TBD
To Win
G. Squarcialupi
To Win
Laura Rahnel vs Gaia Squarcialupi Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W L W W W L W W W L
Form
W W L W W L W W L LH2H: Rahnel 0 - 1 Squarcialupi
They have played 2 sets in total, with Rahnel winning 0 and Squarcialupi winning 2. The last match between Rahnel and Squarcialupi was at the W15 Sharm ElSheikh, 19-02-2025, First, Hard with Gaia Squarcialupi getting the victory 6-3 6-3.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Laura Rahnel | 0 |
| Gaia Squarcialupi | 1 |
W15 Sharm ElSheikh(19-02-2025)
6
3
6
3
73% (8-3)
YTD Win/Loss
55% (6-5)
0
Head-to-Head
1
N/A
Ranking
701
Highest Rank
694
18
Age
27
-
Plays
-
0
Titles
1
67% (16-8)
Career Total W/L
45% (113-137)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
0
Hard H2H
1
0
Clay H2H
0
0
Indoor H2H
0
0
Grass H2H
0
Upcoming Match
TBD VS Squarcialupi
- / First
ODDS
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Monfils VS Korda PREDICTION Hard
Miami Open - Miami atp
25 Mar 2025 / Fourth
ODDS
PREDICTION
EDGE
Svitolina VS Swiatek PREDICTION Hard
Miami Open - Miami wta
24 Mar 2025 / Fourth
ODDS
PREDICTION
EDGE
Rahnel VS Squarcialupi H2H Matches played
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-3 6-3 |
Stats 
Gaia Squarcialupi
Player
Laura Rahnel
51%
(
27 of
53)
1st Serve %
68%
(
36 of
53)
1
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
7
70%
(
19 of
27)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
18 of
36)
42%
(
11 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
6 of
17)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
43%
(
23 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
29 of
53)
59
Total Points Won
47
|
||||
Rahnel VS Squarcialupi H2H Stats
Stats
0
H2H Matches
1
0
Sets Won
2
6
Games Won
12
1
Aces (Total)
1
7
Total Double Faults
2
1:10:40
Average Match Time
1:10:40
68% (36/53)
1st Serve %
51% (27/53)
50% (18/36)
1st Serve Win %
70% (19/27)
35% (6/17)
2nd Serve Win %
42% (11/26)
75% (3/4)
Break Points Won % (Total)
60% (6/10)
43% (23/53)
Return Points Win %
55% (29/53)
0% (0/1)
Best of 3 Sets Win %
100% (1/1)
0% (0/0)
Best of 5 Sets Win %
0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)
Tiebreaks Win % (Total)
0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)
Deciding Set Win %
0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)
1st Set Won, Won Match
100% (1/1)
0% (0/0)
1st Set Won, Lost Match
0% (1/0)
0% (1/0)
1st Set Lost, Won Match
0% (0/0)
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Laura Rahnel vs Gaia Squarcialupi Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Laura Rahnel 0 - 1 Gaia Squarcialupi
Recent Second Serve Performance: In the past six months, Rahnel has displayed a success rate of 32.22% when it comes to winning points on their second serve. Conversely, Squarcialupi has exhibited a more impressive performance, triumphing in 43.1% of these points. It is worth noting the considerable correlation between this statistic and the accuracy of match predictions.
Return Game Statistics: Analyzing recent form, Rahnel has proven their dominance in return games by winning 60.3% of their opponent's second serve points. Squarcialupi, on the other hand, has achieved a slightly lower success rate of 55.84% in this aspect. The statistics for first serve returns are also of significance, with Rahnel recording a success rate of 42.9% and Squarcialupi at 39.27%. These figures bear a strong correlation to determine the favored player in this Head-to-Head matchup.
Under Pressure Analysis: Examining breakpoints, Rahnel has impressively saved 45.33% of them in recent form. In comparison, Squarcialupi has displayed solid defensive abilities, saving 49.42% of breakpoints. This statistic provides valuable insight for those interested in in-game betting predictions.
Performance Overview: Over the course of the past year, Rahnel has emerged victorious in 70% of their matches played, boasting a win-loss record of 14-6. Squarcialupi, on the other hand, has achieved a success rate of 48.94% with a win-loss record of 23-24. Considering these numbers, we can provide an overall prediction for their Head-to-Head matchup.
Best Surface: When analyzing their preferred surfaces, Rahnel has excelled on Hard courts, securing a remarkable 72% win rate (13-5), while their performance on Clay courts has been less impressive with a win rate of 50% (1-1). Squarcialupi, on the other hand, has demonstrated their prowess on Clay courts with a win rate of 48% (97-105), while their performance on Hard courts has been subpar, winning only 28% of their matches (11-28).
