N. B. Kjaer
To Win
J. Engel
To Win
Liam Draxl vs Nicolai Budkov Kjaer Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W W L W W L W W L L
Form
W L W W W W W L W LHead-To-Head: Draxl 1 - 1 Kjaer
They have played 6 sets in total, with Draxl winning 3 and Kjaer winning 3. The last match between Draxl and Kjaer was at the Thionville Challenger, 03-03-2025, First, I.hard with Liam Draxl getting the victory 6-4 6-7(10) 6-4.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Liam Draxl | 1 |
| Nicolai Budkov Kjaer | 1 |
Thionville Challenger(03-03-2025)
6
4
6
7
6
4
Upcoming Match
24 Mar 2025 / First
ODDS
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Minaur VS Fonseca PREDICTION Hard
Miami Open - Miami atp
24 Mar 2025 / Third
ODDS
PREDICTION
EDGE
Dimitrov VS Khachanov PREDICTION Hard
Miami Open - Miami atp
23 Mar 2025 / Third
ODDS
PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-4 6-7(10) 6-4 |
Stats 
Liam Draxl
Player
Nicolai Budkov Kjaer
71%
(
85 of
119)
1st Serve %
56%
(
57 of
101)
5
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
5
73%
(
62 of
85)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
37 of
57)
47%
(
16 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
26 of
44)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
34%
(
41 of
119)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
38 of
101)
116
Total Points Won
104
|
||||
| 6-3 1-6 6-1 |
Stats
Nicolai Budkov Kjaer
Player
Liam Draxl
66%
(
48 of
73)
1st Serve %
78%
(
59 of
76)
10
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
0
77%
(
37 of
48)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
37 of
59)
40%
(
10 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
7 of
17)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
36%
(
26 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
32 of
76)
79
Total Points Won
70
|
||||
Stats
1
H2H Matches
1
3
Sets Won
3
28
Games Won
28
6
Aces (Total)
14
2
Total Double Faults
5
2:20:30
Average Match Time
2:20:30
74% (144/195)
1st Serve %
60% (105/174)
69% (99/144)
1st Serve Win %
70% (74/105)
45% (23/51)
2nd Serve Win %
52% (36/69)
50% (6/12)
Break Points Won % (Total)
31% (5/16)
37% (64/174)
Return Points Win %
37% (73/195)
50% (1/2)
Best of 3 Sets Win %
50% (1/2)
0% (0/0)
Best of 5 Sets Win %
0% (0/0)
0% (0/1)
Tiebreaks Win % (Total)
100% (1/1)
50% (1/2)
Deciding Set Win %
50% (1/2)
100% (1/1)
1st Set Won, Won Match
100% (1/1)
0% (1/0)
1st Set Won, Lost Match
0% (1/0)
0% (1/0)
1st Set Lost, Won Match
0% (1/0)
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Liam Draxl vs Nicolai Budkov Kjaer Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Liam Draxl 1 - 1 Nicolai Budkov Kjaer
Analyzing the recent form of both players provides significant insights into the upcoming tennis match between Draxl and Kjaer. In terms of second serve performance over the past six months, Kjaer has excelled by winning 45.19% of points, surpassing Draxl's 40.93%. This statistic is highly relevant for predicting match outcomes as it often correlates with overall match success.
Examining return game statistics shows a divergence in their capabilities. Draxl, in recent form, has successfully won 49.58% of their opponent's second serve points compared to Kjaer's 42.38%. Conversely, when it comes to returning first serves, Kjaer slightly edges out Draxl, winning 27.75% as opposed to Draxl's 25.88%. These figures are crucial for determining which player might be favored in this head-to-head matchup.
When under pressure, analyzing break point conversion rates reveals that Draxl has converted 33.33% of opportunities while Kjaer has managed a slightly lower conversion rate of 31.97%. Similarly, Draxl has demonstrated resilience by saving 50.6% of break points, marginally outpacing Kjaer's capability at 49.17%. These performance metrics are valuable for live in-game predictions and betting.
Overarching performance analysis over the past year highlights that Kjaer has a marginally better win rate of 70.83% (W/L 34/14), compared to Draxl's 68.6% win percentage (W/L 59/27). However, it is essential to consider the quality of opponents each has faced; Draxl competed against higher-ranked opponents with an average rank of 324.72, while Kjaer's adversaries averaged a rank of 410.29.
Surface preferences and histories provide further context. Draxl's best career surface appears to be indoor hard courts with a win percentage of 70% (W/L 48/21), while Kjaer excels on clay surfaces, achieving a 73% win rate (W/L 19/7). Despite Draxl's proficiency on indoor hard, their worst performance comes on clay, whereas Kjaer's least favorable surface is hard courts.
At the level of play, Draxl has been more active in Challenger/ITF tournaments (>$10K), winning 62.07% of their matches, whereas Kjaer, participating primarily in Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments ($10K), boasts a superior winning percentage of 76.67%. The disparity in tournament levels is relevant for predicting match outcomes, emphasizing Kjaer's predominance at lower-tier events.
