Lilian Poling vs Kaja Juvan Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W L W W L L W W L L
Form
W L W W L W L W W LHead To Head: Poling 1 - 0 Juvan
They have played 3 sets in total, with Poling winning 2 and Juvan winning 1. The last match between Poling and Juvan was at the W35 Glasgow, 26-01-2025, Q1 round, I.hard with Lilian Poling getting the victory 7-6(2) 4-6 10-7.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Lilian Poling | 1 |
| Kaja Juvan | 0 |
W35 Glasgow(26-01-2025)
7
6
4
6
10
7
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Gauff VS Sakkari PREDICTION Hard
Miami Open - Miami wta
22 Mar 2025 / Third
ODDS
PREDICTION
EDGE
Minaur VS Yunchaokete PREDICTION Hard
Miami Open - Miami atp
22 Mar 2025 / Second
ODDS
PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7-6(2) 4-6 10-7 |
Stats 
Lilian Poling
Player
Kaja Juvan
66%
(
62 of
94)
1st Serve %
56%
(
53 of
94)
1
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
6
55%
(
34 of
62)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
35 of
53)
69%
(
22 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
20 of
41)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
40%
(
38 of
94)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
39 of
94)
95
Total Points Won
93
|
||||
Stats
1
H2H Matches
0
2
Sets Won
1
21
Games Won
19
1
Aces (Total)
6
1
Total Double Faults
6
2:36:54
Average Match Time
2:36:54
66% (62/94)
1st Serve %
56% (53/94)
55% (34/62)
1st Serve Win %
66% (35/53)
69% (22/32)
2nd Serve Win %
49% (20/41)
67% (2/3)
Break Points Won % (Total)
38% (3/8)
41% (39/94)
Return Points Win %
40% (38/94)
100% (1/1)
Best of 3 Sets Win %
0% (0/1)
0% (0/0)
Best of 5 Sets Win %
0% (0/0)
100% (1/1)
Tiebreaks Win % (Total)
0% (0/1)
100% (1/1)
Deciding Set Win %
0% (0/1)
100% (1/1)
1st Set Won, Won Match
0% (0/0)
0% (1/0)
1st Set Won, Lost Match
0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)
1st Set Lost, Won Match
0% (1/0)
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Lilian Poling Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Emma Lene
Player
Lilian Poling
73%
(
29 of
40)
1st Serve %
79%
(
41 of
52)
2
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
0
79%
(
23 of
29)
1st Serve Won
37%
(
15 of
41)
18%
(
2 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
3 of
11)
86%
(
6 of
7)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
38%
(
15 of
40)
Rtn Points Won
65%
(
34 of
52)
59
Total Points Won
33
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 | 6-4 6-1 | H2H | |||
| QF |
Stats
Lilian Poling
Player
Liel Marlies Rothensteiner
71%
(
49 of
69)
1st Serve %
70%
(
45 of
64)
0
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
3
65%
(
32 of
49)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
27 of
45)
55%
(
11 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
9 of
19)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
38%
(
26 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
28 of
64)
71
Total Points Won
62
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Lilian Poling
Player
Dominika Podhajecka
78%
(
32 of
41)
1st Serve %
73%
(
29 of
40)
2
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
3
72%
(
23 of
32)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
16 of
29)
56%
(
5 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
18%
(
2 of
11)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
32%
(
13 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
22 of
40)
50
Total Points Won
31
|
3-6 6-4 10-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Meiqi Guo
Player
Lilian Poling
68%
(
55 of
81)
1st Serve %
55%
(
52 of
94)
2
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
5
64%
(
35 of
55)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
25 of
52)
38%
(
10 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
20 of
42)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
42%
(
5 of
12)
44%
(
36 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
49 of
94)
94
Total Points Won
81
|
7-5 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Yelyzaveta Kotliar
Player
Lilian Poling
56%
(
31 of
55)
1st Serve %
76%
(
29 of
38)
0
Aces
0
6
Double Faults
1
74%
(
23 of
31)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
13 of
29)
50%
(
12 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
36%
(
20 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
22 of
38)
57
Total Points Won
36
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Lilian Poling
Player
Lavinia Luciano
71%
(
51 of
72)
1st Serve %
64%
(
44 of
69)
2
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
0
67%
(
34 of
51)
1st Serve Won
41%
(
18 of
44)
33%
(
7 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
15 of
25)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
63%
(
5 of
8)
43%
(
31 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
36 of
69)
77
Total Points Won
64
|
6-4 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| Q2 | 7-5 5-7 10-8 | H2H | |||
| QF |
Stats
Federica Urgesi
Player
Lilian Poling
67%
(
35 of
52)
1st Serve %
71%
(
49 of
69)
3
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
1
80%
(
28 of
35)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
27 of
49)
47%
(
8 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
7 of
20)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
31%
(
16 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
35 of
69)
71
Total Points Won
50
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Lilian Poling
Player
Kaja Juvan
66%
(
62 of
94)
1st Serve %
56%
(
53 of
94)
1
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
6
55%
(
34 of
62)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
35 of
53)
69%
(
22 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
20 of
41)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
40%
(
38 of
94)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
39 of
94)
95
Total Points Won
93
|
7-6(2) 4-6 10-7 | H2H | ||
view more
Kaja Juvan Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Antonia Ruzic
Player
Kaja Juvan
70%
(
46 of
66)
1st Serve %
58%
(
35 of
60)
1
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
