Liam Broady vs Keegan Smith Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W W W W W L W L W L
Form
W W L L W W L W W LHead-to-head: Broady 1 - 0 Smith
They have played 3 sets in total, with Broady winning 2 and Smith winning 1. The last match between Broady and Smith was at the M25 Roehampton, 14-02-2025, Quarterfinals, I.hard with Liam Broady getting the victory 6-4 6-7(8) 7-5.
M25 Roehampton(14-02-2025)
6
4
6
7
7
5
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Joint VS Errani PREDICTION Hard
Miami Open - Miami wta
16 Mar 2025 / Q1 round
ODDS
PREDICTION
EDGE
Rune VS Draper PREDICTION Hard
BNP Paribas Open - Indian Wells atp
17 Mar 2025 / Final
ODDS
PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-4 6-7(8) 7-5 |
Stats 
Liam Broady
Player
Keegan Smith
69%
(
77 of
112)
1st Serve %
76%
(
83 of
109)
0
Aces
9
1
Double Faults
3
69%
(
53 of
77)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
57 of
83)
51%
(
18 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
9 of
26)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
37%
(
41 of
112)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
43 of
109)
114
Total Points Won
107
|
||||
Stats
1
H2H Matches
0
2
Sets Won
1
19
Games Won
16
0
Aces (Total)
9
1
Total Double Faults
3
2:58:29
Average Match Time
2:58:29
69% (77/112)
1st Serve %
76% (83/109)
69% (53/77)
1st Serve Win %
69% (57/83)
51% (18/35)
2nd Serve Win %
35% (9/26)
83% (5/6)
Break Points Won % (Total)
38% (3/8)
39% (43/109)
Return Points Win %
37% (41/112)
100% (1/1)
Best of 3 Sets Win %
0% (0/1)
0% (0/0)
Best of 5 Sets Win %
0% (0/0)
0% (0/1)
Tiebreaks Win % (Total)
100% (1/1)
100% (1/1)
Deciding Set Win %
0% (0/1)
100% (1/1)
1st Set Won, Won Match
0% (0/0)
0% (1/0)
1st Set Won, Lost Match
0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)
1st Set Lost, Won Match
0% (1/0)
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Liam Broady vs Keegan Smith Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Liam Broady 1 - 0 Keegan Smith
- Recent Trends in Second Serve Performance: Over the past six months, Broady and Smith have demonstrated varying success in their second serve performance. Broady has exhibited a 48.58% success rate, whereas Smith has achieved a more impressive 56.97%. It is important to note the close relationship between this statistic and the accuracy of match predictions.
- Return Game Analysis: Analyzing recent return game statistics reveals intriguing insights. Broady has triumphed in 51.38% of opponents' second serve points, while Smith has secured victory in 47.94% of such points. Furthermore, Broady has won 32.23% of first serve returns, whereas Smith's success rate stands at 30.54%. These statistics hold great significance in determining the favored player in this head-to-head (H2H) matchup.
- Under Pressure Assessment: When it comes to handling pressure, recent form indicates that Broady has saved an impressive 59.06% of breakpoints, surpassing Smith's 55.41%. This statistical data proves invaluable when making in-game betting predictions.
- Performance Overview: Examining their performances over the past year, Broady has won 35.71% of matches played (with a win-loss record of 10/18), while Smith has emerged victorious in 60.61% of matches (with a win-loss record of 40/26). Considering these figures allows us to gain an overview of the predicted outcome of their encounters.
- Exploring Preferred Surfaces: It is interesting to note that Broady attains their highest career win percentage of 62% on Hard courts, with a win-loss record of 252/154. Conversely, their least successful surface is Grass, where they have achieved a win percentage of 36% (32/57). Similarly, Smith excels on Hard courts, boasting a career win percentage of 64% (147/81), while displaying a lower performance on Clay courts with a win percentage of 33% (3/6).
- Assessing Player Level: Diving deeper into their playing styles, Broady has predominantly participated in Challenger/ITF tournaments exceeding $10K over the past year, achieving victories in 33.33% of their matches (with a win-loss record of 5/10). Conversely, Smith has primarily competed in Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments worth $10K, achieving an impressive win percentage of 64.86% (24/13). When comparing such statistics to predict the favorite in this matchup, it is vital to consider the relative event levels they have been participating in.
- Opponent Quality Metrics: Over the previous 12 months, Broady has encountered opponents with an average ranking of 197.18, while Smith has faced players with an average ranking of 222.44. These figures shed light on the caliber of competition each player has faced and contribute to predicting their performance in upcoming matches.
- Deciding Set Performance: In matches that extend to a deciding set, Broady has emerged victorious in 40% of such instances over the past 12 months, while Smith has claimed victory in 47% of all matches played on the professional tour. This particular statistic carries significance for those who seek live predictions and betting opportunities.
