Linda Fruhvirtova vs Jodie Anna Burrage Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Samsonova VS Maneiro PREDICTION Grass
Wimbledon - London wta
06 Jul 2025 / Fourth
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Sabalenka VS Mertens PREDICTION Grass
Wimbledon - London wta
06 Jul 2025 / Fourth
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Fruhvirtova VS Burrage H2H Matches played
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-0 6-4 |
Stats 
Linda Fruhvirtova
Player
Jodie Anna Burrage
51%
(
27 of
53)
1st Serve %
39%
(
27 of
69)
2
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
6
78%
(
21 of
27)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
17 of
27)
54%
(
14 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
15 of
42)
36%
(
5 of
14)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
34%
(
18 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
37 of
69)
72
Total Points Won
50
|
||||
Fruhvirtova VS Burrage H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 12 | Games Won | 4 |
| 2 | Aces (Total) | 5 |
| 2 | Total Double Faults | 6 |
| 1:25:49 | Average Match Time | 1:25:49 |
| 51% (27/53) | 1st Serve % | 39% (27/69) |
| 78% (21/27) | 1st Serve Win % | 63% (17/27) |
| 54% (14/26) | 2nd Serve Win % | 36% (15/42) |
| 36% (5/14) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 33% (1/3) |
| 54% (37/69) | Return Points Win % | 34% (18/53) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Fruhvirtova vs Burrage Match Preview :
- Second Serve Performance: Burrage has been more successful on second serve points, winning 43.44% compared to Fruhvirtova's 37.99% in the past six months. Does this offer Burrage an edge? It might suggest greater resilience in extended rallies.
- Return Game Stats: Fruhvirtova shows superior return skills, taking 55.19% of points on opponents' second serves against Burrage's 50%, and outperforms on first serve returns, winning 35.46% to Burrage's 27.76%. Could this indicate Fruhvirtova's aggressive play style? It certainly strengthens her chances when returning.
- Under Pressure Analysis: Burrage edges Fruhvirtova in saving breakpoints, converting 55.16% against Fruhvirtova's 51.45%. Is this a sign of mental fortitude under pressure? It may well be crucial in tight scenarios.
- Performance Overview: Over the past year, Burrage has a better win rate of 54.9% compared to Fruhvirtova's 48.21%, indicating a slight overall competitive edge.
- Best Surface: Both players excel on indoor hard courts, but Burrage's 62% win rate tops Fruhvirtova's 59%. Does this suggest a probable advantage on this surface? It could sway the match if played on indoor hard.
- Player Level: Burrage’s success rate of 66.67% in Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K surpasses Fruhvirtova's 55.17%, hinting at better recent form in similar settings.
- Opponent Quality: Burrage has faced slightly tougher competition, with opponents averaging a ranking of 230.49 compared to Fruhvirtova’s 241.89. Does this tougher schedule prepare Burrage better for challenging matches? It's a testament to her experience against higher-ranked players.
- Deciding Set Performance: Interestingly, Fruhvirtova has a better record in deciding sets, winning 50% of them over the last year, whilst Burrage won 42%.
- Break Point Conversion: Fruhvirtova excels with a 39.73% conversion rate on breakpoints compared to Burrage's 29.68%. Could this be the deciding factor? It points towards greater efficiency in converting opportunities.
Editorial Prediction (June 4, 2025, UTC):
Evaluating the current statistics and performance indicators presents an intriguing matchup between Fruhvirtova and Burrage. Burrage shows strength with a superior second serve performance, suggesting her ability to maintain momentum even when defensive. However, Fruhvirtova counters strongly with impressive return stats, a critical factor in altering the match's rhythm.
Burrage's ability to save breakpoints under pressure might grant her the upper hand in high-stakes moments. However, her lower break point conversion rate could spell difficulty against an opponent like Fruhvirtova, who excels in capitalizing on opportunities.
Fruhvirtova's efficiency in deciding sets and superior break point conversion highlights her capability in clutch situations, suggesting a determined and focused approach when the match is on the line.
Taking into account their recent form, playing conditions, and skill on indoor hard courts, Burrage's better overall performance over the past year and richer experience against stronger opponents appear significant. However, Fruhvirtova's strengths in returns and break point opportunities make her a formidable contender. Given these factors, Fruhvirtova seems slightly more likely to win this encounter.
