Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Lewie Lane vs Otto Virtanen Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Lane vs Virtanen analysis and find out who is favored!
Lewie Lane vs Otto Virtanen Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Lane has won 48.22% of points on his second serve, while Virtanen has won 47.52%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Lane, in recent form, has won 46.18% of his opponent's second serve points, while Virtanen has won 50.53%. The same stats for first serve returns are 31.27% and 30.47% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Lane has saved 58.43% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Virtanen has saved 59.67% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Lane has won 56.36% of matches played (W/L 31/ 24), with Virtanen winning 55.38% (W/L 36/ 29) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Lane has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 63% (W/L 10/ 6), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 32% (W/L 8/ 17). Virtanen has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 72% (W/L 111/ 43), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 43% (W/L 15/ 20).
- Player level: In the last year, Lane has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 56.6% of matches (W/L 30/ 23), where as Virtanen has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 56.76% of matches (W/L 21/ 16). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Lane winning 1 times. They have played 3 sets in total, with Lane winning 2 and Virtanen winning 1. The last match between Lane and Virtanen was at the M25 Hamburg, 18-10-2020, Q1 round, I.hard with Lewie Lane getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:0:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Lane and Virtanen have played a deciding set 1 times, with Lane winning 1 times and Virtanen 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Lane winning 0, and Virtanen 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Lane has played against opponents with an average rank of 124.45 while Virtanen has played against players with an average rank of 238.12.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Lane has won 71% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Virtanen has won 50% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Lane has converted 43.48% of breakpoint opportunities, and Virtanen has converted 42.93% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Lane 1 - 0 Virtanen
711
Rank
709
High
23
Age
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
1
Indoor0
0
Grass0
161
Rank
109
High
22
Age
R
Plays
W
L
W
L
L
W
L
L
W
L
Form
L
W
W
W
W
W
W
L
L
L
55% (78-64)
Career Total W/L
60% (181-119)
36% (5-9)
YTD W/L
70% (19-8)
$0
Career Prize Money
$146,665
0
YTD Titles
2
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Lewie Lane | Otto Virtanen |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 1 |
| Games Won | 21 | 18 |
| Aces (Total) | 0 | 0 |
| DFs (Total) | 0 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 0:0:0 | 0:0:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Points W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-3 4-6 11-9 | |||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Lewie Lane | Otto Virtanen |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 36% (5/9) | 70% (19/8) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 37% (11/19) | 65% (39/21) |
| Games Win/Loss | 48% (135/149) | 53% (302/267) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 33% (1/2) | 30% (3/7) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 40% (2/3) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 33% (2/4) | 94% (16/1) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.29 | 0.84 |
| Aces Total | 40 | 233 |
| DFs per game | 0.27 | 0.37 |
| DFs Total | 38 | 102 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:36:30 | 1:21:51 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 148.43 | 239.96 |
| 1st Serve % | 63% (568/906) | 60% (1089/1815) |
| 1st Serve W% | 68% (385/568) | 72% (786/1089) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 48% (163/338) | 47% (341/726) |
| BPs Won% Total | 43% (30/69) | 44% (78/178) |
| Return Pts W% | 37% (328/893) | 39% (680/1738) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/1) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 50% (1/1) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 100% (1/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 50% (1/1) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 76% (16/5) |
| Futures W/L | 36% (5/9) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 36% (5/14) | 69% (18/26) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 25% (1/4) | 80% (8/10) |
| Deciding Set W% | 50% (1/2) | 71% (5/7) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (5/5) | 100% (15/15) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (5/0) | 0% (15/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (9/0) | 25% (12/3) |
Lewie Lane Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats 
Evgenii Tiurnev
Player
Lewie Lane
47%
(
18 of
38)
1st Serve %
60%
(
18 of
30)
5
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
72%
(
13 of
18)
1st Serve Won
39%
(
7 of
18)
70%
(
14 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
5 of
12)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
29%
(
11 of
38)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
18 of
30)
45
Total Points Won
23
|
6-1 3-1 ret. | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Lewie Lane
Player
Yannik Kelm
59%
(
33 of
56)
1st Serve %
59%
(
29 of
49)
0
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
3
70%
(
23 of
33)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
15 of
29)
52%
(
12 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
8 of
20)
100%
(
5 of
5)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
38%
(
21 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
26 of
49)
61
Total Points Won
44
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Marlon Vankan
Player
Lewie Lane
72%
(
67 of
93)
1st Serve %
73%
(
69 of
95)
1
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
6
69%
(
46 of
67)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
44 of
69)
50%
(
13 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
9 of
26)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
37%
(
34 of
93)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
42 of
95)
101
Total Points Won
87
|
7-6(5) 4-6 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Bogdan Pavel
Player
Lewie Lane
59%
(
39 of
66)
1st Serve %
57%
(
36 of
63)
4
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
2
79%
(
31 of
39)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
19 of
36)
56%
(
15 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
67%
(
18 of
27)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
30%
(
20 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
26 of
63)
72
Total Points Won
57
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Lewie Lane
Player
Henry Searle
61%
(
57 of
93)
1st Serve %
60%
(
53 of
89)
4
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
4
75%
(
43 of
57)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
37 of
53)
58%
(
21 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
20 of
36)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
31%
(
29 of
93)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