- Current Event Head-to-Head Statistics: Although considering past performances is valuable for predicting tennis matches, it is equally important to analyze current event statistics to gauge players' current form. For the most up-to-date information on players' performances in the current event, please refer to the section below (if available). Additionally, it should be noted that certain players showcase superior performances at specific events, which must also be taken into account when predicting the outcome of a match.
- Break Point Conversion Rates: Evaluating recent form, Broady has succeeded in converting 35.98% of breakpoint opportunities, whereas Smith has capitalized on 39.9% of their chances to break their opponents' serve. This statistic proves instrumental in providing valuable tips for in-game live betting scenarios whenever a player finds themselves with a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are intrigued by models that accurately predict tennis matches, you may find this article to be an excellent starting point. Please note that it caters primarily to the enthusiasts of statistical analysis.
Liam Broady Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
George Loffhagen
Player
Liam Broady
58%
(
33 of
57)
1st Serve %
60%
(
35 of
58)
3
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
1
76%
(
25 of
33)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
21 of
35)
54%
(
13 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
10 of
23)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
33%
(
19 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
27 of
58)
65
Total Points Won
50
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Liam Broady
Player
Rafael Izquierdo Luque
62%
(
31 of
50)
1st Serve %
47%
(
18 of
38)
0
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
5
71%
(
22 of
31)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
10 of
18)
63%
(
12 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
9 of
20)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
32%
(
16 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
19 of
38)
53
Total Points Won
35
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Justin Boulais
Player
Liam Broady
59%
(
51 of
87)
1st Serve %
57%
(
63 of
110)
7
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
4
76%
(
39 of
51)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
35 of
63)
39%
(
14 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
27 of
47)
36%
(
5 of
14)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
39%
(
34 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
48 of
110)
101
Total Points Won
96
|
4-6 6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Liam Broady
Player
Yi Zhou
52%
(
46 of
89)
1st Serve %
56%
(
44 of
79)
1
Aces
1
6
Double Faults
1
63%
(
29 of
46)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
26 of
44)
60%
(
26 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
18 of
35)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
38%
(
34 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
35 of
79)
90
Total Points Won
78
|
6-1 5-7 6-3 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Tiago Pereira
Player
Liam Broady
61%
(
50 of
82)
1st Serve %
67%
(
64 of
96)
5
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
0
68%
(
34 of
50)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
38 of
64)
41%
(
13 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
15 of
32)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
80%
(
4 of
5)
43%
(
35 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
43 of
96)
90
Total Points Won
88
|
6-1 2-6 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Liam Broady
Player
Yi Zhou
50%
(
22 of
44)
1st Serve %
65%
(
28 of
43)
1
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
1
59%
(
13 of
22)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
16 of
28)
59%
(
13 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
8 of
15)
100%
(
2 of
2)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
41%
(
18 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
19 of
43)
45
Total Points Won
42
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Liam Broady
Player
Andre Ilagan
60%
(
48 of
80)
1st Serve %
79%
(
72 of
91)
1
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
3
63%
(
30 of
48)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
51 of
72)
72%
(
23 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
8 of
19)
10%
(
1 of
10)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
34%
(
27 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
32 of
91)
85
Total Points Won
86
|
6-3 1-6 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Liam Broady
Player
Robin Bertrand
63%
(
34 of
54)
1st Serve %
64%
(
47 of
73)
1
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
3
65%
(
22 of
34)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
27 of
47)
75%
(
15 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
11 of
26)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
31%
(
17 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
35 of
73)
72
Total Points Won
55
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Liam Broady
Player
Alexander Petrov
54%
(
35 of
65)
1st Serve %
62%
(
45 of
73)
2
Aces
2
6
Double Faults
4
74%
(
26 of
35)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
28 of
45)
40%
(
12 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
7 of
28)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
42%
(
27 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
38 of
73)
76
Total Points Won
62
|
6-1 5-7 10-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-1 6-2 | H2H | |||
view more
Keegan Smith Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Timofey Skatov
Player
Keegan Smith
54%
(
37 of
68)
1st Serve %
68%
(
51 of
75)
0
Aces
7
4
Double Faults
1
81%
(
30 of
37)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
34 of
51)
68%
(
