Li Tu vs Ethan Quinn Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
L W L W L W L W W L
Form
L W L L W W W L W LHead To Head: Tu 1 - 0 Quinn
They have played 3 sets in total, with Tu winning 2 and Quinn winning 1. The last match between Tu and Quinn was at the Terra Wortmann Open - Halle, 14-06-2025, Round: Q1 round, Surface: Grass, with Li Tu getting the victory 5-7 6-3 7-5.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Li Tu | 1 |
| Ethan Quinn | 0 |
LAST H2H MATCH: Terra Wortmann Open - Halle(14-06-2025)
Li Tu
Ethan Quinn
5
7
6
3
7
5
| Tu | Stats | Quinn |
|---|---|---|
| 45% (15-18) | YTD Win/Loss | 64% (34-19) |
| 1 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
| 166 | Ranking | 89 |
| 164 | Highest Rank | 89 |
| 29 | Age | 21 |
| - | Plays | - |
| 10 | Titles | 4 |
| 61% (204-130) | Career Total W/L | 58% (122-87) |
| $371,045 | Career Prize Money | $634,075 |
| 1 | Grass H2H | 0 |
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Passaro VS Bueno PREDICTION Clay
EFG Swiss Open - Gstaad atp
13 Jul 2025 / Q3
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Sinner VS Alcaraz PREDICTION Grass
Wimbledon - London atp
12 Jul 2025 / Final
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 5-7 6-3 7-5 |
Stats 
Li Tu
Player
Ethan Quinn
55%
(
51 of
93)
1st Serve %
59%
(
54 of
92)
11
Aces
14
6
Double Faults
5
86%
(
44 of
51)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
38 of
54)
40%
(
17 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
16 of
38)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
34%
(
32 of
93)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
38 of
92)
99
Total Points Won
86
|
||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 1 |
| 18 | Games Won | 15 |
| 11 | Aces (Total) | 14 |
| 6 | Total Double Faults | 5 |
| 2:9:14 | Average Match Time | 2:9:14 |
| 55% (51/93) | 1st Serve % | 59% (54/92) |
| 86% (44/51) | 1st Serve Win % | 70% (38/54) |
| 40% (17/42) | 2nd Serve Win % | 42% (16/38) |
| 83% (5/6) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 44% (4/9) |
| 41% (38/92) | Return Points Win % | 34% (32/93) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 100% (1/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Tu vs Quinn Match Preview :
- Second Serve Performance: In recent matches, Tu has secured 45.32% of points on second serves, whereas Quinn stands at 47.76%. This statistic is crucial for predicting match outcomes.
- Return Game Comparison: Tu has won 46.49% of opponent second serve points, slightly outperforming Quinn, who achieved 45.97%. However, Quinn excels in first serve returns at 26.53%, compared to Tu’s 22.2%.
- Handling Pressure: Quinn has a higher breakpoint save percentage at 56.4%, compared to Tu's 50.72%. Could this be a deciding factor in tight matches?
- Match Winning Overview: Over the past year, Tu has a 55.71% match win rate, while Quinn leads with 59.49%. How significant is this difference?
- Surface Strengths: Tu excels on hard courts with a 64% win rate, whereas Quinn has a 61% win rate on indoor hard courts. Grass seems to be a challenge for both.
- Level of Competition: Tu mostly competes in Challengers/ITF tournaments with a 55.56% win rate, whereas Quinn shows a slightly higher success rate at 58.97% at the same level.
- Opponent Quality: Tu's average opponent ranking over the last 12 months is 231.69, while Quinn has faced higher-ranked competition averaging 194.61. Does facing stronger opponents benefit Quinn?
- Deciding Set Performance: Quinn has won 58% of deciding sets, significantly outperforming Tu, who has secured only 42%.
- Break Point Conversion: Quinn has a higher breakpoint conversion rate at 31.94% as opposed to Tu's 26.98%.
Editorial Prediction (June 14, 2025, UTC):
As we evaluate the upcoming tennis match between Tu and Quinn, several performance metrics suggest that Quinn has a slight edge. Second serve effectiveness is a crucial area where Quinn slightly outperforms Tu, showing their ability to capitalize on service games.
Returning stats reveal that while Tu marginally fares better in capturing opponent second serve points, Quinn excels in returning first serves, an area with a strong correlation to match outcomes. This could provide Quinn an advantage in breaking serve more frequently.
