Lidia Encheva vs Laura Brunkel Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W L W W L W W L W L
Form
L W W L L L W L W LHead-2-Head: Encheva 2 - 0 Brunkel
They have played 5 sets in total, with Encheva winning 4 and Brunkel winning 1. The last match between Encheva and Brunkel was at the W15 Monastir, 24-04-2025, Round: Second, Surface: Hard, with Lidia Encheva getting the victory 6-4 7-5.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Lidia Encheva | 2 |
| Laura Brunkel | 0 |
LAST H2H MATCH: W15 Monastir(24-04-2025)
Lidia Encheva
Laura Brunkel
6
4
7
5
| Encheva | Stats | Brunkel |
|---|---|---|
| 65% (13-7) | YTD Win/Loss | 59% (10-7) |
| 2 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
| 646 | Ranking | N/A |
| 646 | Highest Rank | N/A |
| 18 | Age | 19 |
| - | Plays | - |
| 0 | Titles | 0 |
| 64% (65-36) | Career Total W/L | 58% (18-13) |
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 2 | Hard H2H | 0 |
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Strakhova VS Pera PREDICTION Clay
Internationaux de Strasbourg - Strasbourg wta
17 May 2025 / Q1 round
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Gauff VS Paolini PREDICTION Clay
Internazionali BNL d'Italia - Rome wta
17 May 2025 / Final
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-4 7-5 |
Stats 
Lidia Encheva
Player
Laura Brunkel
71%
(
37 of
52)
1st Serve %
75%
(
45 of
60)
1
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
1
62%
(
23 of
37)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
25 of
45)
60%
(
9 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
7 of
15)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
38%
(
20 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
28 of
60)
60
Total Points Won
52
|
||||
| 4-6 7-5 6-2 |
Stats
Lidia Encheva
Player
Laura Brunkel
77%
(
84 of
109)
1st Serve %
72%
(
78 of
108)
0
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
1
58%
(
49 of
84)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
41 of
78)
48%
(
12 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
15 of
30)
41%
(
7 of
17)
Break Points Won
50%
(
5 of
10)
44%
(
48 of
109)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
52 of
108)
113
Total Points Won
104
|
||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 4 | Sets Won | 1 |
| 30 | Games Won | 22 |
| 1 | Aces (Total) | 0 |
| 6 | Total Double Faults | 2 |
| 2:25:36 | Average Match Time | 2:25:36 |
| 75% (121/161) | 1st Serve % | 73% (123/168) |
| 60% (72/121) | 1st Serve Win % | 54% (66/123) |
| 53% (21/40) | 2nd Serve Win % | 49% (22/45) |
| 46% (11/24) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 57% (8/14) |
| 48% (80/168) | Return Points Win % | 42% (68/161) |
| 100% (2/2) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/2) |
| 100% (1/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 100% (1/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Encheva vs Brunkel Match Preview :
Ladies and gentlemen, welcome to the fantastical statistical showdown of the century! On the marvelous tennis battlefield, we have Brunkel and Encheva, ready to duel it out with second serves that are smoother than a buttered pancake. In the last six months, Brunkel has managed to win 48.95% of his second serve points, while Encheva, not to be outdone, scoops up 35.83%. With numbers like these, predicting a match outcome is easier than swatting a fly with a racket.
Now, let's return to the return game stats, and no, I'm not talking about tennis balls boomeranging back into play! Brunkel wins 44.68% of the points on his opponent’s second serve—impressive, right? But hold onto your hats because Encheva's got a nifty 50.6% win rate on the second returns. And if that isn’t a nail-biting stat for who's going to win, then I don't know what is! The first serve return numbers aren't too shabby either, with our duo landing 32.48% and 33.6%, respectively, which is close enough that even their imaginary mascot animals are sweating bullets!
The statistical tango continues with breakpoints, where Brunkel saves a neat 50% while Encheva is hot on his heels, saving 49.57%. It's like they're both auditioning for a superhero role in "Breakpoint Heroes: The Return of the Saved Serve." Speaking of heroic performances, let's take a look at their break point conversions—29.73% for Brunkel and a zippy 36.92% for Encheva, suggesting each break point might just be an earth-shattering event!
