A. Kovacevic
To Win
E. Ruusuvuori
To Win
Liam Draxl vs Emil Ruusuvuori Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W L W L W W W W L L
Form
W L W W L L L L W LH2H: Draxl 1 - 0 Ruusuvuori
They have played 2 sets in total, with Draxl winning 2 and Ruusuvuori winning 0. The last match between Draxl and Ruusuvuori was at the Lugano Challenger, 27-02-2025, Round: Second, Surface: I.hard, with Liam Draxl getting the victory 6-4 7-6(2).
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Liam Draxl | 1 |
| Emil Ruusuvuori | 0 |
LAST H2H MATCH: Lugano Challenger(27-02-2025)
Liam Draxl
Emil Ruusuvuori
6
4
7
6
| Draxl | Stats | Ruusuvuori |
|---|---|---|
| 66% (25-13) | YTD Win/Loss | 40% (6-9) |
| 1 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
| 148 | Ranking | 254 |
| 142 | Highest Rank | 37 |
| 23 | Age | 26 |
| R | Plays | R |
| 8 | Titles | 10 |
| 65% (190-102) | Career Total W/L | 61% (285-186) |
| $3,650 | Career Prize Money | $2,614,675 |
| 1 | Indoor H2H | 0 |
Upcoming Match
25 May 2025 / First
ODDS
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Eala VS Arango PREDICTION Clay
French Open - Paris wta
25 May 2025 / First
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Kartal VS Andreeva PREDICTION Clay
French Open - Paris wta
25 May 2025 / First
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Draxl VS Ruusuvuori H2H Matches played
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-4 7-6(2) |
Stats 
Liam Draxl
Player
Emil Ruusuvuori
68%
(
42 of
62)
1st Serve %
56%
(
42 of
75)
3
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
1
74%
(
31 of
42)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
31 of
42)
65%
(
13 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
16 of
33)
22%
(
2 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
29%
(
18 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
28 of
75)
72
Total Points Won
65
|
||||
Draxl VS Ruusuvuori H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 13 | Games Won | 10 |
| 3 | Aces (Total) | 6 |
| 1 | Total Double Faults | 1 |
| 1:33:12 | Average Match Time | 1:33:12 |
| 68% (42/62) | 1st Serve % | 56% (42/75) |
| 74% (31/42) | 1st Serve Win % | 74% (31/42) |
| 65% (13/20) | 2nd Serve Win % | 48% (16/33) |
| 22% (2/9) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 50% (1/2) |
| 37% (28/75) | Return Points Win % | 29% (18/62) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Draxl vs Ruusuvuori Match Preview :
Could the outcome of this thrilling tennis match hinge on second serve performance? Over the past six months, Emil Ruusuvuori has demonstrated strength, capturing 42.86% of points on his second serve, slightly overshadowing Liam Draxl's 40.56%. This element of play often mirrors the final result, making it an essential statistic to weigh in on predictions.
Observing the return game metrics reveals intriguing contrasts. While Draxl outperforms Ruusuvuori by taking 49.78% of opponents’ second serve points compared to Ruusuvuori's 44.55%, the tables turn when they face first serves. Here, Ruusuvuori excels, clinching 31.28% of first-serve returns against Draxl's 25.84%. What does this suggest for the head-to-head outcome, and how might these numbers influence the match dynamics?
Under pressure, both players show resilience, with Ruusuvuori saving 51.61% of break points, just edging out Draxl’s 49.9%. Such data serve gamblers well when making in-game predictions, especially during high-stakes points.
When evaluating year-long performances, Ruusuvuori's win rate stands at 38.1%, a contrast to Draxl’s impressive 69.32%. This disparity could be a decisive factor in predicting the favorite. However, both exhibit proficiency on indoor hard surfaces, with Ruusuvuori clinching 69% and Draxl slightly higher at 70%. Clay, in contrast, presents challenges for both, albeit Draxl fares better with a 60% win rate against Ruusuvuori’s 47%.
Examining both players' experiences, Ruusuvuori has predominantly competed in Challengers/ITF tournaments, achieving a 37.5% win rate. Conversely, Draxl’s experience has been more fruitful, boasting a 62.5% success rate. Moreover, Ruusuvuori faces stiffer competition, with his opponents averaging a ranking of 145.14, considerably higher than Draxl's 330.97.