2
67%
(
31 of
46)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
22 of
35)
60%
(
12 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
13 of
25)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
35%
(
23 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
25 of
60)
68
Total Points Won
58
|
7-6(6) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Kaja Juvan
Player
Lola Radivojevic
57%
(
57 of
100)
1st Serve %
59%
(
62 of
105)
3
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
4
67%
(
38 of
57)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
30 of
62)
37%
(
16 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
21 of
43)
75%
(
9 of
12)
Break Points Won
42%
(
5 of
12)
46%
(
46 of
100)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
54 of
105)
108
Total Points Won
97
|
6-3 6-7(3) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Kaja Juvan
Player
Kamilla Bartone
63%
(
40 of
64)
1st Serve %
67%
(
40 of
60)
0
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
3
63%
(
25 of
40)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
17 of
40)
50%
(
12 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
9 of
20)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
42%
(
27 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
34 of
60)
71
Total Points Won
53
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Whitney Osuigwe
Player
Kaja Juvan
81%
(
55 of
68)
1st Serve %
48%
(
37 of
77)
0
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
0
64%
(
35 of
55)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
21 of
37)
54%
(
7 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
16 of
40)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
38%
(
26 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
40 of
77)
82
Total Points Won
63
|
6-0 7-6(9) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Kaja Juvan
Player
Laura Siegemund
56%
(
58 of
104)
1st Serve %
73%
(
85 of
116)
3
Aces
0
7
Double Faults
8
69%
(
40 of
58)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
51 of
85)
46%
(
21 of
46)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
15 of
31)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
41%
(
43 of
104)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
50 of
116)
111
Total Points Won
109
|
7-5 6-7(2) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ena Shibahara
Player
Kaja Juvan
66%
(
54 of
82)
1st Serve %
58%
(
46 of
80)
3
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
8
74%
(
40 of
54)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
34 of
46)
50%
(
14 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
13 of
34)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
34%
(
28 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
33 of
80)
87
Total Points Won
75
|
2-6 6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Kaja Juvan
Player
Victoria Hu
61%
(
38 of
62)
1st Serve %
55%
(
29 of
53)
2
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
0
71%
(
27 of
38)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
17 of
29)
54%
(
13 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
10 of
24)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
35%
(
22 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
26 of
53)
66
Total Points Won
49
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Kaja Juvan
Player
Louisa Chirico
48%
(
46 of
95)
1st Serve %
63%
(
59 of
93)
6
Aces
0
6
Double Faults
5
70%
(
32 of
46)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
34 of
59)
45%
(
22 of
49)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
15 of
34)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
31%
(
5 of
16)
43%
(
41 of
95)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
44 of
93)
98
Total Points Won
90
|
7-5 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Veronika Erjavec
Player
Kaja Juvan
44%
(
30 of
68)
1st Serve %
52%
(
35 of
67)
0
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
2
73%
(
22 of
30)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
19 of
35)
58%
(
22 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
18 of
32)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
35%
(
24 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
30 of
67)
74
Total Points Won
61
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Kaja Juvan
Player
Clervie Ngounoue
57%
(
47 of
82)
1st Serve %
55%
(
43 of
78)
2
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
3
70%
(
33 of
47)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
21 of
43)
34%
(
12 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
15 of
35)
58%
(
7 of
12)
Break Points Won
75%
(
6 of
8)
45%
(
37 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
42 of
78)
87
Total Points Won
73
|
6-3 2-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
Stats
50% (41/41)
Win/Loss
65% (229/122)
49% (90/93)
Sets Win/Loss
63% (511/299)
51% (868/843)
Games Win/Loss
56% (4106/3281)
53% (30/27)
Hard Win/Loss
59% (66/46)
44% (8/10)
Clay Win/Loss
73% (128/48)
43% (3/4)
Indoor Hard W/L
51% (21/20)
0% (0/0)
Grass Win/Loss
64% (14/8)
0.05
Aces Per Game
0.16
39
Aces Total
584
0.24
Double Faults Per Game
0.18
203
Total Double Faults
650
1:8:32
Average Match Time
1:29:34
376.62
Average Opponent Rank
392.15
63% (2277/3589)
1st Serve %
63% (14180/22651)
56% (1279/2277)
1st Serve Win %
62% (8788/14190)
44% (574/1312)
2nd Serve Win %
50% (4205/8467)
48% (239/496)
Break Points Won % (Total)
50% (1435/2897)
48% (1769/3709)
Return Points Win %
47% (10545/22636)
0% (0/0)
Slam W/L
64% (35/20)
0% (0/0)
Masters W/L
56% (14/11)
0% (0/0)
Cups W/L
65% (13/7)
0% (0/0)
Main Tour W/L
53% (46/41)
0% (0/0)
Tour Finals W/L
0% (0/0)
49% (19/20)
Challenger W/L
71% (91/37)
51% (22/21)
Futures W/L
83% (30/6)
50% (41/82)
Best of 3 Sets Win %
66% (225/343)
0% (0/0)
Best of 5 Sets Win %
0% (0/2)
40% (6/15)
Tiebreaks Win % (Total)
48% (36/75)
58% (11/19)
Deciding Set Win %
51% (58/113)
90% (40/36)
1st Set Won, Won Match
87% (223/194)
10% (40/4)
1st Set Won, Lost Match
13% (223/28)
12% (42/5)
1st Set Lost, Won Match
26% (127/33)
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