32 of
89)
96
Total Points Won
86
|
6-3 4-6 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Simon Beaupain
Player
Lewie Lane
80%
(
48 of
60)
1st Serve %
68%
(
42 of
62)
2
Aces
1
-
Double Faults
-
77%
(
37 of
48)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
27 of
42)
58%
(
7 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
12 of
20)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
27%
(
16 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
23 of
62)
67
Total Points Won
55
|
6-2 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Ezekiel Clark
Player
Lewie Lane
82%
(
58 of
71)
1st Serve %
64%
(
36 of
56)
1
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
2
60%
(
35 of
58)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
22 of
36)
69%
(
9 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
6 of
20)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
11%
(
1 of
9)
38%
(
27 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
28 of
56)
72
Total Points Won
55
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Lewie Lane
Player
Jacopo Bilardo
79%
(
38 of
48)
1st Serve %
53%
(
31 of
59)
0
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
8
76%
(
29 of
38)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
18 of
31)
60%
(
6 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
11 of
28)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
27%
(
13 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
30 of
59)
65
Total Points Won
42
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Sascha Gueymard Wayenburg
Player
Lewie Lane
59%
(
40 of
68)
1st Serve %
60%
(
51 of
85)
6
Aces
0
6
Double Faults
4
80%
(
32 of
40)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
33 of
51)
54%
(
15 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
17 of
34)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
31%
(
21 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
35 of
85)
82
Total Points Won
71
|
7-6(2) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Lewie Lane
Player
Diego Dedura-Palomero
83%
(
48 of
58)
1st Serve %
70%
(
48 of
69)
2
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
1
75%
(
36 of
48)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
31 of
48)
60%
(
6 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
12 of
21)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
28%
(
16 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
26 of
69)
68
Total Points Won
59
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Otto Virtanen Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Ji Sung Nam
Player
Otto Virtanen
67%
(
35 of
52)
1st Serve %
60%
(
30 of
50)
0
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
6
74%
(
26 of
35)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
19 of
30)
53%
(
9 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
9 of
20)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
33%
(
17 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
22 of
50)
57
Total Points Won
45
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Seong Chan Hong
Player
Otto Virtanen
58%
(
25 of
43)
1st Serve %
56%
(
31 of
55)
2
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
4
72%
(
18 of
25)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
16 of
31)
67%
(
12 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
10 of
24)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
30%
(
13 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
29 of
55)
59
Total Points Won
39
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Roberto Bautista Agut
Player
Otto Virtanen
79%
(
70 of
89)
1st Serve %
58%
(
53 of
91)
1
Aces
14
0
Double Faults
4
73%
(
51 of
70)
1st Serve Won
83%
(
44 of
53)
58%
(
11 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
15 of
38)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
30%
(
27 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
32 of
91)
94
Total Points Won
86
|
6-4 4-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Otto Virtanen
Player
Jurij Rodionov
89%
(
77 of
87)
1st Serve %
100%
(
78 of
78)
3
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
0
57%
(
44 of
77)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
39 of
78)
50%
(
5 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
100%
(
8 of
8)
Break Points Won
55%
(
6 of
11)
44%
(
38 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
39 of
78)
88
Total Points Won
77
|
6-7(3) 7-6(7) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Otto Virtanen
Player
Daniel Masur
53%
(
70 of
132)
1st Serve %
61%
(
72 of
119)
16
Aces
2
9
Double Faults
3
77%
(
54 of
70)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
51 of
72)
48%
(
30 of
62)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
25 of
47)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
15%
(
2 of
13)
36%
(
48 of
132)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
43 of
119)
127
Total Points Won
124
|
6-7(4) 6-4 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Otto Virtanen
Player
Rudolf Molleker
63%
(
33 of
52)
1st Serve %
51%
(
21 of
41)
14
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
5
76%
(
25 of
33)
1st Serve Won
81%
(
17 of
21)
63%
(
12 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
5 of
20)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
29%
(
15 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
19 of
41)
56
Total Points Won
37
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Otto Virtanen
Player
Pierre-Hugues Herbert
47%
(
25 of
53)
1st Serve %
57%
(
28 of
49)
4
Aces
7
3
Double Faults
6
80%
(
20 of
25)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
21 of
28)
64%
(
18 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
24%
(
5 of
21)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
28%
(
15 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
23 of
49)
61
Total Points Won
41
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Otto Virtanen
Player
Cem Ilkel
62%
(
21 of
34)
1st Serve %
60%
(
28 of
47)
11
Aces
1
6
Double Faults
3
100%
(
21 of
21)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
15 of
28)
38%
(
5 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
21%
(
4 of
19)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
24%
(
8 of
34)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
28 of
47)
54
Total Points Won
27
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Otto Virtanen
Player
Remy Bertola
52%
(
32 of
61)
1st Serve %
58%
(
45 of
78)
5
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
2
81%
(
26 of
32)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
26 of
45)
59%
(
17 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
18 of
33)
25%
(
3 of
12)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
30%
(
18 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
34 of
78)
77
Total Points Won
62
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Arthur Rinderknech
Player
Otto Virtanen
79%
(
69 of
87)
1st Serve %
69%
(
70 of
102)
12
Aces
17
3
Double Faults
3
74%
(
51 of
69)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
44 of
70)
33%
(
6 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
12 of
32)
36%
(
5 of
14)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
34%
(
30 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
46 of
102)
103
Total Points Won
86
|
6-4 4-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Lane Vs Virtanen Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
