Laura Hietaranta vs Alba Rey Garcia Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
L W W W L W W W W W
Form
L W W L L W L L W LHead-2-Head: Hietaranta 1 - 0 Garcia
They have played 2 sets in total, with Hietaranta winning 2 and Garcia winning 0. The last match between Hietaranta and Garcia was at the W15 Heraklion, 28-03-2025, Round: Quarterfinals, Surface: Clay, with Laura Hietaranta getting the victory 6-0 6-1.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Laura Hietaranta | 1 |
| Alba Rey Garcia | 0 |
LAST H2H MATCH: W15 Heraklion(28-03-2025)
6
0
6
1
| Hietaranta | Stats | Garcia |
|---|---|---|
| 80% (16-4) | YTD Win/Loss | 54% (13-11) |
| 1 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
| 404 | Ranking | 712 |
| 362 | Highest Rank | 593 |
| 21 | Age | 22 |
| - | Plays | - |
| 5 | Titles | 1 |
| 64% (126-70) | Career Total W/L | 53% (127-112) |
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 2 | YTD Titles | 0 |
| 1 | Clay H2H | 0 |
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Giron VS Hurkacz PREDICTION Clay
Internazionali BNL d'Italia - Rome atp
11 May 2025 / Third
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Sinner VS Jong PREDICTION Clay
Internazionali BNL d'Italia - Rome atp
12 May 2025 / Third
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Hietaranta VS Garcia H2H Matches played
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-0 6-1 |
Stats 
Laura Hietaranta
Player
Alba Rey Garcia
55%
(
21 of
38)
1st Serve %
79%
(
42 of
53)
0
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
1
76%
(
16 of
21)
1st Serve Won
38%
(
16 of
42)
76%
(
13 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
6 of
11)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
24%
(
9 of
38)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
31 of
53)
60
Total Points Won
31
|
||||
Hietaranta VS Garcia H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 12 | Games Won | 1 |
| 1 | Total Double Faults | 1 |
| 1:17:47 | Average Match Time | 1:17:47 |
| 55% (21/38) | 1st Serve % | 79% (42/53) |
| 76% (16/21) | 1st Serve Win % | 38% (16/42) |
| 76% (13/17) | 2nd Serve Win % | 55% (6/11) |
| 50% (5/10) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 0% (0/0) |
| 58% (31/53) | Return Points Win % | 24% (9/38) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Hietaranta vs Garcia Match Preview :
Analyzing the recent second serve performance, Garcia has managed to secure 39.18% of points, whereas Hietaranta has achieved a slightly higher rate of 39.62%. This metric shows significant correlation with match prediction precision, offering valuable insights into potential match outcomes.
In return game stats, during the same period, Garcia has been successful in clinching 47.9% of points when returning the opponent's second serve. On the other hand, Hietaranta has captured 47.09%. When considering first serve returns, Garcia stands at 36.88%, while Hietaranta surpasses this with 39.05%. These figures serve as crucial indicators for determining the favored contender in a head-to-head contest.
When under pressure, specifically in terms of saving breakpoints, Garcia has shown a proficiency of 45.11% in recent matches, compared to Hietaranta's 39.46%. This stat is invaluable for making informed in-game betting predictions. Over the past year, Garcia's win percentage in matches is recorded at 56.45% (W/L 35/27), while Hietaranta has outperformed with a win rate of 64.81% (W/L 35/19), providing an overarching prediction based on head-to-head statistics.
Evaluating surface preferences, Garcia demonstrates their highest career win percentage on hard courts at 55% (W/L 46/37), but slightly below on clay with 54% (W/L 75/64). In contrast, Hietaranta excels on clay with a 67% win percentage (W/L 89/43) and records a lower win percentage of 42% on hard courts (W/L 8/11). Player level varies, with Garcia primarily competing in the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K over the last year, boasting a win rate of 66% (W/L 33/17). Meanwhile, Hietaranta has mainly participated in Challengers/ITF tournaments above $10K, achieving a 57.14% success rate (W/L 20/15).
Opponent quality presents another perspective, with Garcia having faced competitors averaging a rank of 362.18 over the previous year, while Hietaranta's opponents averaged a rank of 411.11. This context is essential when contrasting statistics to determine the player likely to dominate. In matches extending to a deciding set, Garcia has a 36% win rate compared to Hietaranta's remarkable 63%, a critical factor for live prediction and betting scenarios.
Looking into breakpoint conversion rates in recent play, Garcia has successfully converted 37.91% of such opportunities. Hietaranta, however, outpaces with a conversion rate of 43.14%. This information is pivotal for crafting effective, in-game live betting strategies whenever a breakpoint emerges. Summarizing all data points, Hietaranta appears to maintain a competitive edge in this matchup, integrating both historical performance and current metrics.