Player Level: Within the last year, Rahnel has primarily competed in the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments with a prize pool of $10K. They have attained an outstanding success rate of 73.68% in these matches (14-5). Squarcialupi, meanwhile, has also primarily played in similar tournaments with a win rate of 48.39% (15-16). When evaluating statistics between players to predict the favorite, it is essential to consider the competitive level at which they have been competing.
Opponent Quality Statistics: Over the past 12 months, Rahnel has faced rivals with an average ranking of 192.3. Squarcialupi, on the other hand, has contested against opponents with an average ranking of 399.53.
Deciding Set Performance: For those interested in live predictions and betting, if this match reaches a deciding set, Rahnel has triumphed in 50% of such sets over the past 12 months. Squarcialupi, however, has only managed to secure victory in 17% of all matches played on the tour that included a deciding set.
Current Event Head-to-Head Statistics: While studying previous player performances is undoubtedly beneficial in predicting tennis matches, it is equally important to analyze current event statistics to gauge the form of players. To access this information, please refer to the section below (if available), particularly if the players have participated in matches within the ongoing event. Additionally, some players exhibit superior performances at specific events, further influencing the outcome selection.
Break Point Conversion: In recent form, Rahnel has impressively converted 53.16% of their breakpoint opportunities. Squarcialupi has also showcased their effectiveness, converting 50% of their chances to break their opponents' serve. These statistics provide valuable insights for in-game live betting tips when either player faces a breakpoint opportunity.
If you are interested in models that provide predictions for tennis matches, this article serves as an excellent starting point. (Warning: Intended for statistics enthusiasts)
Laura Rahnel Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Gaia Squarcialupi
Player
Laura Rahnel
51%
(
27 of
53)
1st Serve %
68%
(
36 of
53)
1
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
7
70%
(
19 of
27)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
18 of
36)
42%
(
11 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
6 of
17)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
43%
(
23 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
29 of
53)
59
Total Points Won
47
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Laura Rahnel
Player
Kaili Demi Teso
46%
(
13 of
28)
1st Serve %
75%
(
27 of
36)
2
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
3
92%
(
12 of
13)
1st Serve Won
41%
(
11 of
27)
53%
(
8 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
29%
(
8 of
28)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
22 of
36)
42
Total Points Won
22
|
6-1 6-0 | H2H | ||
| Q2 | 6-4 6-1 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-1 6-0 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Josy Daems
Player
Laura Rahnel
74%
(
54 of
73)
1st Serve %
75%
(
50 of
67)
0
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
9
59%
(
32 of
54)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
29 of
50)
26%
(
5 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
12%
(
2 of
17)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
45%
(
5 of
11)
49%
(
36 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
36 of
67)
73
Total Points Won
67
|
6-3 6-7(3) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Laura Rahnel
Player
Kisa Yoshioka
71%
(
65 of
92)
1st Serve %
66%
(
53 of
80)
0
Aces
0
8
Double Faults
3
58%
(
38 of
65)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
26 of
53)
26%
(
7 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
15 of
27)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
6 of
12)
51%
(
47 of
92)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
39 of
80)
84
Total Points Won
88
|
7-5 4-6 10-8 | H2H | ||
| Q2 | 6-1 6-4 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-1 6-2 | H2H | |||
| QF |
Stats
Remika Ohashi
Player
Laura Rahnel
79%
(
82 of
104)
1st Serve %
63%
(
64 of
101)
2
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
7
54%
(
44 of
82)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
40 of
64)
50%
(
11 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
12 of
37)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
36%
(
5 of
14)
47%
(
49 of
104)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
49 of
101)
104
Total Points Won
101
|
7-6(6) 6-7(2) 10-8 | H2H | ||
| Q2 | 6-3 6-4 | H2H | |||
view more
Gaia Squarcialupi Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Alexandra Zimmer
Player
Gaia Squarcialupi
68%
(
53 of
78)
1st Serve %
54%
(
43 of
79)
0
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
3
60%
(
32 of
53)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
28 of
43)
52%
(
13 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
14 of
36)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
42%
(
33 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
37 of
79)
82
Total Points Won
75
|
2-6 6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Laura Mair
Player
Gaia Squarcialupi
52%
(
27 of
52)
1st Serve %
56%
(
30 of
54)
0
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
2
74%
(
20 of
27)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
14 of
30)
56%
(
14 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
11 of
