Laura Thorpe vs Rosana De Los Rios Head to Head Stats
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
L L L L W L L W W L
Form
L L W L L W L L L LHead-To-Head: Thorpe 1 - 0 Rios
They have played 3 sets in total, with Thorpe winning 2 and Rios winning 1. The last match between Thorpe and Rios was at the Cuneo, 28-06-2010, Second, Clay with Laura Thorpe getting the victory 6-1 1-6 6-1.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Laura Thorpe | 1 |
| Rosana De Los Rios | 0 |
Cuneo(28-06-2010)
6
1
1
6
6
1
| Thorpe | Stats | Rios |
|---|---|---|
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
| 1 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
| Ret. | Ranking | Ret. |
| 161 | Highest Rank | 78 |
| 37 | Age | 49 |
| - | Plays | R |
| 2 | Titles | 7 |
| 49% (175-184) | Career Total W/L | 55% (272-222) |
| $31,770 | Career Prize Money | $150,941 |
| 0 | YTD Titles | 0 |
| 0 | Hard H2H | 0 |
| 1 | Clay H2H | 0 |
| 0 | Indoor H2H | 0 |
| 0 | Grass H2H | 0 |
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Mensik VS Fritz PREDICTION Hard
Miami Open - Miami atp
29 Mar 2025 / Semifinals
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Djokovic VS Dimitrov PREDICTION Hard
Miami Open - Miami atp
28 Mar 2025 / Semifinals
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-1 1-6 6-1 | |||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 1 |
| 13 | Games Won | 8 |
| 0 | Aces (Total) | 0 |
| 0 | Total Double Faults | 0 |
| 0:0:0 | Average Match Time | 0:0:0 |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Serve Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 2nd Serve Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Return Points Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (1/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Laura Thorpe Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF | 6-4 6-2 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-1 2-6 6-1 | H2H | |||
| Q2 | 6-2 6-1 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-1 6-2 | H2H | |||
| QF | 7-6(5) 6-4 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 3-6 6-1 6-4 | H2H | |||
| Q1 |
Stats 
Maria Irigoyen
Player
Laura Thorpe
58%
(
35 of
60)
1st Serve %
57%
(
45 of
79)
0
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
9
60%
(
21 of
35)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
21 of
45)
60%
(
15 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
16 of
34)
38%
(
6 of
16)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
40%
(
24 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
42 of
79)
78
Total Points Won
61
|
6-1 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Katerina Vankova
Player
Laura Thorpe
69%
(
48 of
70)
1st Serve %
60%
(
49 of
81)
4
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
7
65%
(
31 of
48)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
26 of
49)
55%
(
12 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
11 of
32)
57%
(
8 of
14)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
39%
(
27 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
44 of
81)
87
Total Points Won
64
|
4-6 6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Ling Zhang
Player
Laura Thorpe
65%
(
33 of
51)
1st Serve %
49%
(
21 of
43)
2
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
7
70%
(
23 of
33)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
15 of
21)
44%
(
8 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
14%
(
3 of
22)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
39%
(
20 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
25 of
43)
56
Total Points Won
38
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 | 6-4 6-1 | H2H | |||
view more
Rosana De Los Rios Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Valeria Savinykh
Player
Rosana De Los Rios
55%
(
40 of
73)
1st Serve %
76%
(
44 of
58)
4
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
1
68%
(
27 of
40)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
23 of
44)
58%
(
19 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
7 of
14)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
20%
(
2 of
10)
37%
(
27 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
28 of
58)
74
Total Points Won
57
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Klara Koukalova
Player
Rosana De Los Rios
49%
(
51 of
104)
1st Serve %
65%
(
68 of
104)
3
Aces
0
8
Double Faults
3
57%
(
29 of
51)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
34 of
68)
53%
(
28 of
53)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
14 of
36)
53%
(
9 of
17)
Break Points Won