Laura Hietaranta Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| F |
Stats
Laura Hietaranta
Player
Sarah Iliev
64%
(
27 of
42)
1st Serve %
69%
(
31 of
45)
1
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
2
74%
(
20 of
27)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
15 of
31)
53%
(
8 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
14%
(
2 of
14)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
33%
(
14 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
28 of
45)
56
Total Points Won
31
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Laura Hietaranta
Player
Katharina Hobgarski
80%
(
8 of
10)
1st Serve %
75%
(
3 of
4)
0
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
0
75%
(
6 of
8)
1st Serve Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
100%
(
2 of
2)
2nd Serve Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
100%
(
1 of
1)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
20%
(
2 of
10)
Rtn Points Won
100%
(
4 of
4)
12
Total Points Won
2
|
3-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Laura Hietaranta
Player
Jenny Lim
75%
(
36 of
48)
1st Serve %
64%
(
41 of
64)
0
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
5
56%
(
20 of
36)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
18 of
41)
92%
(
11 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
7 of
23)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
35%
(
17 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
39 of
64)
70
Total Points Won
42
|
6-0 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Laura Hietaranta
Player
Yelyzaveta Kotliar
0%
(
0 of
0)
1st Serve %
75%
(
49 of
65)
-
Aces
-
5
Double Faults
-
0%
(
0 of
0)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
24 of
49)
0%
(
13 of
0)
2nd Serve Won
0%
(
0 of
16)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
27%
(
3 of
11)
0%
(
-13 of
0)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
41 of
65)
0
Total Points Won
57
|
3-6 6-1 10-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Laura Hietaranta
Player
Sara Cakarevic
57%
(
66 of
116)
1st Serve %
68%
(
66 of
97)
0
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
3
61%
(
40 of
66)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
35 of
66)
54%
(
27 of
50)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
16 of
31)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
33%
(
4 of
12)
42%
(
49 of
116)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
46 of
97)
113
Total Points Won
100
|
6-2 4-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Anastasiia Sobolieva
Player
Laura Hietaranta
66%
(
55 of
83)
1st Serve %
63%
(
50 of
80)
0
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
4
58%
(
32 of
55)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
27 of
50)
46%
(
13 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
11 of
30)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
46%
(
38 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
42 of
80)
87
Total Points Won
76
|
6-2 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Laura Hietaranta
Player
Patricia Maria Tig
53%
(
37 of
70)
1st Serve %
57%
(
43 of
76)
0
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
11
62%
(
23 of
37)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
23 of
43)
55%
(
18 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
16 of
33)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
41%
(
29 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
37 of
76)
78
Total Points Won
68
|
6-2 2-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Laura Hietaranta
Player
Despina Papamichail
57%
(
47 of
83)
1st Serve %
78%
(
74 of
95)
0
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
2
62%
(
29 of
47)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
38 of
74)
50%
(
18 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
6 of
21)
62%
(
8 of
13)
Break Points Won
42%
(
5 of
12)
43%
(
36 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
51 of
95)
98
Total Points Won
80
|
6-1 5-7 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Laura Hietaranta
Player
Laura Boehner
59%
(
27 of
46)
1st Serve %
58%
(
22 of
38)
0
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
1
74%
(
20 of
27)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
11 of
22)
63%
(
12 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
19%
(
3 of
16)
100%
(
5 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
30%
(
14 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
24 of
38)
56
Total Points Won
28
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Dimitra Pavlou
Player
Laura Hietaranta
69%
(
27 of
39)
1st Serve %
50%
(
25 of
50)
0
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
3
59%
(
16 of
27)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
12 of
25)
50%
(
6 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
11 of
25)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
44%
(
17 of
39)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
27 of
50)
49
Total Points Won
40
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Alba Rey Garcia Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Julieta Pareja
Player
Alba Rey Garcia
72%
(
51 of
71)
1st Serve %
75%
(
62 of
83)
0
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
2
65%
(
33 of
51)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
38 of
62)
45%
(
9 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
62%
(
13 of
21)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
41%
(
29 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
32 of
83)
74
Total Points Won
80
|
6-4 1-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Alba Rey Garcia
Player
Chelsea Fontenel
65%
(
58 of
89)
1st Serve %
62%
(
65 of
105)
0
Aces
1
6
Double Faults
3
60%
(
35 of
58)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
