Laura Siegemund vs Anna Bondar Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
L L L W L W L W W L
Form
W W L W L W W W W LHead-To-Head: Siegemund 0 - 1 Bondar
They have played 2 sets in total, with Siegemund winning 0 and Bondar winning 2. The last match between Siegemund and Bondar was at the French Open - Paris, 25-05-2025, Round: First, Surface: Clay, with Anna Bondar getting the victory 7-6(2) 6-3.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Laura Siegemund | 0 |
| Anna Bondar | 1 |
LAST H2H MATCH: French Open - Paris(25-05-2025)
Anna Bondar
Laura Siegemund
7
6
6
3
| Siegemund | Stats | Bondar |
|---|---|---|
| 42% (10-14) | YTD Win/Loss | 58% (25-18) |
| 0 | Head-to-Head | 1 |
| 106 | Ranking | 69 |
| 27 | Highest Rank | 50 |
| 37 | Age | 28 |
| R | Plays | - |
| 16 | Titles | 19 |
| 59% (536-371) | Career Total W/L | 63% (428-249) |
| $2,989,733 | Career Prize Money | $753,651 |
| 0 | YTD Titles | 1 |
| 0 | Clay H2H | 1 |
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Sonego VS Zverev PREDICTION Grass
Terra Wortmann Open - Halle atp
19 Jun 2025 / Second
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Sinner VS Bublik PREDICTION Grass
Terra Wortmann Open - Halle atp
18 Jun 2025 / Second
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7-6(2) 6-3 |
Stats 
Anna Bondar
Player
Laura Siegemund
61%
(
51 of
83)
1st Serve %
80%
(
51 of
64)
2
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
1
61%
(
31 of
51)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
28 of
51)
63%
(
20 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
62%
(
8 of
13)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
20%
(
2 of
10)
39%
(
32 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
28 of
64)
79
Total Points Won
68
|
||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 0 | H2H Matches | 1 |
| 0 | Sets Won | 2 |
| 9 | Games Won | 13 |
| 1 | Aces (Total) | 2 |
| 1 | Total Double Faults | 1 |
| 2:8:0 | Average Match Time | 2:8:0 |
| 80% (51/64) | 1st Serve % | 61% (51/83) |
| 55% (28/51) | 1st Serve Win % | 61% (31/51) |
| 62% (8/13) | 2nd Serve Win % | 63% (20/32) |
| 20% (2/10) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 30% (3/10) |
| 39% (32/83) | Return Points Win % | 44% (28/64) |
| 0% (0/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 100% (1/1) |
| 0% (0/1) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 100% (1/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 100% (1/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (1/0) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Siegemund vs Bondar Match Preview :
- Second Serve Performance: Bondar has a slight edge winning 43.59% of second serve points compared to Siegemund's 43.28%. Can this small difference impact the match? It's minor, but every point matters.
- Return Game Stats: Siegemund excels at returning second serves, claiming 51.75% of points against opponents' second serves, better than Bondar's 49.01%.
- First Serve Returns: Both players perform closely, with Bondar having a marginal advantage at 32.86% over Siegemund's 32.55%.
- Under Pressure: Siegemund has a higher breakpoint save rate at 53.74% compared to Bondar's 49%, indicating stronger resilience in crucial moments.
- Performance Overview: Bondar has a better win percentage in the past year at 59.21% versus Siegemund's 43.9%, making her the stronger performer overall.
- Best Surface: Both players excel on clay, but Bondar has a higher win percentage at 69% compared to Siegemund's 65%.
- Player Level: Siegemund competes primarily on the Main tour with a 50% win rate; Bondar shines in Challengers/ITF tournaments with a 79.41% win rate.
- Opponent Quality: Siegemund plays against higher-ranked opponents, averaging a rank of 128.98, while Bondar's opponents have an average rank of 180.59, potentially skewing performance views.
- Deciding Set Performance: Bondar has a considerable edge in deciding sets, winning 55% compared to Siegemund's 31%.
- Break Point Conversion: Siegemund is more efficient with a conversion rate of 38.58%, surpassing Bondar's 34.14% success rate on breakpoints.
