Li-Wie Tan vs Colin Van Beem Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Tan vs Beem analysis and find out who is favored!
Li-Wie Tan vs Colin Van Beem Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Tan has won 0% of points on his second serve, while Beem has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Tan, in recent form, has won 0% of his opponent's second serve points, while Beem has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Tan has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Beem has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Tan has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/ 0), with Beem winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Tan has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 57% (W/L 29/ 22), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 2). Beem has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 60% (W/L 49/ 33), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 3).
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 2 times before with Tan winning 1 times. They have played 5 sets in total, with Tan winning 2 and Beem winning 3. The last match between Tan and Beem was at the M15 Shymkent, 12-09-2019, Second, Clay with Li-Wie Tan getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 2:11:30.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Tan and Beem have played a deciding set 1 times, with Tan winning 1 times and Beem 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 1 tiebreaks against each other with Tan winning 1, and Beem 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Tan has played against opponents with an average rank of while Beem has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Tan has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Beem has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Tan has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Beem has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Tan 1 - 1 Beem
0
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
0
Minor
Ret.
Rank
High
28
Age
R
Plays
1
Total1
0
Hard1
1
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
Ret.
Rank
537
High
31
Age
Plays
0
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
0
Minor
Form
51% (96-91)
Career Total W/L
56% (191-153)
0% (0-0)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
stats | Li-Wie Tan | Colin Van Beem |
---|---|---|
All H2H Matches | 1 | 1 |
Sets Won | 2 | 3 |
Games Won | 19 | 26 |
Aces (Total) | 4 | 8 |
DFs (Total) | 20 | 9 |
Avg Match Time | 2:11:30 | 2:11:30 |
1st Serve % | 55% (86/155) | 46% (60/131) |
1st Serve Win% | 58% (50/86) | 67% (40/60) |
2nd Serve Win% | 36% (25/69) | 48% (34/71) |
BPs Won% (Total) | 50% (9/18) | 50% (13/26) |
Return Points W% | 44% (57/131) | 52% (80/155) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 50% (1/2) | 50% (1/2) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
Deciding Set Win% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 50% (2/1) |
1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 50% (2/1) |
1st set L, W | 50% (2/1) | 0% (0/0) |
Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
0-6 6-2 7-6(5) |
Li-Wie Tan
Player
Colin Van Beem
53%
(
44 of
83)
1st Serve %
40%
(
34 of
85)
1
Aces
2
11
Double Faults
5
59%
(
26 of
44)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
20 of
34)
38%
(
15 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
24 of
51)
44%
(
7 of
16)
Break Points Won
53%
(
8 of
15)
51%
(
42 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
41 of
85)
82
Total Points Won
86
|
||||
6-2 6-4 |
Colin Van Beem
Player
Li-Wie Tan
57%
(
26 of
46)
1st Serve %
58%
(
42 of
72)
6
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
9
77%
(
20 of
26)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
24 of
42)
50%
(
10 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
10 of
30)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
35%
(
16 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
38 of
72)
68
Total Points Won
50
|
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
stats | Li-Wie Tan | Colin Van Beem |
---|---|---|
YTD W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Aces pg | 0 | 0 |
Aces Total | 0 | 0 |
DFs per game | 0 | 0 |
DFs Total | 0 | 0 |
Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1st Match |
Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 0 |
1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Li-Wie Tan Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 |
Faisal Qamar
Player
Li-Wie Tan
69%
(
50 of
72)
1st Serve %
49%
(
31 of
63)
1
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
10
62%
(
31 of
50)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
19 of
31)
64%
(
14 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
16 of
32)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
13%
(
1 of
8)
38%
(
27 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
28 of
63)
73
Total Points Won
62
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Ray Ho
Player
Li-Wie Tan
61%
(
53 of
87)
1st Serve %
56%
(
49 of
88)
3
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
6
64%
(
34 of
53)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
32 of
49)
47%
(
16 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
16 of
39)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
42%
(
5 of
12)
43%
(
37 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
40 of
88)
90
Total Points Won
85
|
6-2 1-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Li-Wie Tan
Player
Aliaksandr Liaonenka
50%
(
51 of
103)
1st Serve %
59%
(
48 of
82)
2
Aces
1
12
Double Faults
3
69%
(
35 of
51)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
32 of
48)
44%
(
23 of
52)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
13 of
34)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
27%
(
4 of
15)
44%
(
45 of
103)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
37 of
82)
95
Total Points Won
90
|
2-6 7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Takashi Saito
Player
Li-Wie Tan
62%
(
43 of
69)
1st Serve %
51%
(
45 of
88)
3
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
5
65%
(
28 of
43)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
27 of
45)
62%
(
16 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
20 of
43)
29%
