelika Koskel |
---|---|---|
All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
Games Won | 12 | 2 |
Aces (Total) | 0 | 0 |
DFs (Total) | 0 | 0 |
Avg Match Time | 0:0:0 | 0:0:0 |
1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st Serve Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
2nd Serve Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
BPs Won% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Return Points W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
6-0 6-2 |
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
stats | Lisa Zaar | Anet Angelika Koskel |
---|---|---|
YTD W/L | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
Sets Win/Loss | 33% (1/2) | 0% (0/0) |
Games Win/Loss | 45% (13/16) | 0% (0/0) |
Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Aces pg | 0 | 0 |
Aces Total | 0 | 0 |
DFs per game | 0.5 | 0 |
DFs Total | 7 | 0 |
Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1st Match |
Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 0 |
1st Serve % | 71% (65/91) | 0% (0/0) |
1st Serve W% | 48% (31/65) | 0% (0/0) |
2nd Serve W% | 46% (12/26) | 0% (0/0) |
BPs Won% Total | 54% (7/13) | 0% (0/0) |
Return Pts W% | 46% (37/80) | 0% (0/0) |
Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Challenger W/L | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, W | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, L | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Lisa Zaar Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 |
Liv Hovde
Player
Lisa Zaar
56%
(
45 of
80)
1st Serve %
71%
(
65 of
91)
-
Aces
-
4
Double Faults
7
56%
(
25 of
45)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
31 of
65)
51%
(
18 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
12 of
26)
62%
(
8 of
13)
Break Points Won
54%
(
7 of
13)
46%
(
37 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
48 of
91)
91
Total Points Won
80
|
3-6 7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Asylzhan Arystanbekova
Player
Lisa Zaar
54%
(
21 of
39)
1st Serve %
62%
(
31 of
50)
2
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
6
71%
(
15 of
21)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
19 of
31)
39%
(
7 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
5 of
19)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
44%
(
17 of
39)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
26 of
50)
48
Total Points Won
41
|
6-2 2-3 ret. | H2H | ||
R2 |
Valerija Maija Kargina
Player
Lisa Zaar
60%
(
63 of
105)
1st Serve %
69%
(
68 of
98)
2
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
8
57%
(
36 of
63)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
39 of
68)
40%
(
17 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
12 of
30)
64%
(
7 of
11)
Break Points Won
41%
(
7 of
17)
50%
(
52 of
105)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
47 of
98)
100
Total Points Won
103
|
2-6 7-5 7-5 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Lisa Zaar
Player
Anastasia Mozgaleva
71%
(
37 of
52)
1st Serve %
72%
(
26 of
36)
-
Aces
-
4
Double Faults
1
62%
(
23 of
37)
1st Serve Won
38%
(
10 of
26)
53%
(
8 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
10%
(
1 of
10)
86%
(
6 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
40%
(
21 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
69%
(
25 of
36)
56
Total Points Won
32
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
F |
Lisa Zaar
Player
Natalija Senic
75%
(
42 of
56)
1st Serve %
61%
(
33 of
54)
-
Aces
-
3
Double Faults
2
67%
(
28 of
42)
1st Serve Won
42%
(
14 of
33)
50%
(
7 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
9 of
21)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
38%
(
21 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
31 of
54)
66
Total Points Won
44
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
SF |
Lisa Zaar
Player
Valeriya Yushchenko
74%
(
64 of
86)
1st Serve %
62%
(
53 of
85)
1
Aces
0
8
Double Faults
1
61%
(
39 of
64)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
23 of
53)
27%
(
6 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
16 of
32)
41%
(
7 of
17)
Break Points Won
86%
(
6 of
7)
48%
(
41 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
46 of
85)
91
Total Points Won
80
|
7-6(1) 7-5 | H2H | ||
QF |
Lisa Zaar
Player
Tatyana Nikolenko
75%
(
84 of
112)
1st Serve %
76%
(
78 of
102)
-
Aces
-
9
Double Faults
3
55%
(
46 of
84)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
36 of
78)
43%
(
12 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
11 of
24)
56%
(
10 of
18)
Break Points Won
50%
(
7 of
14)
48%
(
54 of
112)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
55 of
102)
113
Total Points Won
101
|
6-3 6-7(6) 6-4 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Lisa Zaar
Player
Timea Jaruskova
71%
(
62 of
87)
1st Serve %
72%
(
52 of
72)
1
Aces
0
9
Double Faults
3
61%
(
38 of
62)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
26 of
52)
52%
(
13 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
