Liam Draxl vs Garrett Johns Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W W W L L W W W L L
Form
W L L W W W L W W LHead-2-Head: Draxl 1 - 0 Johns
They have played 2 sets in total, with Draxl winning 2 and Johns winning 0. The last match between Draxl and Johns was at the Savannah Challenger, 22-04-2025, Round: First, Surface: Clay, with Liam Draxl getting the victory 7-5 6-1.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Liam Draxl | 1 |
| Garrett Johns | 0 |
LAST H2H MATCH: Savannah Challenger(22-04-2025)
Liam Draxl
Garrett Johns
7
5
6
1
| Draxl | Stats | Johns |
|---|---|---|
| 65% (28-15) | YTD Win/Loss | 73% (32-12) |
| 1 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
| 148 | Ranking | 352 |
| 142 | Highest Rank | 340 |
| 23 | Age | 24 |
| R | Plays | R |
| 8 | Titles | 8 |
| 65% (193-104) | Career Total W/L | 63% (150-88) |
| $3,650 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 0 | YTD Titles | 3 |
| 1 | Clay H2H | 0 |
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Bergs VS Khachanov PREDICTION Grass
Terra Wortmann Open - Halle atp
16 Jun 2025 / First
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Fonseca VS Cobolli PREDICTION Grass
Terra Wortmann Open - Halle atp
16 Jun 2025 / First
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7-5 6-1 |
Stats 
Liam Draxl
Player
Garrett Johns
69%
(
35 of
51)
1st Serve %
58%
(
32 of
55)
1
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
3
83%
(
29 of
35)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
17 of
32)
50%
(
8 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
12 of
23)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
27%
(
14 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
26 of
55)
63
Total Points Won
43
|
||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 13 | Games Won | 6 |
| 1 | Aces (Total) | 3 |
| 3 | Total Double Faults | 3 |
| 1:29:47 | Average Match Time | 1:29:47 |
| 69% (35/51) | 1st Serve % | 58% (32/55) |
| 83% (29/35) | 1st Serve Win % | 53% (17/32) |
| 50% (8/16) | 2nd Serve Win % | 52% (12/23) |
| 80% (4/5) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 0% (0/1) |
| 47% (26/55) | Return Points Win % | 27% (14/51) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Draxl vs Johns Match Preview :
In recent months, Johns and Draxl have shown distinct skills and patterns on the tennis court, providing an interesting comparison ahead of their upcoming match. Notably, over the past half-year, Johns has won 43.65% of points on their second serve, while Draxl's performance is closely trailing at 42.15%. Additionally, return game statistics reveal Johns capturing 45.9% of their opponent's second serve points, compared to 49.52% by Draxl, with first serve return stats at 25.41% for Johns and 25% for Draxl.
Performance under pressure often influences the outcome of tightly contested matches. During this period, their breakpoint defense shows close margins, with Johns saving 53.01% and Draxl 53.08% of breakpoints faced, indicating resilience on critical points. Furthermore, both player’s conversion on breakpoints showcases potential match-defining moments, as Johns and Draxl converted 31.78% and 32.16% of their opportunities, respectively.
The overall match record in the past year shows Draxl slightly ahead, winning 70% of his matches (W/L 63/27), while Johns suits well with 66.67% (W/L 56/28). Preferences for playing surfaces reveal contrasting strengths, with Johns performing best on Hard courts at a 66% win rate (W/L 89/46), whereas Draxl excels on I.hard surfaces, winning 69% (W/L 50/22).
Assessing the level at which they compete, Johns has shown prowess at Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, with a win rate of 76.92% (W/L 40/12). In contrast, Draxl has faced more challenging competition in the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, maintaining a 66.1% win rate (W/L 39/20). Given the difference in average opponent rank—442.74 for Johns versus 331.81 for Draxl—these stats offer insights into their adaptability against varied competition.
When matches head into deciding sets, Draxl demonstrates a slight edge, having won 70% of those situations over the last 12 months, compared to 67% for Johns. With these factors combined, Draxl's superior success percentage against higher-ranked opponents may give him the edge in this face-off. Based on these statistics, Draxl is slightly favored to win this encounter, yet the match is likely to be competitive throughout.