As for deciding set performances, Draxl seizes 64% of these scenarios compared to Ruusuvuori’s 40%, creating a potential advantage should their match extend to the wire. Break point conversion rates further this notion; Draxl capitalizes on 33.76% of opportunities, outperforming Ruusuvuori’s 27.59%. Such numbers are invaluable for strategic live betting.
In weighing these detailed statistics, Draxl seems favored to emerge victorious. His overall match performance, coupled with his ability on deciding points and lower-ranked opposition, firmly tilts the scales in his favor for this encounter.
Draxl vs Ruusuvuori Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88
Liam Draxl Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Filip Misolic
Player
Liam Draxl
61%
(
27 of
44)
1st Serve %
60%
(
28 of
47)
1
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
1
81%
(
22 of
27)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
15 of
28)
41%
(
7 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
5 of
19)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
34%
(
15 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
27 of
47)
56
Total Points Won
35
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Nicolas Mejia
Player
Liam Draxl
64%
(
64 of
100)
1st Serve %
70%
(
72 of
103)
4
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
1
61%
(
39 of
64)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
39 of
72)
56%
(
20 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
18 of
31)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
36%
(
5 of
14)
41%
(
41 of
100)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
46 of
103)
105
Total Points Won
98
|
2-6 6-2 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Liam Draxl
Player
Genaro Alberto Olivieri
71%
(
64 of
90)
1st Serve %
80%
(
52 of
65)
2
Aces
0
8
Double Faults
0
66%
(
42 of
64)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
27 of
52)
35%
(
9 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
7 of
13)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
21%
(
3 of
14)
43%
(
39 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
31 of
65)
82
Total Points Won
73
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Liam Draxl
Player
Oliver Crawford
65%
(
62 of
96)
1st Serve %
66%
(
73 of
110)
10
Aces
2
8
Double Faults
6
76%
(
47 of
62)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
48 of
73)
41%
(
14 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
12 of
37)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
36%
(
35 of
96)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
50 of
110)
111
Total Points Won
95
|
6-3 6-7(7) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Liam Draxl
Player
Patrick Maloney
68%
(
58 of
85)
1st Serve %
75%
(
55 of
73)
4
Aces
5
4
Double Faults
1
72%
(
42 of
58)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
35 of
55)
48%
(
13 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
8 of
18)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
18%
(
2 of
11)
35%
(
30 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
30 of
73)
85
Total Points Won
73
|
7-5 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Liam Draxl
Player
Garrett Johns
69%
(
35 of
51)
1st Serve %
58%
(
32 of
55)
1
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
3
83%
(
29 of
35)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
17 of
32)
50%
(
8 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
12 of
23)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
27%
(
14 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
26 of
55)
63
Total Points Won
43
|
7-5 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Andrea Collarini
Player
Liam Draxl
74%
(
35 of
47)
1st Serve %
65%
(
45 of
69)
0
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
4
63%
(
22 of
35)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
28 of
45)
83%
(
10 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
21%
(
5 of
24)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
32%
(
15 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
36 of
69)
68
Total Points Won
48
|
6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Liam Draxl
Player
Inaki Montes-De La Torre
72%
(
63 of
88)
1st Serve %
49%
(
51 of
104)
10
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
6
73%
(
46 of
63)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
29 of
51)
24%
(
6 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
24 of
53)
50%
(
7 of
14)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
41%
(
36 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
51 of
104)
103
Total Points Won
89
|
6-4 5-7 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
Emil Ruusuvuori Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Jerome Kym
Player
Emil Ruusuvuori
59%
(
24 of
41)
1st Serve %
52%
(
22 of
42)
1
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
5
83%
(
20 of
24)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
10 of
22)
59%
(
10 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
8 of
20)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
27%
(
11 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
24 of
42)
54
Total Points Won
29
|
