M. D. Vincentis
To Win
L. Lane
To Win
Lewie Lane vs Daniel Verbeek Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W L W L L W L W L W
Form
L L L W L W W L L WHead-to-head: Lane 0 - 1 Verbeek
They have played 2 sets in total, with Lane winning 0 and Verbeek winning 2. The last match between Lane and Verbeek was at the M25 Vila Real de Santo Antonio, 17-02-2025, Q3, Hard with Daniel Verbeek getting the victory 6-2 6-4.
M25 Vila Real de Santo Antonio(17-02-2025)
6
2
6
4
Upcoming Match
- / Q2 round
ODDS
Upcoming Match
- / Q2 round
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Lys VS Ito PREDICTION Hard
Miami Open - Miami wta
17 Mar 2025 / Q3
ODDS
PREDICTION
EDGE
Serrano VS Mboko PREDICTION Hard
Miami Open - Miami wta
18 Mar 2025 / First
ODDS
PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-2 6-4 |
Stats 
Daniel Verbeek
Player
Lewie Lane
68%
(
27 of
40)
1st Serve %
59%
(
24 of
41)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
1
67%
(
18 of
27)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
13 of
24)
77%
(
10 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
8 of
17)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
30%
(
12 of
40)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
20 of
41)
48
Total Points Won
33
|
||||
Stats
0
H2H Matches
1
0
Sets Won
2
6
Games Won
12
0
Aces (Total)
1
1
Total Double Faults
1
1:7:52
Average Match Time
1:7:52
59% (24/41)
1st Serve %
68% (27/40)
54% (13/24)
1st Serve Win %
67% (18/27)
47% (8/17)
2nd Serve Win %
77% (10/13)
100% (1/1)
Break Points Won % (Total)
60% (3/5)
30% (12/40)
Return Points Win %
49% (20/41)
0% (0/1)
Best of 3 Sets Win %
100% (1/1)
0% (0/0)
Best of 5 Sets Win %
0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)
Tiebreaks Win % (Total)
0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)
Deciding Set Win %
0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)
1st Set Won, Won Match
100% (1/1)
0% (0/0)
1st Set Won, Lost Match
0% (1/0)
0% (1/0)
1st Set Lost, Won Match
0% (0/0)
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Lewie Lane vs Daniel Verbeek Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Lewie Lane 0 - 1 Daniel Verbeek
- Recent Form Analysis of Second Serve Performance: In the past six months, Lane and Verbeek have showcased their prowess on the tennis court. Lane boasts a commendable 51.06% victory rate on their second serve, while Verbeek outshines their opponent with an impressive 53.31% success rate. It is worth noting that there exists a notable correlation between this statistical parameter and the accuracy of match predictions.
- Insights into Return Game Statistics: In terms of return game proficiency, Lane demonstrates their skill by triumphing in 45.34% of their opponent's second serve points during their recent encounters. Meanwhile, Verbeek's return game mastery shines through as they conquer 51.62% of these vital points. In a similar vein, when contemplating their performance in first serve returns, Lane achieves a respectable 36.38%, while Verbeek secures 31.76%. Undoubtedly, these statistics considerably aid in gauging the favorite in this head-to-head match-up.
- In-Depth Analysis Under Pressure: When the pressure mounts on the court, Lane demonstrates their resilience by saving an impressive 55.56% of breakpoints in recent competitions. In contrast, Verbeek adeptly defends against their opponents' onslaughts, successfully saving 46.84% of breakpoints. Such data proves invaluable when formulating in-game betting predictions.
- Comprehensive Performance Overview: Examining the players' performance over the past year unveils a fascinating picture. Lane, with a win percentage of 48.28% (14 wins and 15 losses), has undoubtedly faced formidable opponents. Simultaneously, Verbeek has emerged victorious in 60% of their matches (30 wins and 20 losses), showcasing their exceptional skills. Considering these head-to-head statistics, they provide an overarching prediction overview for this forthcoming encounter.
