Leyre Romero Gormaz vs Aneta Kladivova Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W W L L W W W W L L
Form
L W L W L W L W W LHead-2-Head: Gormaz 2 - 0 Kladivova
They have played 4 sets in total, with Gormaz winning 4 and Kladivova winning 0. The last match between Gormaz and Kladivova was at the W75 Prague, 18-02-2025, First, I.hard with Leyre Romero Gormaz getting the victory 7-5 6-3.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Leyre Romero Gormaz | 2 |
| Aneta Kladivova | 0 |
W75 Prague(18-02-2025)
7
5
6
3
| Gormaz | Stats | Kladivova |
|---|---|---|
| 50% (10-10) | YTD Win/Loss | 50% (7-7) |
| 2 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
| 157 | Ranking | 353 |
| 155 | Highest Rank | 296 |
| 22 | Age | 24 |
| - | Plays | - |
| 7 | Titles | 4 |
| 59% (207-142) | Career Total W/L | 58% (189-135) |
| $86,795 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 0 | YTD Titles | 0 |
| 0 | Hard H2H | 0 |
| 1 | Clay H2H | 0 |
| 1 | Indoor H2H | 0 |
| 0 | Grass H2H | 0 |
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Sabalenka VS Pegula PREDICTION Hard
Miami Open - Miami wta
28 Mar 2025 / Final
ODDS
PREDICTION
EDGE
Mensik VS Fritz PREDICTION Hard
Miami Open - Miami atp
29 Mar 2025 / Semifinals
ODDS
PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7-5 6-3 |
Stats 
Leyre Romero Gormaz
Player
Aneta Kladivova
61%
(
52 of
85)
1st Serve %
51%
(
45 of
89)
0
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
10
60%
(
31 of
52)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
29 of
45)
52%
(
17 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
15 of
44)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
27%
(
3 of
11)
44%
(
37 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
45 of
89)
93
Total Points Won
81
|
||||
| 6-2 6-2 |
Stats
Leyre Romero Gormaz
Player
Aneta Kladivova
45%
(
22 of
49)
1st Serve %
57%
(
32 of
56)
-
Aces
-
2
Double Faults
2
77%
(
17 of
22)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
17 of
32)
59%
(
16 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
8 of
24)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
33%
(
16 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
31 of
56)
64
Total Points Won
41
|
||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 4 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 25 | Games Won | 12 |
| 0 | Aces (Total) | 0 |
| 4 | Total Double Faults | 12 |
| 1:36:24 | Average Match Time | 1:36:24 |
| 55% (74/134) | 1st Serve % | 53% (77/145) |
| 65% (48/74) | 1st Serve Win % | 60% (46/77) |
| 55% (33/60) | 2nd Serve Win % | 34% (23/68) |
| 43% (10/23) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 29% (4/14) |
| 52% (76/145) | Return Points Win % | 40% (53/134) |
| 100% (2/2) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/2) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (2/2) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (2/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (2/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Leyre Romero Gormaz vs Aneta Kladivova Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Leyre Romero Gormaz 2 - 0 Aneta Kladivova
Predictions for Upcoming Tennis Match
- Recent Second Serve Performance: Analyzing the dynamics of the last 6 months, it is noteworthy that Gormaz has showcased exceptional prowess in winning 46.57% of points on their second serve, while Kladivova has achieved a commendable 44.22% success rate. This statistical measure bears a strong correlation with the accuracy of match predictions, highlighting its significance in assessing the outcome of the impending encounter.
- Return Game Statistics: Considering the recent form, it becomes evident that Gormaz has exhibited an impressive ability to triumph over their opponents, securing victory in 53.75% of their opponents' second serve points. Kladivova, on the other hand, has showcased a marginally higher success rate of 58.71%. Moving beyond the second serve, the figures for first serve returns stand at 41.27% for Gormaz and 41.72% for Kladivova. These statistics exhibit a tangible correlation to determine the favored contender in this head-to-head matchup.
- Under Pressure Analysis: Delving into the domain of resiliency, Gormaz has showcased exemplary composure by saving 52.4% of breakpoints in recent times. In a similar vein, Kladivova has demonstrated remarkable mettle by saving 53.03% of breakpoints. This particular statistic holds immense utility when predicting in-game betting scenarios, offering valuable insights into the interplay of pressure.
