Leonardo Malgaroli vs Dennis Novak Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W L L W W L W W L L
Form
L W W L W W L W W LHead-2-Head: Malgaroli 0 - 1 Novak
They have played 2 sets in total, with Malgaroli winning 0 and Novak winning 2. The last match between Malgaroli and Novak was at the M25 Trento, 18-02-2025, First, I.hard with Dennis Novak getting the victory 6-4 7-6(3).
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Leonardo Malgaroli | 0 |
| Dennis Novak | 1 |
M25 Trento(18-02-2025)
6
4
7
6
| Malgaroli | Stats | Novak |
|---|---|---|
| 63% (10-6) | YTD Win/Loss | 63% (12-7) |
| 0 | Head-to-Head | 1 |
| N/A | Ranking | 337 |
| Highest Rank | 85 | |
| 22 | Age | 31 |
| - | Plays | R |
| 0 | Titles | 26 |
| 55% (89-73) | Career Total W/L | 62% (515-312) |
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $838,895 |
| 0 | YTD Titles | 0 |
| 0 | Hard H2H | 0 |
| 0 | Clay H2H | 0 |
| 0 | Indoor H2H | 1 |
| 0 | Grass H2H | 0 |
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Sabalenka VS Pegula PREDICTION Hard
Miami Open - Miami wta
28 Mar 2025 / Final
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Mensik VS Fritz PREDICTION Hard
Miami Open - Miami atp
29 Mar 2025 / Semifinals
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-4 7-6(3) |
Stats 
Dennis Novak
Player
Leonardo Malgaroli
61%
(
43 of
70)
1st Serve %
64%
(
44 of
69)
8
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
9
70%
(
30 of
43)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
32 of
44)
52%
(
14 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
9 of
25)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
37%
(
26 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
28 of
69)
72
Total Points Won
67
|
||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 0 | H2H Matches | 1 |
| 0 | Sets Won | 2 |
| 10 | Games Won | 13 |
| 3 | Aces (Total) | 8 |
| 9 | Total Double Faults | 2 |
| 1:30:34 | Average Match Time | 1:30:34 |
| 64% (44/69) | 1st Serve % | 61% (43/70) |
| 73% (32/44) | 1st Serve Win % | 70% (30/43) |
| 36% (9/25) | 2nd Serve Win % | 52% (14/27) |
| 50% (3/6) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 57% (4/7) |
| 37% (26/70) | Return Points Win % | 41% (28/69) |
| 0% (0/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 100% (1/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/1) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 100% (1/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 100% (1/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (1/0) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Leonardo Malgaroli vs Dennis Novak Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Leonardo Malgaroli 0 - 1 Dennis Novak
Over the past six months, an intriguing correlation has emerged between second serve performance and match prediction accuracy in the upcoming tennis clash. In this regard, Malgaroli has triumphed in an impressive 47.11% of points on their second serve, closely followed by Novak with a 47.99% victory.
Shifting our focus to return game statistics, it becomes apparent that Malgaroli's recent form showcases their dominance on the opponent's second serve, securing a commendable 56.01% success rate. Conversely, Novak has exhibited a slightly lower percentage of 53.65% in the same category. For first serve returns, the numbers stand at 33.45% for Malgaroli and 34.42% for Novak. Notably, these figures play a pivotal role in determining the favored player in this highly anticipated head-to-head matchup.
Delving deeper into the analysis, we find that Malgaroli has proven their mettle by saving an impressive 48.42% of breakpoints in recent encounters. Novak, ever the formidable opponent, has showcased an even more remarkable statistic of 60.74% in this aspect. Clearly, these numbers hold significant value when it comes to in-game betting predictions.
Examining the overall performance overview, we observe that over the past year, Malgaroli has emerged victorious in an impressive 67.86% of matches played, boasting a formidable win-loss record of 38 wins and 18 losses. On the other hand, Novak has maintained a slightly lower win rate of 53.57%, with a win-loss record of 30 wins and 26 losses. These figures paint a comprehensive head-to-head prediction overview.
Moving on to the factor of surfaces, Malgaroli has consistently excelled on I.hard courts, impressively securing a win rate of 75% (with 9 wins and 3 losses). However, their performance on Clay courts has been comparatively weaker, with a win rate of 54% (59 wins and 51 losses). Novak, similarly, thrives on Hard courts, where they claim an impressive 69% win rate (115 wins and 52 losses). In contrast, their I.hard court performance falters slightly, with a win rate of 56% (88 wins and 70 losses).
Distinguishing players based on their preferred event level becomes pivotal in predicting the favorite. Malgaroli has predominantly participated in the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments ($10K), securing victories in 67.86% of matches (38 wins and 18 losses). Conversely, Novak's focus lies in the Challengers/ITF tournaments with a price tag exceeding $10K, where they have attained success in 51.22% of matches (21 wins and 20 losses). The comparison of these statistics is naturally relative to the event level at which the players have performed.
