Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Lauren Albanese vs Gail Brodsky Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Albanese vs Brodsky analysis and find out who is favored!
Lauren Albanese vs Gail Brodsky Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Albanese has won 0% of points on his second serve, while Brodsky has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Albanese, in recent form, has won 0% of his opponent's second serve points, while Brodsky has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Albanese has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Brodsky has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Albanese has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/ 0), with Brodsky winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Albanese has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 54% (W/L 158/ 132), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 33% (W/L 1/ 2). Brodsky has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 67% (W/L 22/ 11), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 50% (W/L 4/ 4).
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 3 times before with Albanese winning 2 times. They have played 8 sets in total, with Albanese winning 5 and Brodsky winning 3. The last match between Albanese and Brodsky was at the Surprise, 14-02-2011, First, Hard with Lauren Albanese getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:0:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Albanese and Brodsky have played a deciding set 2 times, with Albanese winning 1 times and Brodsky 1 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Albanese winning 0, and Brodsky 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Albanese has played against opponents with an average rank of while Brodsky has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Albanese has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Brodsky has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Albanese has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Brodsky has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Albanese 2 - 1 Brodsky
Ret.
Rank
158
High
34
Age
R
Plays
2
Total1
2
Hard1
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
Ret.
Rank
182
High
32
Age
Plays
L
W
L
W
W
W
L
L
L
L
Form
L
W
L
L
W
W
L
W
L
L
52% (257-237)
Career Total W/L
57% (146-110)
0% (0-0)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$55,600
Career Prize Money
$33,595
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Lauren Albanese | Gail Brodsky |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 2 | 1 |
| Sets Won | 5 | 3 |
| Games Won | 43 | 36 |
| Aces (Total) | 0 | 0 |
| DFs (Total) | 0 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 0:0:0 | 0:0:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Points W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 67% (2/3) | 33% (1/3) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 50% (1/2) | 50% (1/2) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 50% (2/1) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 50% (2/1) |
| 1st set L, W | 50% (2/1) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-1 6-4 | |||||
| 7-5 3-6 6-3 | |||||
| 4-6 6-4 7-5 | |||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Lauren Albanese | Gail Brodsky |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0 | 0 |
| Aces Total | 0 | 0 |
| DFs per game | 0 | 0 |
| DFs Total | 0 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 0 |
| 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Lauren Albanese Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats 
Ulrikke Eikeri
Player
Lauren Albanese
77%
(
43 of
56)
1st Serve %
55%
(
24 of
44)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
70%
(
30 of
43)
1st Serve Won
42%
(
10 of
24)
46%
(
6 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
6 of
20)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
36%
(
20 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
64%
(
28 of
44)
64
Total Points Won
36
|
6-0 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Yukina Saigo
Player
Lauren Albanese
62%
(
39 of
63)
1st Serve %
55%
(
31 of
56)
0
Aces
5
4
Double Faults
5
67%
(
26 of
39)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
19 of
31)
58%
(
14 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
9 of
25)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
37%
(
23 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
28 of
56)
68
Total Points Won
51
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Naiktha Bains
Player
Lauren Albanese
60%
(
38 of
63)
1st Serve %
70%
(
45 of
64)
3
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
1
63%
(
24 of
38)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
21 of
45)
28%
(
7 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
16%
(
3 of
19)
73%
(
8 of
11)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
51%
(
32 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
40 of
64)
71
Total Points Won
56
|
6-1 7-5 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Olivia Rogowska
Player
Lauren Albanese
54%
(
29 of
54)
1st Serve %
69%
(
37 of
54)
6
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
4
86%
(
25 of
29)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
25 of
37)
60%
(
15 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
24%
(
4 of
17)
27%
(
3 of
11)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
26%
(
14 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
25 of
54)
65
Total Points Won
43
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Lauren Albanese
Player
Jaimee Fourlis
61%
(
53 of
87)
1st Serve %
72%
(
56 of
78)
0
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
0
58%
(
31 of
53)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
34 of
56)
68%
(
23 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
10 of
22)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
38%
(
33 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
34 of
78)
88
Total Points Won
77
|
3-6 6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Lauren Albanese
Player
Mai Minokoshi
66%
(
29 of
44)
1st Serve %
57%
(
25 of
44)
-
Aces
-
-
Double Faults
-
66%
(
19 of
29)
1st Serve Won
40%
(
10 of
25)
80%
(
12 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
9 of
19)
100%
(
5 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
30%
(
13 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
25 of
44)
56
Total Points Won
32
|
6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Lauren Albanese
Player
Ramu Ueda
60%
(
31 of
52)
1st Serve %
59%
(
26 of
44)
3
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
61%
(
19 of
31)
1st Serve Won
42%
(
11 of
26)
62%
(
