Analysis of Second Serve Performance: In their recent form over the past six months, Poling has demonstrated an outstanding ability to win 45.83% of points on their second serve. Similarly, Rothensteiner has exhibited a remarkable performance, securing victory in 45.6% of such points. Undoubtedly, there exists a substantial correlation between this statistical measure and the accuracy of match predictions.

Recent Return Game Statistics: Analyzing the return game statistics of both players, it becomes evident that Poling, in their recent form, has exhibited a mastery over their opponents' second serve, conquering 55.43% of these crucial points. Moreover, Rothensteiner has displayed an impressive performance, triumphing in 53.43% of such points. Equally significant are the statistics for first serve returns, with Poling achieving a success rate of 41.38% and Rothensteiner recording 33.54%. We can ascertain that these figures possess a pronounced correlation in determining the favored player in their head-to-head matchup.

Under Pressure Analysis: When placed under duress, Poling has showcased their ability to remain composed, successfully saving 46.34% of breakpoints in their recent form. Concurrently, Rothensteiner has demonstrated their resilience by saving 40.43% of such breakpoints. This invaluable insight into their performance serves as a useful statistic for making predictions in in-game betting scenarios.

Performance Overview: Examining their overall performance over the past year, Poling has achieved a commendable win rate of 50% in the matches they have played, boasting a win-loss record of 24/24. Comparatively, Rothensteiner has secured victory in 48.72% of their matches, with a win-loss record of 19/20. Taking these numbers into consideration, we can form a comprehensive prediction for their head-to-head encounter.

Surface Expertise: By analyzing their performance on different surfaces, it becomes apparent that Poling has achieved their highest career win percentage on Hard courts, winning an impressive 54% of matches (W/L 29/25). However, their performance on Indoor Hard courts has been less remarkable, with a win percentage of 43% (W/L 3/4). On the other hand, Rothensteiner has excelled on the Hard court surface, recording a career win percentage of 51% (W/L 28/27). Conversely, they have struggled on Clay courts, achieving only a 21% win percentage (W/L 3/11).

Player Level: In the past year, Poling has primarily competed in reputable tournaments such as the Futures, Satellites, and ITF tournaments with a prize of $10K. Impressively, they have emerged victorious in 57.69% of these encounters (W/L 15/11). Similarly, Rothensteiner has primarily participated in the same caliber of tournaments, triumphing in 56.25% of matches (W/L 18/14). When comparing the statistics between the two players to predict the favorite, it is essential to recognize the relative nature of their performance in the respective event levels they have contested.

Opponent Quality Statistics: Over the course of the previous 12 months, Poling has faced opponents with an average ranking of 428.33, indicating the level of competition they have encountered. Conversely, Rothensteiner has confronted players with an average ranking of 311.62. These opponent quality statistics shed light on the level of challenge faced by both players in their respective matches.

Deciding Set Performance against All Players: For those interested in live predictions and betting, it is imperative to assess performance in deciding sets. Over the past 12 months, Poling has proven their exceptional ability to prevail in such intense situations, winning 64% of deciding sets. In contrast, Rothensteiner has secured victory in only 22% of all matches played on the tour. This statistical insight is particularly valuable when evaluating live prediction scenarios.

Current Event Head-to-Head Statistics: While past player performance holds significant predictive power in tennis matches, it is equally vital to consider current event statistics, as they provide an indication of the players' current form. Therefore, it is advisable to review the section below, which provides insights into the players' performance in the ongoing event. Additionally, some players may exhibit enhanced proficiency at specific tournaments, and this factor ought to be considered when predicting the outcome.

Break Point Conversion: In recent contests, Poling has displayed an exceptional ability to capitalize on breakpoint opportunities, converting 50.23% of such chances. On the other hand, Rothensteiner has proven to be a formidable opponent, converting 46.15% of their opportunities to break their opponents' serve. This crucial statistic is instrumental in offering valuable insights for in-game live betting tips whenever either player possesses a breakpoint opportunity.

If you are interested in models that can accurately predict the outcomes of tennis matches, I recommend reading this article. However, please note that it is best suited for stats enthusiasts.