C. O'Connell
To Win
L. Draxl
To Win
Liam Draxl vs Adrian Andreev Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
L W W L W W L W W L
Form
L W W L L W W L L LHead-to-head: Draxl 1 - 0 Andreev
They have played 2 sets in total, with Draxl winning 2 and Andreev winning 0. The last match between Draxl and Andreev was at the Glasgow Challenger, 18-02-2025, First, I.hard with Liam Draxl getting the victory 6-4 6-1.
Glasgow Challenger(18-02-2025)
6
4
6
1
Upcoming Match
17 Mar 2025 / Q1 round
ODDS
Upcoming Match
18 Mar 2025 / First
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Arnaldi VS Wu PREDICTION Hard
Miami Open - Miami atp
19 Mar 2025 / First
ODDS
PREDICTION
EDGE
Vukic VS Goffin PREDICTION Hard
Miami Open - Miami atp
19 Mar 2025 / First
ODDS
PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-4 6-1 |
Stats 
Liam Draxl
Player
Adrian Andreev
74%
(
29 of
39)
1st Serve %
64%
(
37 of
58)
11
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
1
86%
(
25 of
29)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
26 of
37)
70%
(
7 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
6 of
21)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
18%
(
7 of
39)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
26 of
58)
58
Total Points Won
39
|
||||
Stats
1
H2H Matches
0
2
Sets Won
0
12
Games Won
5
11
Aces (Total)
5
1
Total Double Faults
1
1:10:11
Average Match Time
1:10:11
74% (29/39)
1st Serve %
64% (37/58)
86% (25/29)
1st Serve Win %
70% (26/37)
70% (7/10)
2nd Serve Win %
29% (6/21)
44% (4/9)
Break Points Won % (Total)
0% (0/0)
45% (26/58)
Return Points Win %
18% (7/39)
100% (1/1)
Best of 3 Sets Win %
0% (0/1)
0% (0/0)
Best of 5 Sets Win %
0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)
Tiebreaks Win % (Total)
0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)
Deciding Set Win %
0% (0/0)
100% (1/1)
1st Set Won, Won Match
0% (0/0)
0% (1/0)
1st Set Won, Lost Match
0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)
1st Set Lost, Won Match
0% (1/0)
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Liam Draxl vs Adrian Andreev Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Liam Draxl 1 - 0 Adrian Andreev
Insights and Predictions for the Upcoming Tennis Match:
- Prediction Accuracy based on Second Serve Performance: Analyzing their recent form in the last six months, it can be observed that Draxl has achieved a 49% success rate in points won on their second serve, while Andreev has slightly surpassed him with a 50.27% triumph. This particular statistic has demonstrated a noteworthy correlation to the accuracy of match predictions.
- Return Game Statistics and their Impact on Match Prediction: Evaluating the return game stats of both players concerning their recent form, Draxl has impressively won 58.01% of points on their opponent's second serve. In contrast, Andreev's performance in this area stands at 48.51%. Similarly, when considering the stats for first serve returns, Draxl exhibits a success rate of 37.18%, while Andreev lags slightly behind with 33.26%. These return game figures bear significant correlation to determine the favorite in their head-to-head matchup.
- Under Pressure Analysis: In recent form, Draxl has shown remarkable resilience by saving 61.6% of breakpoints. On the other hand, Andreev has showcased a slightly lower figure of 56.35%. This valuable statistic holds potential for accurate in-game betting predictions.
- Performance Overview Reflected in Head-to-Head Prediction: Over the past year, Draxl has demonstrated exceptional prowess on the court, winning an impressive 69.05% of matches played (W/L: 58/26). Comparatively, Andreev's performance stands at 53.03% wins (W/L: 35/31). These overall figures provide a comprehensive prediction overview for their head-to-head encounter.
- Best Surface Analysis: Examining the players' career surface win percentages, Draxl has achieved their highest success rate on indoor hard courts, conquering 70% of matches (W/L: 44/19). However, their performance on clay courts shows a slightly lower win percentage of 60% (W/L: 42/28). In contrast, Andreev has excelled on clay courts with a career surface win percentage of 61% (W/L: 125/80), although their performance on grass courts has been less favorable, with an underwhelming win percentage of 0% (W/L: 0/2).
- Player Level and Event Analysis: Considered within the last year, Draxl has predominantly participated in Challenger and ITF tournaments with prize money exceeding $10,000. Impressively, they have secured victory in 61.54% of matches played (W/L: 32/20). Similarly, Andreev has primarily competed in the same Challenger and ITF tournaments, emerging victorious in 55.17% of matches (W/L: 32/26). When comparing player stats to predict the favored contender, it is essential to consider the relative event level they have been engaged in.
