Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Lexie Stevens vs Fanny Ostlund Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Stevens vs Ostlund analysis and find out who is favored!
Lexie Stevens vs Fanny Ostlund Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Stevens has won 0% of points on his second serve, while Ostlund has won 49.91%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Stevens, in recent form, has won 0% of his opponent's second serve points, while Ostlund has won 53.8%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 42.87% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Stevens has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Ostlund has saved 52.58% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Stevens has won 42.86% of matches played (W/L 12/ 16), with Ostlund winning 60.61% (W/L 40/ 26) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Stevens has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 64% (W/L 7/ 4), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 1). Ostlund has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 58% (W/L 31/ 22), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 55% (W/L 84/ 69).
- Player level: In the last year, Stevens has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 44.44% of matches (W/L 12/ 15), where as Ostlund has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 59.68% of matches (W/L 37/ 25). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 2 times before with Stevens winning 1 times. They have played 5 sets in total, with Stevens winning 3 and Ostlund winning 2. The last match between Stevens and Ostlund was at the W15 Cairo, 14-01-2021, Second, Clay with Lexie Stevens getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 2:5:30.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Stevens and Ostlund have played a deciding set 1 times, with Stevens winning 0 times and Ostlund 1 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Stevens winning 0, and Ostlund 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Stevens has played against opponents with an average rank of 307.07 while Ostlund has played against players with an average rank of 256.39.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Stevens has won 14% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Ostlund has won 60% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Stevens has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Ostlund has converted 51.05% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Stevens 1 - 1 Ostlund
665
Rank
409
High
24
Age
Plays
1
Total1
0
Hard0
1
Clay1
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
366
Rank
360
High
26
Age
Plays
W
L
W
L
W
L
W
L
W
L
Form
W
W
L
W
L
L
W
L
W
L
56% (145-114)
Career Total W/L
56% (265-208)
0% (0-0)
YTD W/L
64% (9-5)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
1
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Lexie Stevens | Fanny Ostlund |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 1 |
| Sets Won | 3 | 2 |
| Games Won | 25 | 22 |
| Aces (Total) | 0 | 1 |
| DFs (Total) | 1 | 8 |
| Avg Match Time | 2:5:30 | 2:5:30 |
| 1st Serve % | 83% (104/126) | 80% (134/168) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 51% (53/104) | 51% (69/134) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 55% (12/22) | 38% (13/34) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 48% (13/27) | 79% (11/14) |
| Return Points W% | 51% (86/168) | 48% (61/126) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 50% (1/2) | 50% (1/2) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/1) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set W, W | 50% (2/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 50% (2/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 50% (2/1) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-3 6-4 |
Stats 
Lexie Stevens
Player
Fanny Ostlund
87%
(
41 of
47)
1st Serve %
74%
(
51 of
69)
-
Aces
-
0
Double Faults
5
56%
(
23 of
41)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
27 of
51)
67%
(
4 of
6)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
5 of
18)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
100%
(
3 of
3)
43%
(
20 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
37 of
69)
64
Total Points Won
52
|
||||
| 3-6 6-4 6-3 |
Stats
Fanny Ostlund
Player
Lexie Stevens
84%
(
83 of
99)
1st Serve %
80%
(
63 of
79)
1
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
1
51%
(
42 of
83)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
30 of
63)
50%
(
8 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
8 of
16)
73%
(
8 of
11)
Break Points Won
44%
(
7 of
16)
49%
(
49 of
99)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
41 of
79)
91
Total Points Won
87
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Lexie Stevens | Fanny Ostlund |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 0% (0/0) | 64% (9/5) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 64% (21/12) |
| Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 56% (174/136) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 78% (7/2) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 40% (2/3) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0 | 0.21 |
| Aces Total | 0 | 32 |
| DFs per game | 0 | 0.24 |
| DFs Total | 0 | 37 |
| Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1:52:42 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 195.14 |
| 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 70% (685/979) |
| 1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 59% (407/685) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 51% (150/294) |
| BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | 56% (74/131) |
| Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | 49% (472/959) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 64% (9/5) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 62% (8/13) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 60% (3/5) |
| Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 33% (2/6) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 89% (9/8) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 11% (9/1) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 20% (5/1) |
Lexie Stevens Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Justina Mikulskyte
Player
Lexie Stevens
75%
(
38 of
51)
1st Serve %
70%
(
44 of
63)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
0
66%
(
25 of
38)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
21 of
44)
62%
(
8 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
5 of
19)
33%
(
6 of
18)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
35%
(
18 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
37 of
63)
70
Total Points Won
44
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Lexie Stevens
Player
Magdalena Stoilkovska
84%
(
41 of
49)
1st Serve %
52%
(
26 of
50)
-
Aces
-
0
Double Faults
4
59%
(
24 of
41)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
14 of
26)
63%
(
5 of
8)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
7 of
24)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
41%
(
20 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
29 of
50)
58
Total Points Won
41
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Lois Boisson
Player
Lexie Stevens
57%
(
48 of
84)
1st Serve %
79%
(
78 of
99)
3
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
0
73%
(
35 of
48)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
41 of
78)
50%
(
18 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
11 of
21)
40%
(
6 of
15)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
37%
(
31 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
47 of
99)
100
Total Points Won
83
|
6-3 5-7 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Lexie Stevens
Player
Anja Wildgruber
85%
(
51 of
60)
1st Serve %
65%
(
34 of
52)
-
Aces
-
2
Double Faults
3
53%
(
27 of
51)
1st Serve Won
41%
(
14 of
34)
22%
(
2 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
17%
(
3 of
18)
80%
(
8 of
10)
Break Points Won
42%
(
5 of
12)
52%
(
31 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
67%
(
35 of
52)
64
Total Points Won
48
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Anouk Koevermans
Player
Lexie Stevens
73%
(
48 of
66)
1st Serve %
58%
(
43 of
74)
1
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
2
54%
(
26 of
48)
1st Serve Won
40%
(
17 of
43)
33%
(
6 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
15 of
31)
64%
(
7 of
11)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
52%
(
34 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
42 of
74)
74
Total Points Won
66
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Lexie Stevens
Player
Amelie Van Impe
78%
(
63 of
81)
1st Serve %
70%
(
59 of
84)
-
Aces
-
3
Double Faults
3
60%
(
38 of
63)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
35 of
59)
56%
(
10 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
9 of
25)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
41%
(
33 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
40 of
84)
88
Total Points Won
77
|
7-5 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Ayla Aksu
Player
Lexie Stevens
64%
(
32 of
50)
1st Serve %
64%
(
29 of
45)
-
Aces
-
4
Double Faults
1
69%
(
22 of
32)
1st Serve Won
38%
(
11 of
29)
39%
(
7 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
7 of
16)
86%
(
6 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
42%
(
21 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
27 of
45)
56
Total Points Won
39
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Lexie Stevens
Player
Emily Welker
83%
(
29 of
35)
1st Serve %
62%
(
34 of
55)
2
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
3
76%
(
22 of
29)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
15 of
34)
67%
(
4 of
6)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
7 of
21)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
26%
(
9 of
35)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
33 of
55)
59
Total Points Won
31
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Georgia Andreea Craciun
Player
Lexie Stevens
58%
(
58 of
100)
1st Serve %
82%
(
82 of
100)
2
Aces
0
11
Double Faults
3
62%
(
36 of
58)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
45 of
82)
45%
(
19 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
8 of
18)
41%
(
7 of
17)
Break Points Won
46%
(
6 of
13)
45%
(
45 of
100)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
47 of
100)
102
Total Points Won
98
|
4-6 6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Lexie Stevens
Player
Gloria Ceschi
80%
(
52 of
65)
1st Serve %
63%
(
40 of
64)
-
Aces
-
0
Double Faults
5
54%
(
28 of
