A. Shah
To Win
L. Midon
To Win
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W L W W L W W L W WForm
W W W W L W L W W LThey have played 10 sets in total, with Midon winning 7 and Kestelboim winning 3. The last match between Midon and Kestelboim was at the M25 Lujan, 30-03-2025, Round: Final, Surface: Clay, with Lautaro Midon getting the victory 6-3 6-1.
Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
---|---|
Lautaro Midon | 3 |
Mariano Kestelboim | 1 |
LAST H2H MATCH: M25 Lujan(30-03-2025)
Midon | Stats | Kestelboim |
---|---|---|
71% (27-11) | YTD Win/Loss | 65% (20-11) |
3 | Head-to-Head | 1 |
313 | Ranking | 398 |
307 | Highest Rank | 387 |
21 | Age | 29 |
- | Plays | R |
6 | Titles | 5 |
66% (120-63) | Career Total W/L | 60% (394-260) |
$0 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
2 | YTD Titles | 0 |
3 | Clay H2H | 1 |
- / Quarterfinals
Internationaux de Strasbourg - Strasbourg wta
22 May 2025 / Quarterfinals
French Open - Paris wta
21 May 2025 / Q2 round
Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
6-3 6-1 |
![]() ![]()
Lautaro Midon
Player
Mariano Kestelboim
59%
(
32 of
54)
1st Serve %
72%
(
36 of
50)
2
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
1
66%
(
21 of
32)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
16 of
36)
50%
(
11 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
5 of
14)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
41%
(
22 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
29 of
50)
61
Total Points Won
43
|
||||
6-2 6-2 |
![]() ![]()
Lautaro Midon
Player
Mariano Kestelboim
67%
(
24 of
36)
1st Serve %
57%
(
32 of
56)
5
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
2
79%
(
19 of
24)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
17 of
32)
58%
(
7 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
8 of
24)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
28%
(
10 of
36)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
31 of
56)
57
Total Points Won
35
|
||||
5-7 6-4 6-0 |
![]() ![]()
Mariano Kestelboim
Player
Lautaro Midon
68%
(
54 of
80)
1st Serve %
67%
(
63 of
94)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
67%
(
36 of
54)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
34 of
63)
65%
(
17 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
14 of
31)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
34%
(
27 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
46 of
94)
99
Total Points Won
75
|
||||
3-6 6-1 6-3 |
![]() ![]()
Lautaro Midon
Player
Mariano Kestelboim
68%
(
76 of
112)
1st Serve %
70%
(
64 of
91)
4
Aces
1
6
Double Faults
5
57%
(
43 of
76)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
33 of
64)
39%
(
14 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
8 of
27)
53%
(
8 of
15)
Break Points Won
46%
(
6 of
13)
49%
(
55 of
112)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
50 of
91)
107
Total Points Won
96
|
Stats | ||
---|---|---|
3 | H2H Matches | 1 |
7 | Sets Won | 3 |
50 | Games Won | 35 |
11 | Aces (Total) | 2 |
8 | Total Double Faults | 9 |
2:10:8 | Average Match Time | 2:10:8 |
66% (195/296) | 1st Serve % | 67% (186/277) |
60% (117/195) | 1st Serve Win % | 55% (102/186) |
46% (46/101) | 2nd Serve Win % | 42% (38/91) |
54% (22/41) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 45% (15/33) |
49% (137/277) | Return Points Win % | 45% (133/296) |
75% (3/4) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 25% (1/4) |
50% (1/2) | Deciding Set Win % | 50% (1/2) |
67% (3/2) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
33% (3/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 100% (1/1) |
100% (1/1) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 33% (3/1) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
When diving into the second serve statistics, we see a close contest between Lautaro Midon and Carlos Kestelboim. Over the past six months, Midon has managed a win rate of 40.48% on his second serve points, slightly edged out by Kestelboim, who holds a 41.66% success rate. The correlation between these numbers and the overall match predictions is significant. But does this slight edge favor Kestelboim when predicting the possible winner?
Next, let’s examine how each player fares when returning serves. Recent data suggests that Kestelboim has a commanding lead, winning 47.69% of his opponent's second serve points compared to Midon’s 44.46%. A more substantial gap is seen with first serve returns, where Kestelboim triumphs again, taking 33.85% of points compared to Midon's 30.78%. These statistics can often be pivotal in determining which player might emerge victorious in a head-to-head matchup.
Analyzing the players’ performances under pressure, such as saving breakpoints, gives further insight. Kestelboim shines here, having saved 48.69% of breakpoints in recent form, while Midon lags slightly, with a save rate of 45.58%. This detail could prove crucial for in-game predictions, especially when stakes are high.
