Liam Broady vs Arthur Nagel Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 18 Oct at 02:32 PM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
L. Broady vs A. Nagel

GBR
2
Win
Played
0
Win

FRA
2
Win
Played
0
Win
Head-to-head: Broady 2 - 0 Nagel
They have played 4 sets in total, with Liam Broady winning 4 and Arthur Nagel winning 0. The last match between Liam Broady and Arthur Nagel was at the M15 Villers-les-Nancy, 18-10-2025, Round: SF, Surface: I.hard, with Liam Broady getting the victory 6-3 6-2.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Broady | 2 |
| Nagel | 0 |
Last 2 H2H Matches:
(SF) M15 Villers-les-Nancy(10-18-25)
(F) M15 Rodez(10-12-25)
L. Broady vs A. Nagel H2H Profile
L. Broady vs A. Nagel Match Preview:
- Liam Broady has recently secured 41.97% of points on his second serve, while Arthur Nagel edges him with 43.39%.
- In return games, Broady has won 40.68% of his opponent's second serve points, with Nagel achieving a higher 43.76%.
- On first serve returns, Broady has a success rate of 25.48%, whereas Nagel is slightly better at 27.16%.
- Is save rate from breakpoints an important factor? Yes, as Broady's is 47.93% compared to Nagel's 49.17%.
- Broady boasts a 74.67% win rate over the past year, superior to Nagel's 63.93%.
- On surfaces, Broady excels on hard courts with a 63% win rate; Nagel shines on clay with 63% as well.
- Both players have frequently competed in Futures/Satellites/ITF $10K events; Broady won 77.94% of these match-ups, better than Nagel's 64.41%.
- They have met once, with Broady claiming victory in straight sets.
- Previously, Broady's opponents had an average ranking of 398.88, slightly lower than Nagel's opponent average of 420.31.
- In deciding sets, Broady wins 58% of the time, closely rivaled by Nagel's 60% success rate.
Editorial Prediction (October 18, 2025, UTC):
Both Liam Broady and Arthur Nagel bring their strengths and weaknesses to this upcoming match. Second serve performance favors Nagel, offering him a slight edge in that department.
When it comes to return games, Nagel again has a better track record, both against first and second serves. Breakpoint saves also lean towards Nagel, indicating his resilience under pressure.
Broady's overall performance from the past year boasts a higher win percentage, suggesting strong consistent performance. Although both players excel in Futures/Satellites/ITF $10K tournaments, Broady's success rate is notably higher.
With Broady having dominated their previous encounter, combined with his higher win percentage over the year, he seems slightly more favorable to win.
Considering these statistics and past encounters, Liam Broady is the most likely winner of this match.
Liam Broady vs Arthur Nagel Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
L. Broady vs A. Nagel H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 4 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 24 | Games Won | 13 |
| 4 | Aces (Total) | 3 |
| 3 | Total Double Faults | 3 |
| 1:16:21 | Average Match Time | 1:16:21 |
| 65% (68/105) | 1st Serve % | 71% (84/118) |
| 74% (50/68) | 1st Serve Win % | 58% (49/84) |
| 65% (24/37) | 2nd Serve Win % | 50% (17/34) |
| 43% (6/14) | Break Pts Won % | 25% (1/4) |
| 44% (52/118) | Return Points Win % | 30% (31/105) |
| 100% (2/2) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/2) |
| 100% (2/2) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/2) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/2) |
Recent Performance Stats
L. Broady Recent Matches Played
A. Nagel Recent Matches Played

L. Broady vs A. Nagel Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 58.68% (534/376) | YTD Win/Loss | 63.16% (96/56) |
| 57.14% (1200/900) | Sets Win/Loss | 59.94% (208/139) |
| 53.01% (10471/9282) | Games Win/Loss | 54.50% (1769/1477) |
| 63.23% (282/164) | Hard Win/Loss | 80.00% (8/2) |
| 54.93% (78/64) | Clay Win/Loss | 65.82% (52/27) |
| 61.04% (141/90) | Indoor Hard W/L | 57.14% (36/27) |
| 36.26% (33/58) | Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) |
| 0.26 | Aces Per Game | 0.28 |
| 2479 | Aces Total | 435 |
| 0.16 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.2 |
| 1581 | Total Double Faults | 311 |
| 1:14:21 | Average Match Time | 1:19:25 |
| 515.52 | Average Opponent Rank | 347.61 |
| 63% (30330/48231) | 1st Serve % | 65% (5537/8525) |
| 68% (20702/30330) | 1st Serve Win % | 67% (3692/5537) |
| 52% (9353/17894) | 2nd Serve Win % | 50% (1506/2988) |
| 43% (2051/4755) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 43% (367/845) |
| 40% (19093/47864) | Return Points Win % | 40% (3324/8261) |
| 47.27% (26/29) | Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 56.25% (9/7) | Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0.00% (0/1) | Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 45.98% (40/47) | Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 55.93% (231/182) | Challenger W/L | 50.00% (1/1) |
| 67.46% (226/109) | Futures W/L | 63.33% (95/55) |
| 59% (522/881) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 63% (94/150) |
| 35% (6/17) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 100% (1/1) |
| 51% (138/272) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 49% (17/35) |
| 52% (141/269) | Deciding Set Win % | 59% (26/44) |
| 87% (523/457) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 88% (95/84) |
| 12% (523/65) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 12% (95/11) |
| 20% (384/76) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 20% (56/11) |