Prediction of Learner Tien [69th] vs Federico Agustin Gomez [136th] Head-to-Head At The
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W W W L L L L W W L
Form
L L L L L W W W L LH2H: Tien 2 - 0 Gomez
They have played 5 sets in total, with Tien winning 4 and Gomez winning 1. The last match between Tien and Gomez was at the Abierto Mexicano Telcel - Acapulco, 23-02-2025, Q1 round, Hard with Learner Tien getting the victory 6-1 6-3.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Learner Tien | 2 |
| Federico Agustin Gomez | 0 |
Recent Performance Stats (Last 6 Months)
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-1 6-3 |
Stats 
Learner Tien
Player
Federico Agustin Gomez
62%
(
36 of
58)
1st Serve %
56%
(
24 of
43)
3
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
5
81%
(
29 of
36)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
14 of
24)
45%
(
10 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
6 of
19)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
33%
(
19 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
23 of
43)
62
Total Points Won
39
|
||||
| 2-6 6-2 7-6(4) |
Stats
Learner Tien
Player
Federico Agustin Gomez
57%
(
52 of
92)
1st Serve %
63%
(
64 of
102)
4
Aces
6
6
Double Faults
3
69%
(
36 of
52)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
36 of
64)
58%
(
23 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
63%
(
24 of
38)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
36%
(
33 of
92)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
42 of
102)
101
Total Points Won
93
|
||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 4 | Sets Won | 1 |
| 27 | Games Won | 18 |
| 7 | Aces (Total) | 8 |
| 9 | Total Double Faults | 8 |
| 1:32:44 | Average Match Time | 1:32:44 |
| 59% (88/150) | 1st Serve % | 61% (88/145) |
| 74% (65/88) | 1st Serve Win % | 57% (50/88) |
| 53% (33/62) | 2nd Serve Win % | 53% (30/57) |
| 64% (7/11) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 25% (3/12) |
| 45% (65/145) | Return Points Win % | 35% (52/150) |
| 100% (2/2) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/2) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (1/1) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 100% (1/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Learner Tien vs Federico Agustin Gomez Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Tien 2 - 0 Gomez
Editorial Prediction:
🎾 **Second Serve Shenanigans:** Hold onto your tennis rackets, folks, because we've got a nail-biter on our hands with Tien and Gomez! In the past six months, Tien has edged out Gomez in the second serve shenanigan statistics, capturing 50.64% of the points compared to Gomez's 49.93%. It seems the second serve might just be the magic wand to predict who will be waving goodbye to their opponent. 🎾
📉 **Return of the Jedi Serve:** Both players have been diligently working on their Jedi skills when it comes to returning serves. Tien, channelling his inner Yoda, has nabbed 58.6% of opponent's second serve points while Gomez, perhaps still on Padawan level, is at 45.72%. When it comes to first-serve returns, they both seem to be practicing their mindfulness, with Tien grabbing 30.45% and Gomez 28.17%. Who will emerge victorious in this epic H2H lightsaber duel? 📉
😂 **Breakpoint Drama:** Breakpoints – the soap opera of tennis. Tien saves them like they're puppies needing rescue, boasting a 64.51% save rate, while Gomez is not slacking either at 61.68%. These numbers are essential for those live-betting enthusiasts looking for a mid-match heart attack. 😂
⭐ **Overall Matchwise Superiority:** In the grand picture of tennis drama, Tien has been dazzling the crowds with an impressive 84% win rate (63 wins, 12 losses), slightly overshadowing our pal Gomez who’s at a respectable 66.27% (55 wins, 28 losses). Will Tien continue to shine, or will Gomez swipe the limelight this time? ⭐
🌍 **Surface and Turf Tales:** As the tale spins, Tien performs like a rock star on Hard surfaces with a 77% success rate, though he seems to slip on Clay, stumbling to 43%. Gomez, on the other hand, reigns on Clay with a royal 63% win rate. However, on indoor hard courts, he appears to be consulting his crystal ball with a win rate of 38%. Which surface will make or break our players this time? 🌍
🔍 **Event Level Mastery:** Both gladiators have mostly been swinging their rackets at Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, with Tien sweeping 81.58% of his matches and Gomez close behind at 66.13%. Context, as always, is queen. This tale promises twists as we dive into their current event duels. 🔍
🤝 **Historical Tug-of-War:** In their lone duel, Tien took the crown, winning 2 out of 3 sets against Gomez in a gripping showdown at Fairfield Challenger. This saga of theirs has clocked in at an amusing average match duration of 1:56:26. ☕ Déjà vu, anyone? 🤝
💪 **Under Pressure Precision:** Let’s talk about those nerve-wracking tiebreaks! Tien won their only tiebreak duel against Gomez, showing he might just be the cooler cucumber when it gets to extreme pressure situations. And if we're talking deciding sets, Tien takes 81% of those, while Gomez is at 71%. Guess who’s more likely to enjoy nail-biting finishes? 💪
🎯 **Current Event and Breakpoint Nuances:** Finally, in the wild world of breakpoints, Tien has successfully converted 42.24% of them into magic moments, whereas Gomez is clicking at 34.71%. Look out for these conversion rates during their current event escapades before casting your bets! 🎯
Learner Tien Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Tallon Griekspoor
Player