- Mastering Different Court Surfaces: Lane boasts an astounding 62% career win rate on I.hard, having triumphed in 13 out of 21 battles. However, their performance slightly falters on Hard courts, achieving a still respectable 42% win rate (14 wins and 19 losses). Verbeek, on the other hand, excels on Hard surfaces, attaining a 59% career win rate (16 wins and 11 losses). In contrast, their prowess on Clay courts diminishes somewhat, maintaining a 56% win rate (18 wins and 14 losses). Such insights concerning their preferred court surfaces are crucial when discerning the likely outcome.
- Player Level Assessment: Over the previous year, Lane has primarily competed in the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments with a $10K prize pool. In these competitions, they have achieved success in 50% of their matches, encountering 14 victories and 14 defeats. Meanwhile, Verbeek has leveraged their talents in a similar tournament setting, acquiring a remarkable 60% win rate (30 wins and 20 losses). Consequently, when evaluating the players' statistical profiles to predict the favorite, it is essential to take into account the relative event level at which they have been performing.
- Analysis of Opponent Quality: When assessing the level of competition faced by Lane and Verbeek, the average rank of their opponents proves enlightening. Over the past 12 months, Lane's adversaries have wielded an average rank of 323.66. In striking contrast, Verbeek has encountered players boasting an average rank of 139.68. Such disparities in opponent caliber have significant implications for forecasting the outcome of their upcoming clash.
- Judicious Evaluation of Deciding Set Performance: For those with a keen interest in live predictions and betting, the ability of Lane and Verbeek to excel in deciding sets is crucial. Over the last year, Lane has emerged victorious in an admirable 38% of deciding sets, showcasing their tenacity in the face of adversity. Verbeek, equally impressive, has conquered 50% of all matches played on the tour. These statistics provide intriguing insights for those eagerly following this enthralling match.
- Indispensable Insights from Current Event Head-to-Head Statistics: While analyzing past player performances offers valuable insights into predicting tennis matches, one should not overlook the significance of current event statistics when assessing the form of the players involved. As the event progresses, keeping a close eye on the performance of Lane and Verbeek in the ongoing competition becomes imperative to gauge their current state. Furthermore, it is essential to acknowledge that some players thrive in specific tournaments, leading to optimal outcomes when selecting the victor.
- Break Point Conversion Mastery: Recent statistics reveal that Lane and Verbeek have mastered the art of converting break point opportunities. Lane impressively capitalizes on 44.29% of their chances, while Verbeek exhibits similar prowess, converting 44.87% of their opponent's vulnerable service games. These compelling figures offer valuable guidance for those seeking astute in-game live betting tips, particularly when either player faces a break point opportunity.
- If you have an inclination towards data-driven models that predict the outcome of enthralling tennis matches, delving into this article provides a promising starting point. However, it is pertinent to heed the warning that only those intrigued by statistics should venture forth.