- Opponent Quality Statistics: Throughout the previous 12 months, Draxl has faced opponents with an average rank of 332.83. In comparison, Andreev's opponents have maintained an average rank of 289.91. These figures provide valuable insight into the level of competition each player has encountered.
- Deciding Set Performance: For those keen on live predictions and betting, an essential factor to consider is the players' performance in deciding sets. In the last 12 months, Draxl has displayed remarkable prowess by securing victory in 67% of deciding sets. Andreev, although not as dominant, has achieved a respectable 55% success rate in all matches played on tour.
- Current Event Head-to-Head Stats: While past player performance undeniably aids in predicting tennis matches, it is equally important to assess current event statistics for an indication of players' current form. To acquire such information, please review the section below (if they have already competed in the current event). Additionally, certain players may exhibit superior performance at specific events, an element that should be duly considered when predicting the match outcome.
- Break Point Conversion: Recent form analysis reveals that Draxl has impressively converted 48.82% of their breakpoint opportunities, displaying a strong ability to capitalize on crucial moments. Comparatively, Andreev has achieved a conversion rate of 45.18% when presented with chances to break their opponents' serve. This pivotal statistic provides valuable insights for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are intrigued by models that offer tennis match predictions, this article can be an informative starting point. Please note that it is tailored for statistics enthusiasts.
Liam Draxl Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Alibek Kachmazov
Player
Liam Draxl
62%
(
67 of
108)
1st Serve %
66%
(
79 of
119)
14
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
5
66%
(
44 of
67)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
51 of
79)
61%
(
25 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
17 of
40)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
36%
(
39 of
108)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
51 of
119)
120
Total Points Won
107
|
7-6(6) 5-7 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Liam Draxl
Player
Beibit Zhukayev
76%
(
65 of
86)
1st Serve %
52%
(
49 of
94)
4
Aces
12
3
Double Faults
4
77%
(
50 of
65)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
34 of
49)
48%
(
10 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
24 of
45)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
30%
(
26 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
36 of
94)
96
Total Points Won
84
|
6-3 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Liam Draxl
Player
Nicolai Budkov Kjaer
71%
(
85 of
119)
1st Serve %
56%
(
57 of
101)
5
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
5
73%
(
62 of
85)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
37 of
57)
47%
(
16 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
26 of
44)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
34%
(
41 of
119)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
38 of
101)
116
Total Points Won
104
|
6-4 6-7(10) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Raphael Collignon
Player
Liam Draxl
76%
(
55 of
72)
1st Serve %
68%
(
52 of
77)
4
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
2
73%
(
40 of
55)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
34 of
52)
47%
(
8 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
13 of
25)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
33%
(
24 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
30 of
77)
78
Total Points Won
71
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Liam Draxl
Player
Emil Ruusuvuori
68%
(
42 of
62)
1st Serve %
56%
(
42 of
75)
3
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
1
74%
(
31 of
42)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
31 of
42)
65%
(
13 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
16 of
33)
22%
(
2 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
29%
(
18 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
28 of
75)
72
Total Points Won
65
|
6-4 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Liam Draxl
Player
Rei Sakamoto
63%
(
38 of
60)
1st Serve %
54%
(
38 of
71)
1
Aces
10
2
Double Faults
2
71%
(
27 of
38)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
29 of
38)
59%
(
13 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
12 of
33)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
33%
(
20 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
30 of
71)
70
Total Points Won
61
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Nicolai Budkov Kjaer
Player
Liam Draxl
66%
(
48 of
73)
1st Serve %
78%
(
59 of
76)
10
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
0
77%
(
37 of
48)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
37 of
59)
40%
(
10 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
7 of
17)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
36%
(
26 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
32 of
76)
79
Total Points Won
70
|
6-3 1-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Liam Draxl
Player
Bernabe Zapata Miralles
76%
(
34 of
45)
1st Serve %
69%
(
37 of
54)
5
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
1
85%
(
29 of
34)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
23 of
37)
45%
(
5 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
6 of
17)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
24%
(
11 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
25 of
54)
59
Total Points Won
40
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Liam Draxl
Player
Adrian Andreev
74%
(
29 of
39)
1st Serve %
64%
(
37 of
58)
11
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