52)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
19 of
40)
62%
(
8 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
10 of
24)
47%
(
7 of
15)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
45%
(
29 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
35 of
64)
71
Total Points Won
58
|
7-5 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
Fanny Ostlund Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Maelys Bougrat
Player
Fanny Ostlund
58%
(
57 of
99)
1st Serve %
64%
(
50 of
78)
1
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
6
56%
(
32 of
57)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
28 of
50)
45%
(
19 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
11 of
28)
64%
(
7 of
11)
Break Points Won
47%
(
7 of
15)
48%
(
48 of
99)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
39 of
78)
90
Total Points Won
87
|
6-4 2-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Fanny Ostlund
Player
Amanda Carolina Nava Elkin
72%
(
58 of
81)
1st Serve %
61%
(
54 of
88)
3
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
5
69%
(
40 of
58)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
35 of
54)
61%
(
14 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
19 of
34)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
33%
(
27 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
34 of
88)
88
Total Points Won
81
|
7-6(3) 3-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Maelys Bougrat
Player
Fanny Ostlund
64%
(
51 of
80)
1st Serve %
77%
(
79 of
102)
2
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
5
63%
(
32 of
51)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
41 of
79)
45%
(
13 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
12 of
23)
50%
(
8 of
16)
Break Points Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
44%
(
35 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
49 of
102)
94
Total Points Won
88
|
6-3 6-7(2) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Fanny Ostlund
Player
Farah Heddar
59%
(
22 of
37)
1st Serve %
70%
(
31 of
44)
1
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
4
86%
(
19 of
22)
1st Serve Won
39%
(
12 of
31)
60%
(
9 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
5 of
13)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
24%
(
9 of
37)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
27 of
44)
55
Total Points Won
26
|
6-0 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Daria Kudashova
Player
Fanny Ostlund
59%
(
47 of
80)
1st Serve %
64%
(
53 of
83)
1
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
3
51%
(
24 of
47)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
27 of
53)
45%
(
15 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
11 of
30)
54%
(
7 of
13)
Break Points Won
67%
(
6 of
9)
51%
(
41 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
45 of
83)
84
Total Points Won
79
|
7-5 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Yeon Woo Ku
Player
Fanny Ostlund
60%
(
58 of
96)
1st Serve %
62%
(
58 of
93)
3
Aces
2
11
Double Faults
5
60%
(
35 of
58)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
33 of
58)
42%
(
16 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
14 of
35)
62%
(
8 of
13)
Break Points Won
43%
(
6 of
14)
47%
(
45 of
96)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
46 of
93)
97
Total Points Won
92
|
4-6 6-2 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Fanny Ostlund
Player
Michika Ozeki
69%
(
36 of
52)
1st Serve %
57%
(
32 of
56)
4
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
1
61%
(
22 of
36)
1st Serve Won
41%
(
13 of
32)
50%
(
8 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
9 of
24)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
42%
(
22 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
34 of
56)
64
Total Points Won
44
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Cadence Brace
Player
Fanny Ostlund
65%
(
64 of
99)
1st Serve %
69%
(
78 of
113)
2
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
3
61%
(
39 of
64)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
44 of
78)
46%
(
16 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
18 of
35)
64%
(
7 of
11)
Break Points Won
88%
(
7 of
8)
44%
(
44 of
99)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
51 of
113)
106
Total Points Won
106
|
7-5 4-6 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Fanny Ostlund
Player
Jaeda Daniel
67%
(
32 of
48)
1st Serve %
63%
(
30 of
48)
2
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
4
50%
(
16 of
32)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
15 of
30)
88%
(
14 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
5 of
18)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
38%
(
18 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
28 of
48)
58
Total Points Won
38
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Fanny Ostlund
Player
Maria Mateas
69%
(
69 of
100)
1st Serve %
69%
(
77 of
112)
8
Aces
4
4
Double Faults
1
55%
(
38 of
69)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
40 of
77)
48%
(
15 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
17 of
35)
44%
(
8 of
18)
Break Points Won
46%
(
6 of
13)
47%
(
47 of
100)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
55 of
112)
108
Total Points Won
104
|
4-6 6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Stevens Vs Ostlund Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
