Laura Siegemund vs Ena Shibahara Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
L W W L L W W W W L
Form
L W L L W L W W L LHead-2-Head: Siegemund 1 - 0 Shibahara
They have played 3 sets in total, with Siegemund winning 2 and Shibahara winning 1. The last match between Siegemund and Shibahara was at the Rothesay Open - Nottingham, 15-06-2025, Round: Q3, Surface: Grass, with Laura Siegemund getting the victory 6-4 3-6 6-4.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Laura Siegemund | 1 |
| Ena Shibahara | 0 |
LAST H2H MATCH: Rothesay Open - Nottingham(15-06-2025)
Laura Siegemund
Ena Shibahara
6
4
3
6
6
4
| Siegemund | Stats | Shibahara |
|---|---|---|
| 47% (14-16) | YTD Win/Loss | 53% (21-19) |
| 1 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
| 54 | Ranking | 116 |
| 27 | Highest Rank | 116 |
| 37 | Age | 27 |
| R | Plays | R |
| 16 | Titles | 1 |
| 59% (540-373) | Career Total W/L | 59% (158-112) |
| $3,389,733 | Career Prize Money | $250,548 |
| 1 | Grass H2H | 0 |
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Vera VS Navone PREDICTION Clay
Plava Laguna Croatia Open - Umag atp
20 Jul 2025 / First
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Bejlek VS Uchijima PREDICTION Hard
Prague Open - Prague wta
21 Jul 2025 / First
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-4 3-6 6-4 |
Stats 
Laura Siegemund
Player
Ena Shibahara
65%
(
56 of
86)
1st Serve %
61%
(
60 of
98)
2
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
3
64%
(
36 of
56)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
37 of
60)
57%
(
17 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
22 of
38)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
38%
(
33 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
39 of
98)
92
Total Points Won
92
|
||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 1 |
| 15 | Games Won | 14 |
| 2 | Aces (Total) | 1 |
| 3 | Total Double Faults | 3 |
| 2:38:5 | Average Match Time | 2:38:5 |
| 65% (56/86) | 1st Serve % | 61% (60/98) |
| 64% (36/56) | 1st Serve Win % | 62% (37/60) |
| 57% (17/30) | 2nd Serve Win % | 58% (22/38) |
| 31% (4/13) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 43% (3/7) |
| 40% (39/98) | Return Points Win % | 38% (33/86) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Siegemund vs Shibahara Match Preview :
- Second serve performance is key, with Siegemund winning 43.8% of points compared to Shibahara's 46.99% in recent months.
- Return game analysis shows Siegemund winning 50.2% of second serve returns, slightly ahead of Shibahara's 49.44%.
- On first serve returns, Siegemund also edges out Shibahara with 32.33% compared to 30.86%.
- Under pressure, Siegemund saves 54.15% of breakpoints, while Shibahara saves 50.31%. Which player performs better under pressure?
- Siegemund's match win rate over the last year is 45.24%, whereas Shibahara's is higher at 60.61%.
- Siegemund excels on clay with a win rate of 65%, while Shibahara performs best on I.hard surfaces at 67%.
- Compared at the player level, Siegemund has more match experience on the Main tour, with a 52.17% win rate.
- Opponent quality is notable; Siegemund faces tougher competition, with an average opponent ranking of 126.45 versus Shibahara's 233.09.
- If the match extends to a deciding set, Shibahara has a higher success rate, winning 57% compared to Siegemund's 33%.
- In breakpoint conversion, Siegemund is slightly more successful, converting 37.23% of chances versus Shibahara's 35.94%.
Editorial Prediction (June 15, 2025, UTC):
Analyzing both players’ recent statistics, several factors emerge that could decide the outcome of their match. Shibahara has a slightly better record on second serve performance and deciding set outcomes, indicating stronger endurance and skill under extended play circumstances.
Siegemund, however, demonstrates a stronger ability in converting breakpoints and handling high-pressure scenarios efficiently. This tendency to perform well in crucial moments may give her a competitive edge.
