Laslo Djere vs Mark Lajal Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W L L L W W L W L L
Form
L L W L W W W L W LHead-To-Head: Djere 0 - 1 Lajal
They have played 2 sets in total, with Djere winning 0 and Lajal winning 2. The last match between Djere and Lajal was at the Libema Open - 's-Hertogenbosch, 11-06-2025, Round: First, Surface: Grass, with Mark Lajal getting the victory 6-2 6-4.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Laslo Djere | 0 |
| Mark Lajal | 1 |
LAST H2H MATCH: Libema Open - 's-Hertogenbosch(11-06-2025)
Mark Lajal
Laslo Djere
6
2
6
4
| Djere | Stats | Lajal |
|---|---|---|
| 64% (23-13) | YTD Win/Loss | 65% (22-12) |
| 0 | Head-to-Head | 1 |
| 60 | Ranking | 168 |
| 27 | Highest Rank | 167 |
| 30 | Age | 22 |
| R | Plays | - |
| 14 | Titles | 4 |
| 59% (429-302) | Career Total W/L | 61% (157-102) |
| $3,622,160 | Career Prize Money | $117,025 |
| 1 | YTD Titles | 0 |
| 0 | Grass H2H | 1 |
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Andreeva VS Navarro PREDICTION Grass
Wimbledon - London wta
06 Jul 2025 / Fourth
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Sabalenka VS Siegemund PREDICTION Grass
Wimbledon - London wta
08 Jul 2025 / Quarterfinals
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-2 6-4 |
Stats 
Mark Lajal
Player
Laslo Djere
69%
(
36 of
52)
1st Serve %
58%
(
35 of
60)
3
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
3
78%
(
28 of
36)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
22 of
35)
63%
(
10 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
11 of
25)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
27%
(
14 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
27 of
60)
65
Total Points Won
47
|
||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 0 | H2H Matches | 1 |
| 0 | Sets Won | 2 |
| 6 | Games Won | 12 |
| 3 | Aces (Total) | 3 |
| 3 | Total Double Faults | 2 |
| 1:18:17 | Average Match Time | 1:18:17 |
| 58% (35/60) | 1st Serve % | 69% (36/52) |
| 63% (22/35) | 1st Serve Win % | 78% (28/36) |
| 44% (11/25) | 2nd Serve Win % | 63% (10/16) |
| 0% (0/4) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 75% (3/4) |
| 27% (14/52) | Return Points Win % | 45% (27/60) |
| 0% (0/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 100% (1/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 100% (1/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (1/0) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Djere vs Lajal Match Preview :
- Second Serve Performance: Djere has won 45.22% of points on their second serve in the past six months, compared to Lajal's 48.01%. Could Lajal's slight edge in this area be a deciding factor?
- Return Game Strength: Djere wins 43.4% of their opponent's second serve points, while Lajal edges out at 44.96%. In first serve returns, Lajal also leads with 26.41%, compared to Djere's 23.71%.
- Pressure Handling: Djere has saved 56.47% of breakpoints, just slightly better than Lajal's 55.69%. Will Djere's effectiveness under pressure sway the outcome?
- Match Wins Last Year: Djere has a win rate of 62.07% over the last year, whereas Lajal boasts a slightly higher win rate at 64.79%.
- Surface Strength: Djere excels on Clay with a 66% win rate, but struggles on Grass at 32%. Conversely, Lajal performs best on Grass with a 67% win rate, but has a lower success rate on Clay at 43%.
- Match Level: Djere's matches are predominantly played on the Main tour (67.74% win rate), while Lajal has mostly played in Challengers/ITF events with a 63.64% win rate.
- Opponent Quality: Djere's opponents had an average rank of 132.07, whereas Lajal's were ranked 251.34 on average.
- Deciding Sets: Lajal has a slight edge in deciding sets, winning 52% compared to Djere's 50% in the past year.
- Break Point Conversion: Djere converts 27.87% of breakpoints, significantly less effective than Lajal's 38.06% conversion rate.