1
86%
(
25 of
29)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
26 of
37)
70%
(
7 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
6 of
21)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
18%
(
7 of
39)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
26 of
58)
58
Total Points Won
39
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Taro Daniel
Player
Liam Draxl
60%
(
32 of
53)
1st Serve %
46%
(
24 of
52)
4
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
6
72%
(
23 of
32)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
15 of
24)
57%
(
12 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
12 of
28)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
34%
(
18 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
25 of
52)
60
Total Points Won
45
|
7-6(6) 4-0 ret. | H2H | ||
view more
Adrian Andreev Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Henri Squire
Player
Adrian Andreev
55%
(
41 of
75)
1st Serve %
64%
(
35 of
55)
13
Aces
5
4
Double Faults
1
90%
(
37 of
41)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
23 of
35)
41%
(
14 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
11 of
20)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
13%
(
1 of
8)
32%
(
24 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
21 of
55)
72
Total Points Won
58
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Liam Draxl
Player
Adrian Andreev
74%
(
29 of
39)
1st Serve %
64%
(
37 of
58)
11
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
1
86%
(
25 of
29)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
26 of
37)
70%
(
7 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
6 of
21)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
18%
(
7 of
39)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
26 of
58)
58
Total Points Won
39
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Nicolai Budkov Kjaer
Player
Adrian Andreev
68%
(
28 of
41)
1st Serve %
64%
(
23 of
36)
11
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
1
75%
(
21 of
28)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
11 of
23)
38%
(
5 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
7 of
13)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
37%
(
15 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
18 of
36)
44
Total Points Won
33
|
7-5 1-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| Rubber 4 | 6-3 3-6 6-3 | H2H | |||
| R2 | w/o | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Adrian Andreev
Player
Clement Chidekh
58%
(
65 of
113)
1st Serve %
58%
(
59 of
102)
6
Aces
9
5
Double Faults
7
63%
(
41 of
65)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
35 of
59)
44%
(
21 of
48)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
24 of
43)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
46%
(
6 of
13)
45%
(
51 of
113)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
43 of
102)
105
Total Points Won
110
|
6-4 4-6 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Adolfo Daniel Vallejo
Player
Adrian Andreev
71%
(
52 of
73)
1st Serve %
58%
(
31 of
53)
5
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
4
63%
(
33 of
52)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
20 of
31)
52%
(
11 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
10 of
22)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
40%
(
29 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
23 of
53)
67
Total Points Won
59
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Benjamin Bonzi
Player
Adrian Andreev
45%
(
5 of
11)
1st Serve %
39%
(
7 of
18)
1
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
0
100%
(
5 of
5)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
67%
(
4 of
6)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
5 of
11)
50%
(
1 of
2)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
18%
(
2 of
11)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
9 of
18)
18
Total Points Won
11
|
3-1 ret. | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Adrian Andreev
Player
Chun Hsin Tseng
73%
(
77 of
106)
1st Serve %
51%
(
55 of
108)
10
Aces
5
0
Double Faults
5
71%
(
55 of
77)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
42 of
55)
52%
(
15 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
32 of
53)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
34%
(
36 of
106)
Rtn Points Won
31%
(
34 of
108)
104
Total Points Won
110
|
6-4 3-6 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| R2 | w/o | H2H | |||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
Stats
65% (180/96)
Win/Loss
56% (195/156)
63% (392/227)
Sets Win/Loss
55% (438/364)
56% (3196/2559)
Games Win/Loss
52% (3876/3636)
66% (88/46)
Hard Win/Loss
54% (45/38)
60% (42/28)
Clay Win/Loss
61% (125/80)
69% (50/22)
Indoor Hard W/L
41% (25/36)
0% (0/0)
Grass Win/Loss
0% (0/2)
0.32
Aces Per Game
0.23
901
Aces Total
832
0.27
Double Faults Per Game
0.19
755
Total Double Faults
697
1:39:47
Average Match Time
1:42:48
419.1
Average Opponent Rank
402.25
65% (11082/16999)
1st Serve %
63% (14633/23104)
70% (7717/11082)
1st Serve Win %
66% (9617/14633)
50% (2973/5917)
2nd Serve Win %
50% (4219/8470)
47% (885/1882)
Break Points Won % (Total)
44% (1072/2460)
42% (7289/17172)
Return Points Win %
41% (9541/23077)
0% (0/0)
Slam W/L
46% (6/7)
0% (0/4)
Masters W/L
0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)
Cups W/L
50% (1/1)
0% (0/2)
Main Tour W/L
31% (5/11)
0% (0/0)
Tour Finals W/L
0% (0/0)
57% (60/45)
Challenger W/L
54% (112/97)
73% (120/45)
Futures W/L
64% (71/40)
66% (175/266)
Best of 3 Sets Win %
56% (189/337)
100% (3/3)
Best of 5 Sets Win %
100% (2/2)
59% (41/70)
Tiebreaks Win % (Total)
64% (62/97)
54% (38/70)
Deciding Set Win %
53% (58/110)
91% (180/164)
1st Set Won, Won Match
86% (190/164)
8% (180/14)
1st Set Won, Lost Match
14% (190/26)
18% (96/17)
1st Set Lost, Won Match
19% (161/31)
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