Editorial Prediction (May 25, 2025, UTC):
With the upcoming match hinging on several intricate aspects of each player's performance, it becomes crucial to dissect how their individual strengths and weaknesses might unfold on the court.
Bondar's strong track record in the past year, alongside her prowess on clay, gives her a slight advantage. Her ability to win deciding sets is notably superior, providing an edge in potentially crucial moments.
Siegemund, however, shows stronger resilience in saving breakpoints and has been competing at a higher level of tournaments, potentially adding a layer of experience against top-tier opponents.
Considering all these factors, Bondar appears to be the likelier contender to win this upcoming tennis match, especially if it progresses to a deciding set where she is statistically stronger.
Siegemund vs Bondar Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88
Laura Siegemund Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Rebecca Sramkova
Player
Laura Siegemund
61%
(
70 of
115)
1st Serve %
74%
(
81 of
109)
5
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
3
67%
(
47 of
70)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
47 of
81)
49%
(
22 of
45)
2nd Serve Won
61%
(
17 of
28)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
63%
(
5 of
8)
40%
(
46 of
115)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
45 of
109)
114
Total Points Won
110
|
7-6(2) 4-6 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Laura Siegemund
Player
Ena Shibahara
65%
(
56 of
86)
1st Serve %
61%
(
60 of
98)
2
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
3
64%
(
36 of
56)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
37 of
60)
57%
(
17 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
22 of
38)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
38%
(
33 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
39 of
98)
92
Total Points Won
92
|
6-4 3-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Laura Siegemund
Player
Hailey Baptiste
70%
(
33 of
47)
1st Serve %
49%
(
28 of
57)
0
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
4
85%
(
28 of
33)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
19 of
28)
71%
(
10 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
13 of
29)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
19%
(
9 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
25 of
57)
63
Total Points Won
41
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Anna Bondar
Player
Laura Siegemund
61%
(
51 of
83)
1st Serve %
80%
(
51 of
64)
2
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
1
61%
(
31 of
51)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
28 of
51)
63%
(
20 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
62%
(
8 of
13)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
20%
(
2 of
10)
39%
(
32 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
28 of
64)
79
Total Points Won
68
|
7-6(2) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R3 | w/o | H2H | |||
| R2 |
Stats
Laura Siegemund
Player
Lucia Bronzetti
73%
(
32 of
44)
1st Serve %
48%
(
23 of
48)
0
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
3
88%
(
28 of
32)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
14 of
23)
50%
(
6 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
11 of
25)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
23%
(
10 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
23 of
48)
57
Total Points Won
35
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Elena Gabriela Ruse
Player
Laura Siegemund
62%
(
47 of
76)
1st Serve %
64%
(
38 of
59)
2
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
1
62%
(
29 of
47)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
17 of
38)
45%
(
13 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
10 of
21)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
45%
(
34 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
32 of
59)
74
Total Points Won
61
|
7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Laura Siegemund
Player
Daria Saville
74%
(
34 of
46)
1st Serve %
64%
(
34 of
53)
0
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
3
76%
(
26 of
34)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
17 of
34)
50%
(
6 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
7 of
19)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
30%
(
14 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
29 of
53)
61
Total Points Won
38
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
Anna Bondar Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| F |
Stats
Anca Alexia Todoni
Player
Anna Bondar
60%
(
64 of
107)
1st Serve %
59%
(
66 of
111)
0
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
4
64%
(
41 of
64)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
42 of
66)
56%
(
24 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
24 of
45)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
39%
(
42 of
107)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
45 of
111)
110
Total Points Won
108
|
6-7(4) 6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Anna Bondar
Player
Kathinka Von Deichmann
53%
(
42 of
79)
1st Serve %
71%
(
47 of
66)
0
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
