Prediction of Linda Fruhvirtova [159th] vs Xinyu Gao [147th] Head-to-Head At The
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W L W W W L W L W L
Form
W L W L L L W L W LHead-To-Head: Fruhvirtova 1 - 0 Gao
They have played 2 sets in total, with Fruhvirtova winning 2 and Gao winning 0. The last match between Fruhvirtova and Gao was at the W75 Trnava, 04-03-2025, First, I.hard with Linda Fruhvirtova getting the victory 7-6(5) 7-6(3).
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Linda Fruhvirtova | 1 |
| Xinyu Gao | 0 |
| Fruhvirtova | Stats | Gao |
|---|---|---|
| 62% (16-10) | YTD Win/Loss | 60% (12-8) |
| 1 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
| 159 | Ranking | 147 |
| 49 | Highest Rank | 125 |
| 19 | Age | 27 |
| - | Plays | - |
| 4 | Titles | 15 |
| 53% (120-105) | Career Total W/L | 62% (256-157) |
| $1,005,861 | Career Prize Money | $141,845 |
| 1 | Indoor H2H | 0 |
Recent Performance Stats (Last 6 Months)
Fruhvirtova VS Gao H2H Matches played
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7-6(5) 7-6(3) |
Stats 
Linda Fruhvirtova
Player
Xinyu Gao
67%
(
64 of
96)
1st Serve %
76%
(
59 of
78)
7
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
3
61%
(
39 of
64)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
34 of
59)
44%
(
14 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
7 of
19)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
43%
(
6 of
14)
45%
(
43 of
96)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
37 of
78)
90
Total Points Won
84
|
||||
Fruhvirtova VS Gao H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 14 | Games Won | 12 |
| 7 | Aces (Total) | 3 |
| 3 | Total Double Faults | 3 |
| 2:14:58 | Average Match Time | 2:14:58 |
| 67% (64/96) | 1st Serve % | 76% (59/78) |
| 61% (39/64) | 1st Serve Win % | 58% (34/59) |
| 44% (14/32) | 2nd Serve Win % | 37% (7/19) |
| 75% (6/8) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 43% (6/14) |
| 47% (37/78) | Return Points Win % | 45% (43/96) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (2/2) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/2) |
| 0% (0/0) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Linda Fruhvirtova vs Xinyu Gao Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Fruhvirtova 1 - 0 Gao
Editorial Prediction:
Analyzing the second serve efficacy over the past six months reveals that Gao has an edge, having secured 41.18% of second serve points compared to Fruhvirtova's 36.74%. This metric is notably significant for determining the match outcome.
When assessing return games, Fruhvirtova has won 56.61% of her opponent's second serve points, while Gao follows with 47.64%. Their performance on first serve returns remains closely matched, with Gao slightly ahead at 35.34% compared to Fruhvirtova's 34.63%. These statistics are integral in evaluating their head-to-head encounter outcomes.
Under pressure, Fruhvirtova demonstrates stronger resilience, saving 52.16% of breakpoints faced, surpassing Gao's rate of 44.93%. This is a crucial factor for in-game betting strategies. Furthermore, over the past year, Gao has exhibited a superior match record, with a win rate of 67.69% (44 wins and 21 losses), while Fruhvirtova has managed a 41.67% win rate (20 wins and 28 losses). This provides a comprehensive overview of their competitive form.
Regarding surface preferences, Fruhvirtova thrives on indoor hard courts with a 57% win rate, while her clay performance dips to 43%. Conversely, Gao excels on clay, sustaining a 69% win rate, yet struggles on grass, without any wins. The preferred playing surface could be a decisive component in the match prediction.
Examining the level of play over the last year, Fruhvirtova has engaged mainly in Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, achieving a 50% win rate. In contrast, Gao has displayed greater success at the same tournament level, with a win rate of 76.09%. This comparison highlights Gao's on-court dominance at similar event levels.
The quality of opposition encountered by each player over the past year also plays a pivotal role. Fruhvirtova’s opponents have averaged a rank of 259.48, whereas Gao has faced those averaging a rank of 250.03, revealing slight differences in their competitive challenges.
If the match stretches into a deciding set, Gao holds a distinct advantage, having won 59% of such sets in the last 12 months compared to Fruhvirtova’s 37%. This is a critical statistic for live match predictions and wagering considerations.
Lastly, both players possess similar breakpoint conversion rates, with Gao converting 38.81% and Fruhvirtova 37.19% of their opportunities. This similarity could influence recommendations for live betting during breakpoint scenarios.
