Learner Tien vs Botic Van De Zandschulp Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
L L W W L L L W L L
Form
W L L W L W L W L LH2H: Tien 1 - 0 Zandschulp
They have played 2 sets in total, with Tien winning 2 and Zandschulp winning 0. The last match between Tien and Zandschulp was at the BMW Open - Munich, 13-04-2025, Round: Q3, Surface: Clay, with Learner Tien getting the victory 6-2 6-2.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Learner Tien | 1 |
| Botic Van De Zandschulp | 0 |
LAST H2H MATCH: BMW Open - Munich(13-04-2025)
Learner Tien
Botic Van De Zandschulp
6
2
6
2
| Tien | Stats | Zandschulp |
|---|---|---|
| 54% (14-12) | YTD Win/Loss | 42% (10-14) |
| 1 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
| 67 | Ranking | 89 |
| 66 | Highest Rank | 22 |
| 19 | Age | 29 |
| - | Plays | R |
| 10 | Titles | 7 |
| 72% (119-47) | Career Total W/L | 61% (363-228) |
| $482,330 | Career Prize Money | $3,456,920 |
| 1 | Clay H2H | 0 |
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Masarova VS Branstine PREDICTION Clay
French Open - Paris wta
21 May 2025 / Q2 round
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Altmaier VS Aliassime PREDICTION Clay
Hamburg Open - Hamburg atp
20 May 2025 / First
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Tien VS Zandschulp H2H Matches played
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-2 6-2 |
Stats 
Learner Tien
Player
Botic Van De Zandschulp
58%
(
29 of
50)
1st Serve %
48%
(
26 of
54)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
4
76%
(
22 of
29)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
16 of
26)
48%
(
10 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
8 of
28)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
36%
(
18 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
30 of
54)
62
Total Points Won
42
|
||||
Tien VS Zandschulp H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 12 | Games Won | 4 |
| 1 | Aces (Total) | 0 |
| 1 | Total Double Faults | 4 |
| 1:16:18 | Average Match Time | 1:16:18 |
| 58% (29/50) | 1st Serve % | 48% (26/54) |
| 76% (22/29) | 1st Serve Win % | 62% (16/26) |
| 48% (10/21) | 2nd Serve Win % | 29% (8/28) |
| 63% (5/8) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 25% (1/4) |
| 56% (30/54) | Return Points Win % | 36% (18/50) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Tien vs Zandschulp Match Preview :
When analyzing recent second serve performance, Zandschulp has managed to secure 43.33% of points, slightly outperforming Tien's 41.2%. This statistic is crucial for match prediction accuracy, suggesting a narrow edge for Zandschulp. Furthermore, examining return game performance, Tien has the lead, winning 48.13% of second serve return points, compared to Zandschulp's 46.53%. In first serve returns, however, the players are closely matched, with Zandschulp at 27.4% and Tien at 27.04%.
Under pressure, Tien has demonstrated greater resilience by saving 54.26% of breakpoints, compared to Zandschulp's 50.47%. This metric is valuable for in-game betting predictions. Over the past year, Tien boasts an impressive match win rate of 79.78% (with a record of 71 wins and 18 losses), whereas Zandschulp has secured victory in 52.24% of his competitions (35 wins and 32 losses), offering a broader perspective on their head-to-head prediction.
Regarding surface preferences, Zandschulp excels on indoor hard courts with a 63% win record (93 wins to 54 losses), but struggles on grass, with only 46% (11 wins to 13 losses). Tien, in contrast, performs best on hard courts, winning 76% of his matches (92 wins to 29 losses), and finds clay challenging, with a 44% win rate (4 wins to 5 losses).
Considering player level and match experience over the last 12 months, Zandschulp has competed mostly on the Main tour, achieving a win rate of 46.15% (12 wins, 14 losses). Conversely, Tien has dominated in Challenger and ITF tournaments, securing victories in 81.58% of his matches (31 wins, 7 losses). The level of competition is crucial, with Zandschulp facing opponents with an average ranking of 156, whereas Tien's opponents averaged a rank of 270.96.