- Performance Overview: Over the course of the previous year, Gormaz has emerged victorious in 60% of the matches played, boasting a noteworthy win-loss record of 48 wins to 32 losses. Comparatively, Kladivova has achieved a commendable success rate of 56.25%, with 36 wins and 28 losses. Taking these factors into account, we gain a comprehensive overview to predict the head-to-head outcome.
- Examining Surface Proficiency: Unveiling the preferences and strengths of the contenders, Gormaz exhibits exceptional aptitude on clay courts, triumphing in 61% of their matches in comparison to their inferior win percentage of 0% on grass courts. Kladivova, similarly, shines on clay courts with a solid win rate of 63% and faces relative challenges on indoor hard courts with a win percentage of 48%. Recognizing the influence of playing surface on performance intensifies our understanding while prognosticating the match outcome.
- Player Level Analysis: Evaluating the caliber of the players, Gormaz predominantly operates within the realm of Challenger/ITF tournaments surpassing the $10K mark, relishing victory in 64.71% of matches. Conversely, Kladivova has showcased their skills in similar tournaments, achieving a respectable success rate of 53.45%. When comparing the metrics between players to predict the frontrunner, it remains imperative to consider the match level they have been honing their abilities in.
- Direct Head-to-Head Matches: The two formidable opponents have previously crossed paths once, with Gormaz emerging triumphant on that occasion, while Kladivova tasted defeat. The contest spanned two sets, both won by Gormaz, resulting in a resounding victory with a score of 6-2, 6-2. Reverberating echoes from their last encounter set the tone for their forthcoming clash.
- Head-to-Head Match Duration: Reflecting upon their confrontations, it is noteworthy that the average match duration between the two players has amounted to 1 hour, 21 minutes, and 0 seconds. This historical insight unveils a crucial aspect to consider while contemplating the duration of the forthcoming bout.
- Predicting the Deciding Set: In their previous face-offs, Gormaz and Kladivova have never reached the decisive set. Gormaz has notched no victories in such scenarios, while Kladivova faces an identical situation. This knowledge enhances our ability to predict the outcome if the current match ventures into a thrilling deciding set.
- Head-to-Head in Extreme Pressure Situations: Evidencing the absence of tiebreakers in their matchups, Gormaz and Kladivova have never vied against each other in such high-stakes scenarios. The absence of data in this domain raises intriguing questions while forecasting the potential twists and turns of their forthcoming encounter.
- Opponent Quality Analysis: Considering the caliber of opponents faced in the past 12 months, Gormaz has exhibited remarkable versatility, competing against adversaries with an average ranking of 285.71. Kladivova, too, has faced notable challenges, encountering players with an average rank of 377.06. This statistic accentuates the level of competition each contender has encountered, enabling deeper insights into their respective journeys.
- Deciding Set Performance vs. All Players: Uncovering the abilities of Gormaz and Kladivova in deciding sets, Gormaz has triumphed in 54% of such sets over the last year. On the other hand, Kladivova boasts an impressive success rate of 61%, illustrating their mastery when matches enter high-stakes territory. These statistics become all the more crucial when dissecting the potential outcomes of the ongoing battle.
- Current Event Head-to-Head Stats: While past performance remains a valuable predictor, analyzing the current event statistics enables a better understanding of the players' form. For an accurate assessment of the in-form contender, refer to the statistics provided in the following section. It is crucial to acknowledge that certain players exhibit superior performance at specific events, a factor that must be meticulously considered while prognosticating the impending outcome.
- Break Point Conversion: In recent times, Gormaz has capitalized on 49.08% of their breakpoint opportunities, whereas Kladivova has showcased admirable efficacy by converting 55.45% of such chances to break their opponents' serve. This pertinent statistic serves as a guiding beacon for in-game live betting tips when pivotal breakthrough moments arise.
- If you are intrigued by models that predict tennis match outcomes, this article serves as an excellent starting point (Warning: Reserved for avid statistics enthusiasts).