Learner Tien
71%
(
37 of
52)
1st Serve %
62%
(
39 of
63)
7
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
3
78%
(
29 of
37)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
24 of
39)
60%
(
9 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
13 of
24)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
27%
(
14 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
26 of
63)
64
Total Points Won
51
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Learner Tien
Player
Botic Van De Zandschulp
58%
(
29 of
50)
1st Serve %
48%
(
26 of
54)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
4
76%
(
22 of
29)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
16 of
26)
48%
(
10 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
8 of
28)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
36%
(
18 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
30 of
54)
62
Total Points Won
42
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Learner Tien
Player
Henri Squire
54%
(
40 of
74)
1st Serve %
66%
(
50 of
76)
3
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
7
75%
(
30 of
40)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
35 of
50)
50%
(
17 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
7 of
26)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
36%
(
27 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
34 of
76)
81
Total Points Won
69
|
7-5 2-6 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Alex Michelsen
Player
Learner Tien
67%
(
30 of
45)
1st Serve %
65%
(
37 of
57)
7
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
2
87%
(
26 of
30)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
25 of
37)
53%
(
8 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
6 of
20)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
24%
(
11 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
26 of
57)
60
Total Points Won
42
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Joao Fonseca
Player
Learner Tien
64%
(
63 of
99)
1st Serve %
62%
(
67 of
108)
10
Aces
10
3
Double Faults
3
71%
(
45 of
63)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
47 of
67)
64%
(
23 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
22 of
41)
25%
(
3 of
12)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
31%
(
31 of
99)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
39 of
108)
107
Total Points Won
100
|
6-7(1) 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Mariano Navone
Player
Learner Tien
66%
(
42 of
64)
1st Serve %
56%
(
49 of
87)
4
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
7
74%
(
31 of
42)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
30 of
49)
55%
(
12 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
20 of
38)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
33%
(
21 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
37 of
87)
80
Total Points Won
71
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Tomas Machac
Player
Learner Tien
57%
(
32 of
56)
1st Serve %
61%
(
51 of
83)
1
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
3
69%
(
22 of
32)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
28 of
51)
50%
(
12 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
12 of
32)
43%
(
6 of
14)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
39%
(
22 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
43 of
83)
77
Total Points Won
62
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Learner Tien
Player
Alexander Zverev
69%
(
40 of
58)
1st Serve %
75%
(
44 of
59)
4
Aces
6
0
Double Faults
0
70%
(
28 of
40)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
30 of
44)
61%
(
11 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
5 of
15)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
33%
(
19 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
24 of
59)
63
Total Points Won
54
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Learner Tien
Player
Cameron Norrie
70%
(
43 of
61)
1st Serve %
70%
(
54 of
77)
2
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
1
67%
(
29 of
43)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
30 of
54)
44%
(
8 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
8 of
23)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
39%
(
24 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
39 of
77)
76
Total Points Won
62
|
7-6(5) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Learner Tien
Player
Dusan Lajovic
61%
(
46 of
76)
1st Serve %
76%
(
71 of
93)
1
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
1
65%
(
30 of
46)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
41 of
71)
47%
(
14 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
9 of
22)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
80%
(
4 of
5)
42%
(
32 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
43 of
93)
87
Total Points Won
82
|
7-5 7-6(7) | H2H | ||
view more
Federico Agustin Gomez Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Joao Lucas Reis Da Silva
Player
Federico Agustin Gomez
54%
(
20 of
37)
1st Serve %
59%
(
33 of
56)
1
Aces
7
1
Double Faults
3
90%
(
18 of
20)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
21 of
33)
76%
(
13 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
11 of
23)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
16%
(
6 of
37)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
24 of
56)
55
Total Points Won
38
|
6-4 3-2 ret. | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Liam Draxl
Player
Federico Agustin Gomez
70%
(
54 of
77)
1st Serve %
61%
(
48 of
79)
0
Aces
6
2
Double Faults
5
69%
(
37 of
54)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