10 of
20)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
17%
(
2 of
12)
41%
(
36 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
36 of
72)
87
Total Points Won
72
|
7-6(5) 6-2 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Lisa Zaar
Player
Iulia Andreea Ionescu
73%
(
36 of
49)
1st Serve %
81%
(
42 of
52)
-
Aces
-
4
Double Faults
1
67%
(
24 of
36)
1st Serve Won
40%
(
17 of
42)
46%
(
6 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
20%
(
2 of
10)
86%
(
6 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
39%
(
19 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
33 of
52)
63
Total Points Won
38
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
QF |
Daria Lopatetskaya
Player
Lisa Zaar
66%
(
35 of
53)
1st Serve %
77%
(
54 of
70)
1
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
4
51%
(
18 of
35)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
26 of
54)
72%
(
13 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
6 of
16)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
100%
(
3 of
3)
42%
(
22 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
38 of
70)
69
Total Points Won
54
|
7-5 6-2 | H2H |
view more
Anet Angelika Koskel Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Q1 | 6-3 7-5 | H2H | |||
R1 |
Anet Angelika Koskel
Player
Naoko Eto
72%
(
26 of
36)
1st Serve %
59%
(
24 of
41)
-
Aces
-
1
Double Faults
4
77%
(
20 of
26)
1st Serve Won
42%
(
10 of
24)
60%
(
6 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
24%
(
4 of
17)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
28%
(
10 of
36)
Rtn Points Won
66%
(
27 of
41)
53
Total Points Won
24
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Ania Hertel
Player
Anet Angelika Koskel
54%
(
40 of
74)
1st Serve %
72%
(
57 of
79)
4
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
4
58%
(
23 of
40)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
30 of
57)
41%
(
14 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
23%
(
5 of
22)
44%
(
7 of
16)
Break Points Won
29%
(
5 of
17)
50%
(
37 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
44 of
79)
81
Total Points Won
72
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Martha Matoula
Player
Anet Angelika Koskel
54%
(
33 of
61)
1st Serve %
70%
(
31 of
44)
2
Aces
0
8
Double Faults
2
79%
(
26 of
33)
1st Serve Won
35%
(
11 of
31)
36%
(
10 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
4 of
13)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
41%
(
25 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
66%
(
29 of
44)
65
Total Points Won
40
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Anet Angelika Koskel
Player
Bianca Behulova
76%
(
44 of
58)
1st Serve %
83%
(
48 of
58)
-
Aces
-
1
Double Faults
2
61%
(
27 of
44)
1st Serve Won
42%
(
20 of
48)
50%
(
7 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
86%
(
6 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
41%
(
24 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
34 of
58)
68
Total Points Won
48
|
7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Katy Dunne
Player
Anet Angelika Koskel
69%
(
43 of
62)
1st Serve %
78%
(
47 of
60)
2
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
2
67%
(
29 of
43)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
22 of
47)
47%
(
9 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
23%
(
3 of
13)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
39%
(
24 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
35 of
60)
73
Total Points Won
49
|
7-5 6-0 | H2H | ||
QF |
Ana Martinez Vaquero
Player
Anet Angelika Koskel
81%
(
66 of
81)
1st Serve %
69%
(
42 of
61)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
50%
(
33 of
66)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
26 of
42)
47%
(
7 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
8 of
19)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
51%
(
41 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
27 of
61)
67
Total Points Won
75
|
6-4 2-6 10-8 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Matilde Jorge
Player
Anet Angelika Koskel
63%
(
59 of
93)
1st Serve %
78%
(
73 of
94)
4
Aces
0
8
Double Faults
4
66%
(
39 of
59)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
38 of
73)
50%
(
17 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
7 of
21)
44%
(
7 of
16)
Break Points Won
80%
(
4 of
5)
40%
(
37 of
93)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
49 of
94)
105
Total Points Won
82
|
4-6 7-5 6-0 | H2H | ||
QF |
Anet Angelika Koskel
Player
Martina Maria Bovio
66%
(
27 of
41)
1st Serve %
50%
(
19 of
38)
0
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
4
81%
(
22 of
27)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
9 of
19)
50%
(
7 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
5 of
19)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
29%
(
12 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
24 of
38)
53
Total Points Won
26
|
6-0 6-1 | H2H | ||
Q2 | 6-1 6-0 | H2H |
view more