S. D. L. Fuente
To Win
L. Midon
To Win
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
L W L W W L W W L WForm
L W W L W W L L L LThey have played 2 sets in total, with Midon winning 2 and Almeida winning 0. The last match between Midon and Almeida was at the M25 Lujan, 28-03-2025, Round: Quarterfinals, Surface: Clay, with Lautaro Midon getting the victory 6-3 6-0.
Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
---|---|
Lautaro Midon | 1 |
Gustavo Ribeiro De Almeida | 0 |
LAST H2H MATCH: M25 Lujan(28-03-2025)
Midon | Stats | Almeida |
---|---|---|
70% (26-11) | YTD Win/Loss | 59% (13-9) |
1 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
313 | Ranking | 840 |
307 | Highest Rank | 840 |
21 | Age | 19 |
- | Plays | - |
6 | Titles | 0 |
65% (119-63) | Career Total W/L | 48% (29-32) |
$0 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
2 | YTD Titles | 0 |
1 | Clay H2H | 0 |
21 May 2025 / Second
Hamburg Open - Hamburg atp
21 May 2025 / Second
Internationaux de Strasbourg - Strasbourg wta
20 May 2025 / Second
Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
6-3 6-0 |
![]() ![]()
Lautaro Midon
Player
Gustavo Ribeiro De Almeida
70%
(
35 of
50)
1st Serve %
77%
(
36 of
47)
0
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
1
71%
(
25 of
35)
1st Serve Won
39%
(
14 of
36)
33%
(
5 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
40%
(
20 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
29 of
47)
59
Total Points Won
38
|
Stats | ||
---|---|---|
1 | H2H Matches | 0 |
2 | Sets Won | 0 |
12 | Games Won | 3 |
1 | Total Double Faults | 1 |
1:15:32 | Average Match Time | 1:15:32 |
70% (35/50) | 1st Serve % | 77% (36/47) |
71% (25/35) | 1st Serve Win % | 39% (14/36) |
33% (5/15) | 2nd Serve Win % | 36% (4/11) |
75% (6/8) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 25% (1/4) |
62% (29/47) | Return Points Win % | 40% (20/50) |
100% (1/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Examining the recent performance on second serves highlights that Almeida has been able to win 45.28% of points compared to Midon's 40.89% over the last six months, an essential indicator in predicting the match's outcome. Historically, a higher percentage in this metric correlates strongly with match prediction accuracy. Furthermore, in return game statistics, Almeida has secured 47.33% of their opponent's second serve points while Midon trails slightly with 44.33%.
When it comes to first serve returns, Midon marginally outperforms Almeida with a percentage of 30.88% compared to 29.04%. This stat often provides insight into who may be favored in head-to-head competitions. Under pressure, both athletes demonstrate similar capabilities in saving breakpoints, with Almeida saving 47.94% and Midon 46.4%, a key factor for making informed in-game betting decisions.
On the surface level, Almeida's strength is prominent on Clay with a winning rate of 52%, while Hard surfaces have proven to be less successful with no wins recorded. Midon's proficiency is noteworthy on Clay as well, boasting a 65% win rate, and they perform relatively well on Hard surfaces with a 60% success rate. This disparity could influence predictions based on the playing surface of the upcoming match.
While Almeida has participated mainly in Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, achieving a 63.64% winning rate in the past year, Midon has been competing in Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, garnering a 58.14% win record. Such event-level differences historically impact head-to-head outcomes. Throughout the past year, opponent quality stats indicate Almeida has faced competitors with an average rank of 274, whereas Midon has confronted players averaging 407.63 in rank.
Pivotal insights emerge from deciding set performance, as Almeida boasts a 50% win in such scenarios over the last year. In contrast, Midon stands at 47%. Moreover, Almeida's breakpoint conversion rate in recent form is 27.07%, while Midon's is significantly higher at 39.9%, a decisive factor for live betting during matches.
Taking into account all statistics and comparative data, Midon's superior performance in break point conversion and clay court capability slightly tips the balance in their favor for the upcoming match. While both players showcase strengths on specific courts and pressure situations, indicators such as recent match performances and playing level suggest Midon could likely emerge victoriously.