Lewie Lane Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 | 6-3 6-0 | H2H | |||
| QF |
Stats
Quinn Vandecasteele
Player
Lewie Lane
60%
(
29 of
48)
1st Serve %
49%
(
23 of
47)
2
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
2
76%
(
22 of
29)
1st Serve Won
39%
(
9 of
23)
58%
(
11 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
10 of
24)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
6)
31%
(
15 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
28 of
47)
61
Total Points Won
34
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-3 6-1 | H2H | |||
| QF |
Stats
Daniel Verbeek
Player
Lewie Lane
68%
(
27 of
40)
1st Serve %
59%
(
24 of
41)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
1
67%
(
18 of
27)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
13 of
24)
77%
(
10 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
8 of
17)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
30%
(
12 of
40)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
20 of
41)
48
Total Points Won
33
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-1 6-1 | H2H | |||
| Q2 | 6-1 6-2 | H2H | |||
| QF | 4-1 ret. | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-4 6-2 | H2H | |||
| R2 |
Stats
Olaf Pieczkowski
Player
Lewie Lane
67%
(
86 of
129)
1st Serve %
62%
(
79 of
128)
8
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
10
63%
(
54 of
86)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
52 of
79)
67%
(
29 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
20 of
49)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
36%
(
46 of
129)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
56 of
128)
139
Total Points Won
118
|
6-7(6) 7-5 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Lewie Lane
Player
Bekkhan Atlangeriev
57%
(
25 of
44)
1st Serve %
49%
(
23 of
47)
3
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
72%
(
18 of
25)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
11 of
23)
68%
(
13 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
12 of
24)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
30%
(
13 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
24 of
47)
55
Total Points Won
36
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Daniel Verbeek Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 | 6-1 7-5 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 2-6 6-2 11-9 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Diego Dedura-Palomero
Player
Daniel Verbeek
59%
(
26 of
44)
1st Serve %
59%
(
24 of
41)
0
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
1
69%
(
18 of
26)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
11 of
24)
56%
(
10 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
5 of
17)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
36%
(
16 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
25 of
41)
53
Total Points Won
32
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Daniel Verbeek
Player
Lewie Lane
68%
(
27 of
40)
1st Serve %
59%
(
24 of
41)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
1
67%
(
18 of
27)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
13 of
24)
77%
(
10 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
8 of
17)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
30%
(
12 of
40)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
20 of
41)
48
Total Points Won
33
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-0 7-5 | H2H | |||
| QF | 6-3 6-1 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-0 6-0 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 4-6 7-5 10-8 | H2H | |||
| Q1 |
Stats
Erik Arutiunian
Player
Daniel Verbeek
73%
(
37 of
51)
1st Serve %
72%
(
46 of
64)
10
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
0
86%
(
32 of
37)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
27 of
46)
71%
(
10 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
72%
(
13 of
18)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
18%
(
9 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
24 of
64)
66
Total Points Won
49
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Kristjan Tamm
Player
Daniel Verbeek
60%
(
37 of
62)
1st Serve %
64%
(
42 of
66)
11
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
2
70%
(
26 of
37)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
27 of
42)
56%
(
14 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
13 of
24)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
35%
(
22 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
26 of
66)
66
Total Points Won
62
|
3-6 6-3 10-6 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
Stats
54% (91/76)
Win/Loss
57% (36/27)
53% (203/178)
Sets Win/Loss
57% (80/60)
51% (1902/1811)
Games Win/Loss
54% (723/620)
42% (15/21)
Hard Win/Loss
58% (18/13)
60% (57/38)
Clay Win/Loss
56% (18/14)
53% (19/17)
Indoor Hard W/L
0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)
Grass Win/Loss
0% (0/0)
0.16
Aces Per Game
0.04
287
Aces Total
24
0.16
Double Faults Per Game
0.12
298
Total Double Faults
78
1st Match
Average Match Time
1st Match
335.04
Average Opponent Rank
145.56
60% (4057/6789)
1st Serve %
64% (1131/1777)
67% (2701/4057)
1st Serve Win %
60% (678/1131)
49% (1344/2732)
2nd Serve Win %
48% (312/646)
43% (281/656)
Break Points Won % (Total)
45% (80/178)
40% (2674/6728)
Return Points Win %
40% (684/1707)
0% (0/0)
Slam W/L
0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)
Masters W/L
0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)
Cups W/L
0% (0/0)
0% (0/1)
Main Tour W/L
0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)
Tour Finals W/L
0% (0/0)
33% (1/2)
Challenger W/L
0% (0/0)
55% (90/73)
Futures W/L
57% (36/27)
55% (91/165)
Best of 3 Sets Win %
57% (36/63)
0% (0/0)
Best of 5 Sets Win %
0% (0/0)
47% (18/38)
Tiebreaks Win % (Total)
63% (5/8)
57% (28/49)
Deciding Set Win %
43% (6/14)
88% (88/77)
1st Set Won, Won Match
87% (38/33)
13% (88/11)
1st Set Won, Lost Match
13% (38/5)
18% (79/14)
1st Set Lost, Won Match
12% (25/3)
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
