Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Lamine Ouahab vs Frederico Gil Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Ouahab vs Gil analysis and find out who is favored!
Lamine Ouahab vs Frederico Gil Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Ouahab has won 0% of points on his second serve, while Gil has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Ouahab, in recent form, has won 0% of his opponent's second serve points, while Gil has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Ouahab has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Gil has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Ouahab has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/ 0), with Gil winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Ouahab has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 69% (W/L 484/ 216), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 19% (W/L 3/ 13). Gil has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 63% (W/L 224/ 131), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 33% (W/L 4/ 8).
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 6 times before with Ouahab winning 4 times. They have played 15 sets in total, with Ouahab winning 10 and Gil winning 5. The last match between Ouahab and Gil was at the Grand Prix Hassan II - Casablanca, 03-04-2010, Q1 round, Clay with Frederico Gil getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:0:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Ouahab and Gil have played a deciding set 2 times, with Ouahab winning 1 times and Gil 1 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 2 tiebreaks against each other with Ouahab winning 2, and Gil 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Ouahab has played against opponents with an average rank of while Gil has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Ouahab has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Gil has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Ouahab has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Gil has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Ouahab 4 - 2 Gil
895
Rank
114
High
39
Age
R
Plays
4
Total2
0
Hard0
4
Clay2
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
Ret.
Rank
62
High
39
Age
R
Plays
L
L
W
W
L
L
W
L
W
L
Form
W
W
L
W
L
L
L
W
W
L
67% (560-279)
Career Total W/L
59% (597-422)
0% (0-0)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$47,000
Career Prize Money
$437,805
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Lamine Ouahab | Frederico Gil |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 4 | 2 |
| Sets Won | 10 | 5 |
| Games Won | 80 | 69 |
| Aces (Total) | 2 | 0 |
| DFs (Total) | 3 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 0:0:0 | 0:0:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 53% (42/80) | 66% (52/79) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 48% (20/42) | 71% (37/52) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 63% (24/38) | 56% (15/27) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 100% (3/3) | 71% (5/7) |
| Return Points W% | 34% (27/79) | 45% (36/80) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 60% (3/5) | 40% (2/5) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 100% (2/2) | 0% (0/2) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 50% (1/2) | 50% (1/2) |
| 1st set W, W | 75% (4/3) | 50% (2/1) |
| 1st set W, L | 25% (4/1) | 50% (2/1) |
| 1st set L, W | 50% (2/1) | 25% (4/1) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4-6 6-3 6-2 |
Stats 
Frederico Gil
Player
Lamine Ouahab
66%
(
52 of
79)
1st Serve %
53%
(
42 of
80)
0
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
3
71%
(
37 of
52)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
20 of
42)
56%
(
15 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
63%
(
24 of
38)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
100%
(
3 of
3)
34%
(
27 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
36 of
80)
88
Total Points Won
71
|
||||
| 7-5 7-5 | |||||
| 6-3 7-6(5) | |||||
| 3-6 6-1 6-3 | |||||
| 6-4 6-3 | |||||
| 7-6(2) 6-4 6-3 | |||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Lamine Ouahab | Frederico Gil |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0 | 0 |
| Aces Total | 0 | 0 |
| DFs per game | 0 | 0 |
| DFs Total | 0 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 0 |
| 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Lamine Ouahab Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q2 | 6-2 2-6 10-8 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-4 1-6 10-5 | H2H | |||
| QF |
Stats
Mario Mansilla Diez
Player
Lamine Ouahab
83%
(
40 of
48)
1st Serve %
67%
(
37 of
55)
-
Aces
-
0
Double Faults
2
58%
(
23 of
40)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
23 of
37)
63%
(
5 of
8)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
7 of
18)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
42%
(
20 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
25 of
55)
53
Total Points Won
50
|
6-1 0-6 10-8 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-4 6-0 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
John Echeverria
Player
Lamine Ouahab
67%
(
38 of
57)
1st Serve %
63%
(
32 of
51)
4
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
79%
(
30 of
38)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
18 of
32)
58%
(
11 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
10 of
19)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
28%
(
16 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
23 of
51)
64
Total Points Won
44
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Ryan Nijboer
Player
Lamine Ouahab
63%
(
17 of
27)
1st Serve %
70%
(
23 of
33)
3
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
0
82%
(
14 of
17)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
12 of
23)
40%
(
4 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
33%
(
9 of
27)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
17 of
33)
35
Total Points Won
25
|
6-3 1-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Lamine Ouahab
Player
Mikel Martinez
63%
(
71 of
113)
1st Serve %
59%
(
79 of
133)
4
Aces
7
3
Double Faults
1
70%
(
50 of
71)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
52 of
79)
55%
(