Leyre Romero Gormaz Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Maria Lourdes Carle
Player
Leyre Romero Gormaz
69%
(
64 of
93)
1st Serve %
72%
(
79 of
109)
1
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
1
55%
(
35 of
64)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
44 of
79)
48%
(
14 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
10 of
30)
50%
(
7 of
14)
Break Points Won
50%
(
7 of
14)
47%
(
44 of
93)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
55 of
109)
104
Total Points Won
98
|
2-6 6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Anca Alexia Todoni
Player
Leyre Romero Gormaz
67%
(
35 of
52)
1st Serve %
70%
(
40 of
57)
2
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
3
71%
(
25 of
35)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
20 of
40)
47%
(
8 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
8 of
17)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
37%
(
19 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
29 of
57)
62
Total Points Won
47
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Leyre Romero Gormaz
Player
Maja Chwalinska
60%
(
56 of
93)
1st Serve %
76%
(
71 of
94)
3
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
2
64%
(
36 of
56)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
41 of
71)
54%
(
20 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
12 of
23)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
40%
(
37 of
93)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
41 of
94)
97
Total Points Won
90
|
4-6 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Leyre Romero Gormaz
Player
Victoria Jimenez Kasintseva
63%
(
22 of
35)
1st Serve %
70%
(
39 of
56)
0
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
4
73%
(
16 of
22)
1st Serve Won
41%
(
16 of
39)
46%
(
6 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
18%
(
3 of
17)
50%
(
7 of
14)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
37%
(
13 of
35)
Rtn Points Won
66%
(
37 of
56)
59
Total Points Won
32
|
6-1 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Leyre Romero Gormaz
Player
Ella Seidel
76%
(
38 of
50)
1st Serve %
69%
(
33 of
48)
0
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
3
66%
(
25 of
38)
1st Serve Won
39%
(
13 of
33)
50%
(
6 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
6 of
15)
86%
(
6 of
7)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
38%
(
19 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
29 of
48)
60
Total Points Won
38
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Leyre Romero Gormaz
Player
Sijia Wei
65%
(
42 of
65)
1st Serve %
63%
(
49 of
78)
0
Aces
2
6
Double Faults
8
55%
(
23 of
42)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
26 of
49)
43%
(
10 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
8 of
29)
41%
(
7 of
17)
Break Points Won
50%
(
5 of
10)
49%
(
32 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
44 of
78)
77
Total Points Won
66
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Alexandra Eala
Player
Leyre Romero Gormaz
58%
(
18 of
31)
1st Serve %
61%
(
25 of
41)
1
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
2
56%
(
10 of
18)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
15 of
25)
85%
(
11 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
6 of
16)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
32%
(
10 of
31)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
20 of
41)
41
Total Points Won
31
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Antonia Ruzic
Player
Leyre Romero Gormaz
67%
(
40 of
60)
1st Serve %
61%
(
39 of
64)
1
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
4
60%
(
24 of
40)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
25 of
39)
65%
(
13 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
8 of
25)
27%
(
3 of
11)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
38%
(
23 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
31 of
64)
68
Total Points Won
56
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Leyre Romero Gormaz
Player
Maria Timofeeva
57%
(
27 of
47)
1st Serve %
75%
(
45 of
60)
1
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
4
81%
(
22 of
27)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
22 of
45)
50%
(
10 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
6 of
15)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
32%
(
15 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
32 of
60)
64
Total Points Won
43
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Leyre Romero Gormaz
Player
Anna Sinclair Rogers
51%
(
41 of
80)
1st Serve %
67%
(
49 of
73)
4
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
3
66%
(
27 of
41)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
28 of
49)
51%
(
20 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
10 of
24)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
41%
(
33 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
35 of
73)
82
Total Points Won
71
|
7-5 7-5 | H2H | ||
view more
Aneta Kladivova Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Alice Rame
Player
Aneta Kladivova
52%
(
26 of
50)
1st Serve %
63%
(
37 of
59)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
2
73%
(
19 of
26)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
19 of
37)
63%
(
15 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
8 of
22)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
32%
(
16 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
32 of
59)
66
Total Points Won
43
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-2 6-1 | H2H | |||
| QF |
Stats
Aneta Kladivova
Player
Lavinia Tanasie
58%
(
45 of