Editorial Prediction (June 11, 2025, UTC):
This upcoming tennis match exhibits intriguing dynamics between two players with different strengths. Djere's experience on the Main tour and better ranking opposition showcases a robust level of competition. However, Lajal's recent form in second serve and break point conversion places him in a favorable position.
Djere's prowess on clay is evident, but with the upcoming match potentially being contested on a surface that does not favor him, Lajal's stronger performance on grass could be pivotal. Both players showcase resilience under pressure, though Djere marginally edges this aspect.
The slight advantage Lajal holds in return games and deciding sets further cements his edge. Considering all aspects, Lajal seems to have a better chance to come out as the winner in this clash.
Djere vs Lajal Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88
Laslo Djere Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Andrey Rublev
Player
Laslo Djere
62%
(
88 of
142)
1st Serve %
52%
(
85 of
163)
12
Aces
13
3
Double Faults
12
77%
(
68 of
88)
1st Serve Won
82%
(
70 of
85)
69%
(
37 of
54)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
35 of
78)
20%
(
3 of
15)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
26%
(
37 of
142)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
58 of
163)
163
Total Points Won
142
|
6-0 7-6(5) 6-7(9) 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Gabriel Diallo
Player
Laslo Djere
68%
(
53 of
78)
1st Serve %
66%
(
50 of
76)
10
Aces
5
3
Double Faults
1
83%
(
44 of
53)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
37 of
50)
52%
(
13 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
14 of
26)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
27%
(
21 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
25 of
76)
82
Total Points Won
72
|
6-3 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Laslo Djere
Player
Bu Yunchaokete
60%
(
37 of
62)
1st Serve %
65%
(
42 of
65)
9
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
4
73%
(
27 of
37)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
27 of
42)
56%
(
14 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
10 of
23)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
34%
(
21 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
28 of
65)
69
Total Points Won
58
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Felix Auger Aliassime
Player
Laslo Djere
73%
(
67 of
92)
1st Serve %
65%
(
51 of
79)
17
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
3
88%
(
59 of
67)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
37 of
51)
36%
(
9 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
15 of
28)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
26%
(
24 of
92)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
27 of
79)
95
Total Points Won
76
|
6-3 6-7(6) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Laslo Djere
Player
Jesper De Jong
67%
(
35 of
52)
1st Serve %
52%
(
30 of
58)
7
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
5
74%
(
26 of
35)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
20 of
30)
59%
(
10 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
7 of
28)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
31%
(
16 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
31 of
58)
67
Total Points Won
43
|
6-4 6-0 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Laslo Djere
Player
Nikoloz Basilashvili
68%
(
45 of
66)
1st Serve %
62%
(
34 of
55)
15
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
1
78%
(
35 of
45)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
23 of
34)
52%
(
11 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
11 of
21)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
30%
(
20 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
21 of
55)
67
Total Points Won
54
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Mark Lajal
Player
Laslo Djere
69%
(
36 of
52)
1st Serve %
58%
(
35 of
60)
3
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
3
78%
(
28 of
36)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
22 of
35)
63%
(
10 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
11 of
25)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
27%
(
14 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
27 of
60)
65
Total Points Won
47
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Alex De Minaur
Player
Laslo Djere
43%
(
43 of
99)
1st Serve %
64%
(
69 of
108)
2
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
4
74%
(
32 of
43)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
43 of
69)
61%
(
34 of
56)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
20 of
39)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
33%
(
33 of
99)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
45 of
108)
111
Total Points Won
96
|
6-3 6-4 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
view more
Mark Lajal Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q2 |
Stats
Chris Rodesch
Player
Mark Lajal
76%
(
32 of
42)
1st Serve %
56%
(
31 of
55)
6
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