5
71%
(
30 of
42)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
23 of
47)
43%
(
16 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
9 of
19)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
25%
(
3 of
12)
42%
(
33 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
34 of
66)
80
Total Points Won
65
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Anna Bondar
Player
Jil Teichmann
56%
(
53 of
95)
1st Serve %
65%
(
67 of
103)
9
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
7
66%
(
35 of
53)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
40 of
67)
48%
(
20 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
15 of
36)
40%
(
6 of
15)
Break Points Won
33%
(
4 of
12)
42%
(
40 of
95)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
48 of
103)
103
Total Points Won
95
|
6-3 4-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Anna Bondar
Player
Tessah Andrianjafitrimo
52%
(
31 of
60)
1st Serve %
60%
(
36 of
60)
4
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
2
55%
(
17 of
31)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
17 of
36)
62%
(
18 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
10 of
24)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
42%
(
25 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
33 of
60)
68
Total Points Won
52
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Anna Bondar
Player
Haruka Kaji
59%
(
35 of
59)
1st Serve %
73%
(
33 of
45)
3
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
1
74%
(
26 of
35)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
15 of
33)
46%
(
11 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
5 of
12)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
37%
(
22 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
25 of
45)
62
Total Points Won
42
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Elina Svitolina
Player
Anna Bondar
51%
(
41 of
80)
1st Serve %
57%
(
43 of
75)
4
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
1
71%
(
29 of
41)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
27 of
43)
54%
(
21 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
18 of
32)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
38%
(
30 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
30 of
75)
80
Total Points Won
75
|
7-6(4) 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Anna Bondar
Player
Laura Siegemund
61%
(
51 of
83)
1st Serve %
80%
(
51 of
64)
2
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
1
61%
(
31 of
51)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
28 of
51)
63%
(
20 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
62%
(
8 of
13)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
20%
(
2 of
10)
39%
(
32 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
28 of
64)
79
Total Points Won
68
|
7-6(2) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Irina-Camelia Begu
Player
Anna Bondar
72%
(
78 of
109)
1st Serve %
69%
(
66 of
95)
0
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
0
68%
(
53 of
78)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
42 of
66)
42%
(
13 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
14 of
29)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
39%
(
43 of
109)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
39 of
95)
105
Total Points Won
99
|
3-6 6-3 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 59% (536/371) | Win/Loss | 63% (428/249) |
| 57% (1199/892) | Sets Win/Loss | 61% (953/600) |
| 53% (10121/8982) | Games Win/Loss | 54% (7841/6623) |
| 51% (140/134) | Hard Win/Loss | 55% (82/66) |
| 65% (341/187) | Clay Win/Loss | 69% (320/144) |
| 53% (40/36) | Indoor Hard W/L | 44% (26/33) |
| 52% (15/14) | Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/6) |
| 0.05 | Aces Per Game | 0.3 |
| 434 | Aces Total | 2098 |
| 0.18 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.17 |
| 1645 | Total Double Faults | 1169 |
| 1st Match | Average Match Time | 1:28:58 |
| 479.21 | Average Opponent Rank | 429.72 |
| 70% (24088/34431) | 1st Serve % | 59% (23402/39716) |
| 60% (14486/24088) | 1st Serve Win % | 66% (15432/23402) |
| 46% (4780/10325) | 2nd Serve Win % | 48% (7842/16314) |
| 48% (2154/4530) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 47% (2260/4831) |
| 46% (16072/34798) | Return Points Win % | 44% (17967/40439) |
| 51% (42/40) | Slam W/L | 27% (7/19) |
| 54% (49/42) | Masters W/L | 44% (15/19) |
| 57% (4/3) | Cups W/L | 47% (9/10) |
| 57% (144/110) | Main Tour W/L | 49% (50/52) |
| 60% (239/157) | Challenger W/L | 66% (225/115) |
| 75% (58/19) | Futures W/L | 78% (122/34) |
| 59% (528/894) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 63% (420/668) |
| 50% (2/4) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 50% (1/2) |
| 51% (93/181) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 52% (90/172) |
| 54% (152/284) | Deciding Set Win % | 50% (101/204) |
| 87% (516/447) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 87% (438/380) |
| 13% (516/69) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 13% (438/58) |
| 23% (390/88) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 20% (239/48) |
Siegemund vs. Bondar Prediction Form Trend:
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