42%
(
5 of
12)
45%
(
47 of
104)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
56 of
104)
113
Total Points Won
95
|
6-3 6-7(6) 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 | 6-4 3-6 6-1 | H2H | |||
| R2 |
Stats
Anastasia Pavlyuchenkova
Player
Rosana De Los Rios
72%
(
31 of
43)
1st Serve %
76%
(
41 of
54)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
1
74%
(
23 of
31)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
22 of
41)
50%
(
6 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
15%
(
2 of
13)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
33%
(
14 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
30 of
54)
59
Total Points Won
38
|
6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Rosana De Los Rios
Player
Andreja Klepac
72%
(
49 of
68)
1st Serve %
48%
(
30 of
63)
0
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
6
57%
(
28 of
49)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
17 of
30)
37%
(
7 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
9 of
33)
70%
(
7 of
10)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
49%
(
33 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
37 of
63)
72
Total Points Won
59
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Kaia Kanepi
Player
Rosana De Los Rios
65%
(
45 of
69)
1st Serve %
77%
(
59 of
77)
3
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
1
78%
(
35 of
45)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
35 of
59)
38%
(
9 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
6 of
18)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
36%
(
25 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
36 of
77)
80
Total Points Won
66
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jill Craybas
Player
Rosana De Los Rios
62%
(
46 of
74)
1st Serve %
80%
(
55 of
69)
0
Aces
1
6
Double Faults
1
63%
(
29 of
46)
1st Serve Won
42%
(
23 of
55)
36%
(
10 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
5 of
14)
58%
(
7 of
12)
Break Points Won
33%
(
4 of
12)
47%
(
35 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
41 of
69)
80
Total Points Won
63
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 | 6-0 7-5 | H2H | |||
| R2 | 6-1 1-6 6-1 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Venus Williams
Player
Rosana De Los Rios
57%
(
27 of
47)
1st Serve %
71%
(
37 of
52)
6
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
3
78%
(
21 of
27)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
16 of
37)
50%
(
10 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
6 of
15)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
34%
(
16 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
30 of
52)
61
Total Points Won
38
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 49% (175/184) | Win/Loss | 55% (272/222) |
| 50% (415/420) | Sets Win/Loss | 53% (597/520) |
| 50% (3804/3794) | Games Win/Loss | 51% (5193/4967) |
| 43% (23/30) | Hard Win/Loss | 55% (122/98) |
| 52% (148/139) | Clay Win/Loss | 58% (128/93) |
| 22% (4/14) | Indoor Hard W/L | 43% (15/20) |
| 0% (0/1) | Grass Win/Loss | 39% (7/11) |
| 0.02 | Aces Per Game | 0.01 |
| 63 | Aces Total | 28 |
| 0.06 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.05 |
| 230 | Total Double Faults | 254 |
| 1st Match | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
| 618.28 | Average Opponent Rank | 507.83 |
| 64% (2087/3249) | 1st Serve % | 67% (3813/5652) |
| 54% (1137/2087) | 1st Serve Win % | 55% (2111/3813) |
| 40% (460/1162) | 2nd Serve Win % | 43% (788/1839) |
| 46% (166/359) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 45% (299/667) |
| 44% (1321/3016) | Return Points Win % | 44% (2451/5614) |
| 27% (3/8) | Slam W/L | 48% (30/33) |
| 0% (0/1) | Masters W/L | 43% (17/23) |
| 0% (0/0) | Cups W/L | 56% (5/4) |
| 29% (10/25) | Main Tour W/L | 45% (79/96) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 49% (117/122) | Challenger W/L | 68% (141/66) |
| 62% (45/28) | Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 49% (171/352) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 54% (261/483) |
| 33% (1/3) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 100% (3/3) |
| 58% (40/69) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 59% (51/87) |
| 44% (53/120) | Deciding Set Win % | 54% (73/136) |
| 78% (186/145) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 86% (264/228) |
| 22% (186/41) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 14% (264/36) |
| 17% (171/29) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 18% (230/42) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