Considering the general win rates and the level of competition each player has faced, Shibahara boasts better overall success recently but against generally lower-ranked opponents, which might not reflect the true challenge posed by a player like Siegemund.
Given these insights, though both players have strengths, Siegemund's experience in higher-level tournaments and ability to convert critical points suggest she might have a slight advantage in securing victory in this match.
Siegemund vs Shibahara Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88
Laura Siegemund Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Aryna Sabalenka
Player
Laura Siegemund
65%
(
67 of
103)
1st Serve %
69%
(
66 of
95)
2
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
5
63%
(
42 of
67)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
36 of
66)
33%
(
12 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
9 of
29)
62%
(
8 of
13)
Break Points Won
55%
(
6 of
11)
48%
(
49 of
103)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
50 of
95)
104
Total Points Won
94
|
4-6 6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R4 |
Stats
Laura Siegemund
Player
Solana Sierra
88%
(
49 of
56)
1st Serve %
65%
(
33 of
51)
0
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
5
67%
(
33 of
49)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
20 of
33)
57%
(
4 of
7)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
7 of
18)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
34%
(
19 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
24 of
51)
61
Total Points Won
46
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R3 |
Stats
Laura Siegemund
Player
Madison Keys
69%
(
43 of
62)
1st Serve %
70%
(
45 of
64)
0
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
4
70%
(
30 of
43)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
29 of
45)
37%
(
7 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
5%
(
1 of
19)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
40%
(
25 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
34 of
64)
71
Total Points Won
55
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Laura Siegemund
Player
Leylah Annie Fernandez
67%
(
38 of
57)
1st Serve %
55%
(
30 of
55)
1
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
4
71%
(
27 of
38)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
16 of
30)
53%
(
10 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
12 of
25)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
35%
(
20 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
27 of
55)
64
Total Points Won
48
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Laura Siegemund
Player
Peyton Stearns
80%
(
53 of
66)
1st Serve %
67%
(
43 of
64)
0
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
4
68%
(
36 of
53)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
25 of
43)
38%
(
5 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
8 of
21)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
38%
(
25 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
31 of
64)
72
Total Points Won
58
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Victoria Azarenka
Player
Laura Siegemund
79%
(
33 of
42)
1st Serve %
68%
(
30 of
44)
5
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
0
85%
(
28 of
33)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
19 of
30)
44%
(
4 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
4 of
14)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
24%
(
10 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
21 of
44)
53
Total Points Won
33
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Rebecca Sramkova
Player
Laura Siegemund
61%
(
70 of
115)
1st Serve %
74%
(
81 of
109)
5
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
3
67%
(
47 of
70)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
47 of
81)
49%
(
22 of
45)
2nd Serve Won
61%
(
17 of
28)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
63%
(
5 of
8)
40%
(
46 of
115)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
45 of
109)
114
Total Points Won
110
|
7-6(2) 4-6 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Laura Siegemund
Player
Ena Shibahara
65%
(
56 of
86)
1st Serve %
61%
(
60 of
98)
2
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
3
64%
(
36 of
56)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
37 of
60)
57%
(
17 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
22 of
38)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
38%
(
33 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
39 of
98)
92
Total Points Won
92
|
6-4 3-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Ena Shibahara Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Haley Giavara
Player
Ena Shibahara
68%
(
57 of
84)
1st Serve %
56%
(
45 of
81)
2
Aces
8
3
Double Faults
2
74%
(
42 of
57)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
32 of
45)
37%
(
10 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
16 of
36)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
38%
(
32 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
33 of
81)
85
Total Points Won
80
|
3-6 7-5 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Linda Fruhvirtova
Player
Ena Shibahara
58%
(
33 of
57)
1st Serve %
75%
(
50 of
67)
