Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Liam Hignett vs Charles Minc Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Hignett vs Minc analysis and find out who is favored!
Liam Hignett vs Charles Minc Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Hignett has won 53.54% of points on his second serve, while Minc has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Hignett, in recent form, has won 38.1% of his opponent's second serve points, while Minc has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 31.9% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Hignett has saved 57.14% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Minc has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Hignett has won 16.67% of matches played (W/L 2/ 10), with Minc winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Hignett has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 33% (W/L 6/ 12), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 1). Minc has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 41% (W/L 12/ 17), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 17% (W/L 1/ 5).
- Player level: In the last year, Hignett has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 16.67% of matches (W/L 2/ 10), where as Minc has played most of their matches on the , winning 0% of matches (W/L / ). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Hignett winning 1 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Hignett winning 2 and Minc winning 0. The last match between Hignett and Minc was at the M25 Glasgow, 13-02-2022, Q1 round, I.hard with Liam Hignett getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:12:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Hignett and Minc have played a deciding set 0 times, with Hignett winning 0 times and Minc 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Hignett winning 0, and Minc 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Hignett has played against opponents with an average rank of 0 while Minc has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Hignett has won 17% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Minc has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Hignett has converted 31.58% of breakpoint opportunities, and Minc has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Hignett 1 - 0 Minc
N/A
Rank
High
24
Age
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
1
Indoor0
0
Grass0
N/A
Rank
High
30
Age
A
Plays
L
W
L
L
L
L
W
L
L
L
Form
W
L
L
L
L
W
L
W
L
L
30% (13-31)
Career Total W/L
38% (24-40)
0% (0-2)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Liam Hignett | Charles Minc |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
| Games Won | 12 | 4 |
| Aces (Total) | 7 | 1 |
| DFs (Total) | 0 | 1 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:12:0 | 1:12:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 66% (29/44) | 53% (25/47) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 76% (22/29) | 60% (15/25) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 73% (11/15) | 36% (8/22) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 44% (4/9) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Points W% | 51% (24/47) | 25% (11/44) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-3 6-1 |
Stats 
Liam Hignett
Player
Charles Minc
66%
(
29 of
44)
1st Serve %
53%
(
25 of
47)
7
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
1
76%
(
22 of
29)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
15 of
25)
73%
(
11 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
8 of
22)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
25%
(
11 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
24 of
47)
57
Total Points Won
34
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Liam Hignett | Charles Minc |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 0% (0/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 20% (1/4) | 0% (0/0) |
| Games Win/Loss | 40% (21/32) | 0% (0/0) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.31 | 0 |
| Aces Total | 8 | 0 |
| DFs per game | 0.38 | 0 |
| DFs Total | 10 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 0 |
| 1st Serve % | 59% (65/111) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve W% | 68% (44/65) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 52% (24/46) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% Total | 20% (1/5) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Pts W% | 26% (28/107) | 0% (0/0) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Liam Hignett Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
James Davis
Player
Liam Hignett
74%
(
43 of
58)
1st Serve %
51%
(
31 of
61)
5
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
8
70%
(
30 of
43)
1st Serve Won
81%
(
25 of
31)
73%
(
11 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
13 of
30)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
29%
(
17 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
23 of
61)
64
Total Points Won
55
|
4-6 6-1 10-8 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
George Houghton
Player
Liam Hignett
61%
(
30 of
49)
1st Serve %
68%
(
34 of
50)
8
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
2
90%
(
27 of
30)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
19 of
34)
58%
(
11 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
69%
(
11 of
16)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
22%
(
11 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
20 of
50)
58
Total Points Won
41
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
David Quayle
Player
Liam Hignett
58%
(
32 of
55)
1st Serve %
64%
(
45 of
70)
1
Aces
7
1
Double Faults
4
69%
(
22 of
32)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
27 of
45)
61%
(
14 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
12 of
25)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
35%
(
19 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
31 of
70)
67
Total Points Won
58
|
6-4 3-6 10-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Liam Hignett
Player
Damian Rodriguez
58%
(
38 of
66)
1st Serve %
68%
(
58 of
85)
10
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
1
76%
(
29 of
38)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
32 of
58)
61%
(
17 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
16 of
27)
25%
(
2 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
30%
(
20 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
37 of
85)
83
Total Points Won
68
|
7-6(1) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Arthur Van Der Kooij
Player
Liam Hignett
58%
(
44 of
76)