34 of
65)
45%
(
14 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
18 of
40)
53%
(
8 of
15)
Break Points Won
64%
(
7 of
11)
45%
(
40 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
53 of
105)
102
Total Points Won
92
|
6-4 4-6 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Viktoria Hruncakova
Player
Alba Rey Garcia
65%
(
42 of
65)
1st Serve %
76%
(
56 of
74)
11
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
2
81%
(
34 of
42)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
34 of
56)
48%
(
11 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
9 of
18)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
13%
(
1 of
8)
31%
(
20 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
31 of
74)
76
Total Points Won
63
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Yuki Naito
Player
Alba Rey Garcia
76%
(
64 of
84)
1st Serve %
86%
(
71 of
83)
0
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
1
72%
(
46 of
64)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
40 of
71)
35%
(
7 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
6 of
12)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
37%
(
31 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
37 of
83)
90
Total Points Won
77
|
4-6 6-2 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Alba Rey Garcia
Player
India Houghton
69%
(
52 of
75)
1st Serve %
71%
(
41 of
58)
0
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
2
62%
(
32 of
52)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
21 of
41)
48%
(
11 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
6 of
17)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
43%
(
32 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
31 of
58)
74
Total Points Won
59
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Veronika Podrez
Player
Alba Rey Garcia
79%
(
55 of
70)
1st Serve %
79%
(
50 of
63)
0
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
56%
(
31 of
55)
1st Serve Won
38%
(
19 of
50)
33%
(
5 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
5 of
13)
50%
(
8 of
16)
Break Points Won
31%
(
5 of
16)
49%
(
34 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
39 of
63)
75
Total Points Won
58
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Laura Hietaranta
Player
Alba Rey Garcia
55%
(
21 of
38)
1st Serve %
79%
(
42 of
53)
0
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
1
76%
(
16 of
21)
1st Serve Won
38%
(
16 of
42)
76%
(
13 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
6 of
11)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
24%
(
9 of
38)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
31 of
53)
60
Total Points Won
31
|
6-0 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Alba Rey Garcia
Player
Lucie Pawlak
71%
(
44 of
62)
1st Serve %
66%
(
33 of
50)
0
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
2
66%
(
29 of
44)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
24 of
33)
50%
(
9 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
10 of
17)
25%
(
1 of
4)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
39%
(
24 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
32%
(
16 of
50)
54
Total Points Won
58
|
7-5 1-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Alba Rey Garcia
Player
Ivana Sebestova
73%
(
29 of
40)
1st Serve %
61%
(
36 of
59)
0
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
3
83%
(
24 of
29)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
18 of
36)
64%
(
7 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
11 of
23)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
23%
(
9 of
40)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
30 of
59)
61
Total Points Won
38
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Rositsa Dencheva
Player
Alba Rey Garcia
54%
(
37 of
69)
1st Serve %
78%
(
51 of
65)
2
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
3
65%
(
24 of
37)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
23 of
51)
47%
(
15 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
6 of
14)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
31%
(
4 of
13)
43%
(
30 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
36 of
65)
75
Total Points Won
59
|
2-6 6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 64% (126/70) | Win/Loss | 53% (127/112) |
| 61% (273/175) | Sets Win/Loss | 54% (289/246) |
| 56% (2218/1756) | Games Win/Loss | 52% (2502/2288) |
| 42% (8/11) | Hard Win/Loss | 55% (46/38) |
| 69% (102/45) | Clay Win/Loss | 53% (77/68) |
| 53% (16/14) | Indoor Hard W/L | 40% (4/6) |
| 0.05 | Aces Per Game | 0.02 |
| 96 | Aces Total | 43 |
| 0.27 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.21 |
| 515 | Total Double Faults | 492 |
| 1:54:33 | Average Match Time | 1:10:47 |
| 433.65 | Average Opponent Rank | 449.71 |
| 63% (7835/12357) | 1st Serve % | 69% (7732/11160) |
| 58% (4546/7835) | 1st Serve Win % | 57% (4398/7732) |
| 48% (2189/4522) | 2nd Serve Win % | 44% (1511/3428) |
| 53% (921/1722) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 47% (708/1491) |
| 50% (6096/12090) | Return Points Win % | 47% (5247/11179) |
| 60% (67/45) | Challenger W/L | 37% (24/41) |
| 70% (59/25) | Futures W/L | 59% (103/71) |
| 64% (122/191) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 53% (125/235) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 55% (17/31) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 40% (12/30) |
| 59% (35/59) | Deciding Set Win % | 42% (25/60) |
| 90% (120/108) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 86% (138/119) |
| 9% (120/11) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 14% (138/19) |
| 24% (76/18) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 9% (101/9) |
Hietaranta vs. Garcia Prediction Form Trend:
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