But what about when the rubber meets the road? In overall heroics over the past year, Brunkel's kicking butt with a 64% match win rate, while Encheva is flaunting a sassy 72.13%. Though let's not ignore the surface-specific conundrums! Brunkel loves Stani...I mean hard courts, with a cool 65% win rate, while clay is like kryptonite to Encheva, who only swings a humble zero for hard courts (here’s hoping they play on clay!).
Speaking of events, you might say that Brunkel and Encheva have been roaming the Futures/Satellites/ITF circus like real tennis gadabouts, with Encheva taking a tiny edge by winning 72.73% against Brunkel’s sly 66.67%. The duo has faced opponents with an average ranking, with Encheva slightly more battle-hardened with tougher matchups. And when it gets sweaty, Brunkel is the gladiator of deciding sets, winning 80%, while Encheva is trailing with 64%. With these electrifying stats, it’s looking like Brunkel might just pull off a winning magic trick, but as they say, the ball is round and this match is anyone's guess! May the best serve prevail!
Encheva vs Brunkel Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88
Lidia Encheva Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Alisa Baranovska
Player
Lidia Encheva
71%
(
60 of
85)
1st Serve %
73%
(
66 of
90)
0
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
9
48%
(
29 of
60)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
33 of
66)
52%
(
13 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
8 of
24)
60%
(
9 of
15)
Break Points Won
54%
(
7 of
13)
51%
(
43 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
49 of
90)
91
Total Points Won
84
|
3-6 6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Lidia Encheva
Player
Zuzanna Bednarz
59%
(
39 of
66)
1st Serve %
81%
(
59 of
73)
1
Aces
2
14
Double Faults
6
67%
(
26 of
39)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
32 of
59)
26%
(
7 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
14%
(
2 of
14)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
50%
(
33 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
39 of
73)
72
Total Points Won
67
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Zeel Desai
Player
Lidia Encheva
67%
(
33 of
49)
1st Serve %
77%
(
49 of
64)
0
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
4
52%
(
17 of
33)
1st Serve Won
39%
(
19 of
49)
31%
(
5 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
5 of
15)
57%
(
8 of
14)
Break Points Won
100%
(
5 of
5)
55%
(
27 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
40 of
64)
62
Total Points Won
51
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Lidia Encheva
Player
Laura Brunkel
71%
(
37 of
52)
1st Serve %
75%
(
45 of
60)
1
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
1
62%
(
23 of
37)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
25 of
45)
60%
(
9 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
7 of
15)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
38%
(
20 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
28 of
60)
60
Total Points Won
52
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Lidia Encheva
Player
Tanisha Kashyap
42%
(
13 of
31)
1st Serve %
77%
(
27 of
35)
1
Aces
0
7
Double Faults
2
85%
(
11 of
13)
1st Serve Won
26%
(
7 of
27)
28%
(
5 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
48%
(
15 of
31)
Rtn Points Won
69%
(
24 of
35)
40
Total Points Won
26
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Hina Inoue
Player
Lidia Encheva
67%
(
40 of
60)
1st Serve %
63%
(
35 of
56)
0
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
6
68%
(
27 of
40)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
20 of
35)
60%
(
12 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
9 of
21)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
35%
(
21 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
27 of
56)
66
Total Points Won
50
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Lidia Encheva
Player
Louna Zoppas
71%
(
32 of
45)
1st Serve %
64%
(
57 of
89)
0
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
6
66%
(
21 of
32)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
32 of
57)
15%
(
2 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
8 of
32)
50%
(
7 of
14)
Break Points Won
80%
(
4 of
5)
49%
(
22 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
49 of
89)
72
Total Points Won
62
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Lidia Encheva
Player
Laura Brunkel
77%
(
84 of
109)
1st Serve %
72%
(
78 of
108)
0
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
1
58%
(
49 of
84)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
41 of
78)
48%
(
12 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
15 of
30)
41%
(
7 of
17)
Break Points Won
50%
(