Direct head-to-head encounters provide another layer of predictability. They have faced each other once, with Kjaer emerging victorious in that encounter. The last match witnessed Kjaer defeating Draxl at the Glasgow Challenger in a three-set contest. Considering matches going to a deciding set, Draxl is slightly more successful, winning 63% of such situations compared to Kjaer's 60%.
Factoring in all available statistics and form, Kjaer's consistent performance across different aspects coupled with a favorable head-to-head record suggests that Kjaer may have the upper hand in this upcoming match. Kjaer appears poised to leverage their recent form to secure yet another victory.
Liam Draxl Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Christopher O'Connell
Player
Liam Draxl
65%
(
31 of
48)
1st Serve %
68%
(
44 of
65)
6
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
1
87%
(
27 of
31)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
25 of
44)
53%
(
9 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
6 of
21)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
25%
(
12 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
34 of
65)
70
Total Points Won
43
|
7-5 6-0 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Alibek Kachmazov
Player
Liam Draxl
62%
(
67 of
108)
1st Serve %
66%
(
79 of
119)
14
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
5
66%
(
44 of
67)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
51 of
79)
61%
(
25 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
17 of
40)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
36%
(
39 of
108)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
51 of
119)
120
Total Points Won
107
|
7-6(6) 5-7 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Liam Draxl
Player
Beibit Zhukayev
76%
(
65 of
86)
1st Serve %
52%
(
49 of
94)
4
Aces
12
3
Double Faults
4
77%
(
50 of
65)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
34 of
49)
48%
(
10 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
24 of
45)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
30%
(
26 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
36 of
94)
96
Total Points Won
84
|
6-3 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Liam Draxl
Player
Nicolai Budkov Kjaer
71%
(
85 of
119)
1st Serve %
56%
(
57 of
101)
5
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
5
73%
(
62 of
85)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
37 of
57)
47%
(
16 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
26 of
44)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
34%
(
41 of
119)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
38 of
101)
116
Total Points Won
104
|
6-4 6-7(10) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Raphael Collignon
Player
Liam Draxl
76%
(
55 of
72)
1st Serve %
68%
(
52 of
77)
4
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
2
73%
(
40 of
55)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
34 of
52)
47%
(
8 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
13 of
25)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
33%
(
24 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
30 of
77)
78
Total Points Won
71
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Liam Draxl
Player
Emil Ruusuvuori
68%
(
42 of
62)
1st Serve %
56%
(
42 of
75)
3
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
1
74%
(
31 of
42)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
31 of
42)
65%
(
13 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
16 of
33)
22%
(
2 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
29%
(
18 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
28 of
75)
72
Total Points Won
65
|
6-4 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Liam Draxl
Player
Rei Sakamoto
63%
(
38 of
60)
1st Serve %
54%
(
38 of
71)
1
Aces
10
2
Double Faults
2
71%
(
27 of
38)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
29 of
38)
59%
(
13 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
12 of
33)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
33%
(
20 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
30 of
71)
70
Total Points Won
61
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Nicolai Budkov Kjaer
Player
Liam Draxl
66%
(
48 of
73)
1st Serve %
78%
(
59 of
76)
10
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
0
77%
(
37 of
48)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
37 of
59)
40%
(
10 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
7 of
17)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
36%
(
26 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
32 of
76)
79
Total Points Won
70
|
6-3 1-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Liam Draxl
Player
Bernabe Zapata Miralles
76%
(
34 of
45)
1st Serve %
69%
(
37 of
54)
5
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
1
85%
(
29 of
34)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
23 of
37)
45%
(
5 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
6 of
17)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
24%
(
11 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
25 of
54)
59
Total Points Won
40
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Liam Draxl
Player
Adrian Andreev
74%
(
29 of
39)
1st Serve %
64%
(
37 of
58)
11
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
1
86%
(
25 of
29)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
26 of
37)
70%
(
7 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
6 of
21)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
18%
(
7 of
39)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
26 of
58)
58
Total Points Won
39
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
Nicolai Budkov Kjaer Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Ivan Gakhov
Player
Nicolai Budkov Kjaer
56%
(
43 of
77)
1st Serve %
67%
(
55 of
82)
4
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
3
65%
(
28 of
43)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
29 of
55)
44%
(
15 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
10 of
27)
35%
(
6 of
17)
Break Points Won
56%
(
5 of
9)
44%
(