13 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
5 of
18)
86%
(
6 of
7)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
38%
(
20 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
64%
(
28 of
44)
60
Total Points Won
36
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Fangzhou Liu
Player
Lauren Albanese
60%
(
27 of
45)
1st Serve %
71%
(
32 of
45)
9
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
1
89%
(
24 of
27)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
19 of
32)
56%
(
10 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
5 of
13)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
24%
(
11 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
21 of
45)
55
Total Points Won
35
|
6-4 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Lauren Albanese
Player
Shilin Xu
63%
(
20 of
32)
1st Serve %
73%
(
22 of
30)
2
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
3
80%
(
16 of
20)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
13 of
22)
58%
(
7 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
100%
(
2 of
2)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
28%
(
9 of
32)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
13 of
30)
36
Total Points Won
26
|
6-3 1-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Haruka Kaji
Player
Lauren Albanese
71%
(
45 of
63)
1st Serve %
75%
(
48 of
64)
3
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
0
64%
(
29 of
45)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
28 of
48)
61%
(
11 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
6 of
16)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
37%
(
23 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
30 of
64)
70
Total Points Won
57
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Gail Brodsky Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Junri Namigata
Player
Gail Brodsky
55%
(
26 of
47)
1st Serve %
37%
(
16 of
43)
3
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
3
73%
(
19 of
26)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
8 of
16)
33%
(
7 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
13 of
27)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
18%
(
2 of
11)
45%
(
21 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
22 of
43)
48
Total Points Won
42
|
7-5 ret. | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Katie Swan
Player
Gail Brodsky
56%
(
23 of
41)
1st Serve %
47%
(
27 of
58)
8
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
6
78%
(
18 of
23)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
14 of
27)
50%
(
9 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
10 of
31)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
34%
(
14 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
34 of
58)
61
Total Points Won
38
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Gail Brodsky
Player
En Shuo Liang
60%
(
27 of
45)
1st Serve %
61%
(
28 of
46)
4
Aces
4
4
Double Faults
2
74%
(
20 of
27)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
16 of
28)
61%
(
11 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
6 of
18)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
31%
(
14 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
24 of
46)
55
Total Points Won
36
|
6-0 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Madison Brengle
Player
Gail Brodsky
74%
(
32 of
43)
1st Serve %
51%
(
26 of
51)
1
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
3
63%
(
20 of
32)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
14 of
26)
91%
(
10 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
8 of
25)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
30%
(
13 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
29 of
51)
59
Total Points Won
35
|
6-0 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Gail Brodsky
Player
Hiroko Kuwata
48%
(
51 of
107)
1st Serve %
73%
(
79 of
108)
8
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
1
73%
(
37 of
51)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
47 of
79)
41%
(
23 of
56)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
11 of
29)
70%
(
7 of
10)
Break Points Won
35%
(
6 of
17)
44%
(
47 of
107)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
50 of
108)
110
Total Points Won
105
|
6-4 5-7 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Gail Brodsky
Player
Abbie Myers
51%
(
29 of
57)
1st Serve %
61%
(
38 of
62)
4
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
5
69%
(
20 of
29)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
21 of
38)
61%
(
17 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
14 of
24)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
35%
(
20 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
27 of
62)
64
Total Points Won
55
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Mai Hontama
Player
Gail Brodsky
68%
(
36 of
53)
1st Serve %
49%
(
27 of
55)
0
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
6
58%
(
21 of
36)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
12 of
27)
47%
(
8 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
9 of
28)
64%
(
7 of
11)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
45%
(
24 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
34 of
55)
63
Total Points Won
45
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Gergana Topalova
Player
Gail Brodsky
54%
(
20 of
37)
1st Serve %
53%
(
20 of
38)
5
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
5
90%
(
18 of
20)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
12 of
20)
59%
(
10 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
22%
(
4 of
18)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
24%
(
9 of
37)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
22 of
38)
50
Total Points Won
25
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Gail Brodsky
Player
Haley Giavara
46%
(
31 of
67)
1st Serve %
69%
(
47 of
68)
3
Aces
0
6
Double Faults
4
74%
(
23 of
31)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
25 of
47)
50%
(
18 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
9 of
21)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
39%
(
26 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
34 of
68)
75
Total Points Won
60
|
6-2 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Natalija Stevanovic
Player
Gail Brodsky
63%
(
48 of
76)
1st Serve %
49%
(
39 of
80)
9
Aces
2
7
Double Faults
6
67%
(
32 of
48)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
22 of
39)
39%
(
11 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
17 of
41)
50%
(
7 of
14)
Break Points Won
33%
(
4 of
12)
43%
(
33 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
41 of
80)
84
Total Points Won
72
|
6-1 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Albanese Vs Brodsky Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
