Leopold Zima vs Simone Vaccari Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Zima vs Vaccari analysis and find out who is favored!
Leopold Zima vs Simone Vaccari Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Zima has won 42.47% of points on his second serve, while Vaccari has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Zima, in recent form, has won 46.37% of his opponent's second serve points, while Vaccari has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 27.57% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Zima has saved 57.69% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Vaccari has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Zima has won 55.1% of matches played (W/L 27/ 22), with Vaccari winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Zima has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 62% (W/L 53/ 33), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 51% (W/L 55/ 52). Vaccari has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 53% (W/L 17/ 15), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 33% (W/L 1/ 2).
- Player level: In the last year, Zima has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 56.25% of matches (W/L 27/ 21), where as Vaccari has played most of their matches on the , winning 0% of matches (W/L / ). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Zima winning 1 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Zima winning 2 and Vaccari winning 0. The last match between Zima and Vaccari was at the M15 Selva Gardena, 25-10-2021, Q3, I.hard with Leopold Zima getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:40:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Zima and Vaccari have played a deciding set 0 times, with Zima winning 0 times and Vaccari 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Zima winning 0, and Vaccari 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Zima has played against opponents with an average rank of 143.57 while Vaccari has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Zima has won 60% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Vaccari has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Zima has converted 48.86% of breakpoint opportunities, and Vaccari has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Zima 1 - 0 Vaccari
0
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
0
Minor
895
Rank
774
High
23
Age
R
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
1
Indoor0
0
Grass0
N/A
Rank
High
21
Age
Plays
0
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
0
Minor
Form
56% (152-120)
Career Total W/L
51% (20-19)
71% (12-5)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
stats | Leopold Zima | Simone Vaccari |
---|---|---|
All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
Games Won | 13 | 9 |
Aces (Total) | 11 | 4 |
DFs (Total) | 5 | 4 |
Avg Match Time | 1:40:0 | 1:40:0 |
1st Serve % | 62% (37/60) | 74% (71/96) |
1st Serve Win% | 86% (32/37) | 65% (46/71) |
2nd Serve Win% | 61% (14/23) | 40% (10/25) |
BPs Won% (Total) | 20% (2/10) | 0% (0/0) |
Return Points W% | 42% (40/96) | 23% (14/60) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
7-5 6-4 |
Leopold Zima
Player
Simone Vaccari
62%
(
37 of
60)
1st Serve %
74%
(
71 of
96)
11
Aces
4
5
Double Faults
4
86%
(
32 of
37)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
46 of
71)
61%
(
14 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
10 of
25)
20%
(
2 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
23%
(
14 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
40 of
96)
86
Total Points Won
70
|
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
stats | Leopold Zima | Simone Vaccari |
---|---|---|
YTD W/L | 71% (12/5) | 0% (0/0) |
Sets Win/Loss | 62% (24/15) | 0% (0/0) |
Games Win/Loss | 53% (204/180) | 0% (0/0) |
Hard Win/Loss | 71% (5/2) | 0% (0/0) |
Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Indoor Hard W/L | 70% (7/3) | 0% (0/0) |
Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Aces pg | 0.31 | 0 |
Aces Total | 59 | 0 |
DFs per game | 0.1 | 0 |
DFs Total | 18 | 0 |
Avg Match Time | N/A | N/A |
Avg Opp Rank | 180.41 | 0 |
1st Serve % | 70% (466/668) | 0% (0/0) |
1st Serve W% | 71% (333/466) | 0% (0/0) |
2nd Serve W% | 41% (83/202) | 0% (0/0) |
BPs Won% Total | 39% (19/49) | 0% (0/0) |
Return Pts W% | 34% (214/629) | 0% (0/0) |
Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Futures W/L | 71% (12/5) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 71% (12/17) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 33% (2/6) | 0% (0/0) |
Deciding Set W% | 100% (5/5) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, W | 100% (11/11) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, L | 0% (11/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set L, W | 17% (6/1) | 0% (0/0) |
Leopold Zima Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
QF | 6-4 6-1 | H2H | |||
Q2 | 6-3 6-3 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-4 6-4 | H2H | |||
R1 |
Keegan Smith
Player
Leopold Zima
78%
(
31 of
40)
1st Serve %
67%
(
30 of
45)
3
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
4
81%
(
25 of
31)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
14 of
30)
56%
(
5 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
5 of
15)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
25%
(
10 of
40)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
26 of
45)
56
Total Points Won
29
|
6-0 6-2 | H2H | ||
QF |
Leopold Zima
Player
Gabriel Decamps
61%
(
63 of
104)
1st Serve %
56%
(
43 of
77)
11
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
6
75%
(
47 of
63)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
30 of
43)
44%
(
18 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
20 of
34)
100%
(
2 of
2)
Break Points Won
10%
(
1 of
10)
38%
(
39 of
104)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
27 of
77)
92
Total Points Won
89
|
7-5 6-7(7) 10-8 | H2H | ||
Q2 | 7-6(6) 6-3 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-2 6-2 | H2H | |||
R1 |
Florian Broska
Player
Leopold Zima
55%
(
38 of
69)
1st Serve %
65%
(
45 of
69)
2
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
2
71%
(
27 of
38)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
33 of
45)
55%
(
17 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
17%
(
4 of
24)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
36%
(
25 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
32 of
69)
76
Total Points Won
62
|
6-2 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
QF | 6-3 6-7(3) 10-3 | H2H | |||
Q2 |
Leopold Zima
Player
Mischa Lanz
70%
(
39 of
56)
1st Serve %
65%
(
45 of
69)
2
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
1
74%
(
29 of
39)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
26 of
45)
47%
(
8 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
14 of
24)
18%
(
2 of
11)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
34%
(
19 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
29 of
69)
66
Total Points Won
59
|
2-6 6-2 10-5 | H2H |
view more
Simone Vaccari Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Q1 | 7-5 6-3 | H2H | |||
Q2 | 6-2 6-2 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-1 6-1 | H2H | |||
Q2 | 6-1 6-2 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 7-6(5) 7-6(2) | H2H | |||
QF | 7-5 6-3 | H2H | |||
Q2 | 6-2 6-2 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-0 6-0 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-3 6-4 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-3 6-2 | H2H |
view more