Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Lennert Van Der Linden vs Yankel Zemel Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Linden vs Zemel analysis and find out who is favored!
Lennert Van Der Linden vs Yankel Zemel Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Linden has won 0% of points on his second serve, while Zemel has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Linden, in recent form, has won 0% of his opponent's second serve points, while Zemel has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Linden has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Zemel has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Linden has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/ 0), with Zemel winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Linden has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 69% (W/L 24/ 11), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 3). Zemel has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 54% (W/L 124/ 107), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 2).
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Linden winning 1 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Linden winning 2 and Zemel winning 0. The last match between Linden and Zemel was at the Israel F15, 26-10-2015, Quarterfinals, Hard with Lennert Van Der Linden getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:5:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Linden and Zemel have played a deciding set 0 times, with Linden winning 0 times and Zemel 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Linden winning 0, and Zemel 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Linden has played against opponents with an average rank of while Zemel has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Linden has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Zemel has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Linden has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Zemel has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Linden 1 - 0 Zemel
Ret.
Rank
439
High
34
Age
R
Plays
1
Total0
1
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
N/A
Rank
High
25
Age
L
Plays
L
W
W
L
W
W
L
L
L
L
Form
L
W
W
W
W
L
W
W
W
L
59% (106-74)
Career Total W/L
53% (129-115)
0% (0-0)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Lennert Van Der Linden | Yankel Zemel |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
| Games Won | 12 | 4 |
| Aces (Total) | 4 | 5 |
| DFs (Total) | 1 | 4 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:5:0 | 1:5:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 63% (24/38) | 59% (29/49) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 83% (20/24) | 59% (17/29) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 86% (12/14) | 45% (9/20) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 57% (4/7) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Points W% | 47% (23/49) | 16% (6/38) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-2 6-2 |
Stats 
Lennert Van Der Linden
Player
Yankel Zemel
63%
(
24 of
38)
1st Serve %
59%
(
29 of
49)
4
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
4
83%
(
20 of
24)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
17 of
29)
86%
(
12 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
9 of
20)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
16%
(
6 of
38)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
23 of
49)
55
Total Points Won
32
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Lennert Van Der Linden | Yankel Zemel |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0 | 0 |
| Aces Total | 0 | 0 |
| DFs per game | 0 | 0 |
| DFs Total | 0 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 0 |
| 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Lennert Van Der Linden Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Niels Lootsma
Player
Lennert Van Der Linden
78%
(
14 of
18)
1st Serve %
53%
(
18 of
34)
2
Aces
2
-
Double Faults
-
71%
(
10 of
14)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
11 of
18)
75%
(
3 of
4)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
7 of
16)
13%
(
1 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
28%
(
5 of
18)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
16 of
34)
29
Total Points Won
23
|
4-2 ret. | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Juan Pablo Grassi Mazzuchi
Player
Lennert Van Der Linden
60%
(
6 of
10)
1st Serve %
50%
(
3 of
6)
0
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
0
83%
(
5 of
6)
1st Serve Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
25%
(
1 of
4)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
100%
(
1 of
1)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Rtn Points Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
10
Total Points Won
6
|
2-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Colin Van Beem
Player
Lennert Van Der Linden
59%
(
51 of
87)
1st Serve %
71%
(
58 of
82)
7
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
4
76%
(
39 of
51)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
35 of
58)
56%
(
20 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
14 of
24)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
32%
(
28 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
33 of
82)
92
Total Points Won
77
|
6-7(3) 6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Moez Echargui
Player
Lennert Van Der Linden
77%
(
34 of
44)
1st Serve %
55%
(
34 of
62)
4
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
4
71%
(
24 of
34)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
20 of
34)
60%
(
6 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
21%
(
6 of
28)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
32%
(
14 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
36 of
62)
66
Total Points Won
40
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Lennert Van Der Linden
Player
Huixin Wang
80%
(
37 of
46)
1st Serve %
55%
(
30 of
55)
3
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
1
70%
(
26 of
37)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
15 of
30)
33%
(
3 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
9 of
25)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
37%
(
17 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
31 of
55)
60
Total Points Won
41
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Lennert Van Der Linden
Player
Yuri Syromolotov Netrebin
64%
(
29 of
45)
1st Serve %
59%
(
41 of
69)
2
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
3
72%
(
21 of
29)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
22 of
41)
88%
(
14 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
13 of
28)
29%
(
4 of
14)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
22%
(
10 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
34 of
69)
69
Total Points Won
45
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Issam Haitham Taweel
Player
Lennert Van Der Linden
64%
(
63 of
98)
1st Serve %
57%
(
55 of
97)
7
Aces
3
7
Double Faults
1
73%
(
46 of
63)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
37 of
55)
43%
(
15 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
23 of
42)
27%
(
3 of
11)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
38%
(
37 of
98)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
37 of
97)
98
Total Points Won
97
|
6-3 3-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Lennert Van Der Linden
Player
Christian Hirschmueller
77%
(
60 of
78)
1st Serve %
56%
(
38 of
68)
4
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
5
75%
(
45 of
60)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
27 of
38)
50%
(
9 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
13 of
30)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
31%
(
24 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
28 of
68)
82
Total Points Won
64
|
5-7 6-2 3-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Lennert Van Der Linden
Player
Kristjan Tamm
57%
(
24 of
42)
1st Serve %
52%
(
30 of
58)
4
Aces
6
3
Double Faults
4
79%
(
19 of
24)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
16 of
30)
72%
(
13 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
11 of
28)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
24%
(
10 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
31 of
58)
63
Total Points Won
37
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Cristian Carli
Player
Lennert Van Der Linden
76%
(
35 of
46)
1st Serve %
63%
(
31 of
49)
1
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
0
71%
(
25 of
35)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
16 of
31)
55%
(
6 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
7 of
18)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
33%
(
15 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
26 of
49)
57
Total Points Won
38
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
Yankel Zemel Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Jacob Brumm
Player
Yankel Zemel
66%
(
49 of
74)
1st Serve %
54%
(
39 of
72)
4
Aces
7
4
Double Faults
5
63%
(
31 of
49)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
25 of
39)
52%
(
13 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
13 of
33)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
41%
(
30 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
34 of
72)
78
Total Points Won
68
|
7-6(3) 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF | 6-2 7-5 | H2H | |||
| Q2 | 6-4 6-0 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-4 6-4 | H2H | |||
| R2 |
Stats
Jordan Hasson
Player
Yankel Zemel
46%
(
13 of
28)
1st Serve %
52%
(
15 of
29)
1
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
1
85%
(
11 of
13)
1st Serve Won
80%
(
12 of
15)
87%
(
13 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
6 of
14)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
14%
(
4 of
28)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
11 of
29)
35
Total Points Won
22
|
6-3 2-1 ret. | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Yankel Zemel
Player
Niv Zuckerman
54%
(
55 of
102)
1st Serve %
55%
(
53 of
97)
7
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
9
76%
(
42 of
55)
1st Serve Won
77%
(
41 of
53)
51%
(
24 of
47)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
14 of
44)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
35%
(
36 of
102)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
42 of
97)
108
Total Points Won
91
|
6-7(5) 6-0 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
| QF | 7-5 6-2 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-1 6-4 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-4 6-0 | H2H | |||
| Q2 |
Stats
Aleksandr Lobanov
Player
Yankel Zemel
60%
(
27 of
45)
1st Serve %
63%
(
31 of
49)
5
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
4
74%
(
20 of
27)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
20 of
31)
78%
(
14 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
6 of
18)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
24%
(
11 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
23 of
49)
57
Total Points Won
37
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Linden Vs Zemel Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