In reviewing their yearly performance, Midon displays a higher match-win percentage, with 69.23%, compared to Kestelboim’s 61.29%. Yet, there's more to the story when we delve into their favored surfaces. Midon boasts a winning percentage of 66% on clay courts, his preferred surface. Kestelboim isn’t far behind, possessing a 61% win rate on the same surface. However, both players show less prowess on hard courts, with Midon at 60% and Kestelboim slightly lower at 58%.
The caliber of competition they've faced also adds weight to our predictive model. Over the last year, Kestelboim’s played against more formidable opponents, with an average rank of 307.56, as opposed to Midon’s competitors, who averaged 400.27. This disparity highlights Kestelboim’s exposure to tougher matches, benefiting his experience under pressure.
Head-to-head statistics reveal their past encounters, with Midon leading the series having won 2 of their 3 matches, and clinching the last victory decisively - a straight-sets win at the M 25 Yerba Buena Semifinals. Historically, when matches between the two extend to a deciding set, it’s a level playing field with each having one win apiece. No tiebreaks have been played, pointing to potential endurance during extensive rallies.
In conclusion, when comparing the stats, every detail points to a thrilling and competitive match. With Midon holding a slightly better break point conversion rate (39.39% to Kestelboim’s 30.43%) and leading their head-to-head record, the scales tip slightly in his favor. However, considering Kestelboim's strong play against higher-ranked opponents and his superior return stats, he presents a formidable challenge. Who will seize the day? Based on these insightful stats, the prediction edges towards Midon coming ahead in this matchup, but much will depend on how these numbers translate into performance on the court.
Midon vs Kestelboim Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88
OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R2 |
![]() ![]()
Lautaro Midon
Player
Santiago De La Fuente
61%
(
48 of
79)
1st Serve %
64%
(
60 of
94)
2
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
2
58%
(
28 of
48)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
28 of
60)
35%
(
11 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
15 of
34)
47%
(
7 of
15)
Break Points Won
88%
(
7 of
8)
51%
(
40 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
51 of
94)
90
Total Points Won
83
|
6-4 2-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Lautaro Midon
Player
Gino Romano
55%
(
12 of
22)
1st Serve %
72%
(
26 of
36)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
1
92%
(
11 of
12)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
14 of
26)
60%
(
6 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
23%
(
5 of
22)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
19 of
36)
36
Total Points Won
22
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
QF |
![]() ![]()
Matheus Pucinelli De Almeida
Player
Lautaro Midon
63%
(
32 of
51)
1st Serve %
63%
(
34 of
54)
2
Aces
3
5
Double Faults
1
84%
(
27 of
32)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
19 of
34)
47%
(
9 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
8 of
20)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
29%
(
15 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
27 of
54)
63
Total Points Won
42
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
R2 |
![]() ![]()
Lautaro Midon
Player
Genaro Alberto Olivieri
69%
(
54 of
78)
1st Serve %
73%
(
52 of
71)
3
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
2
69%
(
37 of
54)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
33 of
52)
63%
(
15 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
9 of
19)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
11%
(
1 of
9)
33%
(
26 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
29 of
71)
81
Total Points Won
68
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Lautaro Midon
Player
Nikolas Sanchez-Izquierdo
50%
(
29 of
58)
1st Serve %
57%
(
30 of
53)
0
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
3
79%
(
23 of
29)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
16 of
30)
52%
(
15 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
11 of
23)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
34%
(
20 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
26 of
53)
64
Total Points Won
47
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
QF |
![]() ![]()
Matheus Pucinelli De Almeida
Player
Lautaro Midon
57%
(
33 of
58)
1st Serve %
55%
(
32 of
58)
2
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
2
76%
(
25 of
33)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
16 of
32)
56%
(
14 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
12 of
26)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
33%
(
19 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
30 of
58)
69
Total Points Won
47
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
R2 |
![]() ![]()
Lautaro Midon
Player
Juan Carlos Prado Angelo
68%
(
49 of
72)
1st Serve %
59%
(
62 of
105)
3
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
2
67%
(
33 of
49)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
39 of
62)
57%
(
13 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
18 of
43)
36%
(
5 of
14)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
36%
(
26 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
48 of
105)
94
Total Points Won
83
|
3-6 6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Lautaro Midon
Player
Mateus Alves
69%
(
79 of
115)
1st Serve %
54%
(
67 of
125)
4
Aces
5
3
Double Faults
6
72%
(
57 of
79)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
48 of
67)
47%
(
17 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
