Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Lenny Hampel vs James Marsalek Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Hampel vs Marsalek analysis and find out who is favored!
Lenny Hampel vs James Marsalek Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Hampel has won 0% of points on his second serve, while Marsalek has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Hampel, in recent form, has won 0% of his opponent's second serve points, while Marsalek has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Hampel has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Marsalek has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Hampel has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/ 0), with Marsalek winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Hampel has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 61% (W/L 172/ 109), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 41% (W/L 7/ 10). Marsalek has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 53% (W/L 117/ 103), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 42% (W/L 27/ 38).
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Hampel winning 1 times. They have played 3 sets in total, with Hampel winning 2 and Marsalek winning 1. The last match between Hampel and Marsalek was at the Qatar F1 (Doha), 06-04-2017, Quarterfinals, Hard with Lenny Hampel getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 2:3:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Hampel and Marsalek have played a deciding set 1 times, with Hampel winning 1 times and Marsalek 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Hampel winning 0, and Marsalek 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Hampel has played against opponents with an average rank of while Marsalek has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Hampel has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Marsalek has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Hampel has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Marsalek has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Hampel 1 - 0 Marsalek
Ret.
Rank
359
High
27
Age
R
Plays
1
Total0
1
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
Ret.
Rank
537
High
32
Age
R
Plays
W
L
W
L
L
W
L
W
W
L
Form
W
L
W
W
W
L
L
L
L
L
60% (255-171)
Career Total W/L
50% (198-201)
0% (0-0)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$6,945
Career Prize Money
$2,575
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Lenny Hampel | James Marsalek |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 1 |
| Games Won | 16 | 9 |
| Aces (Total) | 10 | 1 |
| DFs (Total) | 3 | 3 |
| Avg Match Time | 2:3:0 | 2:3:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 64% (54/85) | 69% (56/81) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 69% (37/54) | 68% (38/56) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 52% (16/31) | 28% (7/25) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 50% (6/12) | 33% (2/6) |
| Return Points W% | 44% (36/81) | 38% (32/85) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-3 4-6 6-0 |
Stats 
Lenny Hampel
Player
James Marsalek
64%
(
54 of
85)
1st Serve %
69%
(
56 of
81)
10
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
3
69%
(
37 of
54)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
38 of
56)
52%
(
16 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
7 of
25)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
38%
(
32 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
36 of
81)
89
Total Points Won
77
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Lenny Hampel | James Marsalek |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0 | 0 |
| Aces Total | 0 | 0 |
| DFs per game | 0 | 0 |
| DFs Total | 0 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 0 |
| 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Lenny Hampel Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Henri Squire
Player
Lenny Hampel
60%
(
33 of
55)
1st Serve %
45%
(
29 of
65)
4
Aces
10
1
Double Faults
5
85%
(
28 of
33)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
19 of
29)
64%
(
14 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
61%
(
22 of
36)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
24%
(
13 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
24 of
65)
66
Total Points Won
54
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Lenny Hampel
Player
Tim Sandkaulen
54%
(
39 of
72)
1st Serve %
61%
(
43 of
70)
6
Aces
5
3
Double Faults
3
77%
(
30 of
39)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
29 of
43)
58%
(
19 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
15 of
27)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
32%
(
23 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
26 of
70)
75
Total Points Won
67
|
6-4 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Lenny Hampel
Player
Alexander Cozbinov
56%
(
32 of
57)
1st Serve %
53%
(
37 of
70)
4
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
5
91%
(
29 of
32)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
27 of
37)
48%
(
12 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
15 of
33)
25%
(
3 of
12)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
28%
(
16 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
28 of
70)
69
Total Points Won
58
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Buvaysar Gadamauri
Player
Lenny Hampel
60%
(
37 of
62)
1st Serve %
66%
(
33 of
50)
0
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
1
62%
(
23 of
37)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
20 of
33)
68%
(
17 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
6 of
17)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
35%
(
22 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
24 of
50)
64
Total Points Won
48
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Lenny Hampel
Player
Andre Biro
49%
(
17 of
35)
1st Serve %
77%
(
41 of
53)
3
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
1
76%
(
13 of
17)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
18 of
41)
72%
(
13 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
17%
(
2 of
12)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
26%
(
9 of
35)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
33 of
53)
59
Total Points Won
29
|
6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Matteo Martineau
Player
Lenny Hampel
59%
(
30 of
51)
1st Serve %
62%
(
36 of
58)
1
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
3
77%
(
23 of
30)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
23 of
36)
52%
(
11 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
6 of
22)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
33%
(
17 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
29 of
58)
63
Total Points Won
46
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Timo Stodder
Player
Lenny Hampel
64%
(
52 of
81)
1st Serve %
61%
(
46 of
76)
1
