Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Leopold Zima vs Yanki Erel Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Zima vs Erel analysis and find out who is favored!
Leopold Zima vs Yanki Erel Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Zima has won 41.13% of points on his second serve, while Erel has won 50%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Zima, in recent form, has won 46.29% of his opponent's second serve points, while Erel has won 55.17%. The same stats for first serve returns are 29.12% and 32.79% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Zima has saved 55.24% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Erel has saved 58.95% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Zima has won 54% of matches played (W/L 27/ 23), with Erel winning 62.5% (W/L 45/ 27) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Zima has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 62% (W/L 53/ 33), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 51% (W/L 58/ 55). Erel has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 69% (W/L 25/ 11), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 1).
- Player level: In the last year, Zima has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 55.1% of matches (W/L 27/ 22), where as Erel has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 70% of matches (W/L 35/ 15). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Zima winning 1 times. They have played 3 sets in total, with Zima winning 2 and Erel winning 1. The last match between Zima and Erel was at the M15 Doha, 16-10-2019, First, Hard with Leopold Zima getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:46:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Zima and Erel have played a deciding set 1 times, with Zima winning 1 times and Erel 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Zima winning 0, and Erel 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Zima has played against opponents with an average rank of 139.68 while Erel has played against players with an average rank of 170.63.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Zima has won 53% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Erel has won 50% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Zima has converted 45.88% of breakpoint opportunities, and Erel has converted 43.93% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Zima 1 - 0 Erel
895
Rank
774
High
23
Age
R
Plays
1
Total0
1
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
347
Rank
325
High
23
Age
L
Plays
L
W
W
L
L
W
W
L
W
L
Form
L
L
W
L
W
W
L
W
L
L
56% (155-123)
Career Total W/L
60% (158-105)
65% (15-8)
YTD W/L
57% (13-10)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Leopold Zima | Yanki Erel |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 1 |
| Games Won | 13 | 12 |
| Aces (Total) | 6 | 2 |
| DFs (Total) | 2 | 3 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:46:0 | 1:46:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 69% (51/74) | 68% (43/63) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 65% (33/51) | 67% (29/43) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 61% (14/23) | 50% (10/20) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 57% (4/7) | 67% (4/6) |
| Return Points W% | 38% (24/63) | 36% (27/74) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-3 1-6 6-3 |
Stats 
Leopold Zima
Player
Yanki Erel
69%
(
51 of
74)
1st Serve %
68%
(
43 of
63)
6
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
3
65%
(
33 of
51)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
29 of
43)
61%
(
14 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
10 of
20)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
36%
(
27 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
24 of
63)
71
Total Points Won
66
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Leopold Zima | Yanki Erel |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 65% (15/8) | 57% (13/10) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 60% (32/21) | 57% (30/23) |
| Games Win/Loss | 53% (281/248) | 53% (268/238) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 71% (5/2) | 56% (9/7) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 50% (3/3) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 70% (7/3) | 57% (4/3) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.25 | 0.27 |
| Aces Total | 64 | 67 |
| DFs per game | 0.09 | 0.27 |
| DFs Total | 23 | 68 |
| Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1:32:29 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 133.35 | 239.22 |
| 1st Serve % | 69% (528/770) | 62% (940/1505) |
| 1st Serve W% | 72% (378/528) | 69% (653/940) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 43% (104/242) | 50% (280/565) |
| BPs Won% Total | 41% (24/58) | 42% (65/154) |
| Return Pts W% | 35% (251/727) | 41% (630/1548) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 100% (1/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/1) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 44% (4/5) |
| Futures W/L | 65% (15/8) | 67% (8/4) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 65% (15/23) | 57% (13/23) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 50% (4/8) | 57% (4/7) |
| Deciding Set W% | 71% (5/7) | 43% (3/7) |
| 1st set W, W | 93% (15/14) | 73% (15/11) |
| 1st set W, L | 7% (15/1) | 27% (15/4) |
| 1st set L, W | 13% (8/1) | 25% (8/2) |
Leopold Zima Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF | 6-3 1-6 10-5 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 7-6(12) 6-3 | H2H | |||
| QF |
Stats
Yannik Kelm
Player
Leopold Zima
65%
(
34 of
52)
1st Serve %
56%
(
31 of
55)
0
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
3
85%
(
29 of
34)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
20 of
31)
50%
(
9 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
12 of
24)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
27%
(
14 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
23 of
55)
61
Total Points Won
46
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Leopold Zima
Player
Emanuele Turconi
66%
(
31 of
47)
1st Serve %
