L. Luciano
To Win
T. Sramkova
To Win
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W W L L L W W W L WForm
L W L L L L L W W LThey have played 2 sets in total, with Luciano winning 2 and Grignac winning 0. The last match between Luciano and Grignac was at the W15 Monastir, 02-04-2025, Round: First, Surface: Hard, with Lavinia Luciano getting the victory 6-2 6-2.
Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
---|---|
Lavinia Luciano | 1 |
Carla Grignac | 0 |
LAST H2H MATCH: W15 Monastir(02-04-2025)
Luciano | Stats | Grignac |
---|---|---|
64% (21-12) | YTD Win/Loss | 33% (3-6) |
1 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
N/A | Ranking | N/A |
Highest Rank | N/A | |
18 | Age | 17 |
- | Plays | - |
0 | Titles | 0 |
62% (48-30) | Career Total W/L | 38% (11-18) |
$0 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
1 | Hard H2H | 0 |
22 May 2025 / Second
Gonet Geneva Open - Geneva atp
22 May 2025 / Quarterfinals
French Open - Paris atp
21 May 2025 / Q2 round
Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
6-2 6-2 |
![]() ![]()
Lavinia Luciano
Player
Carla Grignac
54%
(
26 of
48)
1st Serve %
70%
(
40 of
57)
2
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
3
77%
(
20 of
26)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
25 of
40)
55%
(
12 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
18%
(
3 of
17)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
33%
(
16 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
29 of
57)
61
Total Points Won
44
|
Stats | ||
---|---|---|
1 | H2H Matches | 0 |
2 | Sets Won | 0 |
12 | Games Won | 4 |
2 | Aces (Total) | 0 |
2 | Total Double Faults | 3 |
1:19:47 | Average Match Time | 1:19:47 |
54% (26/48) | 1st Serve % | 70% (40/57) |
77% (20/26) | 1st Serve Win % | 63% (25/40) |
55% (12/22) | 2nd Serve Win % | 18% (3/17) |
44% (4/9) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 50% (1/2) |
51% (29/57) | Return Points Win % | 33% (16/48) |
100% (1/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
What insights can we glean from the battle of second serves and return games? Over the past six months, Grignac has demonstrated slight superiority, clinching 37.84% of points on their second serve versus Luciano's 35.92%. How does this factor into match predictions? There's a significant connection between these stats and accurate forecasts. When it comes to return games, Grignac again takes a minor lead, claiming 55.24% of their opponent's second serve points compared to Luciano's 52.56%. The real intrigue, however, lies in their first serve returns, with Luciano narrowly edging out Grignac, winning 35.88% to Grignac's 35.65%. This paints an intriguing picture for whom might be favored in their head-to-head encounters.
How do these warriors fare in the heat of tough moments? Saving breakpoints is no easy task, but Grignac has managed to ward off 44.64% of them, slightly outpacing Luciano's 43.56%. These statistics offer invaluable insights, especially for those interested in wagering on live matches. Looking at the larger picture, over the last year, Grignac has won 40.74% of matches played (recording 11 wins and 16 losses), while Luciano boasts a stronger 62.9% win rate (with 39 victories to 23 defeats). Which player shines on which surface? Grignac's best incline is the hard courts, winning half of such matchups, whereas Luciano's strength is evidently on indoor hard courts, where they capture 75% of victories.
What about experience at certain event levels and against certain opponents? Grignac predominantly participates in Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, capturing 44% of matches, while Luciano excels in the same conditions, holding a 68% success rate. Yet, Grignac has battled opponents with an average rank of 138.44 last year, facing tougher competition compared to Luciano's adversaries with an average rank of 250.03. Should this match venture into the tense territory of a deciding set, Luciano stands with a notable advantage, winning 57% of such duels compared to Grignac's meager 17%.
How crucial are breakpoint opportunities in this face-off? Currently, Grignac presents a formidable record by converting 58.62% of these chances, whereas Luciano trails with a 42.61% conversion rate. This marks a crucial point for those assessing live betting odds whenever a breakpoint emerges. So, who will likely clinch victory? Although past and current event performances enhance Grignac's profile slightly, Luciano's overall prowess, better recent form, and proficient handling of deciding sets suggest they might have the upper hand as the potential winner in this gripping encounter.