1st Serve %
59%
(
44 of
75)
0
Aces
4
4
Double Faults
4
66%
(
29 of
44)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
28 of
44)
50%
(
16 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
17 of
31)
17%
(
1 of
6)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
41%
(
31 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
30 of
75)
75
Total Points Won
76
|
2-6 7-6(5) 10-0 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
David Quayle
Player
Liam Hignett
67%
(
35 of
52)
1st Serve %
65%
(
31 of
48)
0
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
1
80%
(
28 of
35)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
17 of
31)
47%
(
8 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
5 of
17)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
31%
(
16 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
26 of
48)
62
Total Points Won
38
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Ronald Hohmann
Player
Liam Hignett
58%
(
41 of
71)
1st Serve %
57%
(
49 of
86)
8
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
1
80%
(
33 of
41)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
30 of
49)
67%
(
20 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
65%
(
24 of
37)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
25%
(
18 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
32 of
86)
85
Total Points Won
72
|
6-7(5) 6-3 10-6 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Lorenzo Lorusso
Player
Liam Hignett
55%
(
24 of
44)
1st Serve %
54%
(
26 of
48)
4
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
5
100%
(
24 of
24)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
19 of
26)
60%
(
12 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
11 of
22)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
18%
(
8 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
18 of
48)
54
Total Points Won
38
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Liam Hignett
Player
Ali Habib
52%
(
30 of
58)
1st Serve %
57%
(
39 of
69)
3
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
2
73%
(
22 of
30)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
27 of
39)
54%
(
15 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
13 of
30)
29%
(
2 of
7)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
36%
(
21 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
29 of
69)
66
Total Points Won
61
|
3-6 6-3 10-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Matthew Summers
Player
Liam Hignett
73%
(
37 of
51)
1st Serve %
58%
(
32 of
55)
0
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
3
73%
(
27 of
37)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
20 of
32)
64%
(
9 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
10 of
23)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
29%
(
15 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
25 of
55)
61
Total Points Won
45
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Charles Minc Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 | 5-7 6-3 10-5 | H2H | |||
| QF |
Stats
Mihai Alexandru Coman
Player
Charles Minc
67%
(
34 of
51)
1st Serve %
59%
(
33 of
56)
6
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
4
79%
(
27 of
34)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
20 of
33)
47%
(
8 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
8 of
23)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
31%
(
16 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
28 of
56)
63
Total Points Won
44
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 7-5 7-6(1) | H2H | |||
| QF |
Stats
Hong-Lin Fu
Player
Charles Minc
58%
(
31 of
53)
1st Serve %
53%
(
32 of
60)
6
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
4
81%
(
25 of
31)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
22 of
32)
59%
(
13 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
14 of
28)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
28%
(
15 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
24 of
60)
62
Total Points Won
51
|
3-6 6-1 10-6 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-1 6-1 | H2H | |||
| Q1 |
Stats
Liam Hignett
Player
Charles Minc
66%
(
29 of
44)
1st Serve %
53%
(
25 of
47)
7
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
1
76%
(
22 of
29)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
15 of
25)
73%
(
11 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
8 of
22)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
25%
(
11 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
24 of
47)
57
Total Points Won
34
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Alexandre Reco
Player
Charles Minc
62%
(
24 of
39)
1st Serve %
46%
(
24 of
52)
1
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
3
83%
(
20 of
24)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
11 of
24)
67%
(
10 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
11 of
28)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
23%
(
9 of
39)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
30 of
52)
60
Total Points Won
31
|
6-1 6-0 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Noah Schlagenhauf
Player
Charles Minc
54%
(
31 of
57)
1st Serve %
69%
(
43 of
62)
1
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
0
61%
(
19 of
31)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
23 of
43)
62%
(
16 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
7 of
19)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
39%
(
22 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
32 of
62)
67
Total Points Won
52
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Buvaysar Gadamauri
Player
Charles Minc
58%
(
23 of
40)
1st Serve %
59%
(
33 of
56)
3
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
2
78%
(
18 of
23)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
15 of
33)
71%
(
12 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
9 of
23)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
25%
(
10 of
40)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
32 of
56)
62
Total Points Won
34
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Charles Minc
Player
Hazem Naow
76%
(
38 of
50)
1st Serve %
68%
(
34 of
50)
3
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
1
79%
(
30 of
38)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
20 of
34)
50%
(
6 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
6 of
16)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
28%
(
14 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
24 of
50)
60
Total Points Won
40
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
Hignett Vs Minc Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