If the match proceeds to a deciding set, Tien is favored, having won 81% of such sets over the past 12 months, compared to Zandschulp's 43%. Additionally, Tien has shown superior breakpoint conversion, turning 35.19% of these opportunities, whereas Zandschulp stands at 30.37%, which is critical for live betting predictions.
Assessing all statistical aspects, Tien emerges as the stronger contender based on his superior match win rate, tensile pressure handling, and performance in deciding sets. Given these elements, Tien is predicted to have the upper hand in this upcoming match.
Tien vs Zandschulp Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88
Learner Tien Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Kei Nishikori
Player
Learner Tien
60%
(
59 of
98)
1st Serve %
64%
(
61 of
96)
3
Aces
6
3
Double Faults
3
75%
(
44 of
59)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
38 of
61)
51%
(
20 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
19 of
35)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
15%
(
2 of
13)
35%
(
34 of
98)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
39 of
96)
103
Total Points Won
91
|
4-6 6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Tomas Machac
Player
Learner Tien
46%
(
25 of
54)
1st Serve %
58%
(
37 of
64)
0
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
4
88%
(
22 of
25)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
23 of
37)
48%
(
14 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
12 of
27)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
33%
(
18 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
29 of
64)
65
Total Points Won
53
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Learner Tien
Player
Reilly Opelka
49%
(
36 of
73)
1st Serve %
61%
(
49 of
80)
0
Aces
5
6
Double Faults
4
81%
(
29 of
36)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
33 of
49)
59%
(
22 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
16 of
31)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
30%
(
22 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
31 of
80)
82
Total Points Won
71
|
6-4 7-6(11) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Gastao Elias
Player
Learner Tien
54%
(
51 of
95)
1st Serve %
54%
(
59 of
109)
4
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
7
75%
(
38 of
51)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
36 of
59)
48%
(
21 of
44)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
28 of
50)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
38%
(
36 of
95)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
45 of
109)
104
Total Points Won
100
|
5-7 7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Marcos Giron
Player
Learner Tien
59%
(
61 of
104)
1st Serve %
49%
(
47 of
96)
6
Aces
5
4
Double Faults
3
70%
(
43 of
61)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
33 of
47)
47%
(
20 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
27 of
49)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
39%
(
41 of
104)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
36 of
96)
99
Total Points Won
101
|
6-1 1-6 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Tallon Griekspoor
Player
Learner Tien
71%
(
37 of
52)
1st Serve %
62%
(
39 of
63)
7
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
3
78%
(
29 of
37)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
24 of
39)
60%
(
9 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
13 of
24)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
27%
(
14 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
26 of
63)
64
Total Points Won
51
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Learner Tien
Player
Botic Van De Zandschulp
58%
(
29 of
50)
1st Serve %
48%
(
26 of
54)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
4
76%
(
22 of
29)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
16 of
26)
48%
(
10 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
8 of
28)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
36%
(
18 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
30 of
54)
62
Total Points Won
42
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Learner Tien
Player
Henri Squire
54%
(
40 of
74)
1st Serve %
66%
(
50 of
76)
3
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
7
75%
(
30 of
40)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
35 of
50)
50%
(
17 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
7 of
26)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
36%
(
27 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
34 of
76)
81
Total Points Won
69
|
7-5 2-6 6-0 | H2H | ||
view more
Botic Van De Zandschulp Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Jan-Lennard Struff
Player
Botic Van De Zandschulp
56%
(
37 of
66)
1st Serve %
55%
(
42 of
77)
5
Aces
9
0
Double Faults
5
70%
(
26 of
37)
1st Serve Won
79%
(
33 of
42)
59%
(
17 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
12 of
35)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
35%
(
23 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
32 of
77)
75
Total Points Won
68
|
7-5 2-6 4-1 ret. | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Juan Manuel Cerundolo
Player
Botic Van De Zandschulp
63%
(
72 of
115)
1st Serve %
69%
(
84 of
122)
6
Aces
9
5