72%
(
33 of
46)
3
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
2
81%
(
25 of
31)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
19 of
33)
56%
(
9 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
4 of
13)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
28%
(
13 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
23 of
46)
57
Total Points Won
36
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-4 7-6(3) | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 1-6 6-4 10-8 | H2H | |||
| QF | 6-4 6-1 | H2H | |||
| Q2 | 6-3 6-3 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-4 6-4 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Keegan Smith
Player
Leopold Zima
78%
(
31 of
40)
1st Serve %
67%
(
30 of
45)
3
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
4
81%
(
25 of
31)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
14 of
30)
56%
(
5 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
5 of
15)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
25%
(
10 of
40)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
26 of
45)
56
Total Points Won
29
|
6-0 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Yanki Erel Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
James Kent Trotter
Player
Yanki Erel
53%
(
36 of
68)
1st Serve %
62%
(
38 of
61)
9
Aces
4
4
Double Faults
2
89%
(
32 of
36)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
24 of
38)
41%
(
13 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
13 of
23)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
34%
(
23 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
24 of
61)
69
Total Points Won
60
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Luke Saville
Player
Yanki Erel
60%
(
51 of
85)
1st Serve %
60%
(
53 of
88)
3
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
9
78%
(
40 of
51)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
37 of
53)
38%
(
13 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
10 of
35)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
38%
(
32 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
41 of
88)
94
Total Points Won
79
|
3-6 6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Yanki Erel
Player
Uisung Park
66%
(
41 of
62)
1st Serve %
56%
(
33 of
59)
2
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
3
73%
(
30 of
41)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
20 of
33)
48%
(
10 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
9 of
26)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
35%
(
22 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
30 of
59)
70
Total Points Won
51
|
6-1 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Dane Sweeny
Player
Yanki Erel
57%
(
53 of
93)
1st Serve %
61%
(
74 of
122)
1
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
4
74%
(
39 of
53)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
43 of
74)
43%
(
17 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
24 of
48)
29%
(
5 of
17)
Break Points Won
80%
(
4 of
5)
40%
(
37 of
93)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
55 of
122)
111
Total Points Won
104
|
4-6 6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Yanki Erel
Player
Mikalai Haliak
50%
(
18 of
36)
1st Serve %
54%
(
29 of
54)
1
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
5
89%
(
16 of
18)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
20 of
29)
61%
(
11 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
8 of
25)
25%
(
3 of
12)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
25%
(
9 of
36)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
26 of
54)
53
Total Points Won
37
|
6-2 3-1 ret. | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Yanki Erel
Player
Jie Cui
64%
(
54 of
84)
1st Serve %
60%
(
52 of
86)
7
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
7
74%
(
40 of
54)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
31 of
52)
50%
(
15 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
17 of
34)
22%
(
2 of
9)
Break Points Won
13%
(
1 of
8)
35%
(
29 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
38 of
86)
93
Total Points Won
77
|
6-3 7-6(8) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Erik Arutiunian
Player
Yanki Erel
74%
(
32 of
43)
1st Serve %
54%
(
35 of
65)
11
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
3
84%
(
27 of
32)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
20 of
35)
64%
(
7 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
12 of
30)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
21%
(
9 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
33 of
65)
67
Total Points Won
41
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Yanki Erel
Player
Bekkhan Atlangeriev
54%
(
35 of
65)
1st Serve %
75%
(
48 of
64)
6
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
2
80%
(
28 of
35)
1st Serve Won
77%
(
37 of
48)
70%
(
21 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
8 of
16)
17%
(
1 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
25%
(
16 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
30%
(
19 of
64)
68
Total Points Won
61
|
6-3 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Maximilian Marterer
Player
Yanki Erel
64%
(
36 of
56)
1st Serve %
62%
(
39 of
63)
3
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
5
75%
(
27 of
36)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
24 of
39)
50%
(
10 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
9 of
24)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
34%
(
19 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
30 of
63)
67
Total Points Won
52
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Gastao Elias
Player
Yanki Erel
62%
(
61 of
99)
1st Serve %
71%
(
71 of
100)
8
Aces
1
7
Double Faults
2
75%
(
46 of
61)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
53 of
71)
37%
(
14 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
14 of
29)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
31%
(
4 of
13)
39%
(
39 of
99)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
33 of
100)
93
Total Points Won
106
|
1-6 7-6(5) 7-5 | H2H | ||
view more
Zima Vs Erel Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