Assessing opponent quality statistics over the last 12 months, we find Malgaroli facing players with an average rank of 217.79, while Novak has confronted opponents with an average rank of 322.02. These figures shed light upon the intensity of competition both players have encountered in recent engagements.
To delve into the realm of live predictions and betting, the performance in deciding sets becomes a crucial factor. In this regard, Malgaroli has excelled, triumphing in an impressive 71% of deciding sets over the previous year, while Novak has claimed victory in 47% of all matches played on tour.
While past player performance provides valuable insights, considering the dynamics of the current event becomes indispensable. Thus, it is imperative to scrutinize the players' statistics in the ongoing tournament, as displayed in the designated section below (if available). It is worth noting that certain players exhibit superior performances in specific events, and such considerations play a pivotal role in predicting the ultimate outcome.
Taking a closer look at breakpoint conversion rates, Malgaroli has been formidable, capitalizing on 38.46% of their opportunities, while Novak has displayed a commendable 41.51% conversion rate in breaking their opponents' serves. These statistics provide invaluable information for those seeking in-game betting tips.
For those intrigued by models predicting tennis matches, there is a fascinating article that serves as an excellent starting point. Feel free to peruse this enlightening study at the following link: [article](https://www.researchgate.net/publication/330883807_Predicting_the_Outcome_of_a_Tennis_Tournament_Based_on_Both_Data_and_Judgments) (Warning: Stats geeks only).
Leonardo Malgaroli Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Lucas Bouquet
Player
Leonardo Malgaroli
80%
(
12 of
15)
1st Serve %
84%
(
16 of
19)
4
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
0
75%
(
9 of
12)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
7 of
16)
100%
(
3 of
3)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
20%
(
3 of
15)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
11 of
19)
23
Total Points Won
11
|
6-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Evgeny Karlovskiy
Player
Leonardo Malgaroli
56%
(
32 of
57)
1st Serve %
61%
(
47 of
77)
6
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
6
72%
(
23 of
32)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
28 of
47)
64%
(
16 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
13 of
30)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
32%
(
18 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
36 of
77)
75
Total Points Won
59
|
7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Leonardo Malgaroli
Player
Carlo Alberto Fossati
67%
(
12 of
18)
1st Serve %
61%
(
22 of
36)
1
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
0
100%
(
12 of
12)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
11 of
22)
67%
(
4 of
6)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
6 of
14)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
11%
(
2 of
18)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
19 of
36)
35
Total Points Won
19
|
6-2 1-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Leonardo Malgaroli
Player
Elias Julian Werner
66%
(
33 of
50)
1st Serve %
49%
(
25 of
51)
4
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
8
85%
(
28 of
33)
1st Serve Won
80%
(
20 of
25)
71%
(
12 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
14 of
26)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
20%
(
10 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
17 of
51)
57
Total Points Won
44
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Dennis Novak
Player
Leonardo Malgaroli
61%
(
43 of
70)
1st Serve %
64%
(
44 of
69)
8
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
9
70%
(
30 of
43)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
32 of
44)
52%
(
14 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
9 of
25)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
37%
(
26 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
28 of
69)
72
Total Points Won
67
|
6-4 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Leonardo Malgaroli
Player
Nicolas Parizzia
71%
(
46 of
65)
1st Serve %
80%
(
36 of
45)
3
Aces
7
5
Double Faults
2
78%
(
36 of
46)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
26 of
36)
47%
(
9 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
31%
(
20 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
15 of
45)
60
Total Points Won
50
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Leonardo Malgaroli
Player
Daivat Mehta
68%
(
17 of
25)
1st Serve %
64%
(
18 of
28)
3
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
0
100%
(
17 of
17)
1st Serve Won
17%
(
3 of
18)
88%
(
7 of
8)
2nd Serve Won
10%
(
1 of
10)
100%
(
6 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
4%
(
1 of
25)
Rtn Points Won
86%
(
24 of
28)
48
Total Points Won
5
|
6-0 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 | 6-1 6-1 | H2H | |||
| QF |
Stats
Daniil Ostapenkov
Player
Leonardo Malgaroli
73%
(
24 of
33)
1st Serve %
72%
(
38 of
53)
2
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
3
75%
(
18 of
24)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
18 of
38)
78%
(
7 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
4 of
15)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
24%
(
8 of
33)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
31 of
53)
56
Total Points Won
30
|
6-0 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q2 | 6-3 6-2 | H2H | |||
view more
Dennis Novak Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Christoph Negritu
Player
Dennis Novak
54%
(
49 of
90)
1st Serve %
65%
(
77 of
118)
4
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
1
78%
(
38 of
49)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
45 of
77)
49%
(
20 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
20 of
41)
33%
(
5 of
15)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
36%
(
32 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
53 of
118)
111
Total Points Won
97
|
6-3 6-7(3) 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Dennis Novak
Player
Tung-Lin Wu
73%
(
54 of
74)
1st Serve %
77%
(
49 of
64)
2
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
1
72%
(
39 of
54)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
32 of
49)
45%
(
9 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
7 of
15)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
35%
(
26 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
25 of
64)
73
Total Points Won
65
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Dennis Novak
Player
Juan Carlos Prado Angelo
62%
(
28 of
45)
1st Serve %
60%
(
27 of
45)
7
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
1
82%
(
23 of
28)
1st Serve Won
37%
(
10 of
27)
35%
(
6 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
6 of
18)
86%
(
6 of
7)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
36%
(
16 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
64%
(
29 of
45)
58
Total Points Won
32
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Zsombor Piros
Player
Dennis Novak
49%
(
42 of
86)
1st Serve %
54%
(
37 of
68)
3
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
1
76%
(
32 of
42)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
24 of
37)
48%
(
21 of
44)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
15 of
31)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
38%
(
33 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
29 of
68)
82
Total Points Won
72
|
7-6(3) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Dennis Novak
Player
Timofey Skatov
58%
(
53 of
91)
1st Serve %
49%
(
43 of
87)
3
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
5
64%
(
34 of
53)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
25 of
43)
50%
(
19 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
24 of
44)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
29%
(
4 of
14)
42%
(
38 of
91)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
38 of
87)
91
Total Points Won
87
|
6-4 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Dennis Novak
Player
Pavlos Tsitsipas
53%
(
23 of
43)
1st Serve %
41%
(
19 of
46)
4
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
3
74%
(
17 of
23)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
12 of
19)
80%
(
16 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
9 of
27)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
23%
(
10 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
25 of
46)
58
Total Points Won
31
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Christian Sigsgaard
Player
Dennis Novak
58%
(
35 of
60)
1st Serve %
56%
(
31 of
55)
4
Aces
5
0
Double Faults
1
71%
(
25 of
35)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
22 of
31)
56%
(
14 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
9 of
24)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
35%
(
21 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
24 of
55)
63
Total Points Won
52
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Dennis Novak
Player
Massimo Giunta
59%
(
33 of
56)
1st Serve %
36%
(
21 of
58)
2
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
5
79%
(
26 of
33)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
16 of
21)
61%
(
14 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
18 of
37)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
29%
(
16 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
24 of
58)
64
Total Points Won
50
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Dennis Novak
Player
Leonardo Malgaroli
61%
(
43 of
70)
1st Serve %
64%
(
44 of
69)
8
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
9
70%
(
30 of
43)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
32 of
44)
52%
(
14 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
9 of
25)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
37%
(
26 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
28 of
69)
72
Total Points Won
67
|
6-4 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Blake Mott
Player
Dennis Novak
74%
(
78 of
106)
1st Serve %
69%
(
63 of
91)
4
Aces
5
4
Double Faults
1
71%
(
55 of
78)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
44 of
63)
36%
(
10 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
14 of
28)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
39%
(
41 of
106)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
33 of
91)
98
Total Points Won
99
|
6-4 3-6 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 55% (89/73) | Win/Loss | 62% (515/312) |
| 54% (200/167) | Sets Win/Loss | 60% (1160/777) |
| 52% (1840/1700) | Games Win/Loss | 53% (9752/8535) |
| 56% (19/15) | Hard Win/Loss | 69% (119/54) |
| 53% (59/52) | Clay Win/Loss | 63% (277/166) |
| 65% (11/6) | Indoor Hard W/L | 54% (92/78) |
| 0% (0/0) | Grass Win/Loss | 66% (27/14) |
| 0.09 | Aces Per Game | 0.26 |
| 153 | Aces Total | 2366 |
| 0.2 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.19 |
| 340 | Total Double Faults | 1664 |
| 1st Match | Average Match Time | 1:9:5 |
| 328.12 | Average Opponent Rank | 502.82 |
| 61% (3703/6107) | 1st Serve % | 65% (28186/43663) |
| 64% (2367/3703) | 1st Serve Win % | 69% (19347/28186) |
| 45% (1086/2404) | 2nd Serve Win % | 50% (7769/15476) |
| 47% (282/602) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 42% (1884/4479) |
| 41% (2367/5825) | Return Points Win % | 40% (17694/44232) |
| 0% (0/0) | Slam W/L | 59% (34/24) |
| 0% (0/0) | Masters W/L | 50% (1/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | Cups W/L | 50% (11/11) |
| 0% (0/0) | Main Tour W/L | 46% (40/47) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Challenger W/L | 54% (184/156) |
| 55% (89/73) | Futures W/L | 77% (245/73) |
| 56% (87/156) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 63% (500/794) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 44% (11/25) |
| 53% (16/30) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 56% (155/278) |
| 53% (25/47) | Deciding Set Win % | 53% (135/253) |
| 82% (91/75) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 86% (506/435) |
| 18% (91/16) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 14% (506/70) |
| 21% (71/15) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 25% (321/79) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