24 of
48)
30%
(
7 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
15 of
31)
58%
(
7 of
12)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
43%
(
33 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
40 of
79)
84
Total Points Won
72
|
3-6 6-4 6-0 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Federico Agustin Gomez
Player
Filip Cristian Jianu
67%
(
34 of
51)
1st Serve %
52%
(
26 of
50)
7
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
3
68%
(
23 of
34)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
15 of
26)
71%
(
12 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
9 of
24)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
31%
(
16 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
26 of
50)
61
Total Points Won
40
|
6-4 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Federico Agustin Gomez
Player
Inaki Montes-De La Torre
54%
(
38 of
71)
1st Serve %
59%
(
44 of
75)
3
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
2
68%
(
26 of
38)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
28 of
44)
61%
(
20 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
11 of
31)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
35%
(
25 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
36 of
75)
82
Total Points Won
64
|
6-0 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Federico Agustin Gomez
Player
Garrett Johns
60%
(
29 of
48)
1st Serve %
45%
(
29 of
65)
0
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
1
62%
(
18 of
29)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
18 of
29)
68%
(
13 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
12 of
36)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
35%
(
17 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
35 of
65)
66
Total Points Won
47
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Jenson Brooksby
Player
Federico Agustin Gomez
64%
(
61 of
96)
1st Serve %
60%
(
72 of
120)
5
Aces
5
6
Double Faults
10
64%
(
39 of
61)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
47 of
72)
51%
(
18 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
22 of
48)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
41%
(
39 of
96)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
51 of
120)
108
Total Points Won
108
|
3-6 7-6(5) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
James Duckworth
Player
Federico Agustin Gomez
51%
(
37 of
72)
1st Serve %
55%
(
47 of
85)
0
Aces
8
3
Double Faults
4
78%
(
29 of
37)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
28 of
47)
54%
(
19 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
19 of
38)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
33%
(
24 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
38 of
85)
86
Total Points Won
71
|
7-5 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Rudy Quan
Player
Federico Agustin Gomez
70%
(
48 of
69)
1st Serve %
58%
(
42 of
73)
0
Aces
1
6
Double Faults
5
73%
(
35 of
48)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
22 of
42)
38%
(
8 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
15 of
31)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
38%
(
26 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
36 of
73)
79
Total Points Won
63
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Learner Tien
Player
Federico Agustin Gomez
62%
(
36 of
58)
1st Serve %
56%
(
24 of
43)
3
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
5
81%
(
29 of
36)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
14 of
24)
45%
(
10 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
6 of
19)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
33%
(
19 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
23 of
43)
62
Total Points Won
39
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Dmitry Popko
Player
Federico Agustin Gomez
58%
(
49 of
85)
1st Serve %
67%
(
63 of
94)
6
Aces
9
3
Double Faults
7
76%
(
37 of
49)
1st Serve Won
79%
(
50 of
63)
56%
(
20 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
10 of
31)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
33%
(
28 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
34 of
94)
91
Total Points Won
88
|
2-6 6-3 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 73% (118/43) | Win/Loss | 61% (185/116) |
| 65% (258/136) | Sets Win/Loss | 60% (413/280) |
| 55% (2050/1647) | Games Win/Loss | 53% (3451/3049) |
| 0.26 | Aces Per Game | 0.4 |
| 470 | Aces Total | 1273 |
| 0.25 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.31 |
| 462 | Total Double Faults | 972 |
| 1:41:39 | Average Match Time | 1:28:39 |
| 173.24 | Average Opponent Rank | 379.57 |
| 63% (7296/11605) | 1st Serve % | 59% (10361/17594) |
| 67% (4916/7296) | 1st Serve Win % | 70% (7300/10361) |
| 51% (2219/4309) | 2nd Serve Win % | 50% (3599/7232) |
| 47% (596/1263) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 42% (729/1731) |
| 43% (4905/11540) | Return Points Win % | 39% (6762/17119) |
| 75% (110/147) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 62% (184/299) |
| 50% (6/12) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 62% (39/63) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 57% (45/79) |
| 75% (39/52) | Deciding Set Win % | 53% (49/93) |
| 95% (102/97) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 83% (186/154) |
| 5% (102/5) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 17% (186/32) |
| 36% (59/21) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 27% (115/31) |
Potential H2H Matches This Week For Federico Agustin Gomez
View full predicted draw for Gomez
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
