Leopold Zima vs Joan Nadal Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Zima vs Nadal analysis and find out who is favored!
Leopold Zima vs Joan Nadal Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Zima has won 41.13% of points on his second serve, while Nadal has won 42.25%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Zima, in recent form, has won 46.29% of his opponent's second serve points, while Nadal has won 50%. The same stats for first serve returns are 29.12% and 29.01% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Zima has saved 55.24% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Nadal has saved 54.55% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Zima has won 54% of matches played (W/L 27/ 23), with Nadal winning 21.05% (W/L 4/ 15) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Zima has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 62% (W/L 53/ 33), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 51% (W/L 58/ 55). Nadal has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 39% (W/L 11/ 17), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 14% (W/L 3/ 18).
- Player level: In the last year, Zima has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 55.1% of matches (W/L 27/ 22), where as Nadal has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 21.05% of matches (W/L 4/ 15). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Zima winning 1 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Zima winning 2 and Nadal winning 0. The last match between Zima and Nadal was at the M25 Manacor, 11-01-2022, Q3, Hard with Leopold Zima getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:10:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Zima and Nadal have played a deciding set 0 times, with Zima winning 0 times and Nadal 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Zima winning 0, and Nadal 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Zima has played against opponents with an average rank of 139.68 while Nadal has played against players with an average rank of 56.58.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Zima has won 53% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Nadal has won 25% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Zima has converted 45.88% of breakpoint opportunities, and Nadal has converted 50% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Zima 1 - 0 Nadal
0
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
0
Minor
895
Rank
774
High
23
Age
R
Plays
1
Total0
1
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
N/A
Rank
High
19
Age
Plays
0
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
0
Minor
Form
56% (155-123)
Career Total W/L
29% (14-35)
65% (15-8)
YTD W/L
25% (2-6)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
stats | Leopold Zima | Joan Nadal |
---|---|---|
All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
Games Won | 12 | 3 |
Aces (Total) | 3 | 1 |
DFs (Total) | 1 | 8 |
Avg Match Time | 1:10:0 | 1:10:0 |
1st Serve % | 72% (26/36) | 68% (43/63) |
1st Serve Win% | 81% (21/26) | 51% (22/43) |
2nd Serve Win% | 80% (8/10) | 40% (8/20) |
BPs Won% (Total) | 56% (5/9) | 0% (0/1) |
Return Points W% | 52% (33/63) | 19% (7/36) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
6-1 6-2 |
Leopold Zima
Player
Joan Nadal
72%
(
26 of
36)
1st Serve %
68%
(
43 of
63)
3
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
8
81%
(
21 of
26)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
22 of
43)
80%
(
8 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
8 of
20)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
19%
(
7 of
36)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
33 of
63)
62
Total Points Won
37
|
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
stats | Leopold Zima | Joan Nadal |
---|---|---|
YTD W/L | 65% (15/8) | 25% (2/6) |
Sets Win/Loss | 60% (32/21) | 25% (4/12) |
Games Win/Loss | 53% (281/248) | 38% (51/83) |
Hard Win/Loss | 71% (5/2) | 25% (1/3) |
Clay Win/Loss | 50% (3/3) | 25% (1/3) |
Indoor Hard W/L | 70% (7/3) | 0% (0/0) |
Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Aces pg | 0.25 | 0.03 |
Aces Total | 64 | 2 |
DFs per game | 0.09 | 0.08 |
DFs Total | 23 | 5 |
Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1st Match |
Avg Opp Rank | 133.35 | 93.5 |
1st Serve % | 69% (528/770) | 65% (133/204) |
1st Serve W% | 72% (378/528) | 55% (73/133) |
2nd Serve W% | 43% (104/242) | 42% (30/71) |
BPs Won% Total | 41% (24/58) | 50% (6/12) |
Return Pts W% | 35% (251/727) | 36% (72/199) |
Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Futures W/L | 65% (15/8) | 25% (2/6) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 65% (15/23) | 25% (2/8) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 50% (4/8) | 0% (0/0) |
Deciding Set W% | 71% (5/7) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, W | 93% (15/14) | 100% (2/2) |
1st set W, L | 7% (15/1) | 0% (2/0) |
1st set L, W | 13% (8/1) | 0% (6/0) |
Leopold Zima Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
QF | 6-3 1-6 10-5 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 7-6(12) 6-3 | H2H | |||
QF |
Yannik Kelm
Player
Leopold Zima
65%
(
34 of
52)
1st Serve %
56%
(
31 of
55)
0
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
3
85%
(
29 of
34)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
20 of
31)
50%
(
9 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
12 of
24)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
27%
(
14 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
23 of
55)
61
Total Points Won
46
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
Q2 |
Leopold Zima
Player
Emanuele Turconi
66%
(
31 of
47)
1st Serve %
72%
(
33 of
46)
3
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
2
81%
(
25 of
31)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
19 of
33)
56%
(
9 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
4 of
13)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
28%
(
13 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
23 of
46)
57
Total Points Won
36
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
Q1 | 6-4 7-6(3) | H2H | |||
Q1 | 1-6 6-4 10-8 | H2H | |||
QF | 6-4 6-1 | H2H | |||
Q2 | 6-3 6-3 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-4 6-4 | H2H | |||
R1 |
Keegan Smith
Player
Leopold Zima
78%
(
31 of
40)
1st Serve %
67%
(
30 of
45)
3
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
4
81%
(
25 of
31)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
14 of
30)
56%
(
5 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
5 of
15)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
25%
(
10 of
40)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
26 of
45)
56
Total Points Won
29
|
6-0 6-2 | H2H |
view more
Joan Nadal Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Q1 | 6-3 6-3 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-3 6-4 | H2H | |||
Q2 |
Mariano Tammaro
Player
Joan Nadal
66%
(
38 of
58)
1st Serve %
60%
(
39 of
65)
2
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
2
71%
(
27 of
38)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
21 of
39)
45%
(
9 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
11 of
26)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
38%
(
22 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
33 of
65)
69
Total Points Won
54
|
6-1 7-5 | H2H | ||
Q1 | 6-2 6-4 | H2H | |||
R2 |
Georgii Kravchenko
Player
Joan Nadal
63%
(
26 of
41)
1st Serve %
61%
(
23 of
38)
3
Aces
0
-
Double Faults
-
73%
(
19 of
26)
1st Serve Won
30%
(
7 of
23)
80%
(
12 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
6 of
15)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
24%
(
10 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
66%
(
25 of
38)
56
Total Points Won
23
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Joan Nadal
Player
Andrew Fenty
69%
(
35 of
51)
1st Serve %
66%
(
38 of
58)
2
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
77%
(
27 of
35)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
23 of
38)
63%
(
10 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
6 of
20)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
6)
27%
(
14 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
29 of
58)
66
Total Points Won
43
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Alex Rybakov
Player
Joan Nadal
69%
(
29 of
42)
1st Serve %
72%
(
36 of
50)
3
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
83%
(
24 of
29)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
18 of
36)
54%
(
7 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
21%
(
3 of
14)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
26%
(
11 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
29 of
50)
60
Total Points Won
32
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
Q1 | 6-1 6-3 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 7-5 6-1 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-2 6-1 | H2H |
view more