23 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
27 of
54)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
35%
(
40 of
113)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
54 of
133)
127
Total Points Won
119
|
6-3 6-7(4) 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Lamine Ouahab
Player
Dali Blanch
51%
(
39 of
76)
1st Serve %
65%
(
64 of
99)
1
Aces
10
2
Double Faults
3
74%
(
29 of
39)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
48 of
64)
51%
(
19 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
13 of
35)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
37%
(
28 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
38 of
99)
86
Total Points Won
89
|
2-6 6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Damir Dzumhur
Player
Lamine Ouahab
69%
(
45 of
65)
1st Serve %
49%
(
33 of
68)
1
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
1
64%
(
29 of
45)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
18 of
33)
50%
(
10 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
16 of
35)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
40%
(
26 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
34 of
68)
73
Total Points Won
60
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Adam Moundir
Player
Lamine Ouahab
67%
(
72 of
108)
1st Serve %
63%
(
60 of
96)
4
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
4
64%
(
46 of
72)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
38 of
60)
56%
(
20 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
18 of
36)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
27%
(
4 of
15)
39%
(
42 of
108)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
40 of
96)
106
Total Points Won
98
|
5-7 6-2 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
view more
Frederico Gil Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Paul Jubb
Player
Frederico Gil
59%
(
23 of
39)
1st Serve %
65%
(
32 of
49)
2
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
3
74%
(
17 of
23)
1st Serve Won
41%
(
13 of
32)
63%
(
10 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
6 of
17)
100%
(
6 of
6)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
31%
(
12 of
39)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
30 of
49)
57
Total Points Won
31
|
6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
| QF | 6-2 6-1 | H2H | |||
| Q2 |
Stats
Frederico Gil
Player
Andre Stewart
58%
(
30 of
52)
1st Serve %
54%
(
25 of
46)
2
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
4
67%
(
20 of
30)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
13 of
25)
68%
(
15 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
8 of
21)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
33%
(
17 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
25 of
46)
60
Total Points Won
38
|
6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Harry Wendelken
Player
Frederico Gil
48%
(
31 of
64)
1st Serve %
60%
(
43 of
72)
5
Aces
5
4
Double Faults
1
74%
(
23 of
31)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
24 of
43)
48%
(
16 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
14 of
29)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
100%
(
4 of
4)
39%
(
25 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
34 of
72)
73
Total Points Won
63
|
6-4 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Tomas Lipovsek Puches
Player
Frederico Gil
60%
(
32 of
53)
1st Serve %
52%
(
26 of
50)
3
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
1
81%
(
26 of
32)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
14 of
26)
48%
(
10 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
10 of
24)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
32%
(
17 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
26 of
50)
62
Total Points Won
41
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Simon Carr
Player
Frederico Gil
59%
(
26 of
44)
1st Serve %
52%
(
24 of
46)
2
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
4
85%
(
22 of
26)
1st Serve Won
42%
(
10 of
24)
56%
(
10 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
9 of
22)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
6)
27%
(
12 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
27 of
46)
59
Total Points Won
31
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Frederico Gil
Player
Riccardo Maiga
63%
(
61 of
97)
1st Serve %
50%
(
46 of
92)
5
Aces
10
5
Double Faults
12
70%
(
43 of
61)
1st Serve Won
78%
(
36 of
46)
50%
(
18 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
21 of
46)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
37%
(
36 of
97)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
35 of
92)
96
Total Points Won
93
|
4-6 6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Eduardo Struvay
Player
Frederico Gil
71%
(
25 of
35)
1st Serve %
61%
(
23 of
38)
5
Aces
1
-
Double Faults
-
68%
(
17 of
25)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
15 of
23)
50%
(
5 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
7 of
15)
25%
(
1 of
4)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
37%
(
13 of
35)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
16 of
38)
38
Total Points Won
35
|
5-4 ret. | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Frederico Gil
Player
Marat Deviatiarov
61%
(
64 of
105)
1st Serve %
53%
(
41 of
77)
3
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
7
53%
(
34 of
64)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
24 of
41)
51%
(
21 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
18 of
36)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
46%
(
6 of
13)
48%
(
50 of
105)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
35 of
77)
90
Total Points Won
92
|
6-3 1-6 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Frederico Gil
Player
Riccardo Maiga
64%
(
49 of
77)
1st Serve %
44%
(
31 of
70)
2
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
10
63%
(
31 of
49)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
22 of
31)
39%
(
11 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
15 of
39)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
71%
(
5 of
7)
45%
(
35 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
33 of
70)
75
Total Points Won
72
|
6-3 0-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Ouahab Vs Gil Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