6
88%
(
28 of
32)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
20 of
31)
50%
(
5 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
8 of
24)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
21%
(
9 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
27 of
55)
60
Total Points Won
37
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Mark Lajal
Player
Jan Choinski
68%
(
63 of
93)
1st Serve %
74%
(
63 of
85)
9
Aces
7
3
Double Faults
0
70%
(
44 of
63)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
42 of
63)
53%
(
16 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
12 of
22)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
35%
(
33 of
93)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
31 of
85)
91
Total Points Won
87
|
3-6 6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Zizou Bergs
Player
Mark Lajal
52%
(
47 of
91)
1st Serve %
65%
(
64 of
99)
8
Aces
6
3
Double Faults
4
79%
(
37 of
47)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
46 of
64)
52%
(
23 of
44)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
14 of
35)
18%
(
2 of
11)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
34%
(
31 of
91)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
39 of
99)
99
Total Points Won
91
|
7-6(2) 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| R2 | w/o | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Mark Lajal
Player
Laslo Djere
69%
(
36 of
52)
1st Serve %
58%
(
35 of
60)
3
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
3
78%
(
28 of
36)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
22 of
35)
63%
(
10 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
11 of
25)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
27%
(
14 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
27 of
60)
65
Total Points Won
47
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Mark Lajal
Player
Reilly Opelka
73%
(
43 of
59)
1st Serve %
63%
(
36 of
57)
6
Aces
8
0
Double Faults
2
86%
(
37 of
43)
1st Serve Won
78%
(
28 of
36)
75%
(
12 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
67%
(
14 of
21)
100%
(
1 of
1)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
17%
(
10 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
26%
(
15 of
57)
64
Total Points Won
52
|
7-6(3) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Mark Lajal
Player
Corentin Denolly
63%
(
24 of
38)
1st Serve %
75%
(
49 of
65)
3
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
3
79%
(
19 of
24)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
26 of
49)
71%
(
10 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
4 of
16)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
24%
(
9 of
38)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
35 of
65)
64
Total Points Won
39
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Chak Lam Coleman Wong
Player
Mark Lajal
69%
(
41 of
59)
1st Serve %
58%
(
41 of
71)
9
Aces
12
0
Double Faults
3
83%
(
34 of
41)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
30 of
41)
61%
(
11 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
17 of
30)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
24%
(
14 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
24 of
71)
69
Total Points Won
61
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 59% (429/302) | Win/Loss | 61% (157/102) |
| 56% (993/785) | Sets Win/Loss | 60% (366/246) |
| 52% (8952/8335) | Games Win/Loss | 54% (3148/2714) |
| 44% (55/71) | Hard Win/Loss | 64% (89/49) |
| 66% (321/162) | Clay Win/Loss | 43% (13/17) |
| 46% (43/50) | Indoor Hard W/L | 60% (45/30) |
| 34% (10/19) | Grass Win/Loss | 63% (10/6) |
| 0.33 | Aces Per Game | 0.44 |
| 2786 | Aces Total | 1252 |
| 0.25 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.28 |
| 2127 | Total Double Faults | 798 |
| 1:30:33 | Average Match Time | 1:43:21 |
| 443.5 | Average Opponent Rank | 361.61 |
| 60% (27836/46093) | 1st Serve % | 64% (11622/18128) |
| 70% (19460/27836) | 1st Serve Win % | 71% (8270/11622) |
| 50% (9079/18257) | 2nd Serve Win % | 50% (3274/6512) |
| 41% (1803/4369) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 42% (761/1832) |
| 39% (17733/45908) | Return Points Win % | 40% (7351/18364) |
| 36% (21/38) | Slam W/L | 46% (6/7) |
| 40% (24/36) | Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 50% (5/5) | Cups W/L | 40% (2/3) |
| 58% (145/103) | Main Tour W/L | 63% (5/3) |
| 60% (124/82) | Challenger W/L | 59% (88/60) |
| 74% (110/38) | Futures W/L | 66% (56/29) |
| 61% (402/662) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 61% (154/254) |
| 33% (16/49) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 67% (2/3) |
| 50% (147/293) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 56% (50/89) |
| 57% (148/259) | Deciding Set Win % | 45% (42/93) |
| 85% (417/356) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 85% (154/131) |
| 15% (417/61) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 15% (154/23) |
| 23% (314/71) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 26% (105/27) |
Djere vs. Lajal Prediction Form Trend:
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