24)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
35%
(
18 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
29 of
54)
63
Total Points Won
43
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Gaia Squarcialupi
Player
Eliz Maloney
74%
(
52 of
70)
1st Serve %
69%
(
60 of
87)
1
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
3
69%
(
36 of
52)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
36 of
60)
44%
(
8 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
9 of
27)
25%
(
4 of
16)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
37%
(
26 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
42 of
87)
86
Total Points Won
71
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Gaia Squarcialupi
Player
Viktoria Veleva
67%
(
29 of
43)
1st Serve %
55%
(
21 of
38)
3
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
7
72%
(
21 of
29)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
10 of
21)
64%
(
9 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
6%
(
1 of
17)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
30%
(
13 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
71%
(
27 of
38)
57
Total Points Won
24
|
6-0 6-0 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Tamara Kostic
Player
Gaia Squarcialupi
65%
(
54 of
83)
1st Serve %
47%
(
27 of
58)
0
Aces
0
11
Double Faults
5
69%
(
37 of
54)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
15 of
27)
31%
(
9 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
11 of
31)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
25%
(
3 of
12)
45%
(
37 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
32 of
58)
78
Total Points Won
63
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Gaia Squarcialupi
Player
Kathleen Kanev
56%
(
25 of
45)
1st Serve %
83%
(
50 of
60)
2
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
3
80%
(
20 of
25)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
24 of
50)
50%
(
10 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
33%
(
15 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
32 of
60)
62
Total Points Won
43
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Gaia Squarcialupi
Player
Laura Rahnel
51%
(
27 of
53)
1st Serve %
68%
(
36 of
53)
1
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
7
70%
(
19 of
27)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
18 of
36)
42%
(
11 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
6 of
17)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
43%
(
23 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
29 of
53)
59
Total Points Won
47
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Carol Young Suh Lee
Player
Gaia Squarcialupi
53%
(
24 of
45)
1st Serve %
55%
(
27 of
49)
4
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
3
83%
(
20 of
24)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
14 of
27)
67%
(
14 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
10 of
22)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
24%
(
11 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
25 of
49)
59
Total Points Won
35
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Gaia Squarcialupi
Player
Boyoung Jeong
58%
(
45 of
77)
1st Serve %
73%
(
49 of
67)
0
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
5
56%
(
25 of
45)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
26 of
49)
50%
(
16 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
6 of
18)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
63%
(
5 of
8)
47%
(
36 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
35 of
67)
76
Total Points Won
68
|
7-6(6) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Gaia Squarcialupi
Player
Joody Elkady
63%
(
29 of
46)
1st Serve %
45%
(
40 of
88)
2
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
8
83%
(
24 of
29)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
22 of
40)
71%
(
12 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
25 of
48)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
22%
(
10 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
41 of
88)
77
Total Points Won
57
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
Stats
67% (16/8)
Win/Loss
45% (113/137)
63% (36/21)
Sets Win/Loss
48% (273/301)
56% (304/242)
Games Win/Loss
48% (2500/2682)
68% (13/6)
Hard Win/Loss
31% (13/29)
50% (1/1)
Clay Win/Loss
48% (99/107)
67% (2/1)
Indoor Hard W/L
50% (1/1)
0% (0/0)
Grass Win/Loss
0% (0/0)
0.03
Aces Per Game
0.1
8
Aces Total
252
0.46
Double Faults Per Game
0.24
123
Total Double Faults
603
1:1:5
Average Match Time
1:1:24
260.21
Average Opponent Rank
376.16
62% (555/893)
1st Serve %
60% (6576/10915)
60% (331/555)
1st Serve Win %
59% (3868/6576)
35% (117/338)
2nd Serve Win %
43% (1869/4339)
53% (66/124)
Break Points Won % (Total)
48% (643/1326)
49% (446/905)
Return Points Win %
45% (4942/10921)
0% (0/0)
Slam W/L
0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)
Masters W/L
0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)
Cups W/L
0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)
Main Tour W/L
0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)
Tour Finals W/L
0% (0/0)
50% (2/2)
Challenger W/L
49% (17/18)
70% (14/6)
Futures W/L
45% (96/119)
65% (15/23)
Best of 3 Sets Win %
45% (111/247)
0% (0/0)
Best of 5 Sets Win %
0% (0/0)
40% (2/5)
Tiebreaks Win % (Total)
49% (21/43)
50% (5/10)
Deciding Set Win %
36% (28/77)
93% (14/13)
1st Set Won, Won Match
80% (129/103)
7% (14/1)
1st Set Won, Lost Match
20% (129/26)
30% (10/3)
1st Set Lost, Won Match
8% (121/10)
See recent tennis photos of Rahnel and Squarcialupi
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