Under pressure, Quinn demonstrates a superior ability to save breakpoints compared to Tu, which can be pivotal during crucial match moments. This, combined with a better breakpoint conversion rate, positions Quinn as a more formidable challenger during tense situations.
Furthermore, when matches extend to deciding sets, Quinn’s track record shows a higher success rate, indicating a potential edge in stamina and mental toughness.
Considering the overall match win percentage over the past year, Quinn maintains a slight lead. Moreover, facing opponents with higher average ranks suggests that Quinn might be more seasoned against tougher competitors.
Given these comparisons and performance indicators, Quinn is predicted to be the likely winner in the upcoming tennis match.
Tu vs Quinn Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88
Li Tu Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Adrian Mannarino
Player
Li Tu
67%
(
80 of
119)
1st Serve %
56%
(
61 of
109)
8
Aces
11
1
Double Faults
3
76%
(
61 of
80)
1st Serve Won
80%
(
49 of
61)
59%
(
23 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
24 of
48)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
29%
(
35 of
119)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
36 of
109)
120
Total Points Won
108
|
3-6 6-3 6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Li Tu
Player
Sho Shimabukuro
66%
(
83 of
126)
1st Serve %
55%
(
63 of
115)
17
Aces
10
3
Double Faults
2
76%
(
63 of
83)
1st Serve Won
79%
(
50 of
63)
56%
(
24 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
30 of
52)
0%
(
0 of
2)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
31%
(
39 of
126)
Rtn Points Won
30%
(
35 of
115)
122
Total Points Won
119
|
3-6 7-6(8) 7-6(9) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Li Tu
Player
Daniel Elahi Galan
71%
(
35 of
49)
1st Serve %
56%
(
25 of
45)
10
Aces
5
0
Double Faults
1
80%
(
28 of
35)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
16 of
25)
71%
(
10 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
9 of
20)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
22%
(
11 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
20 of
45)
58
Total Points Won
36
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Benjamin Bonzi
Player
Li Tu
71%
(
48 of
68)
1st Serve %
54%
(
36 of
67)
6
Aces
7
1
Double Faults
4
83%
(
40 of
48)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
25 of
36)
45%
(
9 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
65%
(
20 of
31)
100%
(
2 of
2)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
28%
(
19 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
22 of
67)
71
Total Points Won
64
|
6-4 7-6(7) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Li Tu
Player
Ethan Quinn
55%
(
51 of
93)
1st Serve %
59%
(
54 of
92)
11
Aces
14
6
Double Faults
5
86%
(
44 of
51)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
38 of
54)
40%
(
17 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
16 of
38)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
34%
(
32 of
93)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
38 of
92)
99
Total Points Won
86
|
5-7 6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Pierre-Hugues Herbert
Player
Li Tu
55%
(
47 of
86)
1st Serve %
62%
(
55 of
89)
12
Aces
7
12
Double Faults
4
85%
(
40 of
47)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
37 of
55)
46%
(
18 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
15 of
34)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
33%
(
28 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
37 of
89)
95
Total Points Won
80
|
6-3 6-7(2) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Li Tu
Player
Eliot Spizzirri
66%
(
39 of
59)
1st Serve %
61%
(
37 of
61)
10
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
2
74%
(
29 of
39)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
22 of
37)
50%
(
10 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
11 of
24)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
34%
(
20 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
28 of
61)
67
Total Points Won
53
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Alex Bolt
Player
Li Tu
75%
(
41 of
55)
1st Serve %
55%
(
37 of
67)
11
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
6
76%
(
31 of
41)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
26 of
37)
57%
(
8 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
10 of
30)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
29%
(
16 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
31 of
67)
70
Total Points Won
52
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Ethan Quinn Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Kamil Majchrzak
Player
Ethan Quinn
64%
(
51 of
80)
1st Serve %
73%
(
56 of
77)
5
Aces
8
0
Double Faults
4
69%
(
35 of
51)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
35 of
56)
69%
(
20 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
24%
(
5 of
21)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
31%
(
25 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
37 of
77)
92
Total Points Won
65
|
6-1 6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ethan Quinn
Player
Henry Searle
63%
(
78 of
124)