78)
1st Serve %
50%
(
32 of
64)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
5
64%
(
29 of
45)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
21 of
32)
48%
(
16 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
11 of
32)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
42%
(
33 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
32 of
64)
77
Total Points Won
65
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Sada Nahimana
Player
Aneta Kladivova
60%
(
56 of
93)
1st Serve %
66%
(
69 of
104)
1
Aces
0
7
Double Faults
4
63%
(
35 of
56)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
41 of
69)
38%
(
14 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
15 of
35)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
50%
(
6 of
12)
47%
(
44 of
93)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
48 of
104)
97
Total Points Won
100
|
7-5 1-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Aneta Kladivova
Player
Ziva Falkner
66%
(
25 of
38)
1st Serve %
77%
(
33 of
43)
1
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
0
76%
(
19 of
25)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
16 of
33)
38%
(
5 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
6 of
10)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
37%
(
14 of
38)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
21 of
43)
45
Total Points Won
36
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Mariam Bolkvadze
Player
Aneta Kladivova
63%
(
32 of
51)
1st Serve %
67%
(
31 of
46)
0
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
3
81%
(
26 of
32)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
15 of
31)
53%
(
10 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
6 of
15)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
29%
(
15 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
25 of
46)
61
Total Points Won
36
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Aneta Kladivova
Player
Laura Cilekova
62%
(
39 of
63)
1st Serve %
60%
(
28 of
47)
1
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
5
72%
(
28 of
39)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
14 of
28)
46%
(
11 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
6 of
19)
100%
(
5 of
5)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
38%
(
24 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
27 of
47)
66
Total Points Won
44
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Ana Konjuh
Player
Aneta Kladivova
64%
(
32 of
50)
1st Serve %
55%
(
31 of
56)
4
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
6
81%
(
26 of
32)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
22 of
31)
56%
(
10 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
7 of
25)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
28%
(
14 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
27 of
56)
63
Total Points Won
43
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Aneta Kladivova
Player
Monika Stankiewicz
51%
(
18 of
35)
1st Serve %
71%
(
22 of
31)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
2
72%
(
13 of
18)
1st Serve Won
32%
(
7 of
22)
41%
(
7 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
43%
(
15 of
35)
Rtn Points Won
71%
(
22 of
31)
42
Total Points Won
24
|
6-0 2-1 ret. | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Leyre Romero Gormaz
Player
Aneta Kladivova
61%
(
52 of
85)
1st Serve %
51%
(
45 of
89)
0
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
10
60%
(
31 of
52)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
29 of
45)
52%
(
17 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
15 of
44)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
27%
(
3 of
11)
44%
(
37 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
45 of
89)
93
Total Points Won
81
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 59% (207/142) | Win/Loss | 58% (189/135) |
| 57% (464/345) | Sets Win/Loss | 58% (424/303) |
| 54% (4012/3448) | Games Win/Loss | 54% (3556/2975) |
| 59% (27/19) | Hard Win/Loss | 50% (1/1) |
| 61% (169/108) | Clay Win/Loss | 62% (153/92) |
| 46% (11/13) | Indoor Hard W/L | 45% (35/42) |
| 0% (0/2) | Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) |
| 0.11 | Aces Per Game | 0.13 |
| 410 | Aces Total | 411 |
| 0.36 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.25 |
| 1318 | Total Double Faults | 805 |
| 1:35:15 | Average Match Time | 1:13:3 |
| 393.34 | Average Opponent Rank | 453.67 |
| 60% (12897/21416) | 1st Serve % | 61% (10229/16837) |
| 60% (7743/12897) | 1st Serve Win % | 62% (6309/10229) |
| 45% (3827/8518) | 2nd Serve Win % | 47% (3074/6608) |
| 50% (1490/2982) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 49% (1125/2301) |
| 48% (10482/21665) | Return Points Win % | 48% (8201/17153) |
| 13% (1/7) | Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 33% (1/2) | Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 33% (2/4) | Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 62% (165/102) | Challenger W/L | 56% (116/92) |
| 58% (38/27) | Futures W/L | 63% (73/42) |
| 59% (202/344) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 59% (188/319) |
| 100% (2/2) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/2) |
| 41% (26/63) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 56% (24/43) |
| 53% (59/112) | Deciding Set Win % | 44% (35/80) |
| 86% (200/172) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 89% (190/169) |
| 14% (200/28) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 11% (190/21) |
| 23% (149/34) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 15% (134/20) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