Luciano vs Grignac Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88
OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Lavinia Luciano
Player
Denise Valente
65%
(
41 of
63)
1st Serve %
55%
(
39 of
71)
1
Aces
4
4
Double Faults
6
73%
(
30 of
41)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
21 of
39)
55%
(
12 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
18 of
32)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
33%
(
21 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
32 of
71)
74
Total Points Won
60
|
7-6(4) 6-3 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Luiza Fullana
Player
Lavinia Luciano
59%
(
66 of
112)
1st Serve %
55%
(
52 of
94)
4
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
1
62%
(
41 of
66)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
31 of
52)
37%
(
17 of
46)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
15 of
42)
53%
(
8 of
15)
Break Points Won
35%
(
6 of
17)
48%
(
54 of
112)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
48 of
94)
106
Total Points Won
100
|
6-4 4-6 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
QF | 6-3 6-3 | H2H | |||
Q2 | 6-1 6-2 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 7-6(3) 6-1 | H2H | |||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Daria Kuczer
Player
Lavinia Luciano
65%
(
31 of
48)
1st Serve %
48%
(
29 of
60)
0
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
4
71%
(
22 of
31)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
15 of
29)
41%
(
7 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
10 of
31)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
40%
(
19 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
35 of
60)
64
Total Points Won
44
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
QF |
![]() ![]()
Mara Guth
Player
Lavinia Luciano
61%
(
43 of
70)
1st Serve %
51%
(
36 of
70)
0
Aces
0
12
Double Faults
1
56%
(
24 of
43)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
17 of
36)
33%
(
9 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
19 of
34)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
56%
(
5 of
9)
53%
(
37 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
34 of
70)
67
Total Points Won
73
|
0-6 6-3 12-10 | H2H | ||
Q1 | w/o | H2H |
view more
OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Lavinia Luciano
Player
Carla Grignac
54%
(
26 of
48)
1st Serve %
70%
(
40 of
57)
2
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
3
77%
(
20 of
26)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
25 of
40)
55%
(
12 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
18%
(
3 of
17)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
33%
(
16 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
29 of
57)
61
Total Points Won
44
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
QF |
![]() ![]()
Carla Grignac
Player
Ines Delaloye
71%
(
41 of
58)
1st Serve %
75%
(
47 of
63)
0
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
1
54%
(
22 of
41)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
20 of
47)
53%
(
9 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
5 of
16)
44%
(
7 of
16)
Break Points Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
47%
(
27 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
38 of
63)
69
Total Points Won
52
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
Q2 | 6-3 6-2 | H2H | |||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Isis Louise Van Den Broek
Player
Carla Grignac
76%
(
45 of
59)
1st Serve %
71%
(
46 of
65)
1
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
2
60%
(
27 of
45)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
24 of
46)
57%
(
8 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
16%
(
3 of
19)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
41%
(
24 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
38 of
65)
73
Total Points Won
51
|
6-4 6-0 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
![]() ![]()
Lucie Brun
Player
Carla Grignac
68%
(
21 of
31)
1st Serve %
64%
(
23 of
36)
0
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
2
90%
(
19 of
21)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
13 of
23)
50%
(
5 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
6 of
13)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
23%
(
7 of
31)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
17 of
36)
41
Total Points Won
26
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
![]() ![]()
Selya Rakki
Player
Carla Grignac
62%
(
48 of
77)
1st Serve %
73%
(
53 of
73)
0
Aces
0
10
Double Faults
1
52%
(
25 of
48)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
28 of
53)
31%
(
9 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
10 of
20)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
70%
(
7 of
10)
56%
(
43 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
35 of
73)
69
Total Points Won
81
|
7-6(5) 1-6 10-5 | H2H | ||
Q1 | 6-7(4) 6-3 10-8 | H2H | |||
Q2 | 6-2 6-0 | H2H |
view more
Stats | ||
---|---|---|
62% (48/30) | Win/Loss | 38% (11/18) |
61% (105/68) | Sets Win/Loss | 42% (27/37) |
55% (874/725) | Games Win/Loss | 48% (290/320) |
68% (13/6) | Hard Win/Loss | 47% (8/9) |
59% (30/21) | Clay Win/Loss | 30% (3/7) |
63% (5/3) | Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/2) |
0.03 | Aces Per Game | 0.02 |
23 | Aces Total | 6 |
0.11 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.17 |
88 | Total Double Faults | 50 |
1st Match | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
272.33 | Average Opponent Rank | 122.66 |
63% (1506/2389) | 1st Serve % | 67% (546/816) |
56% (850/1506) | 1st Serve Win % | 52% (286/546) |
43% (381/883) | 2nd Serve Win % | 41% (112/270) |
49% (156/320) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 53% (54/102) |
47% (1177/2489) | Return Points Win % | 48% (381/801) |
36% (5/9) | Challenger W/L | 0% (0/2) |
67% (43/21) | Futures W/L | 41% (11/16) |
62% (48/78) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 38% (11/29) |
60% (6/10) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 33% (1/3) |
47% (8/17) | Deciding Set Win % | 17% (1/6) |
90% (52/47) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 83% (12/10) |
10% (52/5) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 17% (12/2) |
4% (26/1) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 6% (17/1) |