5 of
10)
44%
(
48 of
109)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
52 of
108)
113
Total Points Won
104
|
4-6 7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Laura Brunkel Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Yasmine Kabbaj
Player
Laura Brunkel
74%
(
45 of
61)
1st Serve %
71%
(
40 of
56)
0
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
3
67%
(
30 of
45)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
24 of
40)
56%
(
9 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
6 of
16)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
36%
(
22 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
26 of
56)
65
Total Points Won
52
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Laura Brunkel
Player
Tilda Hessleryd
65%
(
51 of
79)
1st Serve %
59%
(
45 of
76)
0
Aces
0
8
Double Faults
7
59%
(
30 of
51)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
21 of
45)
29%
(
8 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
12 of
31)
78%
(
7 of
9)
Break Points Won
36%
(
5 of
14)
52%
(
41 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
43 of
76)
81
Total Points Won
74
|
6-7(4) 6-2 10-6 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Lidia Encheva
Player
Laura Brunkel
71%
(
37 of
52)
1st Serve %
75%
(
45 of
60)
1
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
1
62%
(
23 of
37)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
25 of
45)
60%
(
9 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
7 of
15)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
38%
(
20 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
28 of
60)
60
Total Points Won
52
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Laura Brunkel
Player
Liel Marlies Rothensteiner
66%
(
50 of
76)
1st Serve %
54%
(
29 of
54)
0
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
5
62%
(
31 of
50)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
18 of
29)
38%
(
10 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
20%
(
5 of
25)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
13%
(
2 of
15)
46%
(
35 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
31 of
54)
72
Total Points Won
58
|
6-1 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Lidia Encheva
Player
Laura Brunkel
77%
(
84 of
109)
1st Serve %
72%
(
78 of
108)
0
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
1
58%
(
49 of
84)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
41 of
78)
48%
(
12 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
15 of
30)
41%
(
7 of
17)
Break Points Won
50%
(
5 of
10)
44%
(
48 of
109)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
52 of
108)
113
Total Points Won
104
|
4-6 7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Abigail Rencheli
Player
Laura Brunkel
62%
(
44 of
71)
1st Serve %
64%
(
34 of
53)
2
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
1
68%
(
30 of
44)
1st Serve Won
41%
(
14 of
34)
48%
(
13 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
10 of
19)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
15%
(
2 of
13)
39%
(
28 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
29 of
53)
72
Total Points Won
52
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF | 6-2 7-5 | H2H | |||
| Q2 | 6-2 7-5 | H2H | |||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 64% (65/36) | Win/Loss | 58% (18/13) |
| 63% (136/81) | Sets Win/Loss | 55% (38/31) |
| 56% (1103/853) | Games Win/Loss | 52% (347/318) |
| 57% (4/3) | Hard Win/Loss | 60% (12/8) |
| 67% (56/28) | Clay Win/Loss | 50% (3/3) |
| 50% (5/5) | Indoor Hard W/L | 60% (3/2) |
| 0.08 | Aces Per Game | 0.05 |
| 72 | Aces Total | 17 |
| 0.38 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.16 |
| 363 | Total Double Faults | 53 |
| 1:12:36 | Average Match Time | 1:20:27 |
| 332.4 | Average Opponent Rank | 344.84 |
| 64% (2997/4681) | 1st Serve % | 67% (934/1402) |
| 59% (1779/2997) | 1st Serve Win % | 58% (545/934) |
| 40% (666/1684) | 2nd Serve Win % | 47% (218/468) |
| 49% (344/699) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 43% (75/173) |
| 50% (2334/4685) | Return Points Win % | 44% (653/1478) |
| 62% (26/16) | Challenger W/L | 43% (3/4) |
| 66% (39/20) | Futures W/L | 63% (15/9) |
| 65% (64/99) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 58% (18/31) |
| 50% (8/16) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 25% (1/4) |
| 59% (10/17) | Deciding Set Win % | 71% (5/7) |
| 95% (60/57) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 88% (16/14) |
| 5% (60/3) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 13% (16/2) |
| 20% (41/8) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 27% (15/4) |
Encheva vs. Brunkel Prediction Form Trend:
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