21 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
12 of
24)
10%
(
1 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
25%
(
17 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
29 of
75)
80
Total Points Won
63
|
7-6(2) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Keegan Smith
Player
Miles Jones
76%
(
45 of
59)
1st Serve %
62%
(
31 of
50)
6
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
4
67%
(
30 of
45)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
18 of
31)
57%
(
8 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
9 of
19)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
36%
(
21 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
23 of
50)
61
Total Points Won
48
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Keegan Smith
Player
Stefan Latinovic
72%
(
58 of
81)
1st Serve %
54%
(
37 of
69)
5
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
5
71%
(
41 of
58)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
22 of
37)
43%
(
10 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
17 of
32)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
37%
(
30 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
30 of
69)
81
Total Points Won
69
|
6-3 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Edas Butvilas
Player
Keegan Smith
74%
(
37 of
50)
1st Serve %
73%
(
49 of
67)
4
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
3
81%
(
30 of
37)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
28 of
49)
62%
(
8 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
8 of
18)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
24%
(
12 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
31 of
67)
69
Total Points Won
48
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Keegan Smith
Player
Norbert Gombos
76%
(
61 of
80)
1st Serve %
58%
(
38 of
65)
3
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
3
70%
(
43 of
61)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
27 of
38)
53%
(
10 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
12 of
27)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
34%
(
27 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
26 of
65)
79
Total Points Won
66
|
6-1 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Keegan Smith
Player
Erik Grevelius
75%
(
56 of
75)
1st Serve %
58%
(
49 of
84)
1
Aces
5
3
Double Faults
4
70%
(
39 of
56)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
30 of
49)
47%
(
9 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
15 of
35)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
36%
(
27 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
39 of
84)
87
Total Points Won
72
|
6-1 4-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Max Wiskandt
Player
Keegan Smith
57%
(
34 of
60)
1st Serve %
67%
(
46 of
69)
6
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
1
82%
(
28 of
34)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
30 of
46)
58%
(
15 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
11 of
23)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
28%
(
17 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
28 of
69)
71
Total Points Won
58
|
7-6(3) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Liam Broady
Player
Keegan Smith
69%
(
77 of
112)
1st Serve %
76%
(
83 of
109)
0
Aces
9
1
Double Faults
3
69%
(
53 of
77)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
57 of
83)
51%
(
18 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
9 of
26)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
37%
(
41 of
112)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
43 of
109)
114
Total Points Won
107
|
6-4 6-7(8) 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Keegan Smith
Player
Remy Bertola
81%
(
74 of
91)
1st Serve %
63%
(
59 of
94)
12
Aces
5
0
Double Faults
6
76%
(
56 of
74)
1st Serve Won
80%
(
47 of
59)
53%
(
9 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
17 of
35)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
29%
(
26 of
91)
Rtn Points Won
32%
(
30 of
94)
95
Total Points Won
90
|
4-6 7-6(4) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Keegan Smith
Player
James Story
79%
(
45 of
57)
1st Serve %
61%
(
28 of
46)
8
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
2
67%
(
30 of
45)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
20 of
28)
67%
(
8 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
8 of
18)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
33%
(
19 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
18 of
46)
56
Total Points Won
47
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
Stats
57% (486/362)
Win/Loss
61% (178/115)
56% (1103/866)
Sets Win/Loss
59% (393/275)
52% (9754/8828)
Games Win/Loss
53% (3413/3047)
62% (259/157)
Hard Win/Loss
65% (151/83)
53% (68/60)
Clay Win/Loss
33% (3/6)
59% (127/88)
Indoor Hard W/L
48% (24/26)
36% (32/57)
Grass Win/Loss
0% (0/0)
0.26
Aces Per Game
0.52
2332
Aces Total
1647
0.16
Double Faults Per Game
0.22
1480
Total Double Faults
705
1st Match
Average Match Time
1:25:15
498.71
Average Opponent Rank
443.25
63% (28187/44883)
1st Serve %
69% (12162/17650)
68% (19158/28187)
1st Serve Win %
71% (8641/12162)
52% (8671/16689)
2nd Serve Win %
51% (2789/5488)
43% (1843/4329)
Break Points Won % (Total)
40% (632/1581)
39% (17471/44255)
Return Points Win %
37% (6723/18010)
47% (26/29)
Slam W/L
0% (0/0)
56% (9/7)
Masters W/L
0% (0/0)
0% (0/1)
Cups W/L
0% (0/0)
46% (40/47)
Main Tour W/L
33% (1/2)
0% (0/0)
Tour Finals W/L
0% (0/0)
56% (226/180)
Challenger W/L
53% (70/62)
65% (183/97)
Futures W/L
68% (107/51)
58% (476/821)
Best of 3 Sets Win %
60% (176/291)
35% (6/17)
Best of 5 Sets Win %
0% (0/0)
51% (133/260)
Tiebreaks Win % (Total)
54% (53/99)
52% (135/259)
Deciding Set Win %
54% (45/84)
86% (478/413)
1st Set Won, Won Match
89% (178/158)
13% (478/64)
1st Set Won, Lost Match
11% (178/20)
20% (368/73)
1st Set Lost, Won Match
17% (115/20)
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