34 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
43 of
82)
86
Total Points Won
73
|
6-4 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Nicolai Budkov Kjaer
Player
Javier Barranco Cosano
70%
(
35 of
50)
1st Serve %
60%
(
42 of
70)
2
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
4
69%
(
24 of
35)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
21 of
42)
67%
(
10 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
11 of
28)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
32%
(
16 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
38 of
70)
72
Total Points Won
48
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Liam Draxl
Player
Nicolai Budkov Kjaer
71%
(
85 of
119)
1st Serve %
56%
(
57 of
101)
5
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
5
73%
(
62 of
85)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
37 of
57)
47%
(
16 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
26 of
44)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
34%
(
41 of
119)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
38 of
101)
116
Total Points Won
104
|
6-4 6-7(10) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Nicolai Budkov Kjaer
Player
Viktor Durasovic
69%
(
33 of
48)
1st Serve %
63%
(
40 of
63)
3
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
3
82%
(
27 of
33)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
26 of
40)
87%
(
13 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
12 of
23)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
17%
(
8 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
25 of
63)
65
Total Points Won
46
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Nicolai Budkov Kjaer
Player
Max Hans Rehberg
73%
(
47 of
64)
1st Serve %
69%
(
42 of
61)
11
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
3
79%
(
37 of
47)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
30 of
42)
71%
(
12 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
8 of
19)
100%
(
2 of
2)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
23%
(
15 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
23 of
61)
72
Total Points Won
53
|
6-3 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Nicolai Budkov Kjaer
Player
Liam Draxl
66%
(
48 of
73)
1st Serve %
78%
(
59 of
76)
10
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
0
77%
(
37 of
48)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
37 of
59)
40%
(
10 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
7 of
17)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
36%
(
26 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
32 of
76)
79
Total Points Won
70
|
6-3 1-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Nicolai Budkov Kjaer
Player
Raul Brancaccio
69%
(
46 of
67)
1st Serve %
66%
(
57 of
86)
8
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
6
80%
(
37 of
46)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
41 of
57)
67%
(
14 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
13 of
29)
25%
(
1 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
24%
(
16 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
32 of
86)
83
Total Points Won
70
|
6-4 7-6(7) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Nicolai Budkov Kjaer
Player
Hugo Grenier
67%
(
58 of
87)
1st Serve %
61%
(
49 of
80)
5
Aces
7
0
Double Faults
3
71%
(
41 of
58)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
33 of
49)
45%
(
13 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
13 of
31)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
38%
(
33 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
34 of
80)
88
Total Points Won
79
|
6-3 3-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Viktor Durasovic
Player
Nicolai Budkov Kjaer
75%
(
47 of
63)
1st Serve %
69%
(
49 of
71)
3
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
3
70%
(
33 of
47)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
31 of
49)
44%
(
7 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
10 of
22)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
37%
(
23 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
30 of
71)
70
Total Points Won
64
|
7-6(5) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Nicolai Budkov Kjaer
Player
Adrian Andreev
68%
(
28 of
41)
1st Serve %
64%
(
23 of
36)
11
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
1
75%
(
21 of
28)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
11 of
23)
38%
(
5 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
7 of
13)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
37%
(
15 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
18 of
36)
44
Total Points Won
33
|
7-5 1-0 ret. | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
Stats
65% (180/97)
Win/Loss
66% (39/20)
63% (392/229)
Sets Win/Loss
64% (87/49)
55% (3201/2572)
Games Win/Loss
55% (703/579)
65% (88/47)
Hard Win/Loss
50% (6/6)
60% (42/28)
Clay Win/Loss
71% (20/8)
69% (50/22)
Indoor Hard W/L
68% (13/6)
0% (0/0)
Grass Win/Loss
0% (0/0)
0.32
Aces Per Game
0.27
906
Aces Total
171
0.27
Double Faults Per Game
0.19
756
Total Double Faults
118
1:39:44
Average Match Time
1:31:34
417.87
Average Opponent Rank
407.41
65% (11126/17064)
1st Serve %
61% (2176/3546)
70% (7742/11126)
1st Serve Win %
68% (1486/2176)
50% (2979/5938)
2nd Serve Win %
54% (734/1370)
47% (886/1885)
Break Points Won % (Total)
49% (178/361)
42% (7301/17220)
Return Points Win %
42% (1507/3563)
0% (0/0)
Slam W/L
0% (0/0)
0% (0/5)
Masters W/L
0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)
Cups W/L
33% (2/4)
0% (0/2)
Main Tour W/L
0% (0/1)
0% (0/0)
Tour Finals W/L
0% (0/0)
57% (60/45)
Challenger W/L
65% (11/6)
73% (120/45)
Futures W/L
74% (26/9)
66% (175/267)
Best of 3 Sets Win %
67% (39/58)
100% (3/3)
Best of 5 Sets Win %
0% (0/0)
59% (41/70)
Tiebreaks Win % (Total)
60% (9/15)
54% (38/70)
Deciding Set Win %
53% (10/19)
91% (180/164)
1st Set Won, Won Match
91% (35/32)
8% (180/14)
1st Set Won, Lost Match
9% (35/3)
18% (97/17)
1st Set Lost, Won Match
29% (24/7)
Potential H2H Matches This Week For Nicolai Budkov Kjaer
View full predicted draw for Kjaer
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