1st Serve %
61%
(
73 of
120)
13
Aces
8
5
Double Faults
6
73%
(
57 of
78)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
45 of
73)
57%
(
26 of
46)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
23 of
47)
88%
(
7 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
4 of
12)
33%
(
41 of
124)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
52 of
120)
135
Total Points Won
109
|
4-6 6-2 7-6(11) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Tallon Griekspoor
Player
Ethan Quinn
65%
(
41 of
63)
1st Serve %
64%
(
48 of
75)
7
Aces
10
1
Double Faults
3
80%
(
33 of
41)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
32 of
48)
55%
(
12 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
16 of
27)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
29%
(
18 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
27 of
75)
72
Total Points Won
66
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ethan Quinn
Player
Camilo Ugo Carabelli
61%
(
33 of
54)
1st Serve %
53%
(
27 of
51)
3
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
5
73%
(
24 of
33)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
14 of
27)
71%
(
15 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
63%
(
15 of
24)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
28%
(
15 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
22 of
51)
61
Total Points Won
44
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Ethan Quinn
Player
Vit Kopriva
57%
(
67 of
118)
1st Serve %
60%
(
72 of
121)
11
Aces
6
12
Double Faults
4
84%
(
56 of
67)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
45 of
72)
39%
(
20 of
51)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
29 of
49)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Break Points Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
36%
(
42 of
118)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
47 of
121)
123
Total Points Won
116
|
5-7 7-5 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Ethan Quinn
Player
Oliver Crawford
55%
(
60 of
109)
1st Serve %
58%
(
75 of
130)
16
Aces
9
5
Double Faults
8
80%
(
48 of
60)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
54 of
75)
55%
(
27 of
49)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
30 of
55)
17%
(
1 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
31%
(
34 of
109)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
46 of
130)
121
Total Points Won
118
|
4-6 7-6(5) 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Li Tu
Player
Ethan Quinn
55%
(
51 of
93)
1st Serve %
59%
(
54 of
92)
11
Aces
14
6
Double Faults
5
86%
(
44 of
51)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
38 of
54)
40%
(
17 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
16 of
38)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
34%
(
32 of
93)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
38 of
92)
99
Total Points Won
86
|
5-7 6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R3 |
Stats
Tallon Griekspoor
Player
Ethan Quinn
72%
(
100 of
139)
1st Serve %
66%
(
101 of
153)
7
Aces
8
4
Double Faults
8
79%
(
79 of
100)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
66 of
101)
49%
(
19 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
28 of
52)
32%
(
6 of
19)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
29%
(
41 of
139)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
59 of
153)
157
Total Points Won
135
|
4-6 6-1 6-7(2) 6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 61% (204/130) | Win/Loss | 58% (122/87) |
| 59% (453/313) | Sets Win/Loss | 55% (279/227) |
| 53% (3871/3380) | Games Win/Loss | 52% (2604/2433) |
| 64% (141/80) | Hard Win/Loss | 60% (70/47) |
| 56% (25/20) | Clay Win/Loss | 51% (19/18) |
| 58% (18/13) | Indoor Hard W/L | 61% (27/17) |
| 54% (20/17) | Grass Win/Loss | 55% (6/5) |
| 0.44 | Aces Per Game | 0.43 |
| 1566 | Aces Total | 1055 |
| 0.19 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.24 |
| 678 | Total Double Faults | 599 |
| 1:20:53 | Average Match Time | 1:48:53 |
| 363.64 | Average Opponent Rank | 315.02 |
| 61% (11724/19166) | 1st Serve % | 60% (9390/15662) |
| 73% (8530/11724) | 1st Serve Win % | 71% (6661/9390) |
| 52% (3885/7442) | 2nd Serve Win % | 51% (3179/6272) |
| 42% (791/1865) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 40% (566/1414) |
| 39% (7722/19689) | Return Points Win % | 38% (5961/15562) |
| 42% (8/11) | Slam W/L | 56% (9/7) |
| 63% (5/3) | Masters W/L | 64% (9/5) |
| 56% (15/12) | Main Tour W/L | 46% (13/15) |
| 48% (63/68) | Challenger W/L | 55% (51/42) |
| 76% (113/36) | Futures W/L | 69% (40/18) |
| 62% (204/329) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 59% (118/200) |
| 0% (0/5) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 43% (3/7) |
| 54% (58/108) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 58% (51/88) |
| 56% (50/90) | Deciding Set Win % | 59% (47/80) |
| 89% (196/174) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 85% (116/99) |
| 11% (196/21) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 15% (116/17) |
| 22% (138/30) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 24% (93/22) |
Tu vs. Quinn Prediction Form Trend:
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
