Prediction of Leif Shiras vs Tommy Ho Head-to-Head, At

Wojtek Kolan

Our Predictions

H2H Records Career Stats

HEAD TO HEAD
L. Shiras vs T. Ho

Leif Shiras

USA

1

Win

Played

0

Win

Age

6'0" (183 cm)

Height

6'0" (183 cm)

Ret.

C. Rank

Ret.

Best Rank

532

Total Titles

YTD Titles

Career Money

Right-Handed

Plays

Left-Handed

Tommy Ho

USA

1

Win

Played

0

Win

Age

6'0" (183 cm)

Height

6'0" (183 cm)

Ret.

C. Rank

Ret.

Best Rank

532

Total Titles

YTD Titles

Career Money

Right-Handed

Plays

Left-Handed

Head-to-head: Shiras 1 - 0 Ho

They have played 2 sets in total, with Leif Shiras winning 2 and Tommy Ho winning 0. The last match between Leif Shiras and Tommy Ho was at the Tokyo Indoor, 17-10-1989, Round: R3, Surface: Carpet, with Leif Shiras getting the victory 6-4 6-2.

Players	Head To Head Match Wins
Shiras	1
Ho	0

Last 1 H2H Matches:

(R3) Tokyo Indoor(10-17-89)

Stats

Leif Shiras

Tommy Ho

L. Shiras vs T. Ho H2H Profile

L. Shiras	Stats	T. Ho
$0	Career Prize Money	$0
48.39% (120-128)	Career Total W/L	34.26% (37-71)
1	Indoor	0
3	Titles	0
1	Total H2H Matches	0
0% (0-0)	YTD Win/Loss	0% (0-0)

L. Shiras vs T. Ho Match Preview:

Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Leif Shiras has won 0% of points on their second serve, while Tommy Ho has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Leif Shiras, in recent form, has won 0% of their opponent's second serve points, while Tommy Ho has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
Under pressure analysis: Leif Shiras has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Tommy Ho has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
Performance overview: Over the last year Leif Shiras has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/0), with Tommy Ho winning 0% (W/L 0/0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
Best surface: Leif Shiras has their best career surface win % on Grass, winning 50% (W/L 28/28), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 0% (W/L 0/1). Tommy Ho has their best career surface win % on Grass, winning 50% (W/L 4/6), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 0% (W/L 0/6).
Player level: In the last year, Leif Shiras has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/0), where as Tommy Ho has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/0). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Leif Shiras winning 1 times and Tommy Ho being victorious 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Leif Shiras winning 2 and Tommy Ho winning 0.
The last match between Leif Shiras and Tommy Ho was at the Tokyo Indoor, 17-10-1989, Round: R3, Surface: Carpet, with Leif Shiras getting the victory 6-4 6-2.
Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:0:0.
Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Leif Shiras has played against opponents with an average rank of 0 while Tommy Ho has played against players with an average rank of 0.
Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Leif Shiras has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Tommy Ho has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
Break point conversion: In recent form, Leif Shiras has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Tommy Ho has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.

Leif Shiras vs Tommy Ho Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.

L. Shiras vs T. Ho H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions

L. Shiras	Stats	T. Ho
1	H2H Matches Won	0
2	Sets Won	0
12	Games Won	6
0:0:0	Average Match Time	0:0:0
100% (1/1)	Best‑of‑3 Win %	0% (0/1)
100% (1/1)	1st Set Won, Won Match	0% (0/0)
0% (0/1)	1st Set Won, Lost Match	0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)	1st Set Lost, Won Match	0% (0/1)

Recent Performance Stats

L. Shiras Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT	RESULT	SCORE	H2H
Indianapolis - 13-08-1990
R1 Robbie WeissR. Weiss	W	6-2 6-4	Stats
R2 Richey RenebergR. Reneberg	L	6-0 6-1	Stats
Cincinnati - 06-08-1990
R1 David WheatonD. Wheaton	L	6-4 7-6	Stats
Canadian Open - 23-07-1990
R1 Paul AnnaconeP. Annacone	W	6-1 6-4	Stats
R2 Jay BergerJ. Berger	L	6-2 6-4	Stats

View All

T. Ho Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT	RESULT	SCORE	H2H
Miller Lite Hall of Fame Tennis Championships - Newport - 06-07-1998
R1 Rainer SchuettlerR. Schuettler	L	6-2 6-3	Stats
Healthsouth/USTA Challenger - Denver - 29-06-1998
R1 Michael RussellM. Russell	L	7-6(8) 6-3	Stats
U.S. Open - New York - 25-08-1997
R1 Martin Damm (1972)M. Damm	L	6-3 6-4 6-7(5) 6-4	Stats
RCA Championships - Indianapolis - 11-08-1997
R2 Glenn WeinerG. Weiner	W	3-6 7-6(2) 6-3	Stats
R3 Jason StoltenbergJ. Stoltenberg	W	6-4 6-3	Stats

View All

L. Shiras vs T. Ho Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents

L. Shiras	Stats	T. Ho
48.39% (120/128)	YTD Win/Loss	34.26% (37/71)
47.10% (300/337)	Sets Win/Loss	40.43% (112/165)
48.56% (3053/3234)	Games Win/Loss	47.07% (1262/1419)
47.11% (57/64)	Hard Win/Loss	33.85% (22/43)
31.25% (5/11)	Clay Win/Loss	20.00% (1/4)
54.55% (30/25)	Indoor Hard W/L	35.71% (10/18)
50.00% (28/28)	Grass Win/Loss	40.00% (4/6)
1st Match	Average Match Time	1st Match
398.17	Average Opponent Rank	280.82
36.67% (11/19)	Slam W/L	29.41% (5/12)
31.25% (5/11)	Masters W/L	37.50% (3/5)
43.31% (55/72)	Main Tour W/L	35.90% (28/50)
65.33% (49/26)	Challenger W/L	20.00% (1/4)
51% (109/215)	Best of 3 Sets Win %	36% (32/90)
35% (11/31)	Best of 5 Sets Win %	29% (5/17)
0% (0/0)	Tiebreaks Win % (Total)	46% (17/37)
59% (55/94)	Deciding Set Win %	29% (10/35)
81% (116/94)	1st Set Won, Won Match	59% (51/30)
19% (116/22)	1st Set Won, Lost Match	41% (51/21)
20% (132/26)	1st Set Lost, Won Match	13% (56/7)