In conclusion, based on these detailed statistics, Gao is projected to have the upper hand in this upcoming match against Fruhvirtova, with stronger overall performance indicators across different metrics.
Linda Fruhvirtova Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Olga Danilovic
Player
Linda Fruhvirtova
58%
(
55 of
95)
1st Serve %
62%
(
51 of
82)
2
Aces
3
7
Double Faults
4
67%
(
37 of
55)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
30 of
51)
35%
(
14 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
12 of
31)
64%
(
7 of
11)
Break Points Won
45%
(
5 of
11)
46%
(
44 of
95)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
40 of
82)
91
Total Points Won
86
|
6-2 3-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Linda Fruhvirtova
Player
Anna Blinkova
65%
(
70 of
107)
1st Serve %
66%
(
82 of
125)
4
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
6
64%
(
45 of
70)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
43 of
82)
30%
(
11 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
17 of
43)
50%
(
9 of
18)
Break Points Won
78%
(
7 of
9)
48%
(
51 of
107)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
65 of
125)
121
Total Points Won
111
|
6-7(5) 6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Aleksandra Krunic
Player
Linda Fruhvirtova
77%
(
92 of
120)
1st Serve %
62%
(
77 of
125)
3
Aces
11
0
Double Faults
12
57%
(
52 of
92)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
46 of
77)
43%
(
12 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
17 of
48)
40%
(
8 of
20)
Break Points Won
50%
(
6 of
12)
47%
(
56 of
120)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
62 of
125)
126
Total Points Won
119
|
6-7(6) 7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Linda Fruhvirtova
Player
Jessica Pieri
71%
(
50 of
70)
1st Serve %
71%
(
66 of
93)
4
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
2
66%
(
33 of
50)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
32 of
66)
45%
(
9 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
13 of
27)
47%
(
7 of
15)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
40%
(
28 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
48 of
93)
90
Total Points Won
73
|
4-6 6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Jaqueline Cristian
Player
Linda Fruhvirtova
63%
(
55 of
87)
1st Serve %
54%
(
43 of
80)
2
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
9
56%
(
31 of
55)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
22 of
43)
41%
(
13 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
16 of
37)
47%
(
7 of
15)
Break Points Won
31%
(
5 of
16)
49%
(
43 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
42 of
80)
86
Total Points Won
81
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Linda Fruhvirtova
Player
Heather Watson
66%
(
43 of
65)
1st Serve %
49%
(
33 of
67)
9
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
3
58%
(
25 of
43)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
19 of
33)
50%
(
11 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
11 of
34)
43%
(
6 of
14)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
45%
(
29 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
37 of
67)
73
Total Points Won
59
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Linda Fruhvirtova
Player
Maya Joint
53%
(
50 of
95)
1st Serve %
69%
(
74 of
107)
2
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
9
66%
(
33 of
50)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
40 of
74)
42%
(
19 of
45)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
14 of
33)
50%
(
8 of
16)
Break Points Won
75%
(
6 of
8)
45%
(
43 of
95)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
53 of
107)
105
Total Points Won
97
|
6-7(5) 6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Linda Fruhvirtova
Player
Daria Saville
60%
(
62 of
103)
1st Serve %
59%
(
61 of
104)
2
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
6
61%
(
38 of
62)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
39 of
61)
46%
(
19 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
15 of
43)
58%
(
7 of
12)
Break Points Won
32%
(
6 of
19)
45%
(
46 of
103)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
50 of
104)
107
Total Points Won
100
|
4-6 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 | w/o | H2H | |||
| R3 |
Stats
Magda Linette
Player
Linda Fruhvirtova
53%
(
39 of
73)
1st Serve %
58%
(
46 of
79)
2
Aces
5
4
Double Faults
5
64%
(
25 of
39)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
32 of
46)
59%
(
20 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
13 of
33)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
18%
(
2 of
11)
38%
(
28 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
34 of
79)
79
Total Points Won
73
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Xinyu Gao Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Astra Sharma
Player
Xinyu Gao
67%
(
24 of
36)
1st Serve %
70%
(
30 of
43)
4
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
2
79%
(
19 of
24)
1st Serve Won
37%
(
11 of
30)
50%
(
6 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
4 of
13)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
31%
(
11 of
36)
Rtn Points Won
65%
(
28 of
43)
53
Total Points Won
26
|
6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Xinyu Gao
Player
Anastasiia Gureva
67%
(
34 of
51)
1st Serve %
64%
(
35 of
55)
4
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
7
56%
(
19 of
34)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
15 of
35)
47%