Draxl vs Johns Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88
Liam Draxl Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Trevor Svajda
Player
Liam Draxl
71%
(
5 of
7)
1st Serve %
75%
(
9 of
12)
1
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
0
80%
(
4 of
5)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
6 of
9)
50%
(
1 of
2)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
0%
(
0 of
1)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
29%
(
2 of
7)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
5 of
12)
10
Total Points Won
9
|
1-1 ret. | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Michael Zheng
Player
Liam Draxl
56%
(
34 of
61)
1st Serve %
54%
(
42 of
78)
6
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
3
68%
(
23 of
34)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
23 of
42)
59%
(
16 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
20 of
36)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
36%
(
22 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
35 of
78)
74
Total Points Won
65
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Liam Draxl
Player
Kenta Miyoshi
58%
(
45 of
78)
1st Serve %
64%
(
48 of
75)
2
Aces
7
6
Double Faults
3
73%
(
33 of
45)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
28 of
48)
55%
(
18 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
67%
(
18 of
27)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
35%
(
27 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
29 of
75)
80
Total Points Won
73
|
7-6(4) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Liam Draxl
Player
Patrick Maloney
69%
(
44 of
64)
1st Serve %
51%
(
23 of
45)
0
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
5
66%
(
29 of
44)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
13 of
23)
50%
(
10 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
10 of
22)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
10%
(
1 of
10)
39%
(
25 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
22 of
45)
61
Total Points Won
48
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Liam Draxl
Player
Rafael Jodar
73%
(
51 of
70)
1st Serve %
67%
(
42 of
63)
2
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
2
67%
(
34 of
51)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
21 of
42)
42%
(
8 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
12 of
21)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
40%
(
28 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
30 of
63)
72
Total Points Won
61
|
7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Filip Misolic
Player
Liam Draxl
61%
(
27 of
44)
1st Serve %
60%
(
28 of
47)
1
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
1
81%
(
22 of
27)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
15 of
28)
41%
(
7 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
5 of
19)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
34%
(
15 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
27 of
47)
56
Total Points Won
35
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Nicolas Mejia
Player
Liam Draxl
64%
(
64 of
100)
1st Serve %
70%
(
72 of
103)
4
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
1
61%
(
39 of
64)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
39 of
72)
56%
(
20 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
18 of
31)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
36%
(
5 of
14)
41%
(
41 of
100)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
46 of
103)
105
Total Points Won
98
|
2-6 6-2 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Liam Draxl
Player
Genaro Alberto Olivieri
71%
(
64 of
90)
1st Serve %
80%
(
52 of
65)
2
Aces
0
8
Double Faults
0
66%
(
42 of
64)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
27 of
52)
35%
(
9 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
7 of
13)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
21%
(
3 of
14)
43%
(
39 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
31 of
65)
82
Total Points Won
73
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Garrett Johns Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Roberto Cid Subervi
Player
Garrett Johns
61%
(
23 of
38)
1st Serve %
50%
(
37 of
74)
1
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
2
83%
(
19 of
23)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
25 of
37)
60%
(
9 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
14 of
37)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
26%
(
10 of
38)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
35 of
74)
63
Total Points Won
49
|
7-5 3-1 ret. | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Garrett Johns
Player
Adhithya Ganesan
65%
(
20 of
31)
1st Serve %
68%
(
28 of
41)
0
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
4
85%
(
17 of
20)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
16 of
28)
73%
(
8 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
7 of
13)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
19%
(
6 of
31)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
18 of
41)
43
Total Points Won
29
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Garrett Johns
Player
Mwendwa Mbithi
52%
(
48 of
93)
1st Serve %
65%
(
60 of
92)
10
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
2
77%
(
37 of
48)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
40 of
60)
62%
(
28 of
45)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
17 of
32)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
30%
(
28 of
93)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
35 of
92)
100
Total Points Won
85
|
6-0 6-7(3) 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Alex Rybakov
Player
Garrett Johns
61%
(
20 of
33)
1st Serve %
52%
(
28 of
54)
3
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
0
95%
(
19 of
20)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
17 of
28)
69%
(
9 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
13 of
26)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
15%
(
5 of
33)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
24 of
54)
52
Total Points Won
35
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Garrett Johns
Player
Liam Krall
45%
(
22 of
49)
1st Serve %
62%
(
32 of
52)
1
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
3
77%
(
17 of
22)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
17 of
32)
52%
(
14 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
10 of
20)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
37%
(
18 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
25 of
52)
56
Total Points Won
45
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Garrett Johns
Player
Unknown Player
54%
(
27 of
50)
1st Serve %
66%
(
27 of
41)
4
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
0
74%
(
20 of
27)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
14 of
27)
52%
(
12 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
6 of
14)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
36%
(
18 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
21 of
41)
53
Total Points Won
38
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Garrett Johns
Player
Olle Sonesson Lidholt
56%
(
19 of
34)
1st Serve %
62%
(
39 of
63)
1
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
1
79%
(
15 of
19)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
19 of
39)
73%
(
11 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
7 of
24)
43%
(
6 of
14)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
24%
(
8 of
34)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
37 of
63)
63
Total Points Won
34
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ryan Dickerson
Player
Garrett Johns
64%
(
44 of
69)
1st Serve %
45%
(
37 of
83)
0
Aces
7
3
Double Faults
5
75%
(
33 of
44)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
27 of
37)
56%
(
14 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
21 of
46)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
32%
(
22 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
35 of
83)
82
Total Points Won
70
|
6-2 7-6(9) | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 65% (193/104) | Win/Loss | 63% (150/88) |
| 63% (419/245) | Sets Win/Loss | 59% (323/222) |
| 55% (3430/2765) | Games Win/Loss | 53% (2713/2362) |
| 65% (91/49) | Hard Win/Loss | 66% (91/47) |
| 61% (52/33) | Clay Win/Loss | 63% (55/33) |
| 69% (50/22) | Indoor Hard W/L | 33% (4/8) |
| 0.32 | Aces Per Game | 0.31 |
| 955 | Aces Total | 764 |
| 0.27 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.17 |
| 829 | Total Double Faults | 421 |
| 1:40:33 | Average Match Time | 1:35:11 |
| 416.39 | Average Opponent Rank | 428.88 |
| 65% (12072/18481) | 1st Serve % | 57% (7865/13894) |
| 69% (8375/12072) | 1st Serve Win % | 69% (5450/7865) |
| 50% (3194/6409) | 2nd Serve Win % | 50% (3028/6029) |
| 47% (961/2037) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 44% (634/1443) |
| 42% (7883/18564) | Return Points Win % | 41% (5774/13991) |
| 0% (0/1) | Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/5) | Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 25% (1/3) | Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/1) |
| 59% (72/50) | Challenger W/L | 51% (30/29) |
| 73% (120/45) | Futures W/L | 67% (120/58) |
| 66% (188/286) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 62% (144/232) |
| 100% (3/3) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 100% (3/3) |
| 57% (43/75) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 59% (37/63) |
| 56% (42/75) | Deciding Set Win % | 62% (43/69) |
| 91% (192/175) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 90% (143/129) |
| 8% (192/15) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 10% (143/14) |
| 18% (104/19) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 22% (95/21) |
Draxl vs. Johns Prediction Form Trend:
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