Fruhvirtova vs Burrage Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88
Linda Fruhvirtova Recent Matches Played
Before:
No Recent Matches Available
Jodie Anna Burrage Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Caty McNally
Player
Jodie Anna Burrage
58%
(
23 of
40)
1st Serve %
55%
(
28 of
51)
2
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
5
83%
(
19 of
23)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
21 of
28)
59%
(
10 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
13%
(
3 of
23)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
28%
(
11 of
40)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
27 of
51)
56
Total Points Won
35
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Barbora Krejcikova
Player
Jodie Anna Burrage
66%
(
60 of
91)
1st Serve %
62%
(
63 of
102)
4
Aces
10
4
Double Faults
4
68%
(
41 of
60)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
43 of
63)
55%
(
17 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
19 of
39)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
36%
(
33 of
91)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
40 of
102)
98
Total Points Won
95
|
6-4 4-6 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jodie Anna Burrage
Player
Moyuka Uchijima
70%
(
32 of
46)
1st Serve %
42%
(
25 of
59)
2
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
9
72%
(
23 of
32)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
14 of
25)
50%
(
7 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
12 of
34)
100%
(
6 of
6)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
35%
(
16 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
33 of
59)
63
Total Points Won
42
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Anca Alexia Todoni
Player
Jodie Anna Burrage
64%
(
43 of
67)
1st Serve %
52%
(
44 of
85)
4
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
8
63%
(
27 of
43)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
29 of
44)
67%
(
16 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
15 of
41)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
36%
(
24 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
41 of
85)
84
Total Points Won
68
|
7-6(2) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Amanda Anisimova
Player
Jodie Anna Burrage
65%
(
59 of
91)
1st Serve %
61%
(
66 of
109)
12
Aces
9
8
Double Faults
9
73%
(
43 of
59)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
47 of
66)
53%
(
17 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
13 of
43)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
34%
(
31 of
91)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
49 of
109)
109
Total Points Won
91
|
4-6 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Linda Fruhvirtova
Player
Jodie Anna Burrage
51%
(
27 of
53)
1st Serve %
39%
(
27 of
69)
2
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
6
78%
(
21 of
27)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
17 of
27)
54%
(
14 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
15 of
42)
36%
(
5 of
14)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
34%
(
18 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
37 of
69)
72
Total Points Won
50
|
6-0 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jodie Anna Burrage
Player
Jana Fett
57%
(
38 of
67)
1st Serve %
65%
(
36 of
55)
4
Aces
5
5
Double Faults
6
66%
(
25 of
38)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
23 of
36)
52%
(
15 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
8 of
19)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
40%
(
27 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
24 of
55)
64
Total Points Won
58
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Danielle Rose Collins
Player
Jodie Anna Burrage
54%
(
39 of
72)
1st Serve %
55%
(
41 of
74)
8
Aces
10
4
Double Faults
3
74%
(
29 of
39)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
29 of
41)
45%
(
15 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
10 of
33)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
39%
(
28 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
35 of
74)
79
Total Points Won
67
|
7-6(1) 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 54% (127/110) | Win/Loss | 58% (260/190) |
| 53% (295/259) | Sets Win/Loss | 58% (594/424) |
| 52% (2641/2459) | Games Win/Loss | 53% (5030/4377) |
| 57% (79/60) | Hard Win/Loss | 61% (160/102) |
| 41% (21/30) | Clay Win/Loss | 30% (7/16) |
| 60% (12/8) | Indoor Hard W/L | 63% (72/43) |
| 56% (15/12) | Grass Win/Loss | 42% (21/29) |
| 0.24 | Aces Per Game | 0.37 |
| 608 | Aces Total | 1693 |
| 0.45 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.33 |
| 1126 | Total Double Faults | 1512 |
| 1:46:16 | Average Match Time | 1:25:3 |
| 233.2 | Average Opponent Rank | 446.02 |
| 61% (10377/16898) | 1st Serve % | 59% (16566/28153) |
| 64% (6660/10377) | 1st Serve Win % | 67% (11099/16566) |
| 42% (2736/6521) | 2nd Serve Win % | 46% (5346/11587) |
| 48% (1017/2130) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 47% (1579/3387) |
| 46% (7757/16823) | Return Points Win % | 44% (12570/28288) |
| 48% (13/14) | Slam W/L | 32% (6/13) |
| 43% (16/21) | Masters W/L | 22% (2/7) |
| 0% (0/1) | Cups W/L | 0% (0/1) |
| 49% (34/36) | Main Tour W/L | 44% (30/38) |
| 59% (50/35) | Challenger W/L | 62% (168/105) |
| 82% (14/3) | Futures W/L | 68% (54/26) |
| 53% (124/233) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 58% (256/442) |
| 67% (2/3) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 52% (27/52) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 51% (53/103) |
| 47% (37/79) | Deciding Set Win % | 38% (48/125) |
| 85% (121/103) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 81% (285/232) |
| 14% (121/17) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 18% (285/51) |
| 19% (116/22) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 16% (165/27) |
Fruhvirtova vs. Burrage Prediction Form Trend:
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
