Liam Drover-Mattinen vs Philip Florig Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Drover-Mattinen vs Florig analysis and find out who is favored!
Liam Drover-Mattinen vs Philip Florig Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Drover-Mattinen has won 0% of points on his second serve, while Florig has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Drover-Mattinen, in recent form, has won 0% of his opponent's second serve points, while Florig has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Drover-Mattinen has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Florig has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Drover-Mattinen has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/ 0), with Florig winning 46.43% (W/L 13/ 15) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Drover-Mattinen has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 1), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 1). Florig has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 47% (W/L 24/ 27), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 35% (W/L 6/ 11).
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Drover-Mattinen has played against opponents with an average rank of while Florig has played against players with an average rank of 178.25.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Drover-Mattinen has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Florig has won 60% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Drover-Mattinen has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Florig has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Drover-Mattinen 0 - 0 Florig
0
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
0
Minor
N/A
Rank
High
19
Age
Plays
0
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
851
Rank
842
High
20
Age
Plays
0
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
0
Minor
Form
0% (0-1)
Career Total W/L
42% (40-55)
0% (0-0)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Drover-Mattinen VS Florig H2h Matches played
Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
w/o |
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
stats | Liam Drover-Mattinen | Philip Florig |
---|---|---|
YTD W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Aces pg | 0 | 0 |
Aces Total | 0 | 0 |
DFs per game | 0 | 0 |
DFs Total | 0 | 0 |
Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1st Match |
Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 0 |
1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Liam Drover-Mattinen Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
QF |
Max Hans Rehberg
Player
Liam Drover-Mattinen
64%
(
41 of
64)
1st Serve %
58%
(
40 of
69)
1
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
8
68%
(
28 of
41)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
20 of
40)
39%
(
9 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
11 of
29)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
42%
(
27 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
38 of
69)
75
Total Points Won
58
|
7-6(7) 6-1 | H2H | ||
Q1 | w/o | H2H |
view more
Philip Florig Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 |
Yanis Ghazouani Durand
Player
Philip Florig
74%
(
28 of
38)
1st Serve %
57%
(
27 of
47)
0
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
2
75%
(
21 of
28)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
13 of
27)
30%
(
3 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
9 of
20)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
37%
(
14 of
38)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
25 of
47)
49
Total Points Won
36
|
6-2 3-1 ret. | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Henrique Rocha
Player
Philip Florig
44%
(
19 of
43)
1st Serve %
63%
(
36 of
57)
2
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
8
68%
(
13 of
19)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
19 of
36)
42%
(
10 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
9 of
21)
27%
(
3 of
11)
Break Points Won
100%
(
3 of
3)
47%
(
20 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
29 of
57)
52
Total Points Won
48
|
7-6(6) ret. | H2H | ||
R1 |
Adrian Oetzbach
Player
Philip Florig
48%
(
48 of
101)
1st Serve %
63%
(
71 of
112)
4
Aces
4
6
Double Faults
7
65%
(
31 of
48)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
36 of
71)
47%
(
25 of
53)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
21 of
41)
57%
(
8 of
14)
Break Points Won
46%
(
6 of
13)
45%
(
45 of
101)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
55 of
112)
111
Total Points Won
102
|
6-2 5-7 7-5 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Dominik Boehler
Player
Philip Florig
63%
(
26 of
41)
1st Serve %
45%
(
22 of
49)
4
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
4
69%
(
18 of
26)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
11 of
22)
73%
(
11 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
11 of
27)
100%
(
5 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
29%
(
12 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
27 of
49)
56
Total Points Won
34
|
6-0 6-2 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Philip Florig
Player
John Hallquist Lithen
56%
(
24 of
43)
1st Serve %
73%
(
35 of
48)
2
Aces
1
-
Double Faults
-
71%
(
17 of
24)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
17 of
35)
74%
(
14 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
6 of
13)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
28%
(
12 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
25 of
48)
56
Total Points Won
35
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Tommaso Compagnucci
Player
Philip Florig
60%
(
34 of
57)
1st Serve %
66%
(
46 of
70)
1
Aces
1
7
Double Faults
4
71%
(
24 of
34)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
24 of
46)
43%
(
10 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
10 of
24)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
40%
(
23 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
36 of
70)
70
Total Points Won
57
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
QF |
Daniel Paty
Player
Philip Florig
60%
(
44 of
73)
1st Serve %
65%
(
47 of
72)
20
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
2
82%
(
36 of
44)
1st Serve Won
83%
(
39 of
47)
69%
(
20 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
11 of
25)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
23%
(
17 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
31%
(
22 of
72)
78
Total Points Won
67
|
6-3 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Philip Florig
Player
Arthur Nagel
71%
(
34 of
48)
1st Serve %
63%
(
30 of
48)
4
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
3
76%
(
26 of
34)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
15 of
30)
43%
(
6 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
6 of
18)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
33%
(
16 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
27 of
48)
59
Total Points Won
37
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Philip Florig
Player
Mariano Dedura-Palomero
63%
(
25 of
40)
1st Serve %
59%
(
19 of
32)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
5
76%
(
19 of
25)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
10 of
19)
40%
(
6 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
23%
(
3 of
13)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
38%
(
15 of
40)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
19 of
32)
44
Total Points Won
28
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Gilles Arnaud Bailly
Player
Philip Florig
71%
(
41 of
58)
1st Serve %
68%
(
54 of
80)
0
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
5
76%
(
31 of
41)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
34 of
54)
59%
(
10 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
9 of
26)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
6)
29%
(
17 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
37 of
80)
78
Total Points Won
60
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H |
view more