Midon vs Almeida Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88
OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Lautaro Midon
Player
Gino Romano
55%
(
12 of
22)
1st Serve %
72%
(
26 of
36)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
1
92%
(
11 of
12)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
14 of
26)
60%
(
6 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
23%
(
5 of
22)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
19 of
36)
36
Total Points Won
22
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
QF |
![]() ![]()
Matheus Pucinelli De Almeida
Player
Lautaro Midon
63%
(
32 of
51)
1st Serve %
63%
(
34 of
54)
2
Aces
3
5
Double Faults
1
84%
(
27 of
32)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
19 of
34)
47%
(
9 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
8 of
20)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
29%
(
15 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
27 of
54)
63
Total Points Won
42
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
R2 |
![]() ![]()
Lautaro Midon
Player
Genaro Alberto Olivieri
69%
(
54 of
78)
1st Serve %
73%
(
52 of
71)
3
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
2
69%
(
37 of
54)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
33 of
52)
63%
(
15 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
9 of
19)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
11%
(
1 of
9)
33%
(
26 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
29 of
71)
81
Total Points Won
68
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Lautaro Midon
Player
Nikolas Sanchez-Izquierdo
50%
(
29 of
58)
1st Serve %
57%
(
30 of
53)
0
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
3
79%
(
23 of
29)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
16 of
30)
52%
(
15 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
11 of
23)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
34%
(
20 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
26 of
53)
64
Total Points Won
47
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
QF |
![]() ![]()
Matheus Pucinelli De Almeida
Player
Lautaro Midon
57%
(
33 of
58)
1st Serve %
55%
(
32 of
58)
2
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
2
76%
(
25 of
33)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
16 of
32)
56%
(
14 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
12 of
26)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
33%
(
19 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
30 of
58)
69
Total Points Won
47
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
R2 |
![]() ![]()
Lautaro Midon
Player
Juan Carlos Prado Angelo
68%
(
49 of
72)
1st Serve %
59%
(
62 of
105)
3
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
2
67%
(
33 of
49)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
39 of
62)
57%
(
13 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
18 of
43)
36%
(
5 of
14)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
36%
(
26 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
48 of
105)
94
Total Points Won
83
|
3-6 6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Lautaro Midon
Player
Mateus Alves
69%
(
79 of
115)
1st Serve %
54%
(
67 of
125)
4
Aces
5
3
Double Faults
6
72%
(
57 of
79)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
48 of
67)
47%
(
17 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
26 of
58)
24%
(
4 of
17)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
36%
(
41 of
115)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
51 of
125)
125
Total Points Won
115
|
7-6(1) 6-7(3) 6-4 | H2H | ||
R2 |
![]() ![]()
Pedro Boscardin Dias
Player
Lautaro Midon
68%
(
58 of
85)
1st Serve %
52%
(
46 of
88)
2
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
0
71%
(
41 of
58)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
32 of
46)
63%
(
17 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
20 of
42)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
32%
(
27 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
36 of
88)
94
Total Points Won
79
|
4-6 6-3 6-4 | H2H |
view more
OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Aryan Shah
Player
Gustavo Ribeiro De Almeida
62%
(
33 of
53)
1st Serve %
54%
(
34 of
63)
2
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
3
73%
(
24 of
33)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
19 of
34)
60%
(
12 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
62%
(
18 of
29)
25%
(
1 of
4)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
32%
(
17 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
26 of
63)
62
Total Points Won
54
|
7-6(3) 6-3 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Sebastian Gima
Player
Gustavo Ribeiro De Almeida
66%
(
46 of
70)
1st Serve %
62%
(
60 of
97)
8
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
5
78%
(
36 of
46)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
37 of
60)
50%
(
12 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
20 of
37)
20%
(
2 of
10)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
31%
(
22 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
40 of
97)
88
Total Points Won
79
|
6-4 7-6(7) | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Alvaro Guillen Meza
Player
Gustavo Ribeiro De Almeida
75%
(
44 of
59)
1st Serve %
60%
(
53 of
89)
1
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
9
68%
(
30 of
44)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
34 of
53)
73%
(
11 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
14 of
36)
20%
(
3 of
15)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
31%
(
18 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
41 of
89)
82
Total Points Won
66
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
QF |
![]() ![]()
Lautaro Midon
Player
Gustavo Ribeiro De Almeida
70%
(
35 of
50)
1st Serve %
77%
(
36 of
47)
0
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
1
71%
(
25 of
35)
1st Serve Won
39%
(
14 of
36)
33%
(
5 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
40%
(
20 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
29 of
47)
59
Total Points Won
38
|
6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
R2 |
![]() ![]()
Gustavo Ribeiro De Almeida
Player
Lorenzo Joaquin Rodriguez
75%
(
40 of
53)
1st Serve %
65%
(
34 of
52)
2
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
2
80%
(
32 of
40)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
16 of
34)
23%
(
3 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
10 of
18)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
34%
(
18 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
26 of
52)
61
Total Points Won
44
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
R1 | 7-6(6) 6-2 | H2H | |||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Mariano Kestelboim
Player
Gustavo Ribeiro De Almeida
71%
(
53 of
75)
1st Serve %
60%
(
25 of
42)
1
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
64%
(
34 of
53)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
13 of
25)
50%
(
11 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
5 of
17)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
40%
(
30 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
24 of
42)
69
Total Points Won
48
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
QF |
![]() ![]()
Gustavo Ribeiro De Almeida
Player
Igor Gimenez
67%
(
40 of
60)
1st Serve %
72%
(
56 of
78)
0
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
4
65%
(
26 of
40)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
32 of
56)
55%
(
11 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
7 of
22)
33%
(
5 of
15)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
38%
(
23 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
39 of
78)
76
Total Points Won
62
|
7-6(4) 6-2 | H2H |
view more
Stats | ||
---|---|---|
65% (119/63) | Win/Loss | 48% (29/32) |
64% (259/148) | Sets Win/Loss | 49% (67/71) |
56% (2072/1632) | Games Win/Loss | 51% (646/625) |
60% (3/2) | Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/1) |
66% (116/61) | Clay Win/Loss | 48% (29/31) |
0.15 | Aces Per Game | 0.12 |
273 | Aces Total | 74 |
0.16 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.23 |
294 | Total Double Faults | 141 |
1:42:45 | Average Match Time | 1:28:24 |
427.22 | Average Opponent Rank | 304.79 |
65% (7366/11345) | 1st Serve % | 69% (2420/3519) |
63% (4664/7366) | 1st Serve Win % | 62% (1506/2420) |
49% (1936/3979) | 2nd Serve Win % | 49% (535/1099) |
51% (742/1450) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 41% (149/361) |
47% (5389/11549) | Return Points Win % | 41% (1393/3438) |
53% (38/34) | Challenger W/L | 20% (2/8) |
74% (81/29) | Futures W/L | 53% (27/24) |
66% (118/179) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 48% (29/60) |
0% (0/1) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
45% (17/38) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 42% (5/12) |
52% (23/44) | Deciding Set Win % | 50% (8/16) |
89% (122/108) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 86% (28/24) |
11% (122/14) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 11% (28/3) |
18% (60/11) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 15% (33/5) |