0
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
3
79%
(
26 of
33)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
32 of
50)
54%
(
13 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
7 of
17)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
32%
(
18 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
28 of
67)
67
Total Points Won
57
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Ena Shibahara
Player
Marina Bassols Ribera
64%
(
85 of
132)
1st Serve %
58%
(
71 of
122)
13
Aces
2
6
Double Faults
9
69%
(
59 of
85)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
48 of
71)
49%
(
23 of
47)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
24 of
51)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
27%
(
4 of
15)
38%
(
50 of
132)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
50 of
122)
132
Total Points Won
122
|
7-6(5) 6-7(5) 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Ena Shibahara
Player
Stefanie Voegele
64%
(
41 of
64)
1st Serve %
57%
(
35 of
61)
9
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
0
83%
(
34 of
41)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
25 of
35)
48%
(
11 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
13 of
26)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
30%
(
19 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
23 of
61)
68
Total Points Won
57
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Laura Siegemund
Player
Ena Shibahara
65%
(
56 of
86)
1st Serve %
61%
(
60 of
98)
2
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
3
64%
(
36 of
56)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
37 of
60)
57%
(
17 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
22 of
38)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
38%
(
33 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
39 of
98)
92
Total Points Won
92
|
6-4 3-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Ena Shibahara
Player
Alize Cornet
67%
(
74 of
111)
1st Serve %
62%
(
58 of
93)
5
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
5
69%
(
51 of
74)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
37 of
58)
38%
(
14 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
15 of
35)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
21%
(
4 of
19)
41%
(
46 of
111)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
41 of
93)
106
Total Points Won
98
|
3-6 6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Heather Watson
Player
Ena Shibahara
51%
(
46 of
90)
1st Serve %
66%
(
64 of
97)
4
Aces
4
8
Double Faults
2
83%
(
38 of
46)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
41 of
64)
45%
(
20 of
44)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
14 of
33)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
36%
(
32 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
42 of
97)
100
Total Points Won
87
|
6-1 5-7 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Nuria Parrizas-Diaz
Player
Ena Shibahara
71%
(
30 of
42)
1st Serve %
55%
(
21 of
38)
1
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
5
73%
(
22 of
30)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
9 of
21)
58%
(
7 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
5 of
17)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
31%
(
13 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
24 of
38)
53
Total Points Won
27
|
6-0 4-2 ret. | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 59% (540/373) | Win/Loss | 59% (158/112) |
| 57% (1208/896) | Sets Win/Loss | 57% (356/273) |
| 53% (10185/9032) | Games Win/Loss | 53% (3081/2721) |
| 51% (140/134) | Hard Win/Loss | 59% (109/77) |
| 65% (341/187) | Clay Win/Loss | 53% (17/15) |
| 53% (40/36) | Indoor Hard W/L | 69% (24/11) |
| 54% (19/16) | Grass Win/Loss | 47% (8/9) |
| 0.05 | Aces Per Game | 0.24 |
| 436 | Aces Total | 684 |
| 0.18 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.24 |
| 1654 | Total Double Faults | 676 |
| 1st Match | Average Match Time | 1:26:1 |
| 478.28 | Average Opponent Rank | 411.3 |
| 70% (24367/34811) | 1st Serve % | 62% (9702/15578) |
| 60% (14667/24367) | 1st Serve Win % | 65% (6268/9682) |
| 46% (4819/10426) | 2nd Serve Win % | 48% (2868/5952) |
| 48% (2178/4577) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 45% (812/1801) |
| 46% (16247/35177) | Return Points Win % | 44% (6870/15710) |
| 53% (46/41) | Slam W/L | 64% (7/4) |
| 54% (49/42) | Masters W/L | 43% (3/4) |
| 57% (4/3) | Cups W/L | 75% (3/1) |
| 56% (144/111) | Main Tour W/L | 43% (20/26) |
| 60% (239/157) | Challenger W/L | 62% (125/77) |
| 75% (58/19) | Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 59% (532/900) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 58% (155/265) |
| 50% (2/4) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 51% (93/181) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 58% (35/60) |
| 53% (152/285) | Deciding Set Win % | 54% (51/94) |
| 87% (521/451) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 87% (157/136) |
| 13% (521/70) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 13% (157/20) |
| 23% (391/88) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 19% (113/21) |
Siegemund vs. Shibahara Prediction Form Trend:
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