Double Faults
1
65%
(
47 of
72)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
61 of
84)
56%
(
24 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
13 of
38)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
56%
(
5 of
9)
38%
(
44 of
115)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
48 of
122)
119
Total Points Won
118
|
7-6(3) 5-7 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Botic Van De Zandschulp
Player
Moise Kouame
59%
(
32 of
54)
1st Serve %
45%
(
24 of
53)
2
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
6
84%
(
27 of
32)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
13 of
24)
55%
(
12 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
15 of
29)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
28%
(
15 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
25 of
53)
64
Total Points Won
43
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Ben Shelton
Player
Botic Van De Zandschulp
68%
(
40 of
59)
1st Serve %
59%
(
40 of
68)
3
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
5
83%
(
33 of
40)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
27 of
40)
58%
(
11 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
14 of
28)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
25%
(
15 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
27 of
68)
71
Total Points Won
56
|
7-6(1) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Botic Van De Zandschulp
Player
Roberto Bautista Agut
72%
(
60 of
83)
1st Serve %
66%
(
64 of
97)
11
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
1
77%
(
46 of
60)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
42 of
64)
43%
(
10 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
19 of
33)
18%
(
2 of
11)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
33%
(
27 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
36 of
97)
92
Total Points Won
88
|
6-4 3-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Learner Tien
Player
Botic Van De Zandschulp
58%
(
29 of
50)
1st Serve %
48%
(
26 of
54)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
4
76%
(
22 of
29)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
16 of
26)
48%
(
10 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
8 of
28)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
36%
(
18 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
30 of
54)
62
Total Points Won
42
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Botic Van De Zandschulp
Player
Max Hans Rehberg
56%
(
25 of
45)
1st Serve %
52%
(
24 of
46)
3
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
6
84%
(
21 of
25)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
17 of
24)
65%
(
13 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
7 of
22)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
24%
(
11 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
22 of
46)
56
Total Points Won
35
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Richard Gasquet
Player
Botic Van De Zandschulp
64%
(
63 of
98)
1st Serve %
59%
(
55 of
93)
2
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
5
65%
(
41 of
63)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
36 of
55)
51%
(
18 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
15 of
38)
40%
(
6 of
15)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
40%
(
39 of
98)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
42 of
93)
101
Total Points Won
90
|
4-6 7-5 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 72% (119/47) | Win/Loss | 61% (363/228) |
| 65% (263/144) | Sets Win/Loss | 58% (828/593) |
| 55% (2114/1717) | Games Win/Loss | 53% (7124/6299) |
| 76% (92/29) | Hard Win/Loss | 58% (68/49) |
| 38% (6/10) | Clay Win/Loss | 62% (170/106) |
| 72% (21/8) | Indoor Hard W/L | 66% (114/60) |
| 0% (0/0) | Grass Win/Loss | 46% (11/13) |
| 0.26 | Aces Per Game | 0.44 |
| 484 | Aces Total | 2892 |
| 0.26 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.33 |
| 485 | Total Double Faults | 2142 |
| 1:42:9 | Average Match Time | 1:35:39 |
| 327.09 | Average Opponent Rank | 388.13 |
| 63% (7536/12043) | 1st Serve % | 62% (24087/39122) |
| 67% (5075/7536) | 1st Serve Win % | 71% (17215/24087) |
| 52% (2327/4507) | 2nd Serve Win % | 48% (7238/15038) |
| 47% (610/1302) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 43% (1781/4127) |
| 42% (5065/11971) | Return Points Win % | 41% (16381/40296) |
| 60% (6/4) | Slam W/L | 62% (32/20) |
| 14% (1/6) | Masters W/L | 49% (26/27) |
| 0% (0/0) | Cups W/L | 63% (12/7) |
| 63% (15/9) | Main Tour W/L | 50% (66/65) |
| 75% (39/13) | Challenger W/L | 63% (72/42) |
| 79% (58/15) | Futures W/L | 70% (155/67) |
| 73% (111/152) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 62% (336/539) |
| 50% (6/12) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 51% (20/39) |
| 62% (40/65) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 55% (100/183) |
| 71% (39/55) | Deciding Set Win % | 57% (112/195) |
| 93% (105/98) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 89% (342/303) |
| 7% (105/7) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 11% (342/38) |
| 34% (61/21) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 24% (247/59) |
Tien vs. Zandschulp Prediction Form Trend:
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