(
8 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
15%
(
3 of
20)
47%
(
8 of
17)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
47%
(
24 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
67%
(
37 of
55)
64
Total Points Won
42
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Veronika Erjavec
Player
Xinyu Gao
82%
(
73 of
89)
1st Serve %
64%
(
47 of
73)
0
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
0
59%
(
43 of
73)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
24 of
47)
50%
(
8 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
15 of
26)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
29%
(
4 of
14)
43%
(
38 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
34 of
73)
85
Total Points Won
77
|
7-5 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Xinyu Gao
Player
Celine Naef
81%
(
25 of
31)
1st Serve %
52%
(
23 of
44)
1
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
3
76%
(
19 of
25)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
11 of
23)
83%
(
5 of
6)
2nd Serve Won
24%
(
5 of
21)
86%
(
6 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
23%
(
7 of
31)
Rtn Points Won
64%
(
28 of
44)
52
Total Points Won
23
|
6-0 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Linda Fruhvirtova
Player
Xinyu Gao
67%
(
64 of
96)
1st Serve %
76%
(
59 of
78)
7
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
3
61%
(
39 of
64)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
34 of
59)
44%
(
14 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
7 of
19)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
43%
(
6 of
14)
45%
(
43 of
96)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
37 of
78)
90
Total Points Won
84
|
7-6(5) 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Antonia Ruzic
Player
Xinyu Gao
67%
(
36 of
54)
1st Serve %
71%
(
35 of
49)
2
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
1
64%
(
23 of
36)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
15 of
35)
44%
(
8 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
5 of
14)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
43%
(
23 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
29 of
49)
60
Total Points Won
43
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Destanee Aiava
Player
Xinyu Gao
66%
(
46 of
70)
1st Serve %
73%
(
60 of
82)
2
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
3
67%
(
31 of
46)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
30 of
60)
38%
(
9 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
10 of
22)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
43%
(
30 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
42 of
82)
82
Total Points Won
70
|
6-3 2-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Xinyu Gao
Player
Jesika Maleckova
61%
(
60 of
98)
1st Serve %
51%
(
61 of
120)
4
Aces
6
6
Double Faults
10
68%
(
41 of
60)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
36 of
61)
37%
(
14 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
31 of
59)
36%
(
5 of
14)
Break Points Won
50%
(
5 of
10)
44%
(
43 of
98)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
53 of
120)
108
Total Points Won
110
|
7-5 2-6 7-5 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Elsa Jacquemot
Player
Xinyu Gao
63%
(
33 of
52)
1st Serve %
69%
(
41 of
59)
6
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
1
61%
(
20 of
33)
1st Serve Won
37%
(
15 of
41)
47%
(
9 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
8 of
18)
54%
(
7 of
13)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
44%
(
23 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
36 of
59)
65
Total Points Won
46
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Xinyu Gao
Player
Amandine Hesse
63%
(
33 of
52)
1st Serve %
44%
(
19 of
43)
0
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
6
61%
(
20 of
33)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
10 of
19)
68%
(
13 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
17%
(
4 of
24)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
37%
(
19 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
67%
(
29 of
43)
62
Total Points Won
33
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 53% (120/105) | Win/Loss | 62% (256/157) |
| 53% (281/247) | Sets Win/Loss | 60% (565/384) |
| 52% (2523/2345) | Games Win/Loss | 54% (4594/3964) |
| 0.24 | Aces Per Game | 0.14 |
| 562 | Aces Total | 579 |
| 0.45 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.22 |
| 1081 | Total Double Faults | 900 |
| 1:46:56 | Average Match Time | 1:17:21 |
| 288.52 | Average Opponent Rank | 472.52 |
| 61% (9894/16106) | 1st Serve % | 63% (13122/20820) |
| 64% (6328/9894) | 1st Serve Win % | 60% (7891/13122) |
| 42% (2607/6212) | 2nd Serve Win % | 46% (3559/7698) |
| 48% (977/2017) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 48% (1322/2758) |
| 46% (7406/16009) | Return Points Win % | 47% (9707/20653) |
| 53% (117/221) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 62% (250/402) |
| 67% (2/3) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 67% (2/3) |
| 53% (27/51) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 56% (42/75) |
| 45% (35/77) | Deciding Set Win % | 56% (72/128) |
| 84% (114/96) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 88% (252/221) |
| 15% (114/17) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 12% (252/30) |
| 20% (111/22) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 21% (161/34) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