26 of
58)
24%
(
4 of
17)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
36%
(
41 of
115)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
51 of
125)
125
Total Points Won
115
|
7-6(1) 6-7(3) 6-4 | H2H |
view more
OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
QF |
![]() ![]()
Alex Barrena
Player
Mariano Kestelboim
58%
(
19 of
33)
1st Serve %
67%
(
29 of
43)
5
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
1
84%
(
16 of
19)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
14 of
29)
86%
(
12 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
4 of
14)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
15%
(
5 of
33)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
25 of
43)
53
Total Points Won
23
|
6-0 6-2 | H2H | ||
R2 |
![]() ![]()
Mariano Kestelboim
Player
Fermin Tenti
70%
(
49 of
70)
1st Serve %
59%
(
40 of
68)
2
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
2
55%
(
27 of
49)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
17 of
40)
52%
(
11 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
12 of
28)
64%
(
7 of
11)
Break Points Won
31%
(
4 of
13)
46%
(
32 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
39 of
68)
77
Total Points Won
61
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Mariano Kestelboim
Player
Alvaro Guillen Meza
64%
(
61 of
96)
1st Serve %
67%
(
63 of
94)
3
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
2
62%
(
38 of
61)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
33 of
63)
57%
(
20 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
16 of
31)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
15%
(
2 of
13)
40%
(
38 of
96)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
45 of
94)
103
Total Points Won
87
|
6-1 3-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
R2 |
![]() ![]()
Alvaro Guillen Meza
Player
Mariano Kestelboim
68%
(
50 of
74)
1st Serve %
52%
(
34 of
65)
2
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
4
62%
(
31 of
50)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
21 of
34)
63%
(
15 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
12 of
31)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
38%
(
28 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
32 of
65)
78
Total Points Won
61
|
6-2 7-5 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Mariano Kestelboim
Player
Guido Ivan Justo
67%
(
37 of
55)
1st Serve %
50%
(
32 of
64)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
3
62%
(
23 of
37)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
17 of
32)
56%
(
10 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
11 of
32)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
40%
(
22 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
36 of
64)
69
Total Points Won
50
|
7-5 6-1 | H2H | ||
F |
![]() ![]()
Lautaro Midon
Player
Mariano Kestelboim
59%
(
32 of
54)
1st Serve %
72%
(
36 of
50)
2
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
1
66%
(
21 of
32)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
16 of
36)
50%
(
11 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
5 of
14)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
41%
(
22 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
29 of
50)
61
Total Points Won
43
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
SF |
![]() ![]()
Mariano Kestelboim
Player
Santiago Rodriguez Taverna
50%
(
2 of
4)
1st Serve %
50%
(
3 of
6)
0
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
0
100%
(
2 of
2)
1st Serve Won
100%
(
3 of
3)
100%
(
2 of
2)
2nd Serve Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
0%
(
0 of
0)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
0%
(
0 of
4)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
7
Total Points Won
3
|
6-0 6-3 | H2H | ||
QF |
![]() ![]()
Mariano Kestelboim
Player
Alejo Lorenzo Lingua Lavallen
79%
(
55 of
70)
1st Serve %
67%
(
48 of
72)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
1
64%
(
35 of
55)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
24 of
48)
40%
(
6 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
11 of
24)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
41%
(
29 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
37 of
72)
78
Total Points Won
64
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H |
view more
Stats | ||
---|---|---|
66% (120/63) | Win/Loss | 60% (394/260) |
64% (261/149) | Sets Win/Loss | 58% (863/614) |
56% (2086/1644) | Games Win/Loss | 54% (7144/6005) |
60% (3/2) | Hard Win/Loss | 58% (35/25) |
66% (117/61) | Clay Win/Loss | 60% (359/235) |
0.15 | Aces Per Game | 0.06 |
275 | Aces Total | 407 |
0.16 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.16 |
296 | Total Double Faults | 1027 |
1:42:57 | Average Match Time | 1:25:1 |
429.56 | Average Opponent Rank | 482.68 |
65% (7414/11424) | 1st Serve % | 72% (23079/32110) |
63% (4692/7414) | 1st Serve Win % | 61% (14139/23079) |
49% (1947/4010) | 2nd Serve Win % | 48% (4349/9043) |
51% (749/1465) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 47% (2042/4320) |
47% (5440/11643) | Return Points Win % | 46% (15191/32783) |
0% (0/0) | Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/1) |
53% (38/34) | Challenger W/L | 51% (46/45) |
74% (82/29) | Futures W/L | 62% (348/214) |
66% (119/180) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 60% (386/642) |
0% (0/1) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 100% (4/4) |
45% (17/38) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 48% (50/104) |
53% (24/45) | Deciding Set Win % | 54% (94/174) |
89% (123/109) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 90% (386/346) |
11% (123/14) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 10% (386/39) |
18% (60/11) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 17% (268/46) |