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
0
67%
(
35 of
52)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
28 of
46)
55%
(
16 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
15 of
30)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
37%
(
30 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
33 of
76)
84
Total Points Won
73
|
4-6 6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Lenny Hampel
Player
Matic Dimic
60%
(
27 of
45)
1st Serve %
62%
(
29 of
47)
2
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
74%
(
20 of
27)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
16 of
29)
61%
(
11 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
6 of
18)
100%
(
5 of
5)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
31%
(
14 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
25 of
47)
56
Total Points Won
36
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Adrian Oetzbach
Player
Lenny Hampel
60%
(
30 of
50)
1st Serve %
54%
(
29 of
54)
2
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
1
73%
(
22 of
30)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
17 of
29)
25%
(
5 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
12 of
25)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
46%
(
23 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
25 of
54)
52
Total Points Won
52
|
6-2 0-6 10-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Lenny Hampel
Player
Neil Oberleitner
67%
(
37 of
55)
1st Serve %
69%
(
41 of
59)
3
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
3
81%
(
30 of
37)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
29 of
41)
61%
(
11 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
8 of
18)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
25%
(
14 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
22 of
59)
63
Total Points Won
51
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
James Marsalek Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Alec Adamson
Player
James Marsalek
62%
(
33 of
53)
1st Serve %
33%
(
13 of
39)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
2
73%
(
24 of
33)
1st Serve Won
38%
(
5 of
13)
60%
(
12 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
9 of
26)
100%
(
5 of
5)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
32%
(
17 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
64%
(
25 of
39)
61
Total Points Won
31
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Hugo Grenier
Player
James Marsalek
52%
(
30 of
58)
1st Serve %
65%
(
33 of
51)
3
Aces
1
6
Double Faults
5
87%
(
26 of
30)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
22 of
33)
54%
(
15 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
8 of
18)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
29%
(
17 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
21 of
51)
62
Total Points Won
47
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Bernardo Saraiva
Player
James Marsalek
65%
(
43 of
66)
1st Serve %
62%
(
37 of
60)
10
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
1
77%
(
33 of
43)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
25 of
37)
61%
(
14 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
13 of
23)
29%
(
2 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
29%
(
19 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
22 of
60)
69
Total Points Won
57
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ben Patael
Player
James Marsalek
61%
(
55 of
90)
1st Serve %
53%
(
48 of
90)
12
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
6
69%
(
38 of
55)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
30 of
48)
46%
(
16 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
18 of
42)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
27%
(
3 of
11)
40%
(
36 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
42 of
90)
96
Total Points Won
84
|
7-6(1) 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Fran Zvonimir Zgombic
Player
James Marsalek
56%
(
24 of
43)
1st Serve %
67%
(
31 of
46)
2
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
1
83%
(
20 of
24)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
18 of
31)
74%
(
14 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
7 of
15)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
21%
(
9 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
21 of
46)
55
Total Points Won
34
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
James Marsalek
Player
Alon Elia
55%
(
36 of
66)
1st Serve %
69%
(
48 of
70)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
4
58%
(
21 of
36)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
25 of
48)
47%
(
14 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
23%
(
5 of
22)
58%
(
7 of
12)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
47%
(
31 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
40 of
70)
75
Total Points Won
61
|
7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
James Marsalek
Player
Christopher Diaz-Figueroa
57%
(
30 of
53)
1st Serve %
53%
(
27 of
51)
2
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
5
77%
(
23 of
30)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
16 of
27)
57%
(
13 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
10 of
24)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
32%
(
17 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
25 of
51)
61
Total Points Won
43
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
James Marsalek
Player
Daniel Entelis
53%
(
26 of
49)
1st Serve %
76%
(
42 of
55)
4
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
2
81%
(
21 of
26)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
24 of
42)
74%
(
17 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
5 of
13)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
22%
(
11 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
26 of
55)
64
Total Points Won
40
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
David Guez
Player
James Marsalek
64%
(
28 of
44)
1st Serve %
37%
(
14 of
38)
3
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
4
86%
(
24 of
28)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
7 of
14)
63%
(
10 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
11 of
24)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
23%
(
10 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
20 of
38)
54
Total Points Won
28
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
James Marsalek
Player
Jaime Pulgar-Garcia
72%
(
43 of
60)
1st Serve %
59%
(
34 of
58)
2
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
2
72%
(
31 of
43)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
22 of
34)
71%
(
12 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
10 of
24)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
6)
28%
(
17 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
26 of
58)
69
Total Points Won
49
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Hampel Vs Marsalek Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