6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Emil Ruusuvuori
Player
Luka Mikrut
71%
(
70 of
99)
1st Serve %
59%
(
52 of
88)
6
Aces
3
5
Double Faults
3
66%
(
46 of
70)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
33 of
52)
45%
(
13 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
15 of
36)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
40%
(
40 of
99)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
40 of
88)
99
Total Points Won
88
|
6-4 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ilia Simakin
Player
Emil Ruusuvuori
65%
(
36 of
55)
1st Serve %
63%
(
42 of
67)
4
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
3
78%
(
28 of
36)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
27 of
42)
42%
(
8 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
7 of
25)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
35%
(
19 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
33 of
67)
69
Total Points Won
53
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Hyeon Chung
Player
Emil Ruusuvuori
68%
(
36 of
53)
1st Serve %
49%
(
32 of
65)
2
Aces
8
4
Double Faults
3
89%
(
32 of
36)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
24 of
32)
41%
(
7 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
13 of
33)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
26%
(
14 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
28 of
65)
67
Total Points Won
51
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Daniel De Jonge
Player
Emil Ruusuvuori
75%
(
15 of
20)
1st Serve %
50%
(
15 of
30)
4
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
3
93%
(
14 of
15)
1st Serve Won
87%
(
13 of
15)
20%
(
1 of
5)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
7 of
15)
0%
(
0 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
25%
(
5 of
20)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
10 of
30)
25
Total Points Won
25
|
4-4 ret. | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Pierre-Hugues Herbert
Player
Emil Ruusuvuori
65%
(
40 of
62)
1st Serve %
62%
(
41 of
66)
12
Aces
4
4
Double Faults
5
80%
(
32 of
40)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
28 of
41)
45%
(
10 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
10 of
25)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
32%
(
20 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
28 of
66)
70
Total Points Won
58
|
7-6(5) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Emil Ruusuvuori
Player
Gauthier Onclin
57%
(
32 of
56)
1st Serve %
70%
(
55 of
79)
6
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
0
84%
(
27 of
32)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
33 of
55)
42%
(
10 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
9 of
24)
24%
(
4 of
17)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
34%
(
19 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
37 of
79)
74
Total Points Won
61
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Emil Ruusuvuori
Player
Oleg Prihodko
57%
(
46 of
81)
1st Serve %
68%
(
50 of
73)
6
Aces
7
2
Double Faults
4
67%
(
31 of
46)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
35 of
50)
54%
(
19 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
11 of
23)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
38%
(
31 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
27 of
73)
77
Total Points Won
77
|
6-4 1-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 65% (190/102) | Win/Loss | 61% (285/186) |
| 63% (413/243) | Sets Win/Loss | 58% (642/470) |
| 55% (3383/2730) | Games Win/Loss | 53% (5660/4980) |
| 65% (88/47) | Hard Win/Loss | 65% (120/66) |
| 61% (52/33) | Clay Win/Loss | 47% (48/55) |
| 69% (50/22) | Indoor Hard W/L | 67% (103/50) |
| 0% (0/0) | Grass Win/Loss | 48% (14/15) |
| 0.32 | Aces Per Game | 0.33 |
| 951 | Aces Total | 1734 |
| 0.27 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.27 |
| 816 | Total Double Faults | 1382 |
| 1:40:43 | Average Match Time | 1:34:13 |
| 414.23 | Average Opponent Rank | 358.69 |
| 65% (11881/18179) | 1st Serve % | 65% (20114/31129) |
| 69% (8250/11881) | 1st Serve Win % | 71% (14255/20114) |
| 50% (3137/6298) | 2nd Serve Win % | 51% (5583/11015) |
| 47% (946/2008) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 42% (1309/3138) |
| 42% (7778/18313) | Return Points Win % | 40% (12797/31971) |
| 0% (0/1) | Slam W/L | 39% (11/17) |
| 0% (0/5) | Masters W/L | 51% (28/27) |
| 0% (0/0) | Cups W/L | 67% (14/7) |
| 25% (1/3) | Main Tour W/L | 57% (86/64) |
| 59% (69/48) | Challenger W/L | 63% (72/43) |
| 73% (120/45) | Futures W/L | 73% (74/28) |
| 66% (185/282) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 62% (270/435) |
| 100% (3/3) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 39% (11/28) |
| 57% (42/74) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 53% (81/152) |
| 56% (42/75) | Deciding Set Win % | 56% (75/133) |
| 91% (189/172) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 89% (286/254) |
| 8% (189/15) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 11% (286/32) |
| 18% (103/19) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 16% (183/30) |
Draxl vs. Ruusuvuori Prediction Form Trend:
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