(
5 of
17)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
36%
(
25 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
41 of
88)
85
Total Points Won
72
|
1-6 6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Alexey Zakharov
Player
Li-Wie Tan
55%
(
56 of
102)
1st Serve %
63%
(
59 of
93)
3
Aces
0
6
Double Faults
8
71%
(
40 of
56)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
32 of
59)
43%
(
20 of
46)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
15 of
34)
78%
(
7 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
41%
(
42 of
102)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
46 of
93)
106
Total Points Won
89
|
6-7(3) 6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Li-Wie Tan
Player
Igor Shrolik
54%
(
29 of
54)
1st Serve %
75%
(
49 of
65)
-
Aces
-
2
Double Faults
4
69%
(
20 of
29)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
28 of
49)
64%
(
16 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
6 of
16)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
33%
(
18 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
31 of
65)
67
Total Points Won
52
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
QF |
Alexander Igoshin
Player
Li-Wie Tan
54%
(
25 of
46)
1st Serve %
49%
(
33 of
67)
3
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
4
76%
(
19 of
25)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
17 of
33)
43%
(
9 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
11 of
34)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
39%
(
18 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
39 of
67)
67
Total Points Won
46
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Li-Wie Tan
Player
Colin Van Beem
53%
(
44 of
83)
1st Serve %
40%
(
34 of
85)
1
Aces
2
11
Double Faults
5
59%
(
26 of
44)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
20 of
34)
38%
(
15 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
24 of
51)
44%
(
7 of
16)
Break Points Won
53%
(
8 of
15)
51%
(
42 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
41 of
85)
82
Total Points Won
86
|
0-6 6-2 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
R1 |
Li-Wie Tan
Player
Gleb Blekher
58%
(
45 of
78)
1st Serve %
56%
(
54 of
97)
3
Aces
8
6
Double Faults
2
67%
(
30 of
45)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
36 of
54)
52%
(
17 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
18 of
43)
36%
(
5 of
14)
Break Points Won
45%
(
5 of
11)
40%
(
31 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
43 of
97)
90
Total Points Won
85
|
2-6 6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Admir Kalender
Player
Li-Wie Tan
72%
(
31 of
43)
1st Serve %
57%
(
33 of
58)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
5
77%
(
24 of
31)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
18 of
33)
58%
(
7 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
8 of
25)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
28%
(
12 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
32 of
58)
63
Total Points Won
38
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H |
view more
Colin Van Beem Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Q2 |
Stefan Loncar
Player
Colin Van Beem
68%
(
49 of
72)
1st Serve %
60%
(
32 of
53)
3
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
4
61%
(
30 of
49)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
21 of
32)
57%
(
13 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
10 of
21)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
40%
(
29 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
22 of
53)
65
Total Points Won
60
|
6-2 3-6 10-6 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Colin Van Beem
Player
Goran Radanovic
57%
(
45 of
79)
1st Serve %
58%
(
47 of
81)
3
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
7
62%
(
28 of
45)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
29 of
47)
44%
(
15 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
18 of
34)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
80%
(
4 of
5)
46%
(
36 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
34 of
81)
77
Total Points Won
83
|
3-6 7-6(0) 10-7 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Mircea-Alexandru Jecan
Player
Colin Van Beem
67%
(
45 of
67)
1st Serve %
56%
(
46 of
82)
2
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
2
71%
(
32 of
45)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
22 of
46)
41%
(
9 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
21 of
36)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
39%
(
26 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
39 of
82)
80
Total Points Won
69
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Colin Van Beem
Player
Patrik Rikl
56%
(
40 of
71)
1st Serve %
63%
(
57 of
91)
3
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
3
80%
(
32 of
40)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
33 of
57)
58%
(
18 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
20 of
34)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
30%
(
21 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
38 of
91)
88
Total Points Won
74
|
3-6 6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
QF | 6-1 6-3 | H2H | |||
Q2 | 6-1 6-2 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-3 6-3 | H2H | |||
R2 |
Fabian Marozsan
Player
Colin Van Beem
61%
(
37 of
61)
1st Serve %
47%
(
27 of
57)
3
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
3
78%
(
29 of
37)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
17 of
27)
46%
(
11 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
10 of
30)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
34%
(
21 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
30 of
57)
70
Total Points Won
48
|
7-5 6-1 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Colin Van Beem
Player
Gokberk Ergeneman
56%
(
30 of
54)
1st Serve %
68%
(
43 of
63)
2
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
1
80%
(
24 of
30)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
22 of
43)
50%
(
12 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
8 of
20)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
33%
(
18 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
33 of
63)
69
Total Points Won
48
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
QF | 6-4 6-2 | H